I'm more worried about how it will influence JG's gameplan and tendency to be butt-puckered on the road.gigem1223 said:
Anyone worried about Dak's shoulder Sunday?
I'm more worried about how it will influence JG's gameplan and tendency to be butt-puckered on the road.gigem1223 said:
Anyone worried about Dak's shoulder Sunday?
And the Cowboys don't have a traditional structure for a GM either.diehard03 said:Quote:
But you're assuming Payton wants to come in and run player personnel. NO has a GM.
Payton has a history with the Jones'. He may deep down not want to work for them as their HC, but if JJ could work with Bill Parcells, I think it's silly to think he couldn't work with Payton.
What about Sean Payton leads you to believe that he's going to give up roster control just to coach the Cowboys?
Loomis isn't a GM in the traditional sense.
Quote:
And the Cowboys don't have a traditional structure for a GM either.
Niether of us know if Payton has any desire to work for the Cowboys....The only point I'm trying to make is that I think JJ would be flexible in his approach if he thought it would bring Payton because he desperately wants that ring before his time is up.
Quote:
JG currently has a tremendous amount of input on the roster. If there were any chance to get Peyton then "control" would not be an issue.
diehard03 said:Quote:
JG currently has a tremendous amount of input on the roster. If there were any chance to get Peyton then "control" would not be an issue.
Lol. The man has literally said publicly that he picks the groceries and he makes all the final decisions on everything. "Control", would exactly be the issue.
Ag Natural said:diehard03 said:Quote:
JG currently has a tremendous amount of input on the roster. If there were any chance to get Peyton then "control" would not be an issue.
Lol. The man has literally said publicly that he picks the groceries and he makes all the final decisions on everything. "Control", would exactly be the issue.
Jerry says publicly that it's all on him. That is true. But you can tell from insider intel that the way decisions are made is very collaborative. I've read that JG has the most impactful voice in the room. I honestly think Jerry makes himself the focal point to try and take heat off the coaches.
expresswrittenconsent said:Ag Natural said:diehard03 said:Quote:
JG currently has a tremendous amount of input on the roster. If there were any chance to get Peyton then "control" would not be an issue.
Lol. The man has literally said publicly that he picks the groceries and he makes all the final decisions on everything. "Control", would exactly be the issue.
Jerry says publicly that it's all on him. That is true. But you can tell from insider intel that the way decisions are made is very collaborative. I've read that JG has the most impactful voice in the room. I honestly think Jerry makes himself the focal point to try and take heat off the coaches.
JG - we are going to look at new kickers this week.
Jerry - no we arent.
That does seem collaborative.
2 weeks later and after publicly cutting the legs from the coach. Funny that you equate them. Most coaches wouldnt.Ag Natural said:expresswrittenconsent said:Ag Natural said:diehard03 said:Quote:
JG currently has a tremendous amount of input on the roster. If there were any chance to get Peyton then "control" would not be an issue.
Lol. The man has literally said publicly that he picks the groceries and he makes all the final decisions on everything. "Control", would exactly be the issue.
Jerry says publicly that it's all on him. That is true. But you can tell from insider intel that the way decisions are made is very collaborative. I've read that JG has the most impactful voice in the room. I honestly think Jerry makes himself the focal point to try and take heat off the coaches.
JG - we are going to look at new kickers this week.
Jerry - no we arent.
That does seem collaborative.
And they looked at kickers. So who really knows what is going on in this scenario? Yeah it's the coach
Quote:
Jerry says publicly that it's all on him. That is true. But you can tell from insider intel that the way decisions are made is very collaborative. I've read that JG has the most impactful voice in the room. I honestly think Jerry makes himself the focal point to try and take heat off the coaches.
expresswrittenconsent said:2 weeks later and after publicly cutting the legs from the coach. Funny that you equate them. Most coaches wouldnt.Ag Natural said:expresswrittenconsent said:Ag Natural said:diehard03 said:Quote:
JG currently has a tremendous amount of input on the roster. If there were any chance to get Peyton then "control" would not be an issue.
Lol. The man has literally said publicly that he picks the groceries and he makes all the final decisions on everything. "Control", would exactly be the issue.
Jerry says publicly that it's all on him. That is true. But you can tell from insider intel that the way decisions are made is very collaborative. I've read that JG has the most impactful voice in the room. I honestly think Jerry makes himself the focal point to try and take heat off the coaches.
JG - we are going to look at new kickers this week.
Jerry - no we arent.
That does seem collaborative.
And they looked at kickers. So who really knows what is going on in this scenario? Yeah it's the coach
Quote:
I firmly believe the main reason Jerry has been so slow to move on from Garrett is the pure disruption it would cause.
diehard03 said:Quote:
I firmly believe the main reason Jerry has been so slow to move on from Garrett is the pure disruption it would cause.
This is hilarious, as he created the disruption by having that press conference where he announced that he would not extend Garrett.
It will come out later that from the players that they had trouble buying in because of coaching staff's situation.
I think that's exactly what's going to happen. The Giants have given JG a safe place to land when he's not renewed by DAL and that's perfect for JJ and his red-headed stepson. Makes the parting easier.diehard03 said:
It's gonna be interesting when the Ministry of Misinformation goes full tilt when Garrett is the Giants coach next year.
Wait, you think that firing Tom Landry was a sign of Jerry not wanting to win?expresswrittenconsent said:
"Firm beliefs" arent facts. They are what santa claus and religion are based on. The results of the entire jones tenure (including dumping a 5x super bowl coach in an embarrassing manner and then firing the back to back defending champs coach and telling everyone that he himself could coach the team to a title) completely invalidate the idea that jerry wants to win more than anything else.
dave94 said:Wait, you think that firing Tom Landry was a sign of Jerry not wanting to win?expresswrittenconsent said:
"Firm beliefs" arent facts. They are what santa claus and religion are based on. The results of the entire jones tenure (including dumping a 5x super bowl coach in an embarrassing manner and then firing the back to back defending champs coach and telling everyone that he himself could coach the team to a title) completely invalidate the idea that jerry wants to win more than anything else.
It's obvious that you have no love lost for Jerry and nothing will change that.
Quote:
Wait, you think that firing Tom Landry was a sign of Jerry not wanting to win?
It's obvious that you have no love lost for Jerry and nothing will change that.
Quote:
I think that's exactly what's going to happen. The Giants have given JG a safe place to land when he's not renewed by DAL and that's perfect for JJ and his red-headed stepson. Makes the parting easier.
dave94 said:Wait, you think that firing Tom Landry was a sign of Jerry not wanting to win?expresswrittenconsent said:
"Firm beliefs" arent facts. They are what santa claus and religion are based on. The results of the entire jones tenure (including dumping a 5x super bowl coach in an embarrassing manner and then firing the back to back defending champs coach and telling everyone that he himself could coach the team to a title) completely invalidate the idea that jerry wants to win more than anything else.
It's obvious that you have no love lost for Jerry and nothing will change that.
Quote:
Without the parenthesis you said: The results of the entire jones tenure completely invalidate the idea that jerry wants to win more than anything else.
And that's just wrong.
I focused on the Landry point because it makes me think you're one of many lifelong Cowboys fans who will never forgive/forget that Jerry did it.
Quote:
Winning isn't the first goal, nor the primary goal.
I seem to remember last time we beat philly they couldn't stop the run.the last of the bohemians said:
Wouldn't be surprising at all if JG goes conservative Sunday do to Daks shoulder and you see another frustrating loss by a couple points...JG is probably feeling over confident about the run game after last week, and he is the dumbest smart coach in the NFL so why wouldn't he go conservative in the game he has to win... wouldn't be a more fitting end to his career at Dallas
Ginger has demonstrated time and time again that he has no feel for the game and no way to adjust. I still remember the no name atlanta Defensive lineman who went off for like 8 sacks in one game against Chaz green. No advance preparation, no adjustments, total fail.the last of the bohemians said:
Yes may very well be the best plan, but you know if it's not working after first few drives, JG will wait to long before adjusting.
Personally I think the passing game is the team's strength and running game succeeds as a byproduct. I would script the beginning of every game as 70% pass during 1st quarter and then let Zeke loose