Safe space to critique the q worshippers

211,017 Views | 1854 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by hbtheduce
SquirrellyDan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I've been banned half a dozen times for questioning the nonsense on the q thread, so I thought I'd create a thread for those who, like me, are bewildered that college educated people can buy into this stuff.

Today, one of the main ringleaders (with an ag tag) said that he believes the Yanni /Laurel thing that went viral is actually a code word for crazies to start acting crazy, which is linked to the Santa Fe shooting.

I would find the whole thing amusing if these people, many of them ags, didn't actually believe this stuff. They also believe the world is a run by a bunch of devil worshipping pedophiles, and if you don't play along you are a liberal sheep. I'm no liberal, these guys do give conservatives a bad name, however.

Ok rant over.
SeattleAgJr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PrimeTime09 said:

I've been banned half a dozen times for questioning the nonsense on the q thread, so I thought I'd create a thread for those who, like me, are bewildered that college educated people can buy into this stuff.

Today, one of the main ringleaders (with an ag tag) said that he believes the Yanni /Laurel thing that went viral is actually a code word for crazies to start acting crazy, which is linked to the Santa Fe shooting.

I would find the whole thing amusing if these people, many of them ags, didn't actually believe this stuff. They also believe the world is a run by a bunch of devil worshipping pedophiles, and if you don't play along you are a liberal sheep. I'm no liberal, these guys do give conservatives a bad name, however.

Ok rant over.
Qonservatives
biobioprof
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SeattleAgJr said:

PrimeTime09 said:

I've been banned half a dozen times for questioning the nonsense on the q thread, so I thought I'd create a thread for those who, like me, are bewildered that college educated people can buy into this stuff.

Today, one of the main ringleaders (with an ag tag) said that he believes the Yanni /Laurel thing that went viral is actually a code word for crazies to start acting crazy, which is linked to the Santa Fe shooting.

I would find the whole thing amusing if these people, many of them ags, didn't actually believe this stuff. They also believe the world is a run by a bunch of devil worshipping pedophiles, and if you don't play along you are a liberal sheep. I'm no liberal, these guys do give conservatives a bad name, however.

Ok rant over.
Qonservatives
Lib Bashers Going to Q for Truth = LBGQT?
digital_ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pretty tame as far as rants go.

Posting here with the disclaimer that certain individuals, also with ag tags, apparently can't comprehend that most (as in 95%+) of the people in that thread entertain Q with a heavy dose of skepticism, and this message has specifically been communicated many, many times in the thread itself.

Being able to entertain a thought, idea, etc without fully accepting* it as belief didn't strike me as a particularly mentally intensive practice but I guess some people need things spelled out in black and white.
suburban cowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We all have the right to believe what we want to believe. You were probably banned for derailing their discussion.

I don't have the truth, but I do know I'm not naive enough to believe our government is honest and that there aren't very powerful people behind the scenes pulling strings every day.

Q seems to have called several shots accurately so even if it is some internet troll they are doing one hell of an entertaining job.
cr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You are college educated and you believe you were banned for simply "questioning the nonsense"?

Lol

Enjoy your safe space.
White Liberals=The Worst
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PrimeTime09 said:

I've been banned half a dozen times for questioning the nonsense on the q thread, so I thought I'd create a thread for those who, like me, are bewildered that college educated people can buy into this stuff.

Today, one of the main ringleaders (with an ag tag) said that he believes the Yanni /Laurel thing that went viral is actually a code word for crazies to start acting crazy, which is linked to the Santa Fe shooting.

I would find the whole thing amusing if these people, many of them ags, didn't actually believe this stuff. They also believe the world is a run by a bunch of devil worshipping pedophiles, and if you don't play along you are a liberal sheep. I'm no liberal, these guys do give conservatives a bad name, however.

Ok rant over.
YAAAAAWN...Not nearly as crazy as tens of millions of liberals believing socialism will work "this time".
InnerCityAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SquirrellyDan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
IceCream14 said:

We all have the right to believe what we want to believe. You were probably banned for derailing their discussion.

I don't have the truth, but I do know I'm not naive enough to believe our government is honest and that there aren't very powerful people behind the scenes pulling strings every day.

Q seems to have called several shots accurately so even if it is some internet troll they are doing one hell of an entertaining job.


I'm not saying our government is honest and that there aren't shady things going on. But when "q" says "watch out. Something is happening," and today people on that thread says that quote predicted Sante Fe and a plane crash in Cuba, it's not naive to think they're nuts.
White Liberals=The Worst
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'll be honest...I am a big skeptic, but Q is definitely some type of well connected insider. He got the POTUS to say "tippy top" in an Easter speech. There have been other indicators as well. It lends to his credibility.
oldarmy1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You need another ban.


/sarcasm
Wyoming Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Conspiracy theories are proved all the time. I find it hard to believe that college educated people so quickly dismiss things when the government has been doing ****ed up **** for generations.
BQ78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hey, Nostredamus had some educated adherents in his day too. Doesn't mean his Prophesies weren't just cryptic garbage just like this Q stuff.
cr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
mesocosm said:

PrimeTime09 said:

I've been banned half a dozen times for questioning the nonsense on the q thread, so I thought I'd create a thread for those who, like me, are bewildered that college educated people can buy into this stuff.

Today, one of the main ringleaders (with an ag tag) said that he believes the Yanni /Laurel thing that went viral is actually a code word for crazies to start acting crazy, which is linked to the Santa Fe shooting.

I would find the whole thing amusing if these people, many of them ags, didn't actually believe this stuff. They also believe the world is a run by a bunch of devil worshipping pedophiles, and if you don't play along you are a liberal sheep. I'm no liberal, these guys do give conservatives a bad name, however.

Ok rant over.


TexAgs has become dominated by conspiracy theory loons. Case in point the widespread belief on this board in the pro Trump, anti-FBI, deep state garbage


Or the widespread belief that Trump colluded with the Russians.

I don't care what you call it. We've taken down McCabe and there are more to come. Peter Traitor for sure and most likely Comey.

Enjoy the ride.
BQ78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So do you believe some person well connected to the Trump administration either wanted the Santa Fe shooting to occur or did nothing to prevent it?
Bulldog73
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
mesocosm said:

PrimeTime09 said:

I've been banned half a dozen times for questioning the nonsense on the q thread, so I thought I'd create a thread for those who, like me, are bewildered that college educated people can buy into this stuff.

Today, one of the main ringleaders (with an ag tag) said that he believes the Yanni /Laurel thing that went viral is actually a code word for crazies to start acting crazy, which is linked to the Santa Fe shooting.

I would find the whole thing amusing if these people, many of them ags, didn't actually believe this stuff. They also believe the world is a run by a bunch of devil worshipping pedophiles, and if you don't play along you are a liberal sheep. I'm no liberal, these guys do give conservatives a bad name, however.

Ok rant over.


TexAgs has become dominated by conspiracy theory loons. Case in point the widespread belief on this board in the pro Trump, anti-FBI, deep state garbage
Getting up every day is starting to become tiresome, isn't it?
Pro Sandy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wycliffe_03 said:

I'll be honest...I am a big skeptic, but Q is definitely some type of well connected insider. He got the POTUS to say "tippy top" in an Easter speech. There have been other indicators as well. It lends to his credibility.
Trump says tippy top quite often. Not very impressive clue.
ThunderCougarFalconBird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think that it is entirely more plausible that Q is either a really talented troll or a well-place political advertisement directed at a specific portion of Trump's voter base. Think about it like this: some PAC saw the 4ch/8ch crowd harassing that one nerd with the "He will not divide us" flag and decided to tap into their loyalties. From there, its not too hard to run a cold reading type scam (see the South Park episode on John Edward here) with information that appears specific enough to be "connected" but vague enough to be impossible to disprove.

Fun to follow but unlikely to be real.
Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Q is this board's Rojo.

Except he doesn't send beer when even his extremely vague statements are proven wrong.
Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Also, anyone who thinks the laurel or yanny thing is a code word to instigate school shootings is a grade a moron
Bulldog73
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
mesocosm said:

Bulldog73 said:

mesocosm said:

PrimeTime09 said:

I've been banned half a dozen times for questioning the nonsense on the q thread, so I thought I'd create a thread for those who, like me, are bewildered that college educated people can buy into this stuff.

Today, one of the main ringleaders (with an ag tag) said that he believes the Yanni /Laurel thing that went viral is actually a code word for crazies to start acting crazy, which is linked to the Santa Fe shooting.

I would find the whole thing amusing if these people, many of them ags, didn't actually believe this stuff. They also believe the world is a run by a bunch of devil worshipping pedophiles, and if you don't play along you are a liberal sheep. I'm no liberal, these guys do give conservatives a bad name, however.

Ok rant over.


TexAgs has become dominated by conspiracy theory loons. Case in point the widespread belief on this board in the pro Trump, anti-FBI, deep state garbage
Getting up every day is starting to become tiresome, isn't it?


Sorry that getting up everyday is so tough for you.
Not a bit. I enjoy getting up every day and seeing the newest facts exposing the filth in Washington and the desperation of the Deep State and its toadies. I was just sympathizing for you as your fantasy world crumbles bit by bit.
MaroonStain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Lib Bashers Going to Q for Truth = LBGQT?


Post of the Month! 500 internet points and 61 blue stars.
MASAXET
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I never look at the Q thread, but the main Mueller thread is pretty damn sad in its own right. Very poor excuses for legal "analysis" going on, even from posters that I otherwise had healthy intellectual respect for, which has led to a feeding frenzy of predictions. Waaay too much selection bias and cognitive dissonance.
IDAGG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
blindey said:

I think that it is entirely more plausible that Q is either a really talented troll or a well-place political advertisement directed at a specific portion of Trump's voter base. Think about it like this: some PAC saw the 4ch/8ch crowd harassing that one nerd with the "He will not divide us" flag and decided to tap into their loyalties. From there, its not too hard to run a cold reading type scam
That actually is a decent theory.
White Liberals=The Worst
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BQ78 said:

So do you believe some person well connected to the Trump administration either wanted the Santa Fe shooting to occur or did nothing to prevent it?
No, did Q state that??? I don't even know what Q is saying most of the time. All I am saying is that he is a confirmed insider. He got the POTUS to say something ridiculous in a speech. No way "tippy-top" was a coincidence.

He could be an insider manipulating us or toying with us...that's a possibility. But he definitely has access to crazy information and people who are very high up.
Bobcat06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Champ Bailey said:

Also, anyone who thinks the laurel or yanny thing is a code word to instigate school shootings is a grade a moron


Link please?

There's plenty to be critical about Q for without making up strawman attacks.
White Liberals=The Worst
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pro Sandy said:

Wycliffe_03 said:

I'll be honest...I am a big skeptic, but Q is definitely some type of well connected insider. He got the POTUS to say "tippy top" in an Easter speech. There have been other indicators as well. It lends to his credibility.
Trump says tippy top quite often. Not very impressive clue.
You obviously didn't follow this. The timing was unquestionable.
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PrimeTime09 said:

IceCream14 said:

We all have the right to believe what we want to believe. You were probably banned for derailing their discussion.

I don't have the truth, but I do know I'm not naive enough to believe our government is honest and that there aren't very powerful people behind the scenes pulling strings every day.

Q seems to have called several shots accurately so even if it is some internet troll they are doing one hell of an entertaining job.


I'm not saying our government is honest and that there aren't shady things going on. But when "q" says "watch out. Something is happening," and today people on that thread says that quote predicted Sante Fe and a plane crash in Cuba, it's not naive to think they're nuts.
When someone says "Something is happening", there is always going to be something happening. That doesn't mean that the person saying it had any inside information about whatever did happen.

It's pretty easy to make a prediction if there are people ready to bend over backwards to believe it. Every year, plenty of charlatans make lots of predictions for the New Year and some actually come true. That doesn't mean that they were doing anything but providing an uninformed opinion.
Pro Sandy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wycliffe_03 said:

Pro Sandy said:

Wycliffe_03 said:

I'll be honest...I am a big skeptic, but Q is definitely some type of well connected insider. He got the POTUS to say "tippy top" in an Easter speech. There have been other indicators as well. It lends to his credibility.
Trump says tippy top quite often. Not very impressive clue.
You obviously didn't follow this. The timing was unquestionable.
I tend to only follow conspiracy theories on coast to coast. George Noory hasnt brought it up.

I just don't find it impressive that it was predicted that trump would use a phrase he often uses.
Secolobo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't think it's just the voting base...

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=qanon

Can I go to sleep Looch?
chach
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Today, one of the main ringleaders (with an ag tag) said that he believes the Yanni /Laurel thing that went viral is actually a code word for crazies to start acting crazy, which is linked to the Santa Fe shooting.
He is more than capable of defending himself but he didn't say he believed it, he said he was wondering about it, but go ahead and make up your own story.

Why is it so hard to believe that people is the highest levels of government and it's agencies are so seriously corrupt and immoral?

Why is it so hard to believe that so many of them are compromised in some way or another.

We've lived through years of saying to ourselves "What the **** is wrong with these people, that's not what we elected them to do." Now it's coming to light and the answers are starring us in the face. The information we've learned explains a lot in regards to why our politicians go against everything we know is right.

But whatever, I'll leave your safe space so you can laugh and point your finger like a school kid on the playground, PrimeTime right. Ha!

(Oh yeah, I'm taking my ag tag with me.)



eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wycliffe_03 said:

BQ78 said:

So do you believe some person well connected to the Trump administration either wanted the Santa Fe shooting to occur or did nothing to prevent it?
No, did Q state that??? I don't even know what Q is saying most of the time. All I am saying is that he is a confirmed insider. He got the POTUS to say something ridiculous in a speech. No way "tippy-top" was a coincidence.

He could be an insider manipulating us or toying with us...that's a possibility. But he definitely has access to crazy information and people who are very high up.
Maybe he's MF Barnes.
Pro Sandy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wycliffe_03 said:

Pro Sandy said:

Wycliffe_03 said:

I'll be honest...I am a big skeptic, but Q is definitely some type of well connected insider. He got the POTUS to say "tippy top" in an Easter speech. There have been other indicators as well. It lends to his credibility.
Trump says tippy top quite often. Not very impressive clue.
You obviously didn't follow this. The timing was unquestionable.
so here is what I find

https://www.theburningplatform.com/2018/04/04/q-is-the-tip-top-tippy-top-of-psyops/

It was requested, didn't happen, and then q takes credit months later when it happens after the fact. What am I missing?
Ervin Burrell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
chach said:

Quote:

Today, one of the main ringleaders (with an ag tag) said that he believes the Yanni /Laurel thing that went viral is actually a code word for crazies to start acting crazy, which is linked to the Santa Fe shooting.

Why is it so hard to believe that people is the highest levels of government and it's agencies are so seriously corrupt and immoral?



That's not hard to believe at all. That doesn't mean the drivel Q is spewing is anywhere near accurate or true.
stetson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You get triggered, bro? I don't know how much of what he drops is speculation versus fact, but he's racked up a pretty good track record if it's speculation and he is definitely is close to Trump. Just off the top of my head:
  • Saudi Arabia
  • National Guard deployment
  • North Korea
  • Tip Top
  • Pope
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.