Not an Odor fan at all and ready to move on, but that said, it's basically junk behind him until Jung is ready. Since they have to pay him anyway, I'll just be shocked if he's gone before Jung os ready
DeangeloVickers said:
Who is going to close Ian Kennedy?
Schall 02 said:
So with Odor gone, what are people gonna argue about on here now?
Fuzzy Dunlop said:
Odor is going to go to another team and rake. He'll bat .290 with 30 HRs and people will complain we didn't give him enough time.
ETA: I'm responding to Shall's question about what people will complain about now with Odor gone.
hawk1689 said:
I'm not against getting rid of Odor. What I don't understand is why they would waste money like that to keep a guy like Charlie Culberson. At best, Culberson matches Odor's production in his down years.
hawk1689 said:
I'm not against getting rid of Odor. What I don't understand is why they would waste money like that to keep a guy like Charlie Culberson. At best, Culberson matches Odor's production in his down years.
Schall 02 said:
So with Odor gone, what are people gonna argue about on here now?
DeangeloVickers said:hawk1689 said:
I'm not against getting rid of Odor. What I don't understand is why they would waste money like that to keep a guy like Charlie Culberson. At best, Culberson matches Odor's production in his down years.
Best guess is he's a turd in the clubhouse
toucan82 said:Schall 02 said:
So with Odor gone, what are people gonna argue about on here now?
I vote Willie
KT 90 said:
Do we even have any bad contracts left?
J.P. 03 said:KT 90 said:
Do we even have any bad contracts left?
Does the amateur scouting department count?
sburg2007 said:
For someone that his been given chance after chance, I just don't have any pity or sympathy. People lose their jobs because they aren't good at them all the time. It's part of life. How come nobody is ever happy for someone getting a new job that takes his place?
I've been an odor apologist since he came up. I don't really care one way or another because it's not like he's blocked someone else.
addition by subtractionDeangeloVickers said:hawk1689 said:
I'm not against getting rid of Odor. What I don't understand is why they would waste money like that to keep a guy like Charlie Culberson. At best, Culberson matches Odor's production in his down years.
Best guess is he's a turd in the clubhouse
FIFYSchall 02 said:
So with Odor gone, whatare people gonna argueis Grapesoda going to post about now?