West Texan said:ATM9000 said:West Texan said:Guitarsoup said:
My #1 trade would be to Boston for Tatum, Rozier, Morris, filler and the Sacramento 2019 pick.
LA for Ingram, Kuzma, Deng and picks could work except it creates the ability for LA to bring in Kawhi, Bron, and George.
I've heard Sacramento #2 and Bogdan Bogdanovic and the Spurs take Luka. Maybe we could force CauleyStein in to play C.
One of my favorites I've seen (although I don't see this happening): Spurs, Cavs, Grizz
Spurs get George Hill, pick #4, and pick #8
Cavs get Kawhi and Chandler Parsons
Memphis gets Kevin Love
Money works out, we get two top ten picks, Cleveland has something to offer Lebron to stay, and Memphis unloads Parsons awful contract and get someone to pair next to Conley and Gasol.
The Cavs absorb a worse contract, lose Love and give up 8 to get a 1 year Kawhi rental with little cap relief... no way in hell they do that.
I already said that I don't think this happens. For the sake of playing devils advocate... OKC gave up Oladipo for a one year rental of Paul George in the hope that they could convince him to stay. If the cavs thought that getting Kawhi would convince Lebron to stay, and perhaps playing with Lebron could convince Kawhi to sign an extension.
I think the Paul George situation is actually a realistic node of comparison for the Spurs and remember hat basically everyone (including me) thought that the Pacers got bent over in that trade. Nobody saw Oladipo becoming what he did last season so the Pacers got a bit lucky there. Also that scenario worked for OKC because they thought they were closer to contending (oops). Lebron-less Cavs assuming that happens aren't 1 Kawhi away from contending.
I wouldn't expect the Spurs to get a kings ransom for Kawhi in this scenario. If you get 2 high picks, expect to be the team to absorb a contract like Parson's too in that deal but even then, I doubt 2 top 10 picks are in scope.