Jeffrey Epstein Arrested For Sex Trafficking of Minors

516,255 Views | 2408 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by LoudestWHOOP!
cbr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Secolobo said:


All of those ****ers are squarely in the 'we raped kids and were compromised to get where we are club' or the 'we have generational fortunes, hate a strong free ethical america becase we cant control that or profit from it, and thus we set up a rape club to cherry pick our politicians and bureaucrats and media message types for our globalist socialist minion powerplay' club.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cbr said:

Secolobo said:


All of those ****ers are squarely in the 'we raped kids and were compromised to get where we are club' or the 'we have generational fortunes, hate a strong free ethical america becase we cant control that or profit from it, and thus we set up a rape club to cherry pick our politicians and bureaucrats and media message types for our globalist socialist minion powerplay' club.
Please, please let Alec Baldwin be involved in this
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BMX Bandit said:

Don't think it stinks at all. She works in SDNY. Should she be fired because her dad is a chode? The people there that want to take Epstein down obviously think she's okay to be on the team.
Second tango on the tarmac, incoming? Bill meets her somewhere?

She doesn't need to be fired, just recused, perhaps. BUT, she does need to run a possible recusal necessity by DOJ, first.

Since Bill Clinton was a frequent companion of Epstein's during the period in question, including dozens of trips to the island, he is at a minimum a witness, if not a potential additional target. Her vetting needs to be thorough.

Frankly, out of an abundance of caution for even the appearance of impropriety, she should be running towards the nearest exit sign. Could be career ending for her, if she stays involved and it goes sideways. Know I would, were I in her shoes.
Sid Farkas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
captkirk said:

cbr said:

Secolobo said:


All of those ****ers are squarely in the 'we raped kids and were compromised to get where we are club' or the 'we have generational fortunes, hate a strong free ethical america becase we cant control that or profit from it, and thus we set up a rape club to cherry pick our politicians and bureaucrats and media message types for our globalist socialist minion powerplay' club.
Please, please let Alec Baldwin be involved in this
Gawker. Heh.
gig em 02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BMX Bandit said:

Don't think it stinks at all. She works in SDNY. Should she be fired because her dad is a chode? The people there that want to take Epstein down obviously think she's okay to be on the team.
Would you rather be prosecuted by a complete stranger or your own mother?

I'd much rather my mom be there to destroy evidence and mess up the prosecution so that I wouldn't be found guilty and no one else could try me for the same crime. The whole prosecution of Epstein could be to dig deeper and cover the Clintons for all you know.
Old_Ag_91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
gig em 02 said:

BMX Bandit said:

Don't think it stinks at all. She works in SDNY. Should she be fired because her dad is a chode? The people there that want to take Epstein down obviously think she's okay to be on the team.
Would you rather be prosecuted by a complete stranger or your own mother?

I'd much rather my mom be there to destroy evidence and mess up the prosecution so that I wouldn't be found guilty and no one else could try me for the same crime. The whole prosecution of Epstein could be to dig deeper and cover the Clintons for all you know.

I agree, it seems like the further back you go they are all interconnected and had previous jobs that their buddies held. Even the wives seem to be connected to all of it. Coincidences are not to be believed anymore. Trust is earned these days, and if your name is comey, mueller, Clinton, or any of the other known names... I don't trust them or anyone in their family. We used to be just dumbass sheep trusting whatever they said "for the good of the country". No longer. Trust none of them.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thanks to the heavens that Hoover was gay and didn't reproduce.
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Cassius said:

BMX Bandit said:

BenFiasco14 said:

If this starts turning into some big fish getting boiled, she absolutely has a conflict per her daddy. No way she should be near anything that could implicate big name Democrats


Now you are changing the known facts.

She's part of team prosecuting Epstein. She's not in the FBI. If there's an issue with prosecuting someone down the line (not just unnamed "big named democrats") then they can look at potential conflicts as they arise




She's conflicted. She should recuse. If she runs across any evidence against Clinton, she can't be trusted not to bury or ignore it and make it available to others.
For precisely what reasons should she recuse herself?

Note that there are rather specific guidelines on what constitutes a conflict of interest. It seems to me that they are mostly financial. Also, if she worked on their campaign or ran against them in her own campaign, it would be a conflict of interest.

Membership in a political party is not a conflict of interest.
Old_Ag_91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Haha. Hawg for the win again.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

For precisely what reasons should she recuse herself?

Note that there are rather specific guidelines on what constitutes a conflict of interest. It seems to me that they are mostly financial. Also, if she worked on their campaign or ran against them in her own campaign, it would be a conflict of interest.

Membership in a political party is not a conflict of interest.
But her father's potential involvement in the original NPA could be. Please note that Epstein's case directly involves the PCU.

If her father is within six degrees of being involved, you claim she would not be conflicted out?
91AggieLawyer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sq 17 said:

The only reason people on this board care is they think it will bring down Clinton,


That's not the ONLY reason. Thats just absurd. I don't think anyone wants him falsely caught up in this. Since he's had Secret Service 24/7/365 protection for almost 30 years, it will be VERY easy to disprove if nothing is there.

Besides, Bill and Hillary have pretty much already been brought down. They continue to take money and interest from fools but other than that have almost nothing to do with anything going on.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Old_Ag_91 said:

Haha. Hawg for the win again.
Can you imagine if Hoover had kids and grandkids that had access to his "personal files"?? How many generations of politicians would have been subject to blackmail?


Wait...that actually might have worked better...uhmmm...maybe not.

But would it have been worse?
Post removed:
by user
Old_Ag_91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggiebrewer said:

shouldn't J Edgar be a hero to the left?

snooping into private lives to ruin people he didn't agree with politically while being a cross dresser...seems perfect
Sounds just like liberal democrats.
Old_Ag_91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pretty scary if you ask me, and it's very possible that's what happening with some of these people in power currently.
PA24
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Most names on the list are not part of a sex predator club.

Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Duggins90 said:

Most names on the list are not part of a sex predator club.
Yep, but most will get their names dragged through the mud because of it.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
FrontPorchAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Duggins90 said:

Most names on the list are not part of a sex predator club.


It's going to be fun watching them all crawfish though.
All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others
boulderaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Old_Ag_91 said:

Pretty scary if you ask me, and it's very possible that's what happening with some of these people in power currently.
CJ Roberts, perhaps?
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

For precisely what reasons should she recuse herself?

Note that there are rather specific guidelines on what constitutes a conflict of interest. It seems to me that they are mostly financial. Also, if she worked on their campaign or ran against them in her own campaign, it would be a conflict of interest.

Membership in a political party is not a conflict of interest.
But her father's potential involvement in the original NPA could be. Please note that Epstein's case directly involves the PCU.

If her father is within six degrees of being involved, you claim she would not be conflicted out?
Eric's generally within 6 degrees of being off-base
Old_Ag_91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wow I didn't even think about that but yes?
FrontPorchAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BenFiasco14 said:

If this starts turning into some big fish getting boiled, she absolutely has a conflict per her daddy. No way she should be near anything that could implicate big name Democrats
THIS! So Comey Sr finds that Hillary committed multiple crimes but refused to recommend prosecution and now his daughter is investigating Bill? What could go wrong?
All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others
FrontPorchAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
captkirk said:

cbr said:

Secolobo said:


All of those ****ers are squarely in the 'we raped kids and were compromised to get where we are club' or the 'we have generational fortunes, hate a strong free ethical america becase we cant control that or profit from it, and thus we set up a rape club to cherry pick our politicians and bureaucrats and media message types for our globalist socialist minion powerplay' club.
Please, please let Alec Baldwin be involved in this
I want Peter Soros
All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others
30wedge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Duggins90 said:

Most names on the list are not part of a sex predator club.


Then which names are and which are not?
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

For precisely what reasons should she recuse herself?

Note that there are rather specific guidelines on what constitutes a conflict of interest. It seems to me that they are mostly financial. Also, if she worked on their campaign or ran against them in her own campaign, it would be a conflict of interest.

Membership in a political party is not a conflict of interest.
But her father's potential involvement in the original NPA could be. Please note that Epstein's case directly involves the PCU.

If her father is within six degrees of being involved, you claim she would not be conflicted out?
Is she a member of the team prosecuting Epstein or a member of a team investigating her father? Are there allegations that her father was a fellow traveler of Epstein's and may become a target of an investigation of Epstein?
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well, Ted Kennedy is off the hook.
Currently a happy listless vessel and deplorable. #FDEMS TRUMP 2024.
Fight Fight Fight.
PA24
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
to be determined.

Once he cooperates....
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:



If her father is within six degrees of being involved, you claim she would not be conflicted out?
Six degrees of being involved?

Who is not within six degrees of being involved in anything?
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
eric76 said:

aggiehawg said:

Quote:

For precisely what reasons should she recuse herself?

Note that there are rather specific guidelines on what constitutes a conflict of interest. It seems to me that they are mostly financial. Also, if she worked on their campaign or ran against them in her own campaign, it would be a conflict of interest.

Membership in a political party is not a conflict of interest.
But her father's potential involvement in the original NPA could be. Please note that Epstein's case directly involves the PCU.

If her father is within six degrees of being involved, you claim she would not be conflicted out?
Is she a member of the team prosecuting Epstein or a member of a team investigating her father? Are there allegations that her father was a fellow traveler of Epstein's and may become a target of an investigation of Epstein?
Uh...I suspect that the anti-corruption unit is involved because there is suspected corruption around the deal Epstein got. A deal her father likely had some involvement in. Why else would that group, which Comey's daughter works for, be involved?
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not that I really want to defend any of this but not all of these people were involved in under age sex issues. I get the implication of being there, but as adults people can party however they want no matter how immoral. The big question is which ones were involved with under age people.
Currently a happy listless vessel and deplorable. #FDEMS TRUMP 2024.
Fight Fight Fight.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
captkirk said:

eric76 said:

aggiehawg said:

Quote:

For precisely what reasons should she recuse herself?

Note that there are rather specific guidelines on what constitutes a conflict of interest. It seems to me that they are mostly financial. Also, if she worked on their campaign or ran against them in her own campaign, it would be a conflict of interest.

Membership in a political party is not a conflict of interest.
But her father's potential involvement in the original NPA could be. Please note that Epstein's case directly involves the PCU.

If her father is within six degrees of being involved, you claim she would not be conflicted out?
Is she a member of the team prosecuting Epstein or a member of a team investigating her father? Are there allegations that her father was a fellow traveler of Epstein's and may become a target of an investigation of Epstein?
Uh...I suspect that the anti-corruption unit is involved because there is suspected corruption around the deal Epstein got. A deal her father likely had some involvement in. Why else would that group, which Comey's daughter works for, be involved?


What's this based on?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Is she a member of the team prosecuting Epstein or a member of a team investigating her father? Are there allegations that her father was a fellow traveler of Epstein's and may become a target of an investigation of Epstein?
You quite frequently go off of the rails on this forum but this is even extremely moronic for you.

Do better to follow what I actually post instead of going off on a tangent that I did not.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I've seen reports that both Mueller and Comey had some involvement. If those reports are untrue, so be it

He was an FBI informant

PA24
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
this is not only improper actions with the underage....evil doers, the unthinkable.

How deep will this rabbit hole go


eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

Is she a member of the team prosecuting Epstein or a member of a team investigating her father? Are there allegations that her father was a fellow traveler of Epstein's and may become a target of an investigation of Epstein?
You quite frequently go off of the rails on this forum but this is even extremely moronic for you.

Do better to follow what I actually post instead of going off on a tangent that I did not.
To many people here, if you are of the same political party as the target, then you shouldn't be investigating someone else of the same party as long as they are Democrats. And, of course, any Democrat investigating a Republican has a conflict of interest.

I, for one, take every claim on this forum about someone having a conflict of interest with a great deal of skepticism.

 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.