quote:I agree with fig on that point.quote:It's official, this thread has ran its course.
I enjoyed Watchmen and 300 but neither is as genuinely entertaining as The Rock or Bad Boys IMO.
quote:I agree with fig on that point.quote:It's official, this thread has ran its course.
I enjoyed Watchmen and 300 but neither is as genuinely entertaining as The Rock or Bad Boys IMO.
quote:quote:It's official, this thread has ran its course.
I enjoyed Watchmen and 300 but neither is as genuinely entertaining as The Rock or Bad Boys IMO.
quote:We've still got a good two weeks to kill till critics reviews start rolling in.
58 pages, it's gonna get off topic from time to time. There's only so many "this movie is going to suck" posts people can do.
quote:
Honestly, I'm surprised it took this long lol
quote:I actually don't even remember what it was about anymore. That actually may be a good thing.
I loved watching it, but was dumbfounded by how bad the plot was.
quote:
I just never thought a BvS thread would culminate into a post about Watchmen vs Bad Boys.
quote:It was Inception for teenage boys.quote:I actually don't even remember what it was about anymore. That actually may be a good thing.
I loved watching it, but was dumbfounded by how bad the plot was.
quote:
so what does Batman vs Superman have to do in order to be considered a "success"?
does it need to hit a certain box office number or can it "underperform" as long as it lays the groundwork for batman, wonder woman and, hopefully for DC, the justice league movie?
quote:
I was thinking it should hit the iron man 1 or capt Merica 1 levels to be considered successful.
Of course I have no idea what those numbers are, but it seems to be in the same setup phase of the movies.
quote:No idea.
so what does Batman vs Superman have to do in order to be considered a "success"?
does it need to hit a certain box office number or can it "underperform" as long as it lays the groundwork for batman, wonder woman and, hopefully for DC, the justice league movie?
quote:Besides the budget, I was thinking that this might be more along the lines of IM2 or CA 2 in atmosphere personally. I mean we already had Man of Steel, and Batman is supposed to be well established like Iron Man would be by CA 2. Meh.quote:
I was thinking it should hit the iron man 1 or capt Merica 1 levels to be considered successful.
Of course I have no idea what those numbers are, but it seems to be in the same setup phase of the movies.
Budget is huge for BvS as opposed to those movies, though.
quote:
Didn't he change his username?
quote:
Didn't he change his username?
quote:300...and you're complaining about MOS being to campy...
Dawn of the Dead
300
Watchmen
All 3 movies have immense 're-watchability', imo, and are at least as good as anything that Michael Bay has made.
Sucker punch?....I'll leave that one alone.
quote:lol did you understand the context of that comment? Someone mentioned Michael Bay as producing movies that can be entertaining and/or retain a certain level of re-watchability (and thus implying Snyder has not). All I did was present 3 movies directed by Zack Snyder that were in line with that thinking. I didn't say they were great, or even good, and I would easily put Man of Steel in the same category. Entertaining with some level of re-watchability. Has nothing to do with what I or others would classify as a good film.quote:300...and you're complaining about MOS being to campy...
Dawn of the Dead
300
Watchmen
All 3 movies have immense 're-watchability', imo, and are at least as good as anything that Michael Bay has made.
Sucker punch?....I'll leave that one alone.
300 was utter garbage compared to MOS...I couldn't even get thru the whole movie.
quote:And I pointed out that 300 couldn't be watched once let alone it has "re-watchabilty"...quote:lol did you understand the context of that comment? Someone mentioned Michael Bay as producing movies that can be entertaining and/or retain a certain level of re-watchability (and thus implying Snyder has not). All I did was present 3 movies directed by Zack Snyder that were in line with that thinking. I didn't say they were great, or even good, and I would easily put Man of Steel in the same category. Entertaining with some level of re-watchability. Has nothing to do with what I or others would classify as a good film.quote:300...and you're complaining about MOS being to campy...
Dawn of the Dead
300
Watchmen
All 3 movies have immense 're-watchability', imo, and are at least as good as anything that Michael Bay has made.
Sucker punch?....I'll leave that one alone.
300 was utter garbage compared to MOS...I couldn't even get thru the whole movie.
quote:A lot of people were able to sit through 300 at least once. Many sat through it a few times.quote:And I pointed out that 300 couldn't be watched once let alone it has "re-watchabilty"...quote:lol did you understand the context of that comment? Someone mentioned Michael Bay as producing movies that can be entertaining and/or retain a certain level of re-watchability (and thus implying Snyder has not). All I did was present 3 movies directed by Zack Snyder that were in line with that thinking. I didn't say they were great, or even good, and I would easily put Man of Steel in the same category. Entertaining with some level of re-watchability. Has nothing to do with what I or others would classify as a good film.quote:300...and you're complaining about MOS being to campy...
Dawn of the Dead
300
Watchmen
All 3 movies have immense 're-watchability', imo, and are at least as good as anything that Michael Bay has made.
Sucker punch?....I'll leave that one alone.
300 was utter garbage compared to MOS...I couldn't even get thru the whole movie.
Ham fisted/campy...whatever