Between September 2012 and March 2013 the following letter was sent to the leadership of Texas A&M. I don't know how any Aggie can read this letter in its entirety and decide that the beveled logo is our very best option as our primary mark. Our logo is vitally important – it is the fundamental building block of our branding and marketing program. The Classic Block aTm captures the essence of our image in its simplest and purest form. Continuing to use the beveled logo doesn't make it less flawed or any more acceptable. Names and contact information in this letter have been obscured for privacy; the content is what is most important. For cell phone users the letter will probably be easier to read here... http://nobevel.com Anyone who wants the pdf version of this letter (with functioning links) send me a PM with your email address or email me at greg@marooned.biz.
Obviously I realize that I am about to get crucified by the Bevel Huggers on this forum. I took a ton of criticism back in June of 2010 when I was part of a very small group that began the grass roots campaign for our move to the SEC. In the early months of the SECede movement I was ridiculed beyond belief for thinking that Texas A&M would even get an invitation to the SEC. Even if we did get an invitation we would not be allowed to leave, etc., etc., etc... I was called names in PMs and emails that I can't repeat on this forum.
I think that intelligent debate on TexAgs is what we should all strive for. I've never understood how disagreements turn into criticism and outright ugliness. I know there are Bevel Huggers here, but at least tell me what is so great about the Bevel. I honestly don't understand why some of you like the Bevel. Don't just say that it is awesome and then criticize the anti-bevel crowd. This is not a sound argument for keeping the Bevel.
My argument starts here...
For those having issues reading some of the finer print the letter is displayed in a larger format at http://nobevel.com. You can also download the letter there as well.http://nobevel.com/LetterToLeadership.pdf
[This message has been edited by Old Main (edited 6/15/2013 8:37p).]
Obviously I realize that I am about to get crucified by the Bevel Huggers on this forum. I took a ton of criticism back in June of 2010 when I was part of a very small group that began the grass roots campaign for our move to the SEC. In the early months of the SECede movement I was ridiculed beyond belief for thinking that Texas A&M would even get an invitation to the SEC. Even if we did get an invitation we would not be allowed to leave, etc., etc., etc... I was called names in PMs and emails that I can't repeat on this forum.
I think that intelligent debate on TexAgs is what we should all strive for. I've never understood how disagreements turn into criticism and outright ugliness. I know there are Bevel Huggers here, but at least tell me what is so great about the Bevel. I honestly don't understand why some of you like the Bevel. Don't just say that it is awesome and then criticize the anti-bevel crowd. This is not a sound argument for keeping the Bevel.
My argument starts here...
For those having issues reading some of the finer print the letter is displayed in a larger format at http://nobevel.com. You can also download the letter there as well.http://nobevel.com/LetterToLeadership.pdf
[This message has been edited by Old Main (edited 6/15/2013 8:37p).]