I like how Old Main bumps his stupid thread every week once it's forgotten. You should bevel your ego.
quote:
It is just the latest of numerous examples of thye bevel not working as well as the traditional solid logo.
If perfectlty made, which is very rare, the bevel can actually look ok. 95% of the time, however, the solid logo works best.
quote:
Staff:
Lock this thread
quote:
Seems that over the last several pages, most of the replies (and most of the bumps) are from those 2 or 3 people who claim to like the bevel.
Of course, most of the bumps have nothing to do with discussion of our flawed logo. They are to dogpile on the O.P.
quote:quote:quote:
Old main,
I wasnt making fun of you. You literally said you know what is good for the university. You are vain, arrogant, and delusional.
I also love that you think you had ANYTHING to do with the SEC.
Youre your own #1 fan.
Ragnar is owning this thread, and everyone has their heads too far up their asses to realize it.
I one called Old Main "annoyingly militant" and received quite the scolding for it, so watch out
[This message has been edited by Elephantrider (edited 4/13/2013 11:29p).]
No, Ragnar is doing what he does, but this time he isn't making much sense. The fact that old main stated his opinion that the bevel is bad for our image, made a solid case to defend his opinion, doesn't make him arrogant at all. It means he has a well reasoned opinion. And whether you agree with his opinion or not, that doesn't change the fact that it's well reasoned.
I have heard Ragnar state similar things regarding tax law, intellectual property rights, gun laws, and puppies. They were all well reasoned opinions about how to run our country. That doesn't make him arrogant or delusional. However, when it comes to an opinion he doesn't share, he takes a hard line approach and falls into the first trap of an emotional response to a well reasoned, logical position: ad hominem.
By Ragnars own admission, Old Main's opinion is just that. I find it quite disturbing, however, that he decides to attack old main personally because of an opinion.
Make an argument AGAINST the block T or FOR the bevel. Frankly speaking, Old Mains arrogance or delusion is really not in question.
He stated his opinion and backed it up. It's important enough to him to put the time and effort into his defense of his opinion. The least you guys could do is refute his opinion, not belittle him as a person.
Oh, and Ragnar, calling someone arrogant and delusional is generally accepted as an insult and a personal attack, even if you tell him it's not.
If I walked up to you and punched you in the nose and then said, I didn't do it to hurt your nose, that doesn't change the fact that your nose is probably bleeding and painful.
Have a good evening gentlemen.
[This message has been edited by Lateralus ag (edited 4/13/2013 11:42p).]
quote:
Here comes Lat to save the day
[This message has been edited by Elephantrider (edited 6/11/2013 9:02p).]
quote:
And whether you agree with his opinion or not, that doesn't change the fact that it's well reasoned
quote:
Oh, and Ragnar, calling someone arrogant and delusional is generally accepted as an insult and a personal attack, even if you tell him it's not. .
quote:
If I walked up to you and punched you in the nose and then said, I didn't do it to hurt your nose, that doesn't change the fact that your nose is probably bleeding and painful.