***Official Game of Thrones: Season 4 Thread (BOOK READERS/SPOILERS ALLOWED)***

209,006 Views | 2149 Replies | Last: 10 yr ago by Twelfthman
mid90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
The Hound is dead, so that's unlikely.



oh really...

redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So many dead that are suspected to not be dead:

Jon Snow
The Mountain
The Hound
Only one confirmed is Lady Stoneheart, and it was never in question.
BTKAG97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
oh really...

Unless you think a holy man is an idiot or a liar, yes.
Aggie_Journalist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
From the nonspoiler thread.

quote:

Totally with you, Littlefinger most likely wouldn't undertake something like that on his own.


If I had to guess I'd put him in the employ of Lady Tyrell, she didn't seem especially heartbroken over the loss of her new grandson-in-law and probably wanted to both save her granddaughter a lot of pain and make things easier on everyone all around.


Boy I can't wait for all the shocks when Littlefinger reveals he's the one behind the Jon Arryn assassination.


Wasn't the Queen of Thorns the one who actually poisoned Joff in the books? Or am I misremembering things/making them up?

Either way, I think the Queen of Thorns and Littlefinger have been in league a long time, especially since the show did more to establish Littlefinger's role in the Tyrell camps at a time when he out of view in the books.
jenn96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think there's a difference between "supported by the text" not dead, like Sandor, and "I don't want him to be dead 'cause he's awesome!" like Syrio. I don't think there's any doubt that Sandor Clegane is still alive; the real issue is will he reappear in the series. His arc is done, and Martin may just leave him there.

Now Jon, we don't have enough evidence to know yet. The main reason I think everyone expects him to pull it out, even if as some kind of warging/rebirth/AA scenario where he isn't really "Jon" anymore, just like Lady Stoneheart and isn't really Cat and (presumably) Robert Strong isn't really Gregor, is because to legitimately kill Jon off now would be pretty crappy storytelling. It would be a shock!! but so would having a tsunami flood Westeros and kill everyone, The End, and that wouldn't be very good storytelling either. For better or worse, Jon has a part to play in this story, or else all the foreshadowing about him is just wasted words. I'm pretty sure he'll die in the end, for good, but having him die now seems like a major copout.
hunter2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
On a side note, I noticed this on the non spoiler thread:



Does anyone know if this is accurate? For starters it makes the essos/dothraki sea to be a lot smaller than I thought, and Westeros to be much bigger. I guess it would explain how Tyrion got to Meereen In essentially one book.
hunter2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Do I see Coldhands in the last frame?
mid90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
Do I see Coldhands in the last frame?




holy carp!!

though I think it might also be a white walker
mid90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
Unless you think a holy man is an idiot or a liar, yes.


He said the Hound was dead, not Sandor Clegane
hunter2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


vs



His face appears to be smoother/ no divots, it also shows Bran just before this frame. I think it is Coldhands...

Show watchers will assume it's just a Other(white walker), which makes the subtlety that much more awesome....
mid90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
he seems to be wearing something too
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
IDK, I think it looks too much like the White Walkers. I can't remember his description, but I didn't think he looked the same. Thought he was more like the wights brought back from the dead by the walkers.
Mega Lops
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
IDK, I think it looks too much like the White Walkers. I can't remember his description, but I didn't think he looked the same. Thought he was more like the wights brought back from the dead by the walkers.
This is correct. Unless HBO is taking creative liberties to make Coldhands look like a White Walker, that was not Coldhands in the preview for next episode. Most likely just a White Walker to keep folks with limited attention spans enthralled.
aggie93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If that is Coldhands they are changing him significantly from the books, here is the wiki:

quote:
Coldhands is dressed in the mottled blacks and greys of the Night's Watch with a scarf concealing his face. His hands are black and as cold as ice, and he rides a great elk. A flock of ravens flies under his command.[1] He does not breathe.[2]

Summer does not like the way Coldhands smells - "dead meat, dry blood, a faint whiff of rot. And cold. Cold all over".[2] Though Coldhands is often described as dead, but still alive, his eyes are described as black, in contrast of the light blue of wights and Others. Although he is thin and gaunt, his voice rattles.


I think that was just a WW.
Tanya 93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Do you think it was rape?

quote:
The Game of Thrones Sex Scene Can’t Be Both Rape and Not Rape

Eliana Dockterman @edockterman

April 21, 2014
Jaime, played by Nikolaj Coster-Waldau, and Cersei, played by Lena Headey, in Game of Thrones HBO
The director suggests that nonconsensual sex can become consensual. Why that's not right

[SPOILERS AHEAD]

Sunday night on Game of Thrones, Jaime forced himself on Cersei. This was problematic for a number of reasons: they’re siblings; they were having sex next to their son’s dead body; and said dead son was the product of their incest. But the biggest problem with that scene was that Jaime raped Cersei … and some of the people on the Game of Thrones cast and crew who have been interviewed about the episode don’t seem to acknowledge it as such.

Margaret Lyons over at Vulture has already done a great job of explaining why, exactly, that scene was rape. (Cersei says “No” repeatedly, to which Jaime replies, “I don’t care.”) In the piece, Lyons quotes two of the Game of Thrones folks hedging against actually calling the assault rape.

Director Alex Graves told Alan Sepinwall at HitFix: “It becomes consensual by the end.”

Nikolaj Coster-Waldau, the actor who plays Jaime, told the Daily Beast: “There are moments where [Cersei] gives in, and moments where she pushes him away. But it’s not pretty.” When asked if Cersei was raped, he answered, “Yes and no.”

The scene was enough to make everyone squirm, and it raises questions like, why did the script writers decide to diverge from the book (in which the sex was consensual — but still creepy for all the reasons listed above)? And will they handle the Cersei’s reaction to the incident with nuance and sensitivity? We might even ask why we keep seeing so much rape on TV. (I have my own theories.)

But first, we ought to take a moment to recognize that this incident isn’t a “gray area.” If a woman or man does not consent to a sexual act, and the other person forces him or her to continue, it’s rape. An incident cannot be both rape and “not rape.” There is no “yes and no” about it. A rape cannot “become consensual at the end.” You do not convince someone over the course of the act that they actually consented.

A lot of people — especially a lot of young people — watch Game of Thrones, and I imagine many of them read interviews with people like Graves and Coster-Waldau after the show. So it’s important that public figures like these should be conscious about how they respond to and describe these issues. How will victims of sexual assault be affected when a director and an actor in one of television’s most popular shows question whether no really means no?

I imagine that Graves and Coster-Waldau’s interpretations of the scene are linked to the common misconception that a person cannot be raped by his or her significant other. Jaime and Cersei are (however twisted it might be) a couple, and therefore some might falsely assume that all their sex must be consensual. But it’s not. That was rape. And I believe it’s important to acknowledge that, otherwise we risk delegitimizing assault.

To his credit, George R.R. Martin — who wrote the Song of Ice and Fire books upon which the Game of Thrones TV series is based — responded to fans’ concerns on Monday in the comments section of his own blog (Martin was not involved in writing the script for this episode):

In the novels, Jaime is not present at Joffrey’s death, and indeed, Cersei has been fearful that he is dead himself, that she has lost both the son and the father/ lover/ brother. And then suddenly Jaime is there before her. Maimed and changed, but Jaime nonetheless. Though the time and place is wildly inappropriate and Cersei is fearful of discovery, she is as hungry for him as he is for her.

The whole dynamic is different in the show, where Jaime has been back for weeks at the least, maybe longer, and he and Cersei have been in each other’s company on numerous occasions, often quarreling. The setting is the same, but neither character is in the same place as in the books, which may be why Dan & David played the sept out differently. But that’s just my surmise; we never discussed this scene, to the best of my recollection.

Also, I was writing the scene from Jaime’s POV, so the reader is inside his head, hearing his thoughts. On the TV show, the camera is necessarily external. You don’t know what anyone is thinking or feeling, just what they are saying and doing.

If the show had retained some of Cersei’s dialogue from the books, it might have left a somewhat different impression — but that dialogue was very much shaped by the circumstances of the books, delivered by a woman who is seeing her lover again for the first time after a long while apart during which she feared he was dead. I am not sure it would have worked with the new timeline.

That’s really all I can say on this issue. The scene was always intended to be disturbing… but I do regret if it has disturbed people for the wrong reasons.

Though Martin never explicitly calls the scene rape, he does express regret that the way it was presented on screen has upset people, which is a step in the right direction.

LawAg05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
93's quote notes that wights and WW have blue eyes, but we know coldhands is a wight because Leaf says he cannot enter the greenseer cave due to wards against wights.

Possibly nothing, but just an observation.

Tanya with the loaded question

[This message has been edited by Lawag05 (edited 4/22/2014 12:30p).]
Mega Lops
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
Do you think it was rape?
Zero f cks are given.
Fat Bib Fortuna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
especially a lot of young people — watch Game of Thrones, and I imagine many of them read interviews with people like Graves and Coster-Waldau after the show


I remember being young and desperately wanting to read interviews with the director of the latest episode of "The A-Team" or "Airwolf" after I watched it on TV, then rushing out to tell my friends, "Yo, G! Homeboy directed the hell outta B.A. Baracus in the scene where he lifted something heavy while Murdock made a wise crack, Face flirted with a girl and Hannibal lit a cigar! I got all da dope scoop on his method and everything thanks to the interview with him I just read!"
hunter2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm not sure why people want an apology based on a game of thrones scene, how have they been able to stomach everything else that's happened in the show? Watch blue's clues if you don't want to be offended...

I actually agree that this scene had to be significantly different because Jaime has been back for a while. But while he's been back, he's essentially been shunned and rendered powerless by his own family and his condition. I see this scene as an attempt by him to assert some sort of control over something(or this case someone) from his life before capture. Is it uncomfortable to watch? Yes. Does it make sense in the context of the show? Also yes.
AgDev01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
The Hound is dead, so that's unlikely.


The Hound is dead Sandor Clegane is digging graves on the quit isles. I hope they end his story there but if he is to come back i can see it during the trial of seven for Cersei, if that happens.


quote:
IDK, I think it looks too much like the White Walkers. I can't remember his description, but I didn't think he looked the same. Thought he was more like the wights brought back from the dead by the walkers.



Has HBO even made a distinction between the two?

[This message has been edited by AgDev01 (edited 4/22/2014 12:55p).]
hunter2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
quote:
IDK, I think it looks too much like the White Walkers. I can't remember his description, but I didn't think he looked the same. Thought he was more like the wights brought back from the dead by the walkers.



Has HBO even made a distinction between the two?

They show the undead and very clearly the White Walkers who appear to be in charge...
hunter2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dp

[This message has been edited by hunter2012 (edited 4/22/2014 12:58p).]
Fat Bib Fortuna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
saw this on tumblr. Not sure i can wait another 5 weeks for it.

Tanya 93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not a loaded question at all.

I thought the article was interesting.
Marsh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
I'm not sure why people want an apology based on a game of thrones scene, how have they been able to stomach everything else that's happened in the show?


It's not about what was shown on the show. No one is appalled or angry that rape is on the show. They understand that this is a very "gritty" and sometimes crude show with some very grotesque scenes.

People are mad that someone (in particular producers and actors in the show) could watch this episode (specifically that scene) and say that it isn't rape. If a woman says no and a man continues anyway (even if eventually the woman is into it), it is rape. If certain Game of Thrones people come out and say "no, that is not the definition of rape" it sends a bad message.

I'm not trying to troll or cause an argument... But that is where I think the people getting offended are coming from.
aggie93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's really a bad example of defining "rape" because Cersei wasn't opposed to the idea of having sex with Jaime, she just didn't think the place and time was appropriate. Some of the camera angles and reactions from Cersei didn't really convey her feelings. If you watch it a few times you can see that she clearly was in to it and it is also consistent with how her and Jaime often had "fight sex" if you go back to Season 1.

Still all kinds of messed up but if anyone really knows the context of the characters and situation they can see it wasn't rape.

Is it a good example for kids? Hell no, but you are talking about a brother and sister having sex next to their dead son. It's not exactly a scene for children.
jenn96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I didn't care for it - I thought it was unnecessary and confused, rather than advanced, Jaime's story - but it was an attempt at illustrating just how truly screwed up Jaime and Cersei's relationship is. And I think it did that.

What I get tired of is the idea among the perpetually aggrieved that rape in fiction, above all crimes, requires super-clear definitions and intentions. And that it somehow influences watchers outsize of any other crimes. Sorry, but the entire show is full of people doing terrible things to each other, and I don't think the directors owe anyone an explanation, any more than they owe explanations for the other scenes of violence. I mean, does anyone worry that youth of America will start throwing little boys out of windows? Obviously the producers thought it was more ambiguous onscreen than most watchers. Big whoop. That disconnect between what was shown and what was intended probably happens 5 times an episode. The fact that this was a "rape" scene doesn't mean they owe apologies, clarification and groveling.
BillOnCapitolHill
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OMG they showed a fictional rape on cable! New low!

Lets ignore the voyeuristic BJ ring! Lets ignore the infanticide! Lets ignore torture and genital mutilation!

An evil character's SO penetrates her!
hunter2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
From the nonspoiler thread:

quote:
To me, it meant that he's sick of following orders and now does what he wants. Which leads me to believe he'll have a hand (hah!) in helping Tyrion, not Cersei or Tywin. But I've given up making predictions about this show. I'm hardly ever right.


Dude needs to be given a dragon or something for that prediction.

LawAg05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


quote:
I thought the rape scene went well
SoTXAg09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That scene was definitely a bit rapey, but as others have said, it's not even in the running for most egregious or immoral act in the series.
MSCAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
To me it was an unnecessary deviation from the book. In the book it was messed up because they both wanted each other and did it right in front of their dead kid.

IMO it also served to show really how "off" Cersei was. Jamie you sorta understood why he didn't give two figs for Joff, he'd been pushed away since his birth from the boy and told by Cersei to accept he'd never really be any sort of father to him. So what does he care if he bangs in front of his dead body.

But Cersei did love her children and the fact that she'd accept banging in front of Joff really just made her character that much more disturbing (at least to me anyway).
Thunder18
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:


quote:
I thought the rape scene went well




...and STAGE FREEZE!
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
My guess (also stated in the other thread) is that filming a single rape scene was a more economical way to show the growing alienation between Cersei and Jaime. On that level, it makes a lot more sense than showing multiple scenes between them. You get the exact same thing with 1 scene.
marble rye
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
On discussion boards, several speculate that Jaime and Cersei are actually Targs bc Joanna was doing up Aegon on the regular...and that Cersei has the mad genes.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.