Pending indictment against Trump in Georgia

189,133 Views | 2411 Replies | Last: 4 days ago by aggiejayrod
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Fani is in the courtroom.
AustinCountyAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I cant follow anything Fanni's little white boy puppet is saying.
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Fani is in the courtroom.
Why is this a big deal?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AustinCountyAg said:

I cant follow anything Fanni's little white boy puppet is saying.
Neither can I, FWIW. He's complaining about Yeartie's testimony being incomplete and not detailed but they had the opportunity to cross her on those issues.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
texagbeliever said:

aggiehawg said:

Fani is in the courtroom.
Why is this a big deal?
Whether she'll be able to control herself or will throw another tantrum.
1836er
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AustinCountyAg said:

I cant follow anything Fanni's little white boy puppet is saying.
Is this guy a real lawyer... this is pathetic.
Maveric
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
1836er said:

AustinCountyAg said:

I cant follow anything Fanni's little white boy puppet is saying.
Is this guy a real lawyer... this is pathetic.
I was about to post the same thing. Is this his first day in court?
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
texagbeliever said:

aggiehawg said:

Fani is in the courtroom.
Why is this a big deal?
She is going to start telling the judge and everyone else what they need to be doing. She is a disgusting *****.
The D
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This guy reminds me when a random low level employee at a company has to present something in front of the team once a year
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
1836er said:

AustinCountyAg said:

I cant follow anything Fanni's little white boy puppet is saying.
Is this guy a real lawyer... this is pathetic.
He had been second chair and only handling a few things. Anna Cross was lead counsel handling most of their side of the hearing. But Cross has been absent from court hearings since the day she threw a chaos bomb on Bradley and called him a liar.

This guy,, Abbate had to step in.

Dont know if Cross resigned or Fani fired her. Haven't heard anyone say she was sick.
1836er
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
and oh by the way... as someone who does a lot of public speaking for a living... if you need to have your argument and "data" laid out in a PowerPoint like that you don't know what you're talking about that well
Foreverconservative
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

1836er said:

AustinCountyAg said:

I cant follow anything Fanni's little white boy puppet is saying.
Is this guy a real lawyer... this is pathetic.
He had been second chair and only handling a few things. Anna Cross was lead counsel handling most of their side of the hearing. But Cross has been absent from court hearings since the day she threw a chaos bomb on Bradley and called him a liar.

This guy,, Abbate had to step in.

Dont know if Cross resigned or Fani fired her. Haven't heard anyone say she was sick.
They said the first day she was absent that she was removed from the case.
“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience" - Mark Twain
AustinCountyAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
safe to assume this guy just checks off a certain box for hiring that has to do with diversity....he wasn't hired for his skills thats obvious.

Like I said earlier, I would love to see Fanni and her stable of minions go after Trump. Her and her staff are a complete clown show.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

They said the first day she was absent that she was removed from the case.
Removed? That means she was fired. You don't remove lead counsel in the middle of a hearing and keep them on the rest of the case.
Foreverconservative
How long do you want to ignore this user?
McAfee now has solid ground to get this politically disastrous case off his docket, and referred to Skandalakis and McAfee walks away
“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience" - Mark Twain
dallasiteinsa02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I would be making the case that the conflict is that she brought the case to get money to her lover.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Foreverconservative said:

McAfee now has solid ground to get this politically disastrous case off his docket, and referred to Skandalakis and McAfee walks away
He would still remain the judge is my understanding. Just new prosecutors from anoth countu office will be substituted, if any are.
Foreverconservative
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Foreverconservative said:

Anna Cross was fired!!!!
That's the reason I used the word fired first thing that day
“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience" - Mark Twain
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He's skipping slides because the judge knows these cases better than he does.

LOL.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LOL. I was just saying to The hubs that was a bad case for Abbate to put up and then the judge says the same. Not applicable.
dallasiteinsa02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He is just grasping a straws to act like no case law applies because it is not exactly the same situation.
Foreverconservative
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SOOOO according to this idiot the LAW says even the mere appearance of a conflict but that's not what it means....
“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience" - Mark Twain
TxAgLaw03RW
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm not watching, but does this guy look as bad as he sounds? Umm, ughh, in reference, as to…

Did he also just say Willis fought the subpoena because she didn't want to get exposed?
Foreverconservative
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Boy howdy for a guy so fixated on speculation, he's 100% speculating on Yearie because they never cross examined her or try to impeach her testimony
“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience" - Mark Twain
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TxAgLaw03RW said:

I'm not watching, but does this guy look as bad as he sounds? Umm, ughh, in reference, as to…

Did he also just say Willis fought the subpoena because she didn't want to get exposed?
Yes, he looks just as bad.

But the exposed comment was to Yeartie's appearance, not Willis. But the judge could just as easily ask that same question of Willis. Why fight the subpoena so hard and then voluntarily testify anyway?
TxAgLaw03RW
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thanks. I'm having trouble following this dude. He clearly picked the wrong area of practice.
Foreverconservative
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There's Anna Cross via Zoom
“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience" - Mark Twain
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TxAgLaw03RW said:

Thanks. I'm having trouble following this dude. He clearly picked the wrong area of practice.
He was second chair, mostly the paper/pleading document guy until lead counsel Cross was fired.
AustinCountyAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anyone watching seen the looks Sadow was giving in the background?? complete wtf look at this guy. Even he cant believe how terrible this is.
1872walker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anna Cross was shown on the Zoom call. She appears to be watching but not participating.

I'm guessing she was removed (or removed herself) due to the Bradley events. Is this an issue that arose out of her obviously not correcting statements she knew to be false before burning him? In other words, was she in a legal pickle that forced her to take a back seat?
TxAgLaw03RW
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is a joke. Keep cash as a safety net to fund your sexual affairs.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
1872walker said:

Anna Cross was shown on the Zoom call. She appears to be watching but not participating.

I'm guessing she was removed (or removed herself) due to the Bradley events. Is this an issue that arose out of her obviously not correcting statements she knew to be false before burning him? In other words, was she in a legal pickle that forced her to take a back seat?
Well it was quite the chaos bomb that she threw in there towards Bradley, a friendly witness to them from his evasive testimony upon direct. I don't know how that came about but it was obviously planned because she had two witnesses waiting outside and ready to testify.

Then again, this entire hearing has been pretty screwed up.
1836er
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Anyone else able to figure out what the state's main argument/narrative is here?
Kool
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
1836er said:

Anyone else able to figure out what the state's main argument/narrative is here?
Orange Man Bad???
Avoid the rush. Start hating Socialism now.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
1836er said:

Anyone else able to figure out what the state's main argument/narrative is here?
Not really. A lot of this.

 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.