Excellent rack.
Jimmy McNulty said:
I REALLY need to watch her season
one of the best and not only because of the eye candyJimmy McNulty said:
I REALLY need to watch her season
truly perplexing these idiots go along with Paul's plan to the T. I have no idea what incentive they had to split the votes and force Josh to be the one to send her home. My only guess is Paul sold them the idea to let Paul win the veto so he could get his hands slightly 'dirty', he wouldn't use it. In return, Paul votes for Alex and Josh has to seal her fate.Sex Panther said:
So why did Paul and Guy ****es Day decide to split the votes?
Once again Josh (who has it all figured out, lol) comes off looking like the bad guy
Flashdiaz said:truly perplexing these idiots go along with Paul's plan to the T. I have no idea what incentive they had to split the votes and force Josh to be the one to send her home. My only guess is Paul sold them the idea to let Paul win the veto so he could get his hands slightly 'dirty', he wouldn't use it. In return, Paul votes for Alex and Josh has to seal her fate.Sex Panther said:
So why did Paul and Guy ****es Day decide to split the votes?
Once again Josh (who has it all figured out, lol) comes off looking like the bad guy
I disagree, to a certain extent: I've been watching longer than I care to admit, and more often than not, jury voters will set aside their hurt feelings and recognize good game play when it's warranted. Despite all the advantages Paul has had this season, and there are many (maybe more than we'll ever know), nobody can argue he hasn't played a masterful game. It was all made easier for him in that the vast majority of the contestants this year were tailor-made to be manipulated by him, but he's been in complete control virtually the entire time. He'll be rewarded for that if he makes final two and if (this to me will be the last hurdle for him) he can make the crystal-clear case for why he should win during his "why I should win" speech during the finale. I know most jury members will have already made their decisions by then, and I do think the large majority will be for Paul to win. But if he can clearly and systematically articulate how he went about his game, with specific examples (particularly as they relate to those whose feelings might still be controlling their decision making: Alex, Jason, et al, and probably including/especially Christmas) he'll be able to solidify the votes he already has, and maybe steal 1 or 2 that were planning on voting against him. Conversely, I think if during that speech he comes across as arrogant (which I don't think he will; he's been pretty collected and calculating thus far) he may manage to lose a vote or two he might previously have had.PermianBasinAggie said:
A lot of people are going to the jury house hating Paul. I think there's a real chance he loses the final vote. Remember that it's a social game, and when you treat real people like pieces on a chessboard, you run the risk that they won't want to give you $500K. It's the Russell Hantz effect. He was masterful at the game aspect, but not many jurors could bring themselves to reward his ruthless gameplay.