trouble said:
There's one in the Target parking lot
But that's ALL THE WAY up in Bryan. What about the college station residents along east University? They need mail salons closer!
trouble said:
There's one in the Target parking lot
Yes the College Station Hilton Garden Inn over there is in fact on the Bryan side.trouble said:
Isn't that parcel that just sold also Bryan?
althormoon said:
Dollar Slice Club is now open in Northgate (where Antonio's used to be)
*has decent BBQ and a good selection of sidesJemotz13 said:
That's exciting news! Smokey Mo's has good BBQ and in the Austin area usually is a good community support as well.
phillytex24 said:
Coopers aint gonna last. $30 for me to eat there! Plus hard to get to. Not going back.
I'm surprised they're still pursuing their own location and not partnering with the museum A&M is planning.Captn_Ag05 said:
Update on the potential Military Heritage Center at Veteran's Park. They have around $4 million more to raise to reach their goal.
https://wtaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/CScoun041422MilHerCtrPrez.pdf
rocketscience said:
Agreed. I'm hoping plans materialize soon for the former FedEx property to complement the Rise and Aspire. The most sustainable and cheapest way to decrease rush hour traffic in BCS is to increase density in Northgate!
PS3D said:rocketscience said:
Agreed. I'm hoping plans materialize soon for the former FedEx property to complement the Rise and Aspire. The most sustainable and cheapest way to decrease rush hour traffic in BCS is to increase density in Northgate!
Density is going to increase traffic, not decrease it. You think that two giant apartment buildings are adding LESS cars to University Drive than two banks did?
Well he's not wrong. Increasing the student density in Northgate - walking distance from TAMU - will decrease the amount of students driving to/from campus.maroon barchetta said:PS3D said:rocketscience said:
Agreed. I'm hoping plans materialize soon for the former FedEx property to complement the Rise and Aspire. The most sustainable and cheapest way to decrease rush hour traffic in BCS is to increase density in Northgate!
Density is going to increase traffic, not decrease it. You think that two giant apartment buildings are adding LESS cars to University Drive than two banks did?
No kidding.
This isn't…rocket science
YEEEEAAAHHHHHH!
Actually, he IS wrong, because those students just don't go to campus, they go to other restaurants, grocery stores, churches, back home, everywhere else, and they all have to go on University Drive. A quarter of the floors on those buildings is a parking garage!kraut said:Well he's not wrong. Increasing the student density in Northgate - walking distance from TAMU - will decrease the amount of students driving to/from campus.maroon barchetta said:PS3D said:rocketscience said:
Agreed. I'm hoping plans materialize soon for the former FedEx property to complement the Rise and Aspire. The most sustainable and cheapest way to decrease rush hour traffic in BCS is to increase density in Northgate!
Density is going to increase traffic, not decrease it. You think that two giant apartment buildings are adding LESS cars to University Drive than two banks did?
No kidding.
This isn't…rocket science
YEEEEAAAHHHHHH!
What I said was "rush hour traffic". That excludes the cases you mentioned (depending on the time you do them). Yes, moving students to within walking distance of campus has the potential to decrease rush hour car trips by up to however many beds are added there.PS3D said:Actually, he IS wrong, because those students just don't go to campus, they go to other restaurants, grocery stores, churches, back home, everywhere else, and they all have to go on University Drive. A quarter of the floors on those buildings is a parking garage!kraut said:Well he's not wrong. Increasing the student density in Northgate - walking distance from TAMU - will decrease the amount of students driving to/from campus.maroon barchetta said:PS3D said:rocketscience said:
Agreed. I'm hoping plans materialize soon for the former FedEx property to complement the Rise and Aspire. The most sustainable and cheapest way to decrease rush hour traffic in BCS is to increase density in Northgate!
Density is going to increase traffic, not decrease it. You think that two giant apartment buildings are adding LESS cars to University Drive than two banks did?
No kidding.
This isn't…rocket science
YEEEEAAAHHHHHH!
You are correct, that is a valid option to decrease traffic. That would take 5-10 years time in planning/construction and well north of $100 million in tax dollars whereas increasing density in Northgate takes less time (I think the 10 floor property is supposed to be ready for Fall 2024) and uses private dollars. I've presented this as an either or question but it really isn't one in reality; the increasing density option is just much easier and faster.Hornbeck said:
Better roadway planning, like having an east west expressway , or make 2818 limited access, would decrease traffic, but what do I know?