Fani is in the courtroom.
Pending indictment against Trump in Georgia
219,613 Views |
2442 Replies |
Last: 7 days ago by Stat Monitor Repairman
I cant follow anything Fanni's little white boy puppet is saying.
Why is this a big deal?aggiehawg said:
Fani is in the courtroom.
Neither can I, FWIW. He's complaining about Yeartie's testimony being incomplete and not detailed but they had the opportunity to cross her on those issues.AustinCountyAg said:
I cant follow anything Fanni's little white boy puppet is saying.
Whether she'll be able to control herself or will throw another tantrum.texagbeliever said:Why is this a big deal?aggiehawg said:
Fani is in the courtroom.
Is this guy a real lawyer... this is pathetic.AustinCountyAg said:
I cant follow anything Fanni's little white boy puppet is saying.
I was about to post the same thing. Is this his first day in court?1836er said:Is this guy a real lawyer... this is pathetic.AustinCountyAg said:
I cant follow anything Fanni's little white boy puppet is saying.
She is going to start telling the judge and everyone else what they need to be doing. She is a disgusting *****.texagbeliever said:Why is this a big deal?aggiehawg said:
Fani is in the courtroom.
This guy reminds me when a random low level employee at a company has to present something in front of the team once a year
He had been second chair and only handling a few things. Anna Cross was lead counsel handling most of their side of the hearing. But Cross has been absent from court hearings since the day she threw a chaos bomb on Bradley and called him a liar.1836er said:Is this guy a real lawyer... this is pathetic.AustinCountyAg said:
I cant follow anything Fanni's little white boy puppet is saying.
This guy,, Abbate had to step in.
Dont know if Cross resigned or Fani fired her. Haven't heard anyone say she was sick.
and oh by the way... as someone who does a lot of public speaking for a living... if you need to have your argument and "data" laid out in a PowerPoint like that you don't know what you're talking about that well
They said the first day she was absent that she was removed from the case.aggiehawg said:He had been second chair and only handling a few things. Anna Cross was lead counsel handling most of their side of the hearing. But Cross has been absent from court hearings since the day she threw a chaos bomb on Bradley and called him a liar.1836er said:Is this guy a real lawyer... this is pathetic.AustinCountyAg said:
I cant follow anything Fanni's little white boy puppet is saying.
This guy,, Abbate had to step in.
Dont know if Cross resigned or Fani fired her. Haven't heard anyone say she was sick.
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
safe to assume this guy just checks off a certain box for hiring that has to do with diversity....he wasn't hired for his skills thats obvious.
Like I said earlier, I would love to see Fanni and her stable of minions go after Trump. Her and her staff are a complete clown show.
Like I said earlier, I would love to see Fanni and her stable of minions go after Trump. Her and her staff are a complete clown show.
Removed? That means she was fired. You don't remove lead counsel in the middle of a hearing and keep them on the rest of the case.Quote:
They said the first day she was absent that she was removed from the case.
McAfee now has solid ground to get this politically disastrous case off his docket, and referred to Skandalakis and McAfee walks away
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
I would be making the case that the conflict is that she brought the case to get money to her lover.
He would still remain the judge is my understanding. Just new prosecutors from anoth countu office will be substituted, if any are.Foreverconservative said:
McAfee now has solid ground to get this politically disastrous case off his docket, and referred to Skandalakis and McAfee walks away
That's the reason I used the word fired first thing that dayForeverconservative said:
Anna Cross was fired!!!!
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
He's skipping slides because the judge knows these cases better than he does.
LOL.
LOL.
LOL. I was just saying to The hubs that was a bad case for Abbate to put up and then the judge says the same. Not applicable.
He is just grasping a straws to act like no case law applies because it is not exactly the same situation.
SOOOO according to this idiot the LAW says even the mere appearance of a conflict but that's not what it means....
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
I'm not watching, but does this guy look as bad as he sounds? Umm, ughh, in reference, as to…
Did he also just say Willis fought the subpoena because she didn't want to get exposed?
Did he also just say Willis fought the subpoena because she didn't want to get exposed?
Boy howdy for a guy so fixated on speculation, he's 100% speculating on Yearie because they never cross examined her or try to impeach her testimony
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
Yes, he looks just as bad.TxAgLaw03RW said:
I'm not watching, but does this guy look as bad as he sounds? Umm, ughh, in reference, as to…
Did he also just say Willis fought the subpoena because she didn't want to get exposed?
But the exposed comment was to Yeartie's appearance, not Willis. But the judge could just as easily ask that same question of Willis. Why fight the subpoena so hard and then voluntarily testify anyway?
Thanks. I'm having trouble following this dude. He clearly picked the wrong area of practice.
There's Anna Cross via Zoom
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
He was second chair, mostly the paper/pleading document guy until lead counsel Cross was fired.TxAgLaw03RW said:
Thanks. I'm having trouble following this dude. He clearly picked the wrong area of practice.
Anyone watching seen the looks Sadow was giving in the background?? complete wtf look at this guy. Even he cant believe how terrible this is.
Anna Cross was shown on the Zoom call. She appears to be watching but not participating.
I'm guessing she was removed (or removed herself) due to the Bradley events. Is this an issue that arose out of her obviously not correcting statements she knew to be false before burning him? In other words, was she in a legal pickle that forced her to take a back seat?
I'm guessing she was removed (or removed herself) due to the Bradley events. Is this an issue that arose out of her obviously not correcting statements she knew to be false before burning him? In other words, was she in a legal pickle that forced her to take a back seat?
This is a joke. Keep cash as a safety net to fund your sexual affairs.
Well it was quite the chaos bomb that she threw in there towards Bradley, a friendly witness to them from his evasive testimony upon direct. I don't know how that came about but it was obviously planned because she had two witnesses waiting outside and ready to testify.1872walker said:
Anna Cross was shown on the Zoom call. She appears to be watching but not participating.
I'm guessing she was removed (or removed herself) due to the Bradley events. Is this an issue that arose out of her obviously not correcting statements she knew to be false before burning him? In other words, was she in a legal pickle that forced her to take a back seat?
Then again, this entire hearing has been pretty screwed up.
Anyone else able to figure out what the state's main argument/narrative is here?
Orange Man Bad???1836er said:
Anyone else able to figure out what the state's main argument/narrative is here?
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Not really. A lot of this.1836er said:
Anyone else able to figure out what the state's main argument/narrative is here?
