Okay, I'm not terribly well educated on the whole Epstein affair, for good reason. Prior to yesterday, I was certainly aware of him and his shenanigans, but it was always in the realm of conspiracy. Therefore, I wasn't sure what was true. Even when the Miami Herald article is chosen as a means of reference (I haven't read it yet), you come along and say it's anti-Trump, which makes me want to read it less. Although, it's not difficult to find anti-Trump writing in our supposed professional journalists product, but I will read it today.
Point being, I've never read the genisis of this case, old or new, Epstein's history, or how it pertains to Spygate, Clinton Foundation, Mueller, etc.. but I am learning.
So, now that I have a genuine interest, is there a decently respected article about this moral flea where I can educate myself? I do absolutely believe Epstein is the beneficiary of Executive help, whether it's Bush or Obama, along with may lawyers and judges.
Candidly, it kind of seems like Epstein is a J. Edgar Hoover. Hoover seemed to have dirt on everyone, so he was untouchable. Is Epstein similar?
Point being, I've never read the genisis of this case, old or new, Epstein's history, or how it pertains to Spygate, Clinton Foundation, Mueller, etc.. but I am learning.
So, now that I have a genuine interest, is there a decently respected article about this moral flea where I can educate myself? I do absolutely believe Epstein is the beneficiary of Executive help, whether it's Bush or Obama, along with may lawyers and judges.
Candidly, it kind of seems like Epstein is a J. Edgar Hoover. Hoover seemed to have dirt on everyone, so he was untouchable. Is Epstein similar?