[You have been around long enough to know that is over the line. -Staff]
It could have been as you describe, but too many like the OP and others here don't want to explain why they disagree, just ridicule those that agree.Champ Bailey said:
The correct way to handle it would be to let posters agree or disagree with Q, and explain why all on one thread. Some posters like having their own sandbox though, and the moderation on this board has given it to them. So a counter thread seems appropriate.
I disagree with personally calling posters out from other threads though. Itvseems kind of vindictive. Although it's no worse than any 2 teas comment or the posters who have posts from other people in their signatures.
And stuff like this leads to bans and deletions. I think it's funny and should stay up longer.digital_ag said:
This thread took a... turn.
blindey said:Maybe it started with a dedicated base and -- perhaps surprisingly -- grew. People are willing to buy into what they want to hear and what they think they want to hear.Secolobo said:
I don't think it's just the voting base...
https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=qanon
Everyone is looking for an explanation of the world around them and Q certainly offers one.
flashplayer said:
OP just stated what a lot of us who've ventured into that thread and are actually curious about what information is coming out (if nothing else for entertainment purposes) have been thinking the whole time.
I've gone into that thread several times and raised some counterpoints or questioned peoples conclusions, and it turns into a lynch mob of Q disciples.
I am also not naive and believe that a good many people involved in government are absolute slime and evil, and I do think there was a conspiracy by the FBI / Dept of justice to let HRC off the hook for her crimes and probably to spy on Trump and his campaign. And I am sure that it's possible at least some of the specific accusations made by whoever the Q anon character is are legitimately accurate.
But some of the crap they spew on that thread is absolute nonsense and I can't believe they get away with ridiculing people who question some of the mental gymnastics.
marble rye said:
Also OP needs a few of these.
MooreTrucker said:It could have been as you describe, but too many like the OP and others here don't want to explain why they disagree, just ridicule those that agree.Champ Bailey said:
The correct way to handle it would be to let posters agree or disagree with Q, and explain why all on one thread. Some posters like having their own sandbox though, and the moderation on this board has given it to them. So a counter thread seems appropriate.
I disagree with personally calling posters out from other threads though. Itvseems kind of vindictive. Although it's no worse than any 2 teas comment or the posters who have posts from other people in their signatures.
I don't think marble rye is gayPooDoo said:marble rye said:
Also OP needs a few of these.
Your wife doesn't get mad when you post pictures of her legs on TexAgs?
Good. I find myself in exactly the same place.flashplayer said:
I am also not naive and believe that a good many people involved in government are absolute slime and evil, and I do think there was a conspiracy by the FBI / Dept of justice to let HRC off the hook for her crimes and probably to spy on Trump and his campaign. And I am sure that it's possible at least some of the specific accusations made by whoever the Q anon character is are legitimately accurate.
marble rye said:
Also OP needs a few of these.
It seems that you just don't understand what is actually going on in that thread. There is a lot of skepticism, but it is more for reading than arguing. Not sure why that pisses you off so much.PrimeTime09 said:flashplayer said:
OP just stated what a lot of us who've ventured into that thread and are actually curious about what information is coming out (if nothing else for entertainment purposes) have been thinking the whole time.
I've gone into that thread several times and raised some counterpoints or questioned peoples conclusions, and it turns into a lynch mob of Q disciples.
I am also not naive and believe that a good many people involved in government are absolute slime and evil, and I do think there was a conspiracy by the FBI / Dept of justice to let HRC off the hook for her crimes and probably to spy on Trump and his campaign. And I am sure that it's possible at least some of the specific accusations made by whoever the Q anon character is are legitimately accurate.
But some of the crap they spew on that thread is absolute nonsense and I can't believe they get away with ridiculing people who question some of the mental gymnastics.
Well said. I'm by no means naive and I don't trust a lot of what is fed to us by our government and main stream media. What gets me is that those guys (most of them) feel that if you can't prove something to be false, it's absolute gospel unless it doesn't fit into the fantasy they want to believe.
Ellis Wyatt said:It seems that you just don't understand what is actually going on in that thread. There is a lot of skepticism, but it is more for reading than arguing. Not sure why that pisses you off so much.PrimeTime09 said:flashplayer said:
OP just stated what a lot of us who've ventured into that thread and are actually curious about what information is coming out (if nothing else for entertainment purposes) have been thinking the whole time.
I've gone into that thread several times and raised some counterpoints or questioned peoples conclusions, and it turns into a lynch mob of Q disciples.
I am also not naive and believe that a good many people involved in government are absolute slime and evil, and I do think there was a conspiracy by the FBI / Dept of justice to let HRC off the hook for her crimes and probably to spy on Trump and his campaign. And I am sure that it's possible at least some of the specific accusations made by whoever the Q anon character is are legitimately accurate.
But some of the crap they spew on that thread is absolute nonsense and I can't believe they get away with ridiculing people who question some of the mental gymnastics.
Well said. I'm by no means naive and I don't trust a lot of what is fed to us by our government and main stream media. What gets me is that those guys (most of them) feel that if you can't prove something to be false, it's absolute gospel unless it doesn't fit into the fantasy they want to believe.
It is already a really long thread that is only made longer by the ridiculous tangential things people post because they think other people are looney for following Q. Especially considering that probably more than half the regulars on that thread don't necessarily believe a lot or any of the Q posts.
It's not really difficult.
I don't ridicule anyone, and I don't worship Q. I do find his stuff fascinating and think some of that stuff hits to close to just be coincidence. Of course, a lot of that has to do with the HOPE that it's actually true and that bad people are about to get some of what they deserve. I've also said many times that I don't think when it's all said and done that it will matter much to REALLY clean things up.PrimeTime09 said:MooreTrucker said:
It could have been as you describe, but too many like the OP and others here don't want to explain why they disagree, just ridicule those that agree.
I'm just a random internet poster like q. If anything, you should have to prove your w followers' nonsense posts. Please explain why you disagree with me instead of ridiculing logical people who don't fall in line with your ludacris ideas.
Redstone said:
Really? Why have I been getting so few stars across these 2 threads?
MooreTrucker said:I don't ridicule anyone, and I don't worship Q. I do find his stuff fascinating and think some of that stuff hits to close to just be coincidence. Of course, a lot of that has to do with the HOPE that it's actually true and that bad people are about to get some of what they deserve. I've also said many times that I don't think when it's all said and done that it will matter much to REALLY clean things up.PrimeTime09 said:MooreTrucker said:
It could have been as you describe, but too many like the OP and others here don't want to explain why they disagree, just ridicule those that agree.
I'm just a random internet poster like q. If anything, you should have to prove your w followers' nonsense posts. Please explain why you disagree with me instead of ridiculing logical people who don't fall in line with your ludacris ideas.
jefe95 said:
First day back from a ban and so tempted to tee off on primetime.
jefe95 said:
Now if he was spitting truth there wouldn't be a need to tee off now would there?