McCarthy getting speaker?

151,777 Views | 2450 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by lil99chris
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
74OA said:

Ag06Law said:

TxAgPreacher said:

So McCarthy is hoping some dems will go home? I'm not a numbers guy. Does this help him?


If people leave the chamber, it lowers the number needed for a majority vote. The majority is determined by the votes present at the start of the vote.
......or it could go this route with only a handful of Republicans needed to join with Dems to elect a Speaker:

"For about as long as Kevin McCarthy's ascent to House speaker has been in doubt, he and his allies have invoked a nightmare scenario for the ultraconservative House Freedom Caucus: If they thwart him, a handful of Republicans could join with Democrats to elect a moderate GOP speaker.

The play is obvious. They want the Freedom Caucus to fall in line for fear of this outcome, however plausible or implausible. And the man some have floated as the would-be speaker in this scenario, former congressman Fred Upton (R-Mich.), says he's interested."
Where is that from?
Daddy-O5
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yep. Agree.
redcrayon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He posted this earlier.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/as-some-float-bipartisan-pick-for-speaker-ohio-and-pennsylvania-actually-do-it/ar-AA15YaHO?cvid=37c9a9597edd4f67a2a11e672890a25e
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aTmAg said:

74OA said:

Ag06Law said:

TxAgPreacher said:

So McCarthy is hoping some dems will go home? I'm not a numbers guy. Does this help him?


If people leave the chamber, it lowers the number needed for a majority vote. The majority is determined by the votes present at the start of the vote.
......or it could go this route with only a handful of Republicans needed to join with Dems to elect a Speaker:

"For about as long as Kevin McCarthy's ascent to House speaker has been in doubt, he and his allies have invoked a nightmare scenario for the ultraconservative House Freedom Caucus: If they thwart him, a handful of Republicans could join with Democrats to elect a moderate GOP speaker.

The play is obvious. They want the Freedom Caucus to fall in line for fear of this outcome, however plausible or implausible. And the man some have floated as the would-be speaker in this scenario, former congressman Fred Upton (R-Mich.), says he's interested."
Where is that from?
HERE
Houstonag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We cannot have a minority controlling a majority and this hurts the Republican Party. It has been clear for some time that the American people have not been represented in DC.

This recent omnibus bill passed due to McConnell selling out including our own John Cornyn. They do not care about the American people for their lives are supported by huge benefits paid by the taxpayer. The bill contained huge earmarks for the special interest groups and will continue to fuel inflation.

Meanwhile drugs come across the border, illegal aliens, criminals, etc are flooding our nation and killing our citizens.

DC does not care for they are not effected. The US voter needs to wake up for our nation is lost. What will happen is an aristocracy has been created in DC and the beltway will control our nation. The rest will decay into a real low low class and there will be not middle class.
superunknown
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
In countries with a number of parties, none of them in the majority, the legislative body supposedly requires that the various parties form coalitions. In such cases, from what I have read, a small party can wield a great deal more influence than their size itself would lead to.
AGHouston11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just curious if Frank Lundtz has shown up on any of the networks with a "poll"

Psycho Bunny
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sixth vote will be the same at the seventh, eighth, ninth and tenth vote.

Our tax dollars hard at work.
TheEternalPessimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Houstonag said:

We cannot have a minority controlling a majority and this hurts the Republican Party. It has been clear for some time that the American people have not been represented in DC.

This recent omnibus bill passed due to McConnell selling out including our own John Cornyn. They do not care about the American people for their lives are supported by huge benefits paid by the taxpayer. The bill contained huge earmarks for the special interest groups and will continue to fuel inflation.

Meanwhile drugs come across the border, illegal aliens, criminals, etc are flooding our nation and killing our citizens.

DC does not care for they are not effected. The US voter needs to wake up for our nation is lost. What will happen is an aristocracy has been created in DC and the beltway will control our nation. The rest will decay into a real low low class and there will be not middle class.
DC, Silicon Valley, and New York are the Capitol District and Districts 1 and 2 from Hunger Games. The rest are for generating resources that the power districts consume.
Daddy-O5
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
gbaby23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hopefully this shows the American people how much power a 3rd party could have. It isn't much, but it is better than voting for a uniparty stooge because they have (R) next to their name.
fka ftc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The congress lady just ***** slapped the house democrats in grand style.

Saying Dems are enjoying this as evidenced by their popcorn and alcohol consumption.

Libs really are a bunch of classless, debaucherous asshats who don't give two poops about thus are just having a grand ol time at our expense.

If they cared about getting on with business at all, then why don't a few of them cross the aisle.

The great divide in this Country lies at the feet of the Democrat Socialist Party, where breaking ranks lands you in exile or is addressed with a call from HRC to the suicide hotline.
AGHouston11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Daddy-O5 said:




Paul Ryan and Fox News ! What a joke
Charpie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
gbaby23 said:

Hopefully this shows the American people how much power a 3rd party could have. It isn't much, but it is better than voting for a uniparty stooge because they have (R) next to their name.
I like this
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
gbaby23 said:

Hopefully this shows the American people how much power a 3rd party could have. It isn't much, but it is better than voting for a uniparty stooge because they have (R) next to their name.
Exactly.

If done intelligently, such a third party could have much more power than their size would indicate.
fka ftc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Daddy-O5 said:


Been watching all day and yesterday. This is a poor take.

Like many classic Rs, they value decorum and tradition over change and principles. But they are not throwing a "hissyfit".
TheEternalPessimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
gbaby23 said:

Hopefully this shows the American people how much power a 3rd party could have. It isn't much, but it is better than voting for a uniparty stooge because they have (R) next to their name.
I am arriving there pretty quickly.

Rand Paul and Matt Gaetz should declare themselves independents and work to establish the 3rd party.
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fka ftc said:

Daddy-O5 said:


Been watching all day and yesterday. This is a poor take.

Like many classic Rs, they value decorum and tradition over change and principles. But they are not throwing a "hissyfit".
Well said.

Holding onto our traditional values and keeping what works is preferred. If change is necessary, it should be done slowly and deliberately. Making massive changes quickly is a radical approach.
TheEternalPessimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eric76 said:

gbaby23 said:

Hopefully this shows the American people how much power a 3rd party could have. It isn't much, but it is better than voting for a uniparty stooge because they have (R) next to their name.
Exactly.

If done intelligently, such a third party could have much more power than their size would indicate.
It would force coalition government. Something we may need for accountability.

If someone is on the hard left, they should welcome this too. It makes a Socialist Party more viable to actually win seats without slapping a (D) on their name in urban cores and perhaps Vermont..
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Psycho Bunny said:

Sixth vote will be the same at the seventh, eighth, ninth and tenth vote.

Our tax dollars hard at work.


What's the current record for the max number of votes before a speaker is elected?
TheEternalPessimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eric76 said:

fka ftc said:

Daddy-O5 said:


Been watching all day and yesterday. This is a poor take.

Like many classic Rs, they value decorum and tradition over change and principles. But they are not throwing a "hissyfit".
Well said.

Holding onto our traditional values and keeping what works is preferred. If change is necessary, it should be done slowly and deliberately. Making massive changes quickly is a radical approach.
I want RADICAL change --- which is the NULLIFICATION of federal law at the local and state level. Incrementalism got us into this mess.
pacecar02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
in the 100's
rgag12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
gbaby23 said:

Hopefully this shows the American people how much power a 3rd party could have. It isn't much, but it is better than voting for a uniparty stooge because they have (R) next to their name.


You realize if the current rogue members were a third party then Jeffries would be speaker, and the Dems would probably be close to a filibuster proof majority in the senate.

Edit: Actually, I guess Pelosi would still be speaker
gbaby23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No Spin Ag said:

Psycho Bunny said:

Sixth vote will be the same at the seventh, eighth, ninth and tenth vote.

Our tax dollars hard at work.


What's the current record for the max number of votes before a speaker is elected?
1856 - 133 ballots
45-70Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No Spin Ag said:

Psycho Bunny said:

Sixth vote will be the same at the seventh, eighth, ninth and tenth vote.

Our tax dollars hard at work.


What's the current record for the max number of votes before a speaker is elected?


153 i think in 1856
TheEternalPessimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rgag12 said:

gbaby23 said:

Hopefully this shows the American people how much power a 3rd party could have. It isn't much, but it is better than voting for a uniparty stooge because they have (R) next to their name.


You realize if the current rogue members were a third party then Jeffries would be speaker, and the Dems would probably be close to a filibuster proof majority in the senate.
So be it -- let the Democrats prove how all they can do is burn this country to the ground. It's what their militant wing (Antifa and BLM) do in the streets. It's what their hoodlum voters do in the urban cores. So if they do so by nationalizing bad policy.... the catastrophe they create leads to their catastrophic defeat in 2024 and onward.

If the GOP is simply going to be DNC-Lite, what is the point? It is better to resist the duopoly of the swamp at the risk of everything in the short term in order to win the long game...... which eventually the good and Godly people of this nation will win.
fka ftc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eric76 said:

fka ftc said:


Been watching all day and yesterday. This is a poor take.

Like many classic Rs, they value decorum and tradition over change and principles. But they are not throwing a "hissyfit".
Well said.

Holding onto our traditional values and keeping what works is preferred. If change is necessary, it should be done slowly and deliberately. Making massive changes quickly is a radical approach.
That is what I said. Now, I wish Fox was a bit more adamant about a non-McCarthy solution.

Kilmeade is breaking it down well noting at least we are seeing the sausage being made.

With D's they make tubes of **** in the Schiff SCIF then try and sell it to the public as Grade A Consolidated Sausage that you must bite into to know whats in it.
J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheEternalPessimist said:

eric76 said:

gbaby23 said:

Hopefully this shows the American people how much power a 3rd party could have. It isn't much, but it is better than voting for a uniparty stooge because they have (R) next to their name.
Exactly.

If done intelligently, such a third party could have much more power than their size would indicate.
It would force coalition government. Something we may need for accountability.

If someone is on the hard left, they should welcome this too. It makes a Socialist Party more viable to actually win seats without slapping a (D) on their name in urban cores and perhaps Vermont..


Really we should have 4 parties at this point. The freedom caucus/far right republicans, moderate/establishment republicans, establishment dems like most of the democrats in the senate and house, and the far left/quasi socialist dems like AOC, Talib etc. Would require a lot more negotiation and actually governing than what we have now.
fka ftc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Term limits will need to be put in place before another party can rise. These multi-decade house rats and senate rats from both sides of the aisle have led to this *******ization of democracy.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Of course, then one side would just join forces and blow the other out of the water. That's why we have coalesced into 2 parties in the first place.

Working within one of the 2 major parties is the way to get the most power. The freedom caucus is doing it right. The Libertarian Party is doing it wrong.
fka ftc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In a Country where our Founding Fathers ensured minority voices must be heard and addressed, then this is a great example of that principle. If McCarthy wants to be Speaker, he needs to figure it out. If Rs want to be in charge, they need to figure it out.

Perfectly fine for these 5 to 10 holding the process hostage. Its how minority representation works.
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
gbaby23 said:

Hopefully this shows the American people how much power a 3rd party could have. It isn't much, but it is better than voting for a uniparty stooge because they have (R) next to their name.
This is exactly why we don't need a third party. The various caucuses are effectively third parties. Right now the Freedom Party are the last holdouts the Establishment Party needs to form their right of center coalition government.

The Establishment Party is welcome to reach out to the Moderate Democrat Party to form a centerist coalition government if the Moderate Democrat Parties' demands are more palatable than the Freedom Party's.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
45-70Ag said:

No Spin Ag said:

Psycho Bunny said:

Sixth vote will be the same at the seventh, eighth, ninth and tenth vote.

Our tax dollars hard at work.


What's the current record for the max number of votes before a speaker is elected?


153 i think in 1856


So this could take a while. Damn...
10thYrSr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
lb3 said:

gbaby23 said:

Hopefully this shows the American people how much power a 3rd party could have. It isn't much, but it is better than voting for a uniparty stooge because they have (R) next to their name.
This is exactly why we don't need a third party. The various caucuses are effectively third parties. Right now the Freedom Party are the last holdouts the Establishment Party needs to form their right of center coalition government.

The Establishment Party is welcome to reach out to the Moderate Democrat Party to form a centerist coalition government if the Moderate Democrat Parties' demands are more palatable than the Freedom Party's.


Under that model why have parties at all then? People could just vote for politicians and then the politicians could caucus as they please.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.