*****Official Texas Rangers 2021 Season Thread*****

236,825 Views | 3491 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by DeangeloVickers
fc2112
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BTW - it was just one year ago we were all dreamy about what the Padres were doing - they were "all in" and we wished the Rangers would be like them.

Welp - they done **** the bed - gutted the farm system - $175 MM payroll this year - $162 MM next year.

A.J. Preller, that brainiac genius who MUST have been the brains behind the Rangers World Series runs, is in danger of losing his job. Same with Jayce Tingler.

The farm system was gutted to win NOW - and they're left with an inflated payroll, an empty farm system, and a sub .500 record.

https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sports/padres/story/2021-09-27/padres-aj-preller-trades-free-agents-roster-process-timeline-machado-tatis-hosmer

Quote:

The Padres' 18 trades since the start of the 2019-20 offseason that resulted in them acquiring major league talent are most by any team, as are the 23 players with major league experience the team acquired in those trades.

In that time, Preller traded away 18 minor leaguers who were among the team's top 30 prospects, as ranked by Baseball America. That includes six who were ranked in the top 12.

With all those machinations, the Padres believed they were building a perennial playoff team.

Instead, they will be watching the postseason again, for the 14th time in 15 years and the 47th time in their 53 years of existence.
investorAg83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah but at least they gave it a go.
fc2112
How long do you want to ignore this user?
investorAg83 said:

Yeah but at least they gave it a go.

Was it worth it to handicap your club for the next 5-7 years?

And if so, you were A-OK with where the Rangers are right now since we "went for it" as well?
Fuzzy Dunlop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They weren't expecting the Giants to come out of nowhere and win the West either. Well, nobody but the Giants were expecting that. Dervish imploded, as we all know Davis will do, and Tatis missed quite a bit of time not to mention much of their starting 5 missed time as well.
investorAg83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fc2112 said:

investorAg83 said:

Yeah but at least they gave it a go.

Was it worth it to handicap your club for the next 5-7 years?

And if so, you were A-OK with where the Rangers are right now since we "went for it" as well?


That's such a BS question. Just because it didn't work out doesn't make the decision to go all in a bad one.

Quote:

It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.


I'd rather try and suffer the consequences than not and have 3rd place seasons over and over.
AggieEP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Padres also are going to get a chance to run it back next year with a hopefully healthy rotation that includes Clevinger, Lamet, Snell and Darvish. Those are four really good starters if it works out. They also have MacKenzie Gore as one of the top pitching prospects in the game ready to be a number 5 guy, along with Musgrove and Weathers.

Their lineup just stopped hitting for some reason this year, but if they find a way to sneak another big bat on that team to pair up with Tatis and Machado then they are going to be really good.

Sometimes for whatever reason a team doesn't win, and in the case of the Padres, it's not a failure because it didn't work out for one year. We can talk in 4 years if they have nothing to show for this, but my money is on them making the playoffs the next few years.

And to really answer the question, yes I'd rather have one of the most entertaining teams in baseball even if it meant missing the playoffs. This isn't a zero sum game like some idiots have tried to condition us to think. Some of my favorite Rangers teams were those early Michael Young teams with Hank Blalock and Tex along with Kevin Mench (1 man 5 tools). Baseball can be fun to watch even when you don't win the World Series. It's not fun to watch when the owner fields a minor league club on purpose because of "rebuilding."

You guys are dumb if you think this strategy works. I've broken this down over and over again, but smart franchises win because they make smart decisions. Bad franchises don't suddenly get good because they tanked for X number of years in a row. Even the Astros who are the poster boy for this method, really messed up on 2 of their very high draft picks, (Appell and Aiken) and one of them (Tucker) really only started contributing this year. The rest of their roster was just built in an intelligent way with players that any other team could have had as well. (i.e. not top 5 draft picks)
DallasAg 94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fc2112 said:

BTW - it was just one year ago we were all dreamy about what the Padres were doing - they were "all in" and we wished the Rangers would be like them.

Welp - they done **** the bed - gutted the farm system - $175 MM payroll this year - $162 MM next year.

A.J. Preller, that brainiac genius who MUST have been the brains behind the Rangers World Series runs, is in danger of losing his job. Same with Jayce Tingler.

The farm system was gutted to win NOW - and they're left with an inflated payroll, an empty farm system, and a sub .500 record.



With just 5 games, left in the season, it is easy to say the Padres were a failure this season.

However, did you see the St Louis Cardinals winning 17 straight games?

On Sept 12th, the Padres were in the 2nd WC spot.

I think the idea of "gutting the farm" is misaligned.

Caratini (C-27): Through 2023
Hosmer (1B-31): Through 2025
Cronenworth (2B-27): Through 2025
Kim (Ut-25): 2024/2025
Tatis (SS-22): 2034
Machado (3B-28): Controlled for forever. 2028

Pham (LF-33): FA after 2021
Grisham (CF-24): Through 2025
Myers (RF-30): Through 2023

Snell (SP-28): 2023
Darvish (SP-34): Through 2023
Paddock (SP-25): Through 2024
Weathers (SP-21): Through 2026
Musgrove (SP-28): Through 2023

The fact they may be thin in their minors is probably not that big a deal.

There is a tremendous amount of talent in that lineup. There may not be a single positional player that isn't better than the Rangers equivalent.

Their problem?

Dodgers: $247.7M
Padres: $174.1M
Giants: $149.5M

Astros: $187M
Angels: $182M
Rangers: $95M

The Dodgers have abandoned a $40M SP who was CyYoung last year... and without him, their payroll would still be significantly higher than the Padres.
Mr Gigem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just lost our Assistant GM to the Padres
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This guy was here 15 years. Good riddance to any part of the personnel dept who was here for the past 10+ years. Maybe we can get the Padres to take Kip ***g too
South Platte
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Terrible post.
South Platte
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Excellent post. I think we are in the extreme minority. Everybody else thinks the answer is tank and sign mega free agents.
Proposition Joe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieEP said:

You guys are dumb if you think this strategy works. I've broken this down over and over again, but smart franchises win because they make smart decisions. Bad franchises don't suddenly get good because they tanked for X number of years in a row. Even the Astros who are the poster boy for this method, really messed up on 2 of their very high draft picks, (Appell and Aiken) and one of them (Tucker) really only started contributing this year. The rest of their roster was just built in an intelligent way with players that any other team could have had as well. (i.e. not top 5 draft picks)

Yeah, no.

The core of the Astros production their World Series year was made up of either players drafted near the top of the draft or players acquired by trading away some of those amassed picks.

Hell, Bregman and Correa alone put up a 10.7 WAR... When you've got two players that can produce that for next-to-nothin and have almost zero money locked up you can go out and buy the other 80 WAR.

Did a few things still have to go right? Sure. But make no mistake the strategy worked.
DallasAg 94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Verlander ... and smashing trash cans were the 2 biggest impacts on them winning the 2017 WS.

Astros were 11-17 in August and then 21-8 the rest of the way.

He went 5 GS, 6G, 36.2 IP, 4-1, with a 2.21 ERA.

The Astros went 11-7 in the playoffs. They were 5-1 in games he pitched, leaving 6-6 without him.
AggieEP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Believe this all you want, the top 30 in batting WAR this year consists of only 4 top 10 picks. And the top 30 in pitching WAR also includes only 4 top 10 picks.

The baseball draft is just too much of a crap shoot to assume picking in the top 5 is going to net you a winning club. It definitely gives you potential access to the top prospects in a given year, but I'll argue with you forever that scouting, player development and health is more important than where you pick. Somehow the Dodgers continue to find Walker Buehlers, Alex Verdugos, Corey Seagers, Gavin Luxs, Will Smiths and Cody Bellingers late in the first round, it's not magic, they just get it right more often then most teams.

The road to winning the World Series includes getting great players, but in baseball those players can come from anywhere. Hell, pretty much any team could have signed Acuna, Guerrero, Tatis and Soto. The international signing market is where teams have really hit the jackpot on getting good players for cheap.
jkag89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Proposition Joe said:

AggieEP said:

You guys are dumb if you think this strategy works. I've broken this down over and over again, but smart franchises win because they make smart decisions. Bad franchises don't suddenly get good because they tanked for X number of years in a row. Even the Astros who are the poster boy for this method, really messed up on 2 of their very high draft picks, (Appell and Aiken) and one of them (Tucker) really only started contributing this year. The rest of their roster was just built in an intelligent way with players that any other team could have had as well. (i.e. not top 5 draft picks)

Yeah, no.

The core of the Astros production their World Series year was made up of either players drafted near the top of the draft or players acquired by trading away some of those amassed picks.

Hell, Bregman and Correa alone put up a 10.7 WAR... When you've got two players that can produce that for next-to-nothin and have almost zero money locked up you can go out and buy the other 80 WAR.

Did a few things still have to go right? Sure. But make no mistake the strategy worked.
MLB does not allow you to trade draft picks. I assume you meant that the Astros were able to trade some of their accumulated young talent for more established talent when the core started to produce results that indicated deep postseason runs were possible.
J.P. 03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We lost Zonk today.

Quote:

Rangers' superfan John "Zonk" Lanzillo, Jr., who became well known for standing and banging a drum during much of the 26-year history of The Ballpark in Arlington, died Thursday in North Richland Hills at the age of 88.

Lanzillo, who had battled Alzheimer's Disease later in life, had not attended many games in recent years, but was at the last home opener at the old park, then called Globe Life Park in Arlington in 2019.
alvtimes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fc2112 said:

BTW - it was just one year ago we were all dreamy about what the Padres were doing - they were "all in" and we wished the Rangers would be like them.

Welp - they done **** the bed - gutted the farm system - $175 MM payroll this year - $162 MM next year.

A.J. Preller, that brainiac genius who MUST have been the brains behind the Rangers World Series runs, is in danger of losing his job. Same with Jayce Tingler.

The farm system was gutted to win NOW - and they're left with an inflated payroll, an empty farm system, and a sub .500 record.

https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sports/padres/story/2021-09-27/padres-aj-preller-trades-free-agents-roster-process-timeline-machado-tatis-hosmer

Quote:

The Padres' 18 trades since the start of the 2019-20 offseason that resulted in them acquiring major league talent are most by any team, as are the 23 players with major league experience the team acquired in those trades.

In that time, Preller traded away 18 minor leaguers who were among the team's top 30 prospects, as ranked by Baseball America. That includes six who were ranked in the top 12.

With all those machinations, the Padres believed they were building a perennial playoff team.

Instead, they will be watching the postseason again, for the 14th time in 15 years and the 47th time in their 53 years of existence.



Padres "gutted" farm system still has 4 top 100 players.
DallasAg 94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'd see his pickup in Richardson, periodically in the early 2000s.

Legend.
DallasAg 94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
alvtimes said:

fc2112 said:


Quote:

The Padres' 18 trades since the start of the 2019-20 offseason that resulted in them acquiring major league talent are most by any team, as are the 23 players with major league experience the team acquired in those trades.

In that time, Preller traded away 18 minor leaguers who were among the team's top 30 prospects, as ranked by Baseball America. That includes six who were ranked in the top 12.

With all those machinations, the Padres believed they were building a perennial playoff team.

Instead, they will be watching the postseason again, for the 14th time in 15 years and the 47th time in their 53 years of existence.

Padres "gutted" farm system still has 4 top 100 players.
This is what Gutted looks like:

#6 CJ Abrams (SS-20-AA)
#37 Luis Campusano (C-23-AAA)
#43 Robert Hassell (OF-20-A+)
#56 MacKenzie Gore (LHP-22-AA)


#12 Jack Leiter (RHP-21)
#48 Josh Jung (3B-AAA-23)
#60 Cole Winn (RHP-AAA-21)
#83 Justin Foscue (2B-AA-22)
#91 Sam Huff (C/1B-AAA-23)


vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
I'm looking at Jung's stats and wondering why we haven't seen him yet.
alvtimes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DallasAg 94 said:

alvtimes said:

fc2112 said:


Quote:

The Padres' 18 trades since the start of the 2019-20 offseason that resulted in them acquiring major league talent are most by any team, as are the 23 players with major league experience the team acquired in those trades.

In that time, Preller traded away 18 minor leaguers who were among the team's top 30 prospects, as ranked by Baseball America. That includes six who were ranked in the top 12.

With all those machinations, the Padres believed they were building a perennial playoff team.

Instead, they will be watching the postseason again, for the 14th time in 15 years and the 47th time in their 53 years of existence.

Padres "gutted" farm system still has 4 top 100 players.
This is what Gutted looks like:

#6 CJ Abrams (SS-20-AA)
#37 Luis Campusano (C-23-AAA)
#43 Robert Hassell (OF-20-A+)
#56 MacKenzie Gore (LHP-22-AA)


#12 Jack Leiter (RHP-21)
#48 Josh Jung (3B-AAA-23)
#60 Cole Winn (RHP-AAA-21)
#83 Justin Foscue (2B-AA-22)
#91 Sam Huff (C/1B-AAA-23)





not sure where u are going with this..but if u are cheerleading for the Rangers ..... compare rosters
hawk1689
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
vander54 said:

I'm looking at Jung's stats and wondering why we haven't seen him yet.
My guess is opening day of '22.
Proposition Joe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieEP said:

Believe this all you want, the top 30 in batting WAR this year consists of only 4 top 10 picks. And the top 30 in pitching WAR also includes only 4 top 10 picks.

The baseball draft is just too much of a crap shoot to assume picking in the top 5 is going to net you a winning club.

It's been well established the Top 10 in any given year doesn't net you guaranteed performers.

But the Top 1 or 2 is wholly different.

Which is why Houston took it to another level and went after the overall number one in consecutive seasons.

Here are the 13 years top picks prior to Houston drafting #1 overall:

2011 overall #1: Gerrit Cole
2010 overall #1: Bryce Harper
2009 overall #1: Stephen Strasburg
2008 overall #1: Tim Beckhem
2007 overall #1: David Price
2006 overall #1: Luke Hochevar
2005 overall #1: Justin Upton
2004 overall #1: Matt Bush
2003 overall #1: Delmon Young
2002 overall #1: Bryan Bullington
2001 overall #1: Joe Mauer
2000 overall #1: Adrian Gonzalez
1999 overall #1: Josh Hamilton



Gut your payroll to where you have a hundred million to spend and pick two of the players from that above list and tell me you aren't in a significantly better position at making a run 3-4 years down the line than most other teams? Silly to even imply otherwise.

Is it a guarantee? No. But it's hardly a crapshoot. Houston wasn't hoping to "get lucky" when they made their historical tank job - they knew where they would be on the other side of it.
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
alvtimes said:

DallasAg 94 said:

alvtimes said:

fc2112 said:


Quote:

The Padres' 18 trades since the start of the 2019-20 offseason that resulted in them acquiring major league talent are most by any team, as are the 23 players with major league experience the team acquired in those trades.

In that time, Preller traded away 18 minor leaguers who were among the team's top 30 prospects, as ranked by Baseball America. That includes six who were ranked in the top 12.

With all those machinations, the Padres believed they were building a perennial playoff team.

Instead, they will be watching the postseason again, for the 14th time in 15 years and the 47th time in their 53 years of existence.

Padres "gutted" farm system still has 4 top 100 players.
This is what Gutted looks like:

#6 CJ Abrams (SS-20-AA)
#37 Luis Campusano (C-23-AAA)
#43 Robert Hassell (OF-20-A+)
#56 MacKenzie Gore (LHP-22-AA)


#12 Jack Leiter (RHP-21)
#48 Josh Jung (3B-AAA-23)
#60 Cole Winn (RHP-AAA-21)
#83 Justin Foscue (2B-AA-22)
#91 Sam Huff (C/1B-AAA-23)





not sure where u are going with this..but if u are cheerleading for the Rangers ..... compare rosters


It's pretty easy to see where he's going. He saying they still have better top farm system talent than us despite being "gutted"
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RIP Zonk. Odd dude. A buddy and I got paired with him for a round of golf at Sherrill Park once about 20 years ago. Zonk played 9 holes and didn't say one word the entire time. No hello, didn't introduce himself, nothing the entire time, and didn't say he was quitting after 9 and instead just left. It made me wonder if he was on the spectrum, or if he felt like a celebrity that was above interacting with the plebs.

In any case, stay hard, Zonk
rbtexan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
vander54 said:

I'm looking at Jung's stats and wondering why we haven't seen him yet.


I would imagine that a big part of it is keeping the extra year of team control. Why start the clock on free agency just for some meaningless ABs in a 100-loss season.
Jimbo Franchione
DallasAg 94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
vander54 said:

alvtimes said:

DallasAg 94 said:

alvtimes said:

fc2112 said:


Quote:

The Padres' 18 trades since the start of the 2019-20 offseason that resulted in them acquiring major league talent are most by any team, as are the 23 players with major league experience the team acquired in those trades.

In that time, Preller traded away 18 minor leaguers who were among the team's top 30 prospects, as ranked by Baseball America. That includes six who were ranked in the top 12.

With all those machinations, the Padres believed they were building a perennial playoff team.

Instead, they will be watching the postseason again, for the 14th time in 15 years and the 47th time in their 53 years of existence.

Padres "gutted" farm system still has 4 top 100 players.
This is what Gutted looks like:

#6 CJ Abrams (SS-20-AA)
#37 Luis Campusano (C-23-AAA)
#43 Robert Hassell (OF-20-A+)
#56 MacKenzie Gore (LHP-22-AA)

#12 Jack Leiter (RHP-21)
#48 Josh Jung (3B-AAA-23)
#60 Cole Winn (RHP-AAA-21)
#83 Justin Foscue (2B-AA-22)
#91 Sam Huff (C/1B-AAA-23)
not sure where u are going with this..but if u are cheerleading for the Rangers ..... compare rosters
It's pretty easy to see where he's going. He saying they still have better top farm system talent than us despite being "gutted"
Yep.
AggieEP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Proposition Joe said:

AggieEP said:

Believe this all you want, the top 30 in batting WAR this year consists of only 4 top 10 picks. And the top 30 in pitching WAR also includes only 4 top 10 picks.

The baseball draft is just too much of a crap shoot to assume picking in the top 5 is going to net you a winning club.

It's been well established the Top 10 in any given year doesn't net you guaranteed performers.

But the Top 1 or 2 is wholly different.

Which is why Houston took it to another level and went after the overall number one in consecutive seasons.

Here are the 13 years top picks prior to Houston drafting #1 overall:

2011 overall #1: Gerrit Cole
2010 overall #1: Bryce Harper
2009 overall #1: Stephen Strasburg
2008 overall #1: Tim Beckhem
2007 overall #1: David Price
2006 overall #1: Luke Hochevar
2005 overall #1: Justin Upton
2004 overall #1: Matt Bush
2003 overall #1: Delmon Young
2002 overall #1: Bryan Bullington
2001 overall #1: Joe Mauer
2000 overall #1: Adrian Gonzalez
1999 overall #1: Josh Hamilton



Gut your payroll to where you have a hundred million to spend and pick two of the players from that above list and tell me you aren't in a significantly better position at making a run 3-4 years down the line than most other teams? Silly to even imply otherwise.

Is it a guarantee? No. But it's hardly a crapshoot. Houston wasn't hoping to "get lucky" when they made their historical tank job - they knew where they would be on the other side of it.



You inadvertently are making my point for me by posting those picks. If your tank years were from 2001 (getting top pick in 2002) through 2005 a full 5 year tank job, the only player worth anything you would have come out of there with is Justin Upton and maybe Delmon Young if you really want to stretch. That's a consecutive stretch where there was only a 20% hit rate on the overall number 1 pick. You could even extend it 2 more years adding Price and worthless Beckham, and now it's only 2 out of 7 for the hit rate.

And, this also means you have to be bad enough to get the number one pick for consecutive seasons which is hard to do.

Houston got the number 1 pick 3 straight years and only got it right once. They totally whiffed on Appel and Aiken and only through exceptional luck did they get the consolation pick the next year after Aiken which became Bergman. Think about that, if they would have signed Aiken, maybe no world series for the Astros despite the tank job.
DallasAg 94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieEP said:






Think about that, if they would have signed Aiken, maybe no world series for the Astros despite the tank job.
Don't forget the trashcans.
alvtimes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
vander54 said:

alvtimes said:

DallasAg 94 said:

alvtimes said:

fc2112 said:


Quote:

The Padres' 18 trades since the start of the 2019-20 offseason that resulted in them acquiring major league talent are most by any team, as are the 23 players with major league experience the team acquired in those trades.

In that time, Preller traded away 18 minor leaguers who were among the team's top 30 prospects, as ranked by Baseball America. That includes six who were ranked in the top 12.

With all those machinations, the Padres believed they were building a perennial playoff team.

Instead, they will be watching the postseason again, for the 14th time in 15 years and the 47th time in their 53 years of existence.

Padres "gutted" farm system still has 4 top 100 players.
This is what Gutted looks like:

#6 CJ Abrams (SS-20-AA)
#37 Luis Campusano (C-23-AAA)
#43 Robert Hassell (OF-20-A+)
#56 MacKenzie Gore (LHP-22-AA)


#12 Jack Leiter (RHP-21)
#48 Josh Jung (3B-AAA-23)
#60 Cole Winn (RHP-AAA-21)
#83 Justin Foscue (2B-AA-22)
#91 Sam Huff (C/1B-AAA-23)





not sure where u are going with this..but if u are cheerleading for the Rangers ..... compare rosters


It's pretty easy to see where he's going. He saying they still have better top farm system talent than us despite being "gutted"


that was my original point also..... someone above surmised that the Padres gutted their minor league system to get their roster..... I mentioned their 4 top 100 players as a rebuttal to "gutted"
Proposition Joe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieEP said:

Proposition Joe said:

AggieEP said:

Believe this all you want, the top 30 in batting WAR this year consists of only 4 top 10 picks. And the top 30 in pitching WAR also includes only 4 top 10 picks.

The baseball draft is just too much of a crap shoot to assume picking in the top 5 is going to net you a winning club.

It's been well established the Top 10 in any given year doesn't net you guaranteed performers.

But the Top 1 or 2 is wholly different.

Which is why Houston took it to another level and went after the overall number one in consecutive seasons.

Here are the 13 years top picks prior to Houston drafting #1 overall:

2011 overall #1: Gerrit Cole
2010 overall #1: Bryce Harper
2009 overall #1: Stephen Strasburg
2008 overall #1: Tim Beckhem
2007 overall #1: David Price
2006 overall #1: Luke Hochevar
2005 overall #1: Justin Upton
2004 overall #1: Matt Bush
2003 overall #1: Delmon Young
2002 overall #1: Bryan Bullington
2001 overall #1: Joe Mauer
2000 overall #1: Adrian Gonzalez
1999 overall #1: Josh Hamilton



Gut your payroll to where you have a hundred million to spend and pick two of the players from that above list and tell me you aren't in a significantly better position at making a run 3-4 years down the line than most other teams? Silly to even imply otherwise.

Is it a guarantee? No. But it's hardly a crapshoot. Houston wasn't hoping to "get lucky" when they made their historical tank job - they knew where they would be on the other side of it.



You inadvertently are making my point for me by posting those picks. If your tank years were from 2001 (getting top pick in 2002) through 2005 a full 5 year tank job, the only player worth anything you would have come out of there with is Justin Upton and maybe Delmon Young if you really want to stretch. That's a consecutive stretch where there was only a 20% hit rate on the overall number 1 pick. You could even extend it 2 more years adding Price and worthless Beckham, and now it's only 2 out of 7 for the hit rate.

And, this also means you have to be bad enough to get the number one pick for consecutive seasons which is hard to do.

Houston got the number 1 pick 3 straight years and only got it right once. They totally whiffed on Appel and Aiken and only through exceptional luck did they get the consolation pick the next year after Aiken which became Bergman. Think about that, if they would have signed Aiken, maybe no world series for the Astros despite the tank job.


I'm not sure what point you are trying to combat?

Are you saying Carlos Correa and Alex Bregman's production wasn't a major factor in the Astros World Series run?

Are you saying that they lucked in to setting a historical loss record over a 4-year span and weren't purposely trying to acquire the overall #1 pick those years?

Are you saying that during that process they didn't purposely refrain from extending any long-term significant salary so that when their studs were ready they could make moves in free agency?

I mean... It's pretty obvious that is what the strategy was, and it worked.

Did it have a chance to not work? Sure.
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
So basically this forcing your statement with data
WestTexasAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pretty nice little evening so far. Pirates win and Rangers on their way to a loss. About to reclaim the #3 spot in draft order. One game "lead" over Pirates with 2 games left.
DallasAg 94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Getting to get to the game today makes two years in a row that I will have seen the final game of the season at GLF.

Could be the start of a new tradition.

Thanks Mr Gigem
Grapesoda2525
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is the #3 overall draft pick locked up?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.