HYC_AG said:
The Hobbit is a children's book and not difficult…
I did an oral book report on the Hobbit in 5th grade. Let's be honest though, it was more based around my having listened to this record a few hundred times.
HYC_AG said:
The Hobbit is a children's book and not difficult…
AliasMan02 said:
I haven't read this thread or watched any media on this in weeks but am just here to say I am ****ing stoked.
c-jags said:C@LAg said:Honors English Lit classPatAg said:
This is a sidebar, but are you saying you had to read The Hobbit in school for a class? That's crazy.
My 6th grader had to read it last year. I was all "dude I barely made it through the The Hobbit in HS and I was a fantasy nerd."
I let him watch the movies as he got through that part of the book so it was a little broken up.
Classical school.
Unpossible. This book was obviously so incredibly deep as to require (3) full length movies to cover.Brian Earl Spilner said:
Yeah I'm a bit confused. I read The Hobbit in one sitting at a B&N.
Cinco Ranch Aggie said:Gotta disagree. The movie was good but there was so much more in the book. No Clancy-based movie has ever been better than the books IMO, although THFRO was easily the most crowd-pleasing.Philip J Fry said:
Hunt for red October
chilidogfood said:Unpossible. This book was obviously so incredibly deep as to require (3) 3+hour full length movies to cover.Brian Earl Spilner said:
Yeah I'm a bit confused. I read The Hobbit in one sitting at a B&N.
I think one difference is that The Hobbit/LOTR effectively started an entire genre of books: Fantasy. Even if it technically didn't it's considered the Father of Fantasy. So, it will always have that first mover advantage whereas Dune isn't considered the Father of SciFi. SciFi has been in the public conscious for longer even if it was a bunch of campy movies and non-serious subject matter.PatAg said:TCTTS said:
I was referring to everyone having read The Hobbit in school, not LOTR. And because of The Hobbit, so many people already knew what hobbits were, what the general setting was, etc. In that sense, I would say more people were familiar with The Hobbit/LOTR going into those movies than are with Dune going into this movie.
Regardless, the LOTR movies were four quadrant family affairs that basically defined Christmas, pop-culture-wise, for thee straight years. Dune doesn't have that four quadrant family vibe, nor has it planted its flag as some kind of massive release that defines a particular season.
I know my friends and I were there opening day for Fellowship, and we talked people who had not heard of it into going to see it with us. There were a lot more people in my social group that had not read the books than people who had but still saw it opening weekend.
I wonder if Dune, as a book and culturally relevant touchstone, just hasn't stayed as relevant with the middle school-college age crowd as time passes by?
This is a sidebar, but are you saying you had to read The Hobbit in school for a class? That's crazy.
I Have Spoken said:
Let's get this back on topic...
TCTTS - I'm planning to watch Dune on my bedroom's 32 inch screen TV streaming under semi-rural bandwidth limitations, so it will be heavily compressed. Do you have any thoughts?
I am going to watch it at home and if it is good I will find a time to go to the imax.Bonzer103 said:
Here's the question. How many people with HBOMax will watch on the streaming service, or will instead go the cinematic route (Imax?)?
Yep. Tickets at 7 for IMAX tonight. I may watch it again at home, but honestly if I love it as much as I'm hoping, I may do a second watch in theaters before it leaves which I almost never do.Brian Earl Spilner said:
Have HBO Max here. Never even entered my brain to watch it at home.
IMAX tonight at 6 pm.
I have thoughts - but cannot express them because of texags TOS.I Have Spoken said:
Let's get this back on topic...
TCTTS - I'm planning to watch Dune on my bedroom's 32 inch screen TV streaming under semi-rural bandwidth limitations, so it will be heavily compressed. Do you have any thoughts?
The fanny pack shield belts didn't test well with audiences.Decay said:
Shield belts are now wrist watches? Am I just now hearing about this?
Faustus said:The fanny pack shield belts didn't test well with audiences.Decay said:
Shield belts are now wrist watches? Am I just now hearing about this?
Decay said:
Shield belts are now wrist watches? Am I just now hearing about this?
Same. This is the kind of movie that needs to be seen in IMAX even though I would prefer to be more comfortable at home.Brian Earl Spilner said:
Have HBO Max here. Never even entered my brain to watch it at home.
IMAX tonight at 6 pm.
Baron Von Flag Smasher said:
After where this thread turned, if Paul doesn't have large hairy feet I may feel disappointed
Wish granted: Timothy Chalewhatevers permanent emo-face means every look at any other character is a half-lidded longing gaze.YouBet said:Baron Von Flag Smasher said:
After where this thread turned, if Paul doesn't have large hairy feet I may feel disappointed
We will need overwhelming gay undertones with his fellow Fremen as well.
javajaws said:
You'll are giving TCTTS too much ammo for his Spice Girls sequel script!
Baron Von Flag Smasher said:
After where this thread turned, if Paul doesn't have large hairy feet I may feel disappointed
or maybe they sweat more because they get too hot.Champ Bailey said:Baron Von Flag Smasher said:
After where this thread turned, if Paul doesn't have large hairy feet I may feel disappointed
Hairy feet do hold more moisture.