A trade with LAL that does not include Ingram would be a complete failure.
West Texan said:Guitarsoup said:
Seems like the Lalas are trying to force Kawhi for Deng and a future first (top-25 protected, naturally)
What do they see Ingram that makes him so untouchable that they're not willing to offer him up for a deal that could potentially land them Kawhi, LeBron, and Paul George?
Yep, they're all morons, and I'd rather not have any of their immaturity on the Spurs. It seems like basketball is low on the list of priorities. Thanks for all the drama, crybaby Kawhi.West Texan said:Guitarsoup said:
Lonzo, Hart, and Kuz are annoying as **** for a bunch of young bucks that haven't proved anything on a crappy team. Running amok on Twitter, rap disses, etc. The Lakers desperately need some veteran leadership.
LA is in the conversation because that is where Kawhi apparently wants to go, and the Lakers are the most desperate to get him.500,000ags said:
I don't understand how LA is even in the conversation. Their young guys suck aside from Kuzma, and, if they truly get their way, their draft picks will suck too. Philly and Boston have much better assets.
Pumpkinhead said:LA is in the conversation because that is where Kawhi apparently wants to go, and the Lakers are the most desperate to get him.500,000ags said:
I don't understand how LA is even in the conversation. Their young guys suck aside from Kuzma, and, if they truly get their way, their draft picks will suck too. Philly and Boston have much better assets.
Money Ag said:
Don't think Lonzo is in play here. I think a few well connected people have said the Lakers are shopping Ball for assets the Spurs would actually want.
I'm gonna go out on a limb and say Lonzo, Ingram, and Kuzma will never be as good as LeBron, Kawhi, and PG13.Ulrich said:
I've seen articles saying that maybe the Lakers should simply stay the course and wait for these young guys develop into a good team rather than send out all their youth and picks and probably still lose to the warriors.
But after 5 consecutive losing seasons and 7 consecutive seasons under 50 wins, they may be too impatient.
LeBron makes significantly more money off court than he does on court.flashplayer said:
Similar to Paul George, there was no way Lebron was opting in, purely because that'd be an idiotic financial move.
He may very well stay in Cleveland, but he'd want another 1+1 deal to be able to opt into next summer if he blows an Achilles or something.
Guitarsoup said:LeBron makes significantly more money off court than he does on court.flashplayer said:
Similar to Paul George, there was no way Lebron was opting in, purely because that'd be an idiotic financial move.
He may very well stay in Cleveland, but he'd want another 1+1 deal to be able to opt into next summer if he blows an Achilles or something.
Considering he signed a 1+1y contract when he could have signed a 5y, then he signed a 2+1y contract when he could have signed a 5y contract, I would say you are wrong.flashplayer said:Guitarsoup said:LeBron makes significantly more money off court than he does on court.flashplayer said:
Similar to Paul George, there was no way Lebron was opting in, purely because that'd be an idiotic financial move.
He may very well stay in Cleveland, but he'd want another 1+1 deal to be able to opt into next summer if he blows an Achilles or something.
He's still a savvy profiteer and if you think he'd pass up 30 million after blowing an Achilles you're off your rocker.
Guitarsoup said:
Which was my point. He isn't worried about losing $35mm by blowing an Achilles which is why short contacts don't bother him.