Pending indictment against Trump in Georgia

189,097 Views | 2411 Replies | Last: 4 days ago by aggiejayrod
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In a bizarre twist, the by far weakest of 4 weak cases is the only one that made it to trial before election.

I'm Gipper
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:

In a bizarre twist, the by far weakest of 4 weak cases is the only one that made it to trial before election.
It was nearly bullet proof because of the venue.

****ing pathetic that this is where we are in America.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Anything that makes Weissmann have a meltdown, is okay with me.

Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Anything that makes Weissmann have a meltdown, is okay with me.


**** Herr Veissmann. He should be in prison.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

**** Herr Veissmann. He should be in prison.
As I always say, the right pigs are squealing! Over target.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TXAggie2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Judge McAfee denies a request to halt proceedings with regards to the defendants that aren't party to the appeal, so this case will continue moving forward for some of the defendants, at least to some extent.

McAfee had previously discussed severing the defendants so this might just be the natural way to do eventually do it.

aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Waste of judicial resources. It was Fani who insisted on all of the defendants being tried together.
TXAggie2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Waste of judicial resources. It was Fani who insisted on all of the defendants being tried together.


Are you suggesting trying them together would be less efficient than severing them?
ShaggySLC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAggie2011 said:

aggiehawg said:

Waste of judicial resources. It was Fani who insisted on all of the defendants being tried together.


Are you suggesting trying them together would be less efficient than severing them?
I think he's suggesting Fani was less efficient and a waste of taxpayer money. Also made Georgia and Georgians into a laughingstock. They're (dems) going to hang Fani out to dry.
TXAggie2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Interesting motion to dismiss the appeal filed by Fulton County in the appeal over the disqualification issue. It takes a little bit to wrap your head around, but the basic argument is that the Findings of Fact by the trial court cannot possibly support removal of the DA under the legal theory being pushed by Trump, et. al. so there's basically nothing to review.

In short, Trump's theory rests on the DA acquiring a personal interest and the DA says the Findings of Fact cannot possibly support the actual acquisition of a personal interest. Won't get into the weeds, but the motion is here: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24742830-a24a1595-motion-to-dismiss

Probably won't be granted per the Georgia lawyers who have commented on it, but they're saying its not without its merit
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sorry but that case is dead.
Al Bula
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
But is it interesting?
DenverAg91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Could the case really go on if he wins? I'm highly skeptical of that
TXAggie2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It almost certainly would not be allowed to proceed once he took office.

That was a stupid interview and a waste of time.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kaitlan Collins has terminal TDS. She's no journalist.
AggieVictor10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TheTruthsLastHope said:

Kvetch said:

Wow! A political prosecution that has no basis in fact! Who would've seen that coming?


Except there is seemingly evidence of fact that will be presented to a grand jury and again to a jury if indicted. Are you confused on what "fact" means?


It's all fake
Less virtue signaling, more vice signaling.

Birds aren’t real.

RFK/brain worm 2024
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DenverAg91 said:



Could the case really go on if he wins? I'm highly skeptical of that
Unlikely. But why does a little known shady lawyer have a Media Consultant? When Wade owes a crap ton of money to his still wife, Jocelyn, plus hiding funds from her by using his IOLTA accounts?
Foreverconservative
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Watch this move by this dummy's handlers

“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience" - Mark Twain
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
My what a tangled web we weave
Foreverconservative
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So Fani has filed a Motion to Dismiss Appeal as Improvidently Granted!!!

She basically telling the appeal court to stay in their lane and they granted the appeal without grounds because McAfee already handled the matter.
“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience" - Mark Twain
TXAggie2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Foreverconservative said:

So Fani has filed a Motion to Dismiss Appeal as Improvidently Granted!!!

She basically telling the appeal court to stay in their lane and they granted the appeal without grounds because McAfee already handled the matter.



I posted this above. The argument is essentially even if the Court adopted Trump's suggested legal standard for removal, the factual findings by the trial court can not amount to meeting that legal standard. Because appellate courts only very very very rarely disturb a trial courts factual findings, there is nothing possibly determinative of the issue review.

That's their argument, at least. I think it makes sense. Still probably reason for the appellate court to hear the case in order to set legal precedent. I don't know if the Court will grant it or if it's procedurally time to make the argument, would have to ask a Georgia expert about that
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Foreverconservative said:

Watch this move by this dummy's handlers


It's like another country, run by a despot.
Foreverconservative
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wait what?

On Nathan Wade's phone Fani was listed as What?

Gorilla Grip Pu**y Pal?


“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience" - Mark Twain
Foreverconservative
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Marlon Wayans has cracked the case

“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience" - Mark Twain
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is insane.



TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

This is insane.






Hawg, had a thread for you about tu interfering in CWS and stealing our coach. Got moved from politics to baseball then disappeared. If you could give any opinions on them actively recruiting a coach they'd then be rivals against it would be appreciated (on baseball forum)
Tea Party
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

This is insane.




How is the strong desire to bury evidence not the clearest sign that D's want unimpeded tyranny and will do anything to keep power?

Conservatives and leftists have irreconsolible differences regarding election integrity.
Learn about the Texas Nationalist Movement
https://tnm.me
Foreverconservative
How long do you want to ignore this user?
“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience" - Mark Twain
MelvinUdall
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You can't be serious.
aggiejayrod
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tea Party said:

aggiehawg said:

This is insane.




How is the strong desire to bury evidence not the clearest sign that D's want unimpeded tyranny and will do anything to keep power?

Conservatives and leftists have irreconsolible differences regarding election integrity.


"Our elections are strong and secure we won't even let you see the ballots we're so confident that they're perfect. Now that we've established they're perfect can we shred them and prosecute anybody who dares question how pristine they are?"
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.