McCarthy getting speaker?

151,719 Views | 2450 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by lil99chris
TXAggie2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I can't understand Boebert's thought process.

her election took 2 weeks to confirm as she won by barely 500 votes in a GOP +3 district. she underperformed literally every single Republican in Colorado.

so her grand strategy now is to act EVEN MORE CRAZY AND RIGHT WING.

how does that help her next election campaign?!
She doesn't know how to do anything else. And if she loses an election, she can go make more money speaking to those who love her "conviction."
TXAggie2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I cannot speak to her thought process, but I absolutely despise politicians making decisions based on what will help them get elected next time. If she's doing more of the same then that is commendable being consistent.
Isn't part of representing a constituency doing what they want you to do...in other words, doing what would help you get elected?
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LMCane said:

McInnis 03 said:




I can't understand Boebert's thought process.

her election took 2 weeks to confirm as she won by barely 500 votes in a GOP +3 district. she underperformed literally every single Republican in Colorado.

so her grand strategy now is to act EVEN MORE CRAZY AND RIGHT WING.

how does that help her next election campaign?!
You should have just stopped with the bolded part.


If you want to understand her and the others thought process why don't you try LISTENING to what they are saying?
Jinx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LMCane said:

McInnis 03 said:




I can't understand Boebert's thought process.

her election took 2 weeks to confirm as she won by barely 500 votes in a GOP +3 district. she underperformed literally every single Republican in Colorado.

so her grand strategy now is to act EVEN MORE CRAZY AND RIGHT WING.

how does that help her next election campaign?!


You know how cult leaders have their right hand men/women who truly believe in the cause and throw their whole existence behind it?

She isnt worried about the "next election campaign" because in her mind its impossible not to win once people see "the truth".

Unfortunately, those same people are all slowly waking up and not in the way she thinks.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jinx said:

LMCane said:

McInnis 03 said:




I can't understand Boebert's thought process.

her election took 2 weeks to confirm as she won by barely 500 votes in a GOP +3 district. she underperformed literally every single Republican in Colorado.

so her grand strategy now is to act EVEN MORE CRAZY AND RIGHT WING.

how does that help her next election campaign?!


You know how cult leaders have their right hand men/women who truly believe in the cause and throw their whole existence behind it?

She isnt worried about the "next election campaign" because in her mind its impossible not to win once people see "the truth".

Unfortunately, those same people are all slowly waking up and not in the way she thinks.
This person above is another example of not knowing what is actually being debated.....
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LMCane said:

McInnis 03 said:




I can't understand Boebert's thought process.

her election took 2 weeks to confirm as she won by barely 500 votes in a GOP +3 district. she underperformed literally every single Republican in Colorado.

so her grand strategy now is to act EVEN MORE CRAZY AND RIGHT WING.

how does that help her next election campaign?!
Tell me you haven't actually listened to any of her interviews without telling me...

She has been anything but crazy and right wing in what she has been saying and doing. She was asking for crazy right-wing stuff like returning the house to normal order so that bills came out of committees instead of locked backrooms of the speaker's office. Extremist stuff like single issue bills and the ability to remove amendments that are offtopic. Crazy nutjob stuff like allowing a vote on proposed amendments to a bill on the floor.

Yeah, that is just crazy talk. We all know that the founding fathers intended for the government to be run by giant legislative funding packages that were created in backrooms and dropped on the floor with less than 24 hours for reps to read them before being forced to vote on them.
TheHulkster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

He was never accused of pedophilia. He was accused of banging a 17 year old
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LMCane said:

McInnis 03 said:




I can't understand Boebert's thought process.

her election took 2 weeks to confirm as she won by barely 500 votes in a GOP +3 district. she underperformed literally every single Republican in Colorado.

so her grand strategy now is to act EVEN MORE CRAZY AND RIGHT WING.

how does that help her next election campaign?!
She's building a brand (hot, guns, "patriot") that will survive being a House Rep. (smart given her last showing) and not have to go back to running the restaurant.

The more spotlight the better.

samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
txags92 said:

LMCane said:

McInnis 03 said:




I can't understand Boebert's thought process.

her election took 2 weeks to confirm as she won by barely 500 votes in a GOP +3 district. she underperformed literally every single Republican in Colorado.

so her grand strategy now is to act EVEN MORE CRAZY AND RIGHT WING.

how does that help her next election campaign?!
Tell me you haven't actually listened to any of her interviews without telling me...

She has been anything but crazy and right wing in what she has been saying and doing. She was asking for crazy right-wing stuff like returning the house to normal order so that bills came out of committees instead of locked backrooms of the speaker's office. Extremist stuff like single issue bills and the ability to remove amendments that are offtopic. Crazy nutjob stuff like allowing a vote on proposed amendments to a bill on the floor.

Yeah, that is just crazy talk. We all know that the founding fathers intended for the government to be run by giant legislative funding packages that were created in backrooms and dropped on the floor with less than 24 hours for reps to read them before being forced to vote on them.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Faustus said:

LMCane said:

McInnis 03 said:




I can't understand Boebert's thought process.

her election took 2 weeks to confirm as she won by barely 500 votes in a GOP +3 district. she underperformed literally every single Republican in Colorado.

so her grand strategy now is to act EVEN MORE CRAZY AND RIGHT WING.

how does that help her next election campaign?!
She's building a brand (hot, guns, "patriot") that will survive being a House Rep. (smart given her last showing) and not have to go back to running the restaurant.

The more spotlight the better.


Building a brand based on the principles of the founding fathers is one I can get behind.

This should be quoted for you as well I guess: "Tell me you haven't actually listened to any of her interviews without telling me..."
Rodney Ruxin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Yeah, that is just crazy talk. We all know that the founding fathers intended for the government to be run by giant legislative funding packages that were created in backrooms and dropped on the floor with less than 24 hours for reps to read them before being forced to vote on them.
Street Fighter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jinx said:

LMCane said:

McInnis 03 said:




I can't understand Boebert's thought process.

her election took 2 weeks to confirm as she won by barely 500 votes in a GOP +3 district. she underperformed literally every single Republican in Colorado.

so her grand strategy now is to act EVEN MORE CRAZY AND RIGHT WING.

how does that help her next election campaign?!



Unfortunately, those same people are all slowly waking up and not in the way she thinks.

You mean plugging back into the matrix.
TheEternalPessimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I used to think F16 was populated by mostly principled conservatives......
Artorias
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TheEternalPessimist said:

I used to think F16 was populated by mostly principled conservatives......
zoneag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LMCane said:

McInnis 03 said:




I can't understand Boebert's thought process.

her election took 2 weeks to confirm as she won by barely 500 votes in a GOP +3 district. she underperformed literally every single Republican in Colorado.

so her grand strategy now is to act EVEN MORE CRAZY AND RIGHT WING.

how does that help her next election campaign?!


It's crazy and right wing to not support a squishy establishment neocon for speaker?

The guy you support opposes putting a balanced budget and term limits up for a vote. I guess those are crazy right wing things too, huh Barnes?
Tea Party
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAggie2011 said:

Quote:

I cannot speak to her thought process, but I absolutely despise politicians making decisions based on what will help them get elected next time. If she's doing more of the same then that is commendable being consistent.
Isn't part of representing a constituency doing what they want you to do...in other words, doing what would help you get elected?
The context the other poster brought up was she barely won, therefore the assumption is she should change her ideology towards the center so she can get re-elected. The premise ignores that she can stay true to her beliefs use this time to get her goals implemented.

There is no guarantee that if she alters her ideology towards the center that the MSM, D's, and RINO's still won't go against her thus she would possibly have wasted her term not pursuing what she originally set out to do.

If people really wanted a centrist candidate, then they should be advocating for a third party and quit supporting the divide, but people do not like to walk uphill when walking downhill to the cliff's edge is easier.
Learn about the Texas Nationalist Movement
https://tnm.me
45-70Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They can both be child predators.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheEternalPessimist said:

I used to think F16 was populated by mostly principled conservatives......
Not liking Gaetz or Boebert does not mean people aren't principled conservatives.
TheEternalPessimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tea Party said:

TXAggie2011 said:

Quote:

I cannot speak to her thought process, but I absolutely despise politicians making decisions based on what will help them get elected next time. If she's doing more of the same then that is commendable being consistent.
Isn't part of representing a constituency doing what they want you to do...in other words, doing what would help you get elected?
The context the other poster brought up was she barely won, therefore the assumption is she should change her ideology towards the center so she can get re-elected. The premise ignores that she can stay true to her beliefs use this time to get her goals implemented.

There is no guarantee that if she alters her ideology towards the center that the MSM, D's, and RINO's still won't go against her thus she would possibly have wasted her term not pursuing what she originally set out to do.

If people really wanted a centrist candidate, then they should be advocating for a third party and quit supporting the divide, but people do not like to walk uphill when walking downhill to the cliff's edge is easier.
DeSantis barely won in 2018 and did not change his ideology. Won by 1.5 million votes and flipped blue enclaves Miami-Dade and Hillsborough counties.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They're doing what they think is right. They're not acting crazy. Is is better to say "I better vote this way because Nancy said I better vote this way or I'll be destroyed". The dems can't even think about what is good for the country. They have to do what the dictator says or else. I admire these holdout for their beliefs.
FbgTxAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tea Party said:

TXAggie2011 said:

Quote:

I cannot speak to her thought process, but I absolutely despise politicians making decisions based on what will help them get elected next time. If she's doing more of the same then that is commendable being consistent.
Isn't part of representing a constituency doing what they want you to do...in other words, doing what would help you get elected?
The context the other poster brought up was she barely won, therefore the assumption is she should change her ideology towards the center so she can get re-elected. The premise ignores that she can stay true to her beliefs use this time to get her goals implemented.

There is no guarantee that if she alters her ideology towards the center that the MSM, D's, and RINO's still won't go against her thus she would possibly have wasted her term not pursuing what she originally set out to do.

If people really wanted a centrist candidate, then they should be advocating for a third party and quit supporting the divide, but people do not like to walk uphill when walking downhill to the cliff's edge is easier.


Yea the idea that "Oh I barely won this time so I gotta move to the middle and compromise SO I CAN GET RE-ELECTED" isn't swampy at all….
TheEternalPessimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108 said:

TheEternalPessimist said:

I used to think F16 was populated by mostly principled conservatives......
Not liking Gaetz or Boebert does not mean people aren't principled conservatives.
Your statement is fair and true. But I did not say that.
Whirligigs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggie93 said:

Tea Party said:

Wild thought just popped into my head that I'm sure has significant flaws due to my lacking knowledge of how the House operates.

D have Presidency,
D have Senate with VP tie breaker
R has the House.

Under these conditions not much will get passed legislatively from either side.

Even if we had a D SOTH, that does not mean that D controls the House. It's not like if the D SOTH refuses to bring R majority legislation to a vote will matter because it will not get passed in the Senate.

What's the harm in this scenario of holding ground against McCarthy and forcing him to deal with D's thus exposing his lack of conservative ideals?

Accepting concessions now just keeps the status quo where establishment gives an inch but takes a mile, though this would be one of the rare times where establishment gave an inch.

Force the RINO's to admit they would rather side with the D's than support a conservative candidate and agenda and hopefully the sheeple will finally get to see the wolf in sheeps clothing that they foolishly have been voting for these past decades and thus correct their voting habits.
You do have significant flaws in the how the House works.

Your plan means that Dems appoint the Chairs of every committee and thus control the bills and agenda of those committees, that's what the Speaker does. So no Oversight or very little (Hunter Laptop, Church Committee, on and on) happens. Essentially the little power the GOP was going to get they just give up.

Your plan also is FAR more likely to have the opposite effect. It will show the GOP can't work together and can't govern. Now I understand as a conservative how that sounds great but the reality is conservatives are not the majority in this country, at all. Even among conservatives many still want government to operate and to get some wins. In order for your plan to work you would need a massive wave of conservatives to sweep the GOP Primaries and then to win the General in '24. Oh, and they have to do it somehow without much money because the money comes from folks that actually want to get legislation done. If you have a few billion of your own sitting around to fund it then great but otherwise you are talking about suicide.

This is not the time to go for the golden ring. This is the time to send a message and get significant concessions and fight for more in '24 hopefully with DeSantis or Trump as President and a GOP Senate. Hell this session of Congress is only going to be relevant for a few months before the '24 race takes over and even sooner if Biden doesn't run and you have both Parties fighting over the nomination.

Chip Roy did this the right way. He was reasonable and clear and got concessions. He made good points and won over folks. In the end though he also knows that there is no hard core conservative with enough pull to win the Speaker's race this cycle because there are enough RINO's to block it just as the conservatives are doing now. In the end these folks have to work together and burning every bridge with no plan that has a chance of succeeding is idiocy, that is unless you don't care about actually enacting real change and would rather just talk about it.
Been hearing this sorry ass excuse for decades.
45-70Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What just happened
McInnis 03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
45-70Ag said:

What just happened
Mc - 214
Jeff - 212
Other - 6

Motion to adjourn to 10PM is being voted on now.
aggie93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Whirligigs said:

aggie93 said:

Tea Party said:

Wild thought just popped into my head that I'm sure has significant flaws due to my lacking knowledge of how the House operates.

D have Presidency,
D have Senate with VP tie breaker
R has the House.

Under these conditions not much will get passed legislatively from either side.

Even if we had a D SOTH, that does not mean that D controls the House. It's not like if the D SOTH refuses to bring R majority legislation to a vote will matter because it will not get passed in the Senate.

What's the harm in this scenario of holding ground against McCarthy and forcing him to deal with D's thus exposing his lack of conservative ideals?

Accepting concessions now just keeps the status quo where establishment gives an inch but takes a mile, though this would be one of the rare times where establishment gave an inch.

Force the RINO's to admit they would rather side with the D's than support a conservative candidate and agenda and hopefully the sheeple will finally get to see the wolf in sheeps clothing that they foolishly have been voting for these past decades and thus correct their voting habits.
You do have significant flaws in the how the House works.

Your plan means that Dems appoint the Chairs of every committee and thus control the bills and agenda of those committees, that's what the Speaker does. So no Oversight or very little (Hunter Laptop, Church Committee, on and on) happens. Essentially the little power the GOP was going to get they just give up.

Your plan also is FAR more likely to have the opposite effect. It will show the GOP can't work together and can't govern. Now I understand as a conservative how that sounds great but the reality is conservatives are not the majority in this country, at all. Even among conservatives many still want government to operate and to get some wins. In order for your plan to work you would need a massive wave of conservatives to sweep the GOP Primaries and then to win the General in '24. Oh, and they have to do it somehow without much money because the money comes from folks that actually want to get legislation done. If you have a few billion of your own sitting around to fund it then great but otherwise you are talking about suicide.

This is not the time to go for the golden ring. This is the time to send a message and get significant concessions and fight for more in '24 hopefully with DeSantis or Trump as President and a GOP Senate. Hell this session of Congress is only going to be relevant for a few months before the '24 race takes over and even sooner if Biden doesn't run and you have both Parties fighting over the nomination.

Chip Roy did this the right way. He was reasonable and clear and got concessions. He made good points and won over folks. In the end though he also knows that there is no hard core conservative with enough pull to win the Speaker's race this cycle because there are enough RINO's to block it just as the conservatives are doing now. In the end these folks have to work together and burning every bridge with no plan that has a chance of succeeding is idiocy, that is unless you don't care about actually enacting real change and would rather just talk about it.
Been hearing this sorry ass excuse for decades.
Ah, ok.

Well I am very conservative and don't like the system but I understand the system. I am amazed that more people don't agree with conservative policies but I am just as amazed at conservatives that act like throwing a big enough tantrum will result in getting back our Constitutional Republic.

When you simply ignore how the world works don't be surprised you can't get the changes you want. BTW, one of Trump's biggest flaws is he didn't understand how DC worked and it sunk him over and over again. You have to know how to play the game in order to win it.

Happy to hear any flaws in my earlier logic though. Please point out to me how you can get RINO's to vote for a hardcore conservative when they don't have to. The way to beat them is to primary them and beat them at the ballot box. BTW, the fact that Roy got concessions about McCarthy funding RINO's in primaries was HUGE.
"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."

Ronald Reagan
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Faustus said:

LMCane said:

McInnis 03 said:




I can't understand Boebert's thought process.

her election took 2 weeks to confirm as she won by barely 500 votes in a GOP +3 district. she underperformed literally every single Republican in Colorado.

so her grand strategy now is to act EVEN MORE CRAZY AND RIGHT WING.

how does that help her next election campaign?!
She's building a brand (hot, guns, "patriot") that will survive being a House Rep. (smart given her last showing) and not have to go back to running the restaurant.

The more spotlight the better.




True, and the time for her to do this is definitely now while she's the hottest piece in the House, because before long a younger and hotter model will come out and she'll need to secure her position so that it won't matter when it happens.
Rodney Ruxin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

When you simply ignore how the world works don't be surprised you can't get the changes you want. BTW, one of Trump's biggest flaws is he didn't understand how DC worked and it sunk him over and over again. You have to know how to play the game in order to win it.
The only way to return to anything resembling a functional constitutional republic is to remove power from D.C. The corruption is so long-standing and so deep, you aren't going to get any meaningful change by electing the Trump's of the world. We don't need different people in Washington. Well we do, but that's not a realistic goal, the system has literally been designed to keep people with goodwill away from holding any legitimate power. Literally the only way forward is removing power.
J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAggie2011 said:

Quote:

I can't understand Boebert's thought process.

her election took 2 weeks to confirm as she won by barely 500 votes in a GOP +3 district. she underperformed literally every single Republican in Colorado.

so her grand strategy now is to act EVEN MORE CRAZY AND RIGHT WING.

how does that help her next election campaign?!
She doesn't know how to do anything else. And if she loses an election, she can go make more money speaking to those who love her "conviction."


Exactly. Her thought process is whatever gets her the most camera time. She doesn't care about governing or passing anything, which is why she almost got booted from a pretty safe district.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
J. Walter Weatherman said:

TXAggie2011 said:

Quote:

I can't understand Boebert's thought process.

her election took 2 weeks to confirm as she won by barely 500 votes in a GOP +3 district. she underperformed literally every single Republican in Colorado.

so her grand strategy now is to act EVEN MORE CRAZY AND RIGHT WING.

how does that help her next election campaign?!
She doesn't know how to do anything else. And if she loses an election, she can go make more money speaking to those who love her "conviction."


Exactly. Her thought process is whatever gets her the most camera time. She doesn't care about governing or passing anything,which is why she almost got booted from a pretty safe district.


You just described every politician.
1872walker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J. Walter Weatherman said:

TXAggie2011 said:

Quote:

I can't understand Boebert's thought process.

her election took 2 weeks to confirm as she won by barely 500 votes in a GOP +3 district. she underperformed literally every single Republican in Colorado.

so her grand strategy now is to act EVEN MORE CRAZY AND RIGHT WING.

how does that help her next election campaign?!
She doesn't know how to do anything else. And if she loses an election, she can go make more money speaking to those who love her "conviction."


Exactly. Her thought process is whatever gets her the most camera time. She doesn't care about governing or passing anything, which is why she almost got booted from a pretty safe district.


I'd much prefer my congressman passing nothing vs. a $1.7 trillion dollar bill that adds to our already enormous debt. All at the expense of the American taxpayer.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rodney Ruxin said:

Quote:

When you simply ignore how the world works don't be surprised you can't get the changes you want. BTW, one of Trump's biggest flaws is he didn't understand how DC worked and it sunk him over and over again. You have to know how to play the game in order to win it.
The only way to return to anything resembling a functional constitutional republic is to remove power from D.C. The corruption is so long-standing and so deep, you aren't going to get any meaningful change by electing the Trump's of the world. We don't need different people in Washington. Well we do, but that's not a realistic goal, the system has literally been designed to keep people with goodwill away from holding any legitimate power. Literally the only way forward is removing power.
Giant Meteor 2024
aggie93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rodney Ruxin said:

Quote:

When you simply ignore how the world works don't be surprised you can't get the changes you want. BTW, one of Trump's biggest flaws is he didn't understand how DC worked and it sunk him over and over again. You have to know how to play the game in order to win it.
The only way to return to anything resembling a functional constitutional republic is to remove power from D.C. The corruption is so long-standing and so deep, you aren't going to get any meaningful change by electing the Trump's of the world. We don't need different people in Washington. Well we do, but that's not a realistic goal, the system has literally been designed to keep people with goodwill away from holding any legitimate power. Literally the only way forward is removing power.
So your argument is things are so broken that we can't win within the current system and by electing the right people. Ok, only 3 ways to get that then. First is a Convention of States and then for it to go the way you want. Second is a Revolution/Civil War that overthrows the government. Third is secession.

First is a pipe dream that will fail. Way too many socialists to ever agree to a real improvement of the Constitution.

Second is insane.

Third has promise but it's complicated and risky on its own.

Otherwise you are just wishcasting that the world doesn't work the way you want. That's great for Stars but that's about it.
"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."

Ronald Reagan
J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1872walker said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

TXAggie2011 said:

Quote:

I can't understand Boebert's thought process.

her election took 2 weeks to confirm as she won by barely 500 votes in a GOP +3 district. she underperformed literally every single Republican in Colorado.

so her grand strategy now is to act EVEN MORE CRAZY AND RIGHT WING.

how does that help her next election campaign?!
She doesn't know how to do anything else. And if she loses an election, she can go make more money speaking to those who love her "conviction."


Exactly. Her thought process is whatever gets her the most camera time. She doesn't care about governing or passing anything, which is why she almost got booted from a pretty safe district.


I'd much prefer my congressman passing nothing vs. a $1.7 trillion dollar bill that adds to our already enormous debt. All at the expense of the American taxpayer.


You might prefer that. Considering she almost lost this time around it doesn't seem like a large portion of her constituents agree. But I'm sure the next "Stop AOC Act" will show just how serious she is about the job.
aggie93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This really was a dumb statement for McCarthy to make even if he is right. He simply doesn't seem to grasp that his arrogance and entitlement is a huge part of the problem, especially for the last few holdouts. He's practically daring them to keep holding out.

"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."

Ronald Reagan
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.