Judge set himself a two week deadline that comes up tomorrow. If he keeps to it, sometime tomorrow or tomorrow night. Friday evening news dump, I guess.GarryowenAg said:
I wonder when the judge will actually make his ruling. Any insight into when this is expected?
Pending indictment against Trump in Georgia
213,876 Views |
2428 Replies |
Last: 5 days ago by TXAggie2011
Overt acts do not themselves have to be criminal under Georgia law.aggiehawg said:Good point. The counter to that is whether his arranging a phone call that has now been quashed still a conspiracy as to him? Not inclined to find a persuasive argument that it is as applied to Meadows.Quote:
The paragraph starting with however says you can be charged with a conspiracy if a co-conspirator is found to have committed an overt act. So it looks like MM could still be in this case even with the only overt act he allegedly committed being thrown out.
So, even if turns out that any of the overt acts Meadows allegedly committed were not criminal themselves, it doesn't really matter. (And Meadows is alleged to have committed several...Overt Acts #5, #9, #19, etc.)
Assuming he committed the alleged overt act, the relevant questions as to Meadows would be the same as anyone charged...were they aware of the conspiracy, did they have the intent to participate in it, and was the purpose of the conspiracy criminal in nature.
🚨 #BREAKING: @Jim_Jordan threatens to hold Fani Willis in contempt pic.twitter.com/2XLt3eOPYN
— House Judiciary GOP (@JudiciaryGOP) March 14, 2024
will25u said:🚨 #BREAKING: @Jim_Jordan threatens to hold Fani Willis in contempt pic.twitter.com/2XLt3eOPYN
— House Judiciary GOP (@JudiciaryGOP) March 14, 2024
That'll be an absolute three ring circus if she shows up to testify. Jordan won't put up with her 'tude.
And that's where it fails. What the "crime" that was the goal of an alleged conspiracy? Questioning multiple irregularities across several states in 2020 election? Asking for an investigation as to why the numbers of votes cast and voting age population do not jive?Quote:
and was the purpose of the conspiracy criminal in nature.
With Raffensperger, already had a federal judge's decision preelection finding the use of Dominion violated Georgia law and the system was deeply flawed and insecure. Raffensperger and Gabe Sterling knew all of that before the election. Yet Raffenspeger lied to Trump, lied to the Governor and lied to the Georgia public about the issues. And when he was called to testify BY THE JUDGE during evidentiary hearings earlier this year, he went uo the 11th Circuit to avoid being put on the stand and asked questions, again BY THE JUDGE.
A little premature. Save the popcorn for tomorrow.
She will just claim that she can't testify about an ongoing investigation.
Nothing will come up from the Jordan sideshow.
Fani should be disqualified in this case should be dismissed!!! Congress is trying to get in on the action, but they will embarrass themselves as
I'm Gipper
Nothing will come up from the Jordan sideshow.
Fani should be disqualified in this case should be dismissed!!! Congress is trying to get in on the action, but they will embarrass themselves as
I'm Gipper
Checkout the U. of Texas fan site. (Or don't.) It's absolutely toxic with TDS..jt2hunt said:
This thread is insanely silent from all the Trump haters.
He set a deadline for himself for Friday.GarryowenAg said:
I wonder when the judge will actually make his ruling. Any insight into when this is expected?
aggiehawg said:
A little premature. Save the popcorn for tomorrow.
I was told it would happen today. Disappointed.
Of course it fails -- on appeal.aggiehawg said:And that's where it fails. What the "crime" that was the goal of an alleged conspiracy? Questioning multiple irregularities across several states in 2020 election? Asking for an investigation as to why the numbers of votes cast and voting age population do not jive?Quote:
and was the purpose of the conspiracy criminal in nature.
What Fani and her Boo have -- under the direction of former White House counsel Jeff DeSantis -- is designed to create a multi-count indictment hanging over President Trump, a mugshot, a drain of financial resources, and punishment by the corrupt legal system for anyone who dared to challenge their election fraud.
Additional goals include a six-week show trial with Trump stuck in Atlanta instead of campaigning and a partisan jury's guilty conviction that allows MSNBC and CNN pundits to claim Trump shouldn't be on house arrest in Mar-a-Lago but should instead be locked up in Fulton Co. Jail on Election Night.
In exchange for this, Fani has been promised the moon -- governor of Georgia? U.S. Senator? White House appointment?
In reality, it would take five minutes for a competent Constitutional lawyer to shred this indictment under the First Amendment's guarantee of the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. But that won't/wouldn't happen until mid-2025.
The Congressional inquiry is into the misuse of federal funds provided for anti-gang prosecution that Fani used as her personal slush fund.Im Gipper said:
She will just claim that she can't testify about an ongoing investigation.
Nothing will come up from the Jordan sideshow.
Fani should be disqualified in this case should be dismissed!!! Congress is trying to get in on the action, but they will embarrass themselves as
It's not related to the Trump case.
And McAfee has said he'll allow for immediate appeal. Meaning the case will not be tried before the election, if ever. After the election there is no point, not a pardon issue, a POTUS issue. Civil case? Yeah POTUS can be called for a deposition but even that would be fraught with massive potholes for the plaintiff.Quote:
Of course it fails -- on appeal.
Criminal state case against a sitting POTUS? Much different question.
Yeah...when the last one got shut down, it appears only the hard core lefties and a VERY small handful of conservatives made it over to the latest iteration.Reality Check said:Checkout the U. of Texas fan site. (Or don't.) It's absolutely toxic with TDS..jt2hunt said:
This thread is insanely silent from all the Trump haters.
I made a couple posts over there a few years back and got neg repped into purgatory (literally).
I only post on the food and travel board now.
Heck, we had a poster here, clob94 that PLAYED for tu back in the 90s and he stopped posting on that board for the same reason...
Fani stays as long as she replaces Wade
That's a coward ruling
He says there's a conflict but doesn't go all the way
That's a coward ruling
He says there's a conflict but doesn't go all the way
“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience" - Mark Twain
once again all the Trump fans who spent weeks proclaiming Willis would be gone and the case would collapse.
proven wrong once again.
proven wrong once again.
LMCane said:
once again all the Trump fans who spent weeks proclaiming Willis would be gone and the case would collapse.
proven wrong once again.
I am far from a Trump fan, but I will vote for him in November, but she should have been removed…sorry you can't see that, but your hate for Trump is showing once again.
Lying to the court is fine as long as you're a democrat.
“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience" - Mark Twain
If the certificate of appeal is allowed to go forward immediately, then the judge has opened the door and opened it widely for an appellate court to boot her.
Can't say one stays but one goes with a straight face.
Can't say one stays but one goes with a straight face.
Does that mean she just has to appoint a new special prosecutor and we start back up right where we are or does it mean that we go back to the beginning with a new special prosecutor since the current proceedings have been tainted?Foreverconservative said:
Fani stays as long as she replaces Wade
That's a coward ruling
He says there's a conflict but doesn't go all the way
Here's the actual ruling
https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2024/03/2024.03.15-Order-on-Motion-to-Disqualify.pdf
https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2024/03/2024.03.15-Order-on-Motion-to-Disqualify.pdf
“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience" - Mark Twain
Tony Franklins Other Shoe
Joined:
May 6, 2014
Posts:
31,093
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's what you get out of all this?LMCane said:
once again all the Trump fans who spent weeks proclaiming Willis would be gone and the case would collapse.
proven wrong once again.
Person Not Capable of Pregnancy
LMCane said:
once again all the Trump fans who spent weeks proclaiming Willis would be gone and the case would collapse.
proven wrong once again.
This is like a pill for your TDS isn't it.
Tony Franklins Other Shoe said:That's what you get out of all this?LMCane said:
once again all the Trump fans who spent weeks proclaiming Willis would be gone and the case would collapse.
proven wrong once again.
You seem surprised that he would say something like that.
Whoever goes wouldn't have to be replaced, there are other attorneys including other special prosecutors on the case already. But I would assume they would add someone to help re-staff it. And continue along from where we are.
Dude, I can't stand Trump and have taken a load of **** about not voting for him on here...LMCane said:
once again all the Trump fans who spent weeks proclaiming Willis would be gone and the case would collapse.
proven wrong once again.
But even I know that this ruling is complete bull*****
Call balls and strikes with your TDS glasses off...
Wow, can't say I'm surprised.
White liberal **** male judge.
Fani should be in prison.
Ridiculous.
White liberal **** male judge.
Fani should be in prison.
Ridiculous.
So...what was Wade's role again in the prosecution? I've lost track.TXAggie2011 said:Ag with kids said:Does that mean she just has to appoint a new special prosecutor and we start back up right where we are or does it mean that we go back to the beginning with a new special prosecutor since the current proceedings have been tainted?Foreverconservative said:
Fani stays as long as she replaces Wade
That's a coward ruling
He says there's a conflict but doesn't go all the way
Whoever goes wouldn't have to be replaced, there are other attorneys including other special prosecutors on the case already. But I would assume they would add someone to help re-staff it. And continue along from where we are.
Is he in charge of this case? Or is Willis?
Foreverconservative said:
Lying to the court is fine as long as you're a democrat.
That is the literal meaning of the ruling.
Also, law signed yesterday by Georgia governor empowers Senate committee to remove D.A. So that's on the table now.
Bottom line, this case is going nowhere fast. No way it's tried before Election Day.
Bottom line, this case is going nowhere fast. No way it's tried before Election Day.
So Wade gets to keep all his money and head to the bank, no problem. Smiling all the way.
Ag with kids said:So...what was Wade's role again in the prosecution? I've lost track.TXAggie2011 said:Ag with kids said:Does that mean she just has to appoint a new special prosecutor and we start back up right where we are or does it mean that we go back to the beginning with a new special prosecutor since the current proceedings have been tainted?Foreverconservative said:
Fani stays as long as she replaces Wade
That's a coward ruling
He says there's a conflict but doesn't go all the way
Whoever goes wouldn't have to be replaced, there are other attorneys including other special prosecutors on the case already. But I would assume they would add someone to help re-staff it. And continue along from where we are.
Is he in charge of this case? Or is Willis?
Willis and her office are "in charge."
Wade is just an outside hire brought in to assist. While that could mean he's been the "manager" or "coordinator" on the case, or doing the most work, that's really just an internal decision of how to manage and staff the case.
sounds like dumb ruling. No time to read it, maybe over the weekend.
Tony Franklins Other Shoe
Joined:
May 6, 2014
Posts:
31,093
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Don't forget his cash also.Rockdoc said:
So Wade gets to keep all his money and head to the bank, no problem. Smiling all the way.
Person Not Capable of Pregnancy
Featured Stories
See All
51:38
12h ago
6.1k
Learned, Loved, Loathed: Auburn 43, Texas A&M 41 (4OT)
by Olin Buchanan
12 Key Statistics: Auburn 43, Texas A&M 41 (4OT)
by Luke Evangelist
10:42
11h ago
1.3k
StrickAggie06
Should DJ Be Able To Play Loud Music Between Plays?
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
14
Orlando Ayala Cant Read
Just My Own Thoughts On Last Night, Where We Are As a Program, and Sip Coming Up Sat
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
12
AggieCrew44
Just My Own Thoughts On Last Night, Where We Are As a Program, and Sip Coming Up Sat
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
8