TXAggie2011 said:SockStilkings said:
the quintessential version of millennial lawyers - the have a degree sort with experience in "transactional" law but no real experience in theory
Pretty sure transactional real estate attorney AggieHawg isn't a millennial by any means
LOL. No I'm a boomer. And I did far more civil trial law than I did real estate transactions in my later career. Fell into that becaue of business connections, as in investments. Eventually, I had to step in and run one of those companies and having an active status as a lawyer became problematical. So I went inactive.TXAggie2011 said:SockStilkings said:
the quintessential version of millennial lawyers - the have a degree sort with experience in "transactional" law but no real experience in theory
Pretty sure transactional real estate attorney AggieHawg isn't a millennial by any means
You might want to take that up with Brandon.TheAngelFlight said:
AggieHawg wouldn't have to, by all appearances, stretch if not straight lie about her credentials if her experience in this area of law went beyond an internet persona.
https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3390092/replies/65415586
TheAngelFlight said:US Attorneys don't represent the State of Georgia, so I don't see why they would take over the case. That doesn't make any sense.aggiehawg said:No. She's a lowly county prosecutor, probably not even licensed in federal district cour (which is not that hard BTW as I was licensed in many) but she doesn't know those local rules as well.TheAngelFlight said:
If its removed, wouldn't the same prosecutor prosecute the case in Fulton County, just in a different court room with a different judge?
Is it a big deal, either way?
More likely a US Attorney takes over if it get removes.
They can if she defers when it is removed. Federal court is very different. In fact, you could see Fani takes the same tack as James, who is nowhere near counsel table and has refused to press her "own" case in her own courthouse. Or are claiming US Attorneys don't know how to try state law cases in federal court? As you have implied?TheAngelFlight said:
You've repeatedly make blatantly incorrect and bizarre statements and claims about basic things, yet alone have any ability to provide insight beyond what's thought in Intro to Litigation.TheAngelFlight said:US Attorneys don't represent the State of Georgia, so I don't see why they would take over the case. That doesn't make any sense.aggiehawg said:No. She's a lowly county prosecutor, probably not even licensed in federal district cour (which is not that hard BTW as I was licensed in many) but she doesn't know those local rules as well.TheAngelFlight said:
If its removed, wouldn't the same prosecutor prosecute the case in Fulton County, just in a different court room with a different judge?
Is it a big deal, either way?
More likely a US Attorney takes over if it get removes.
HTownAg98 said:SockStilkings said:HTownAg98 said:This is a pile of nonsense. Rudy deserved the best counsel he can afford. If he can't pay his attorneys, they aren't going to work for him for long. It's also possible they had to withdraw due to a conflict of interest.SockStilkings said:
Why would anyone cheer Rudy not being able to get effective counsel? The man took down the mob and turned from a decaying dump to, until last few years, a thriving city and shining light that inspired many other major cities in the US and around the globe to clean up their act.
But he was buddies with Trump so go ahead and hang him from the cross two.
People that are cheering this type of stuff on are simply not American and frankly are not good people.
I pray none have kids. And they should agree not too, being the little Hitler they are showing themselves to be.
You think Rudy cannot afford an attorney or does not have a friend who would pay for one? That is funny.
I take it you do not know many if any rich, famous, well connected people.
Can't pay and won't pay are two different things. But this could have nothing to do with ability to pay.
aggiehawg said:They can if she defers when it is removed. Federal court is very different. In fact, you could see Fani takes the same tack as James, who is nowhere near counsel table and has refused to press her "own" case in her own courthouse. Or are claiming US Attorneys don't know how to try state law cases in federal court? As you have implied?TheAngelFlight said:
You've repeatedly make blatantly incorrect and bizarre statements and claims about basic things, yet alone have any ability to provide insight beyond what's thought in Intro to Litigation.TheAngelFlight said:US Attorneys don't represent the State of Georgia, so I don't see why they would take over the case. That doesn't make any sense.aggiehawg said:No. She's a lowly county prosecutor, probably not even licensed in federal district cour (which is not that hard BTW as I was licensed in many) but she doesn't know those local rules as well.TheAngelFlight said:
If its removed, wouldn't the same prosecutor prosecute the case in Fulton County, just in a different court room with a different judge?
Is it a big deal, either way?
More likely a US Attorney takes over if it get removes.
You are not paying attention here. Fani's case was coordinated by the feds, Jack Wright to be exact.Im Gipper said:
Oh I'm sure Merrick's DOJ is coordinating with Fani!
But that doesn't change that US Attorneys don't step in for state prosecutors. It just doesn't work that way.
They certainly can't just take it over.
But you still think Fani will be on her own if anything gets removed to federal court? With federal defenses? Risky if they really want to nail him.Im Gipper said:
I literally just said I'm sure they are coordinating!
aggiehawg said:But you still think Fani will be on her own if anything gets removed to federal court? With federal defenses? Risky if they really want to nail him.Im Gipper said:
I literally just said I'm sure they are coordinating!
Much of our argument is moot anyway. Trump did not file to remove in time. Again why not, I have no idea. Second year law student knows about removal from Fed Civ Pro.
So just admit that the the feds are driving the bus, not sitting in the back like you insist they are.TXAggie2011 said:
Now you're just trying to change the subject. Just admit you were wrong or hell, just don't respond
Yes. The Fulton County DA will try this case in October and whenever the other defendants go to trial.Quote:
You really think DOJ is going to let Fani come close to trying this case?
Lawyers looking for unpaid legal fees, wife looking for bounced alimony checks, and companies after unpaid bills reads to you that everyone (all those folks) is suing because he had the audacity to saddle up with Trump?SockStilkings said:TXAggie2011 said:
Rudy's currently being sued for $1.3 million in unpaid legal fees. In another recent case, he failed to pay court ordered fees and sanctions. He's been sued numerous times for other unpaid bills. A couple of years ago, he was in court because his alimony checks to his ex-wide were bouncing. His company has been sued for not paying the phone bill.
We don't know why they withdrew here, but we know Rudy has some financial challenges. He's admitted as much multiple times in court
Sounds like everyone is suing him because he had the audacity to saddle up with Trump. I wouldn't pay **** either.
Hell, if I am Rudy I take a public defender and maybe teach them something about the law.
You are an attorney… you good on your pro bono hours?
Yeah, put me down in the group that reads bounced alimony checks, unpaid legal fees, and unpaid bills literally.Quote:
I need a crib sheet of lawyers for TexAgs that matches with real life as there is a distinction between those lawyers who have experience and knowledge of the law and also a reasonable demeanor and ability to critically think (like you Hawg), and others on threads like these that seem to be the quintessential version of millennial lawyers - the have a degree sort with experience in "transactional" law but no real experience in theory, understanding and as in the case of most younger ones the absolute inability to think for themselves or apply any sort of reasonable thinking, critical decisioning.
Quote:
First, Georgia election officials told you that the 2020 election was "the most secure in history."
Then they tried to hide any evidence of cheating.
Then they ignored the evidence of cheating that was discovered only because they were sued in court and forced to release it.
Then they ignored the analysis of computer experts who gave sworn declarations about the vote rigging in their reports submitted to the courts.
Now, Georgia election officials are trying to tell Georgia voters that they don't understand any of this evidence so they won't make any changes to the election system.
Here's a letter from investigator Kevin Moncla to the Georgia Secretary of State explaining that feigning stupidity is not actually a valid defense of their fraud.
Quote:
The results of the 2020 election were certified as correct and accurate by Zagorin even though 6,000 ballots were removed from the hand-count and the audit.
How do we know that's truth?
Because Kevin Moncla and others discovered the missing batches of ballots and they can identify the missing images!
Beware: scanner 801 has got some bad batches.
Unclear. Maybe she expects the defense counsel to use it?? The point is that Raffensperger admitted he was aware of the dirty voter rolls but said that Stacey Abrams was using courts to block him from cleaning up the voter rolls. Possibly good impeachment material for Raffensperger knowing the voter rolls were screwed up and that people cast ballots that were counted that shouldn't have been. Given the margin of victory was so slim, those numbers are astounding. And he knew it.Im Gipper said:
Do you know what that was filed with?
Im Gipper said:
I understand what it means, I was just asking in what context it was filed. It would be very odd for her just to file an affidavit with the court on her own.
Maybe there is some sort of motion to dismiss or some similar Georgia procedural motion.
Who knew Marc Elias posted on TexAgs? Hi, Marc!Quote:
True the Vote was sued by the State of Georgia and I assume it was filed in that case.
I can only find mention of this in a gateway pundit story saying true the vote emailed a copy in a fundraising email
Of course it was. That's the point.Quote:
And Cheseboro's motion to dismiss was denied.
NEW: Judge McAfee in Fulton County enters an order DENYING Kenneth Chesebro's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Comply (with a requirement to file an oath of office before taking action as a Special ADA).
— Katie Phang (@KatiePhang) October 6, 2023
Judge McAfee using some interesting language to emphasize his thoughts... pic.twitter.com/QcUi98L4Ka
Ooh. I was willing to give this judge the benefit of the doubt. That was bad on the judge's part.TXAggie2011 said:
50 points to Gryffindor for the Monty Python referenceNEW: Judge McAfee in Fulton County enters an order DENYING Kenneth Chesebro's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Comply (with a requirement to file an oath of office before taking action as a Special ADA).
— Katie Phang (@KatiePhang) October 6, 2023
Judge McAfee using some interesting language to emphasize his thoughts... pic.twitter.com/QcUi98L4Ka
JUST IN: Georgia prosecutors seek trial testimony from:
— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) October 10, 2023
1) RNC Chair Ronna McDANIEL
2) Alex JONEShttps://t.co/FE5mKMwygQhttps://t.co/ZhWpz0Vr2L pic.twitter.com/5zgajHbY2a
JUST IN: Judge Scott McAfee DENIES several motions by Ken Chesebro and Sidney Powell to dismiss the criminal charges against them in Fulton County, Georgia.
— Anna Bower (@AnnaBower) October 17, 2023
Each challenged count is "facially sound as alleged," McAfee writes. pic.twitter.com/QMTCMgZpDc
