Musk, then Saudi holdings (16%) and then Dorsey is next in share ownership. Dorsey and the Saudis combined still cannot outvote Musk.Quote:
Dorsey owned more than 18 million shares in Twitter, valued at about $1 billion. He could have cashed those shares out at $54.20 a piece when Musk took the company private, instead, he will end up saving Musk about $1 billion in his purchase price by rolling those shares over.
Elon makes all-cash offer to take Twitter private
358,114 Views |
2862 Replies |
Last: 5 days ago by titan
Saved a 9 figure tax bill.EKUAg said:🤔 Twitter Co-Founder Jack Dorsey Retained Stake in Company After Elon Musk Acquisition, Filings Show https://t.co/zt1agnEC8E
— KJGray (@KJGinKY) November 1, 2022
Demosthenes81 said:
So bad it is funnyElon slaughtered so many Indians today that his nickname should be Andrew Jackson@SenWarren has gone into hiding just to be safe
— Michael Malice (@michaelmalice) October 29, 2022
The trail of Twitter Tears.
JUST IN: Treasury Department officials have begun looking into whether they have the legal authority to start an investigation into the Elon Musk’s Twitter purchase because of Musk’s ties to foreign governments and investors, per the Washington Post.
— unusual_whales (@unusual_whales) November 2, 2022
aggiehawg said:Musk, then Saudi holdings (16%) and then Dorsey is next in share ownership. Dorsey and the Saudis combined still cannot outvote Musk.Quote:
Dorsey owned more than 18 million shares in Twitter, valued at about $1 billion. He could have cashed those shares out at $54.20 a piece when Musk took the company private, instead, he will end up saving Musk about $1 billion in his purchase price by rolling those shares over.
Dorsey was semi-red pilled towards the end of his time there. He openly criticized the BoD and the company's direction.
Wish government officials conducting political witch hunts could be counter sued or investigated and charged with a crime.
aggiehawg said:Musk, then Saudi holdings (16%) and then Dorsey is next in share ownership. Dorsey and the Saudis combined still cannot outvote Musk.Quote:
Dorsey owned more than 18 million shares in Twitter, valued at about $1 billion. He could have cashed those shares out at $54.20 a piece when Musk took the company private, instead, he will end up saving Musk about $1 billion in his purchase price by rolling those shares over.
Based on my calcs and the Dorsey article above the Saudi Prince owns $1.9 billion in shares .. or 4 % Dorsey $1 billion or almost 2 % and Elon $44 billion or 94 %
Banana Republic. We are it. Maybe Nov 8th will change it a bit.will25u said:JUST IN: Treasury Department officials have begun looking into whether they have the legal authority to start an investigation into the Elon Musk’s Twitter purchase because of Musk’s ties to foreign governments and investors, per the Washington Post.
— unusual_whales (@unusual_whales) November 2, 2022
Seems at first glance like quite a few partisans on that list.
Talked to civil society leaders @JGreenblattADL, @YaelEisenstat, @rashadrobinson, @JGo4Justice, @normanlschen, @DerrickNAACP, @TheBushCenter Ken Hersch & @SindyBenavides about how Twitter will continue to combat hate & harassment & enforce its election integrity policies
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 2, 2022
Twitter's content moderation council will include representatives with widely divergent views, which will certainly include the civil rights community and groups who face hate-fueled violence
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 2, 2022
Hate fueled violence sounds like BLM.
Showertime at the Bidens
Joined:
Oct 21, 2020
Posts:
3,382
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is on par with elon's earlier statements. He said the content moderation policy will be made public so everyone knows the rules. I'm okay with this but how will that board ever come to a consensus on Jordan Peterson or James Lindsey? I foresee this just like when Trump tried to bring in advisors when he first took office. They got so much pressure they had to resign. Good luck.
The real change will come from removing the bias and manipulation of trending topics, shadow banning, and the outright suspensions and platforming of any conservative that starts to become popular. Will finally have a fair fight.
It didn't dawn on me until right now, but due to Musk's ownership of Twitter, it's highly likely the Dems will start pushing either reform of section 230, or outright repeal.
I'd be shocked if it's repeal, because they still have massive interaction and control of all of the other big social media ops, but they'll start mouthing off before long.
I'd be shocked if it's repeal, because they still have massive interaction and control of all of the other big social media ops, but they'll start mouthing off before long.
A lot of tech work is not remote so no need for libs to physically move to Texas.nortex97 said:
My only concern about this is that unemployment rates are much lower/job prospects better for tech workers in red states like Texas now, vs. San Fran/communist states. We also have lower hateful hammer attack rates.
"And liberals, being liberals, will double down on failure." - dedgod
Might be worth it.fasthorse05 said:
It didn't dawn on me until right now, but due to Musk's ownership of Twitter, it's highly likely the Dems will start pushing either reform of section 230, or outright repeal.
I'd be shocked if it's repeal, because they still have massive interaction and control of all of the other big social media ops, but they'll start mouthing off before long.
Why? Thing is, as so many like Rush and Prager point out, Left ideas need suppression, censorship, and use of imposition by courts and various other means of legislative force to win. They do not win when fairly reviewed and depending on an honest majority informed because so harmful and regressive and the rulers immune to the impact as well, adding insult to injury.
What does this add up to? It means that if the Democrats really did undermine all big media it would work to the Right's advantage. Sensible ideas and common sense do not need propaganda and lies to prevail -- just being allowed to come forth is enough. So it would almost be worth it.
I'd call this an absolute win then. It isn't just the libs that want major changes to Section 230. It would stop the major offenders from censoring content or face litigation. The platforms (Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, TikTok, etc.) would truly be platforms. If they censored content, they are publishers.fasthorse05 said:
It didn't dawn on me until right now, but due to Musk's ownership of Twitter, it's highly likely the Dems will start pushing either reform of section 230, or outright repeal.
I'd be shocked if it's repeal, because they still have massive interaction and control of all of the other big social media ops, but they'll start mouthing off before long.
You might be correct. I was working off the 16% figure for the Saudi holdings in an article. It did not mention the total amount of outstanding shares in Musk's new entity.Quote:
Based on my calcs and the Dorsey article above the Saudi Prince owns $1.9 billion in shares .. or 4 % Dorsey $1 billion or almost 2 % and Elon $44 billion or 94 %
Thanks for the clarification.
This is to be about 3,700 current employees.
— unusual_whales (@unusual_whales) November 3, 2022
Read more details: https://t.co/48KSVde0Ju
will25u said:This is to be about 3,700 current employees.
— unusual_whales (@unusual_whales) November 3, 2022
Read more details: https://t.co/48KSVde0Ju
Learn to co…..wait….learn to plumb!!
Pure savagery. 🔥 pic.twitter.com/oxB5aRKqvN
— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) November 2, 2022
BREAKING: Elon Musk to end Twitter’s work from home policy, per Bloomberg.
— unusual_whales (@unusual_whales) November 3, 2022
will25u said:Pure savagery. 🔥 pic.twitter.com/oxB5aRKqvN
— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) November 2, 2022
Literal laugh cry, "$8"
"And liberals, being liberals, will double down on failure." - dedgod
will25u said:Pure savagery. 🔥 pic.twitter.com/oxB5aRKqvN
— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) November 2, 2022
Need an $8 bill image with Elon's face on it.
Make it so and tweet that **** to him. Someone will become a legend.
EDIT:
It's a hot mess but...
Make it so and tweet that **** to him. Someone will become a legend.
EDIT:
It's a hot mess but...
ThreatLevel: Midnight
Joined:
Jul 30, 2007
Posts:
2,019
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'd say that's an $8 photoshop job so just about right
Thanks & Gig 'Em
Showertime at the Bidens
Joined:
Oct 21, 2020
Posts:
3,382
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Irish 2.0 said:will25u said:This is to be about 3,700 current employees.
— unusual_whales (@unusual_whales) November 3, 2022
Read more details: https://t.co/48KSVde0Ju
Learn to co…..wait….learn to plumb!!
I wonder what the average salary is. Even if it's $150,000, yearly savings would be over half a billion.
Of course the top execs probably totaled that in compensation.
.@elonmusk clarified that this is not accurate: Twitter employees can continue working from home, but for another employer. https://t.co/maENg10Xcx
— Dr. Eli David (@DrEliDavid) November 3, 2022
Replace "Washington" under his head with "Chief Twit" and then update "Washington D.C." to Silicon Valley or Muskville, CA or something more clever than that.AgResearch said:
Need an $8 bill image with Elon's face on it.
Make it so and tweet that **** to him. Someone will become a legend.
EDIT:
It's a hot mess but...
Was he criticizing the BoD for fraudulent data and statements about bots, possibly opening up legal prosecution? Or did he also begin understanding the hateful biased political direction the corporation?YouBet said:Dorsey was semi-red pilled towards the end of his time there. He openly criticized the BoD and the company's direction.aggiehawg said:Musk, then Saudi holdings (16%) and then Dorsey is next in share ownership. Dorsey and the Saudis combined still cannot outvote Musk.Quote:
Dorsey owned more than 18 million shares in Twitter, valued at about $1 billion. He could have cashed those shares out at $54.20 a piece when Musk took the company private, instead, he will end up saving Musk about $1 billion in his purchase price by rolling those shares over.
Could be both or just the threat of legal ramifications jeopardizing his investment, I honestly don't know.
edit for clarity
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
richardag said:Was he criticizing the BoD for fraudulent data and statements about bots, possibly opening up legal prosecution? Or did. also begin understanding the hateful biased political direction the corporation?YouBet said:Dorsey was semi-red pilled towards the end of his time there. He openly criticized the BoD and the company's direction.aggiehawg said:Musk, then Saudi holdings (16%) and then Dorsey is next in share ownership. Dorsey and the Saudis combined still cannot outvote Musk.Quote:
Dorsey owned more than 18 million shares in Twitter, valued at about $1 billion. He could have cashed those shares out at $54.20 a piece when Musk took the company private, instead, he will end up saving Musk about $1 billion in his purchase price by rolling those shares over.
Could be both or just the threat of legal ramifications jeopardizing his investment, I honestly don't know.
I just recall him saying that the BoD was responsible for Twitters lack of direction and/or stagnation.
YouBet
Thanks for the response
Thanks for the response
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
I got laid off from Twitter this morning with no notice. I was the lead software engineer responsible for the feature where you catch a glimpse of a tweet and then the timeline refreshes
— gigabear🧸 (@2170cell) November 3, 2022
ok for a non twitter person, what does this mean? just curious.. I have no clueAdverse Event said:I got laid off from Twitter this morning with no notice. I was the lead software engineer responsible for the feature where you catch a glimpse of a tweet and then the timeline refreshes
— gigabear🧸 (@2170cell) November 3, 2022
They're being a smartass and taking jabs at stupid things that Twitter code writers should've had resolved 5 years ago.fullback44 said:ok for a non twitter person, what does this mean? just curious.. I have no clueAdverse Event said:I got laid off from Twitter this morning with no notice. I was the lead software engineer responsible for the feature where you catch a glimpse of a tweet and then the timeline refreshes
— gigabear🧸 (@2170cell) November 3, 2022
fullback44
Joined:
Dec 8, 2006
Posts:
26,202
How long do you want to ignore this user?