Jeffrey Epstein Arrested For Sex Trafficking of Minors

458,339 Views | 2408 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by LoudestWHOOP!
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I don't know about that site either, but they're quoting the NYT and Vanity Fair in the piece you linked.
Aaannd? Don't trust them either.
biobioprof
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

I don't know about that site either, but they're quoting the NYT and Vanity Fair in the piece you linked.
Aaannd? Don't trust them either.
got me!
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
biobioprof said:

aggiehawg said:

Quote:

I don't know about that site either, but they're quoting the NYT and Vanity Fair in the piece you linked.
Aaannd? Don't trust them either.
got me!
I get that Epstein's mansion in New York is freaking huge but really? Contractors or workers wouldn't have some issues with that crap? And talk about them? Epstein doesn't strike me as a DIYer.

But reporting coming out of the Virgin Islands and the fears of those who have had contact with Epstein's island construction makes me wonder just how far he went to ensure silence from his employees.
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I would imagine there's a line item in the bid for "keeping your mouth shut."
Scruffy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
As someone who has worked in facilities maintenance, I can say they don't look for things; and if questionable things are seen, they don't see those either.

Only if obvious and dangerous law breaking was found would reporting it be considered.
On an island he owns and is probably worked on by either poor locals or specialty contractors flown out, they wouldn't "see" anything either.

Keep in mind, even in NYC, if there were contractors out to repair something they would go directly to what was broken and work on that. For a nice place such as he has/had, they might ease their heads around a corner or two just to see how the uber-rich lived but other than telling friends how crazy it was (even if they saw a dead hooker being eaten by naked children) they probably wouldn't say anything because:
1) they know someone with that much money is above the law.
2) they need work and that job paid. If they were to snitch on everything they saw they would lose work.
chevy con queso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Scruffy said:

As someone who has worked in facilities maintenance, I can say they don't look for things; and if questionable things are seen, they don't see those either.

Only if obvious and dangerous law breaking was found would reporting it be considered.
On an island he owns and is probably worked on by either poor locals or specialty contractors flown out, they wouldn't "see" anything either.

Keep in mind, even in NYC, if there were contractors out to repair something they would go directly to what was broken and work on that. For a nice place such as he has/had, they might ease their heads around a corner or two just to see how the uber-rich lived but other than telling friends how crazy it was (even if they saw a dead hooker being eaten by naked children) they probably wouldn't say anything because:
1) they know someone with that much money is above the law.
2) they need work and that job paid. If they were to snitch on everything they saw they would lose work.
I worked on a lot of expensive houses when I was younger. Most of the owners are super nice people and don't give you cause for concern, and why would they? They're paying you to fix or build something, not sacrifice a lamb at a satan worshipper's altar. I'd say your assessment is accurate, but we peeked around a few more corners than we probably should have. The rich have some sweet cribs.

But, anybody worried about a contractor just stumbling into their sex dungeon would have locked it or not hired anyone to come out until it could be secured anyway. I never saw anything super strange, and the most illegal thing we crossed was someone's drug parephenalia that they forgot to put back into the drawer (multiple owners on multiple occasions). No biggie. Their money spends as well as anyone elses. I ain't gonna tell you how to live your life.

I can imagine if you're the guy constructing the dungeon, you've probably got some bullsh*t reason on the plans for what it actually is, but again, if you don't see it happening, you are no witness. The specification for a load bearing beam that can handle the weight of a large several hundred pound "planter" is odd, but if you don't want to call it a sex swing mount on the plans, that's your prerogative. Weird doesn't mean illegal, and I'm not a cop.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Per the New York Times, Epstein's $56 million Manhattan home contained a number of features that, even if he weren't an alleged child molester, would easily be considered deeply weird. Among them: "A mural that Mr. Epstein had commissioned in recent years: a photorealistic prison scene that included barbed wire, corrections officers and a guard station, with Mr. Epstein portrayed in the middle."

Public relations specialist R. Couri Hay told the Times that he'd visited Epstein's home for a meeting and to see the mural three months ago. Hay recounted to the Times that Epstein said: "That's me, and I had this painted because there is always the possibility that could be me again."

The Upper East Side homewhose massive front doors police pried open with a crowbar during their weekend raidalso reportedly features a hallway festooned with fake eyes initially created for injured soldiers. And in a particularly grotesque detail given the allegations against him, he also decorated his home with "a life-size female doll hanging from a chandelier," according to the Times.

Even Epstein's chess set was enough to trigger major creep alarms. One visitor to the home told the newspaper the set featured "custom figurines dressed in underwear each piece, he noted, was modeled after one of his staffers."

During his initial court appearance on Monday, attorneys for Epsteinwho pleaded not guilty to the charges against himclaimed that because there had been no threats of violence or coercion against the girls Epstein is accused of assaulting, he could not be considered a rapist.
What about these folks?

Scruffy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
100% agree.
Ag In Ok
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Where are you hearing this?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag In Ok said:

Where are you hearing this?
Hearing what? Other than what I have posted links for and quotes from same????
Ag In Ok
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I was hoping you had a link or links to share - haven't been able to keep up with this thread.
No worries - will dig through it tonight
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Okay. Know it is a long thread but I don't bookmark all of my links to just vomit them out and post them upon command.
Cy_Tolliver
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm actually surprised Epstein hasn't been arkanicid'ed yet. Could be that he assured Clinton he had sufficient pics of others that the deep state would never come after him. Or maybe at this point the Clintons have no power anymore so, like the Clinton Foundation and no donations, they have no ability to off their opponents anymore.

I think at this point the DNC was hoping that Epstein could be used to get Trump and in that case, Clinton would be easily acceptable collateral damage. The tweets out there indicate those were the talking points in anticipation of that, and the DNC instructed CNN to attack any conservative loosely related to Trump for not apologizing for Epstein (I only know this because we have forced CNN watching at my gym) Now they don't know what to do since Trump had no part in this other than banning Epstein.
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I thought the bail hearing was today
oldarmy1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Madman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


There is a diagram on this site. Unfortunately it is in a format that will not imbed I believe. Anyway it has a bunch of claims about a bunch of the players. Its a drag and expand type thing.


Got it right maybe

https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2019/07/the-epstein-diagram.html
Madman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Now I understand. The diagram has expandable links. Thus my first error.
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Madman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bunk Moreland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Madman said:




Edit Nvmnd. Didn't see middle tweet.
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bunk Moreland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Did you even read that article? It's garbage and ends with "what do you think? Let us know!"

It insinuates most sexual encounters with underage girls happened on the plane. Where has that been cited? The person quoted provided no source and then it just linked quotes from articles discussing his arrest.

That's a bull**** aggregator site. Cmon man.
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's no worse than an MSNBC correspondent saying that Trump could be involved with "industrial strength pedophilia". That was on a network instead of a tweet.
Bunk Moreland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Agree completely. So you want to be as trashy as them?
TyHolden
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oldarmy1 said:


she might be pressured into sexual relations with bill...
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Madman said:


Maher should never wear a baseball cap again
atmtws
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Acosta resigning.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/12/labor-secretary-alex-acosta-is-resigning-as-pressure-mounts-from-jeffrey-epstein-case.html
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ATMTWS said:

Acosta resigning.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/12/labor-secretary-alex-acosta-is-resigning-as-pressure-mounts-from-jeffrey-epstein-case.html
Good.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sid Farkas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
captkirk said:

Madman said:


Maher should never wear a baseball cap again
Read the pathetic public tweets from a boorish elderly failure of a man
BenFiasco14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ATMTWS said:

Acosta resigning.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/12/labor-secretary-alex-acosta-is-resigning-as-pressure-mounts-from-jeffrey-epstein-case.html
CNN just creamed its treasonous pants.
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

During the 2006-2007 probe in South Florida, federal agents considered charging Epstein with witness tampering because he used some of his employees to try to intimidate victims so that they wouldn't cooperate with police, court records reviewed by the Herald show.

In one instance, a victim's father told Palm Beach police that he had been followed by someone and forced off the road. He wrote down the car's license plate number and police traced it to a private investigation company that had been hired by Epstein's legal team, the police report about the incident said.

Epstein's investigators also followed the then-Palm Beach police chief, Michael Reiter, and the lead detective in the case, Joe Recarey. Recarey said he was so concerned about the aggressive tactics Epstein was using that he would often switch vehicles in an attempt to throw them off.

"At some point it became like a cat-and-mouse game. I would stop at a red light and go. I knew they were there, and they knew I knew they were there. I was concerned about my kids because I didn't know if it was someone that they hired just out of prison that would hurt me or my family,'' Recarey told the Herald as part of its series on the case.

Recarey, who died shortly after he was interviewed by the Herald, said the victims, who were as young as 13, were scared to death of Epstein, and even more so because of the private investigators and defense lawyers who dug into every dark corner of their lives, and the lives of their brothers, sisters, parents and boyfriends.
Quote:

At least a dozen new victims have come forward to claim they were sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein even as the multimillionaire money manager tries to convince a federal judge to allow him to await a sex trafficking trial from the comfort of the same $77 million Manhattan mansion where he's accused of luring teenage girls into unwanted sex acts.

Following Epstein's arrest Saturday in New Jersey, four women have reached out to New York lawyer David Boies, and at least 10 other women have approached other lawyers who have represented dozens of Epstein's alleged victims in the past.
Much More Here
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:


Quote:

At least a dozen new victims have come forward to claim they were sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein even as the multimillionaire money manager tries to convince a federal judge to allow him to await a sex trafficking trial from the comfort of the same $77 million Manhattan mansion where he's accused of luring teenage girls into unwanted sex acts.

Following Epstein's arrest Saturday in New Jersey, four women have reached out to New York lawyer David Boies, and at least 10 other women have approached other lawyers who have represented dozens of Epstein's alleged victims in the past.
Much More Here
Sounds like the floodgates are opening. Not going to be a way to stop this locomotive. Everyone involved in this should be crapping their pants right about now
n_touch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm guessing that most of the big names will not have done anything here and it would have all be on the island where no witnesses or victims will be found.
K188Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I am guessing that the MSM will want this to end with Acosta resigning. Lets hope they cast a wider net on how Epstein got off so easy.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.