TexAgs91 said:

---

titan said:

---

PrimeTime09 said:

---

The next big reveal date is December 5....plan on your world changing!

Zzzzzzzzz

---

Is this a hard and fast prediction?

Whatever they are expecting, there is no chance of it happening under a Democratic House -- between them and MSM coordination and judicial activism, they will bury anything that gets going or stall it.

So that leaves only this month to settle this. Revelations after will have probably little impact. Is Dec 5 a major date?

---

I think the plans for December 5th have changed with Bush's funeral predictably set for that date.

---

30wedge said:

---

gomerschlep said:

---

Sick of getting banned for calling out those idiots over there. So here I am.

---

There are some real true believers over there! On the one hand, it is hard to believe they are college educated, on the other hand it is quite easy to see how multi-level marketers and Bernie Madoff are/were able to snag so many people.

I wonder if any hold a dual membership in the Flat Earth Society?

---

gomerschlep said:

---

So wait, I thought a tweet about some poodle had something to do with 41's assassination... Did I miss something? Or like every other day it was just some stupid bull*****...

---

gomerschlep said:

---

So wait, I thought a tweet about some poodle had something to do with 41's assassination... Did I miss something? Or like every other day it was just some stupid bull*****...

---

gomerschlep said:

---

So wait, I thought a tweet about some poodle had something to do with 41's assassination... Did I miss something? Or like every other day it was just some stupid bull*****...

---

garc said:

---

I don't care what you call it. We've taken down McCabe and there are more to come. Peter Traitor for sure and most likely Comey.

---

schmendeler said:

---

I feel like gullibility needs to be categorized as separate from intelligence. Because you have otherwise smart people that buy into something obviously dumb to the rest of us but they just lap it up. Maybe gullibility pairs with self righteousness and stubbornness.

---

schmendeler said:

---

I feel like gullibility needs to be categorized as separate from intelligence. Because you have otherwise smart people that buy into something obviously dumb to the rest of us but they just lap it up. Maybe gullibility pairs with self righteousness and stubbornness.

---

Duncan Idaho said:

---

I don't feel like wading through both of these threads.

But could someone give a current summary of q and the deep state? Just really looking for the who is going to be locked up when and for what.

---

IDAGG said:

---

I have no doubt that a few people in the Obama administration were surveilling the Trump campaign under the guise of "contacts with Russians" What I don't understand is why Hillary would have to attempt a soft coup during the 2016 campaign when it looked like she was going to beat Trump soundly up until the last week or two when it tightened somewhat. Remember, she was off campaigning in Arizona trying to make it a landslide for her.

ETA: I listened to the clip you attached. He has zero details other than going on for 4 minutes about a coup/countercoup. No details at all. None.

---

Duncan Idaho said:

---

Thanks. So is that the latest and the greatest?

---

Charpie said:

---

Sense. This makes NONE

---

IDAGG said:

---

I have no doubt that a few people in the Obama administration were surveilling the Trump campaign under the guise of "contacts with Russians" What I don't understand is why Hillary would have to attempt a soft coup during the 2016 campaign when it looked like she was going to beat Trump soundly up until the last week or two when it tightened somewhat. Remember, she was off campaigning in Arizona trying to make it a landslide for her.

---

TexAgs91 said:

---

IDAGG said:

---

I have no doubt that a few people in the Obama administration were surveilling the Trump campaign under the guise of "contacts with Russians" What I don't understand is why Hillary would have to attempt a soft coup during the 2016 campaign when it looked like she was going to beat Trump soundly up until the last week or two when it tightened somewhat. Remember, she was off campaigning in Arizona trying to make it a landslide for her.

---

You haven't heard about the FISA stuff? Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Loretta Lynch, Andrew McCabe, Christopher Steele, Bruce & Nellie Ohr, Andrew Weissmann? What about the 6 people with FBI-ties who tried to infiltrate the Trump campaign before any investigation started?

Must be a MSM viewer

---

Quote:

---

I have no doubt that a few people in the Obama administration were surveilling the Trump campaign under the guise of "contacts with Russians"

---

TexAgs91 said:

---

Duncan Idaho said:

---

I don't feel like wading through both of these threads.

But could someone give a current summary of q and the deep state? Just really looking for the who is going to be locked up when and for what.

---

According to this guy


Hillary was trying to attempt a soft coup during the 2016 election. There is now overwhelming evidence of this. Several members of the intelligence community responded with a counter-coup. Watch the video. He explains it. And he's not a conspiracy theory whackjob.

Q is apparently someone or multiple people who are part of this counter-coup with high level clearance and access to the president who are trying to educate (red pill) the public about what has been going on. Google Q proofs if you want to see what has been confirmed about what Q has been saying.

---

IDAGG said:

---

TexAgs91 said:

---

IDAGG said:

---

I have no doubt that a few people in the Obama administration were surveilling the Trump campaign under the guise of "contacts with Russians" What I don't understand is why Hillary would have to attempt a soft coup during the 2016 campaign when it looked like she was going to beat Trump soundly up until the last week or two when it tightened somewhat. Remember, she was off campaigning in Arizona trying to make it a landslide for her.

---

You haven't heard about the FISA stuff? Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Loretta Lynch, Andrew McCabe, Christopher Steele, Bruce & Nellie Ohr, Andrew Weissmann? What about the 6 people with FBI-ties who tried to infiltrate the Trump campaign before any investigation started?

Must be a MSM viewer

---

Hello? It's right in my comment you quoted above. I'll copy it below for your convenience:

Quote:

---

I have no doubt that a few people in the Obama administration were surveilling the Trump campaign under the guise of "contacts with Russians"

---

They surveilled with bogus FISA warrants. So yes, I am very familiar with it.

---

TexAgs91 said:

---

Duncan Idaho said:

---

Thanks. So is that the latest and the greatest?

---

No, that's just the background. It's been going on for over a year, so there's a lot to it. It should help give you some frame of reference for anything you read about Q. Try doing some searches like I suggested as a start and/or start perusing through the Q Anon thread.

---

TexAgs91 said:

---

Duncan Idaho said:

---

I don't feel like wading through both of these threads.

But could someone give a current summary of q and the deep state? Just really looking for the who is going to be locked up when and for what.

---

According to this guy


Hillary was trying to attempt a soft coup during the 2016 election. There is now overwhelming evidence of this. Several members of the intelligence community responded with a counter-coup. Watch the video. He explains it. And he's not a conspiracy theory whackjob.

Q is apparently someone or multiple people who are part of this counter-coup with high level clearance and access to the president who are trying to educate (red pill) the public about what has been going on. Google Q proofs if you want to see what has been confirmed about what Q has been saying.

---

Duncan Idaho said:

---

TexAgs91 said:

---

Duncan Idaho said:

---

Thanks. So is that the latest and the greatest?

---

No, that's just the background. It's been going on for over a year, so there's a lot to it. It should help give you some frame of reference for anything you read about Q. Try doing some searches like I suggested as a start and/or start perusing through the Q Anon thread.

---

You are missing the point. I don't want to have to spend the time researching this. I just want someone to lay out the current theory. Basically a s of this week, what is the storm and when is it coming?

---

TexAgs91 said:

---

Duncan Idaho said:

---

TexAgs91 said:

---

Duncan Idaho said:

---

Thanks. So is that the latest and the greatest?

---

No, that's just the background. It's been going on for over a year, so there's a lot to it. It should help give you some frame of reference for anything you read about Q. Try doing some searches like I suggested as a start and/or start perusing through the Q Anon thread.

---

You are missing the point. I don't want to have to spend the time researching this. I just want someone to lay out the current theory. Basically a s of this week, what is the storm and when is it coming?

---

I see. Well my research rate is 40$/hr. Let me know if you're interested.

---