Good luck with that.Muy said:
Thanks libs, don't cry when the shoes on the other foot now.
The current world brought to us by the woke left and their minions believe "women's rights" is letting a man walk around the girls dong parading his female champion ship trophy whilst swinging his dong in their faces.aggiehawg said:
Yes intent is key here for the underlying crime if they choose to bootstrap the computer trespass "crime" in a RICO case.
Then again Mike Deperno in Antrim, MI has been charged with computer tresspass and he had a court order authorizing it.
The world has gone insane.
Yeah, that's definitely what I am saying. BTW, he is basically running a basement campaign. He spent more time hanging out with Laura Loomer at his Country Club than he did at the State Fair in Iowa Saturday. Trump is literally begging for more legal issues.Funky Winkerbean said:aggie93 said:
Totally agree this is a hitjob and a witch hunt but Trump definitely is a complete idiot when it comes to asking for more of this stuff. Either that or he just wants more charges. I can't imagine a day in the life of being Trump's attorney.Trump is now explicitly telling a witness slated to testify Tuesday that he shouldn't testify. pic.twitter.com/kz8rGe0dxp
— Aaron Blake (@AaronBlake) August 14, 2023
Yea, he should just ball up and run a basement campaign like Biden.
Of course he has a right to say what he wants. Everyone has a right to be a dumbass. This is just insane from a legal perspective to do this kind of lunacy. Everything he says like this can be used against him in Court. What sounds great sitting on the toilet typing away doesn't sound so great in front of a Judge that probably doesn't like you to begin with.fka ftc said:Pretty sure Trump has a 1st amendment right to share his opinion.aggie93 said:
Totally agree this is a hitjob and a witch hunt but Trump definitely is a complete idiot when it comes to asking for more of this stuff. Either that or he just wants more charges. I can't imagine a day in the life of being Trump's attorney.Trump is now explicitly telling a witness slated to testify Tuesday that he shouldn't testify. pic.twitter.com/kz8rGe0dxp
— Aaron Blake (@AaronBlake) August 14, 2023
How is what he said intimidating? Trump, a private citizen, can give his opinion on this.
But I am sure Madame Gang-Banger Indicty Pants from Atlanta will claim otherwise.
Anything to silence political opposition.
His words are never going to be heard in court, but that aside, him speaking up and speaking out is WHO HE IS.aggie93 said:
Of course he has a right to say what he wants. Everyone has a right to be a dumbass. This is just insane from a legal perspective to do this kind of lunacy. Everything he says like this can be used against him in Court. What sounds great sitting on the toilet typing away doesn't sound so great in front of a Judge that probably doesn't like you to begin with.
Look, I don't question that all of this stuff is crap against Trump but this illustrates one of his biggest flaws. Trump is an expert at taking a problem and making it a LOT worse. This is how he ended up not getting so many things done because he played stupid games like this over and over again and he hasn't learned a thing. It just amazes me how people continue to defend his stupidity.
heck of a rant, but kemp does not have the power to pardon himLMCane said:
Why wouldn't the Governor of Georgia be able to pardon him?
the most ironic thing of all:
is that Trump because he is such a @$#@#$ completely slandered and worked to defeat Georgia Governor Kemp the last several years...
no way will Kemp pardon him now.
another 5D stable genius chess move!
Does Mr. Trump really believe that statements like this actually help his cause?aggie93 said:
Totally agree this is a hitjob and a witch hunt but Trump definitely is a complete idiot when it comes to asking for more of this stuff. Either that or he just wants more charges. I can't imagine a day in the life of being Trump's attorney.Trump is now explicitly telling a witness slated to testify Tuesday that he shouldn't testify. pic.twitter.com/kz8rGe0dxp
— Aaron Blake (@AaronBlake) August 14, 2023
what is "his cause"?Quote:
Does Mr. Trump really believe that statements like this actually help his cause?
and some of the "Fake Electors"Ags77 said:
I predict Rudy will also be indicted with Trump in Georgia.
BMX Bandit said:what is "his cause"?Quote:
Does Mr. Trump really believe that statements like this actually help his cause?
winning an election? then yes he does. and he is right.
Trump does not tweet. Flagged for rumor, unconfirmed and false information.LMCane said:and some of the "Fake Electors"Ags77 said:
I predict Rudy will also be indicted with Trump in Georgia.
then they will turn state's evidence and bring down Giuliani and Trump.
THIS is why Trump is rage tweeting all weekend long!
Bring one even remotely based on law and evidence and we can discuss.The Green Dragon said:
Would MAGA ever acknowledge that a criminal complaint against trump is valid?
Just like the leftist loons that simply ignore Biden and deep state corruption.
aggie93 said:Of course he has a right to say what he wants. Everyone has a right to be a dumbass. This is just insane from a legal perspective to do this kind of lunacy. Everything he says like this can be used against him in Court. What sounds great sitting on the toilet typing away doesn't sound so great in front of a Judge that probably doesn't like you to begin with.fka ftc said:Pretty sure Trump has a 1st amendment right to share his opinion.aggie93 said:
Totally agree this is a hitjob and a witch hunt but Trump definitely is a complete idiot when it comes to asking for more of this stuff. Either that or he just wants more charges. I can't imagine a day in the life of being Trump's attorney.Trump is now explicitly telling a witness slated to testify Tuesday that he shouldn't testify. pic.twitter.com/kz8rGe0dxp
— Aaron Blake (@AaronBlake) August 14, 2023
How is what he said intimidating? Trump, a private citizen, can give his opinion on this.
But I am sure Madame Gang-Banger Indicty Pants from Atlanta will claim otherwise.
Anything to silence political opposition.
Look, I don't question that all of this stuff is crap against Trump but this illustrates one of his biggest flaws. Trump is an expert at taking a problem and making it a LOT worse. This is how he ended up not getting so many things done because he played stupid games like this over and over again and he hasn't learned a thing. It just amazes me how people continue to defend his stupidity.
BMX Bandit said:
your question makes no sense. try again.
First off most of that was wiped out in days by Biden and his pen. More importantly though Trump wasted so much of his Presidency burning news cycles and turning off potential supporters with idiocy like this. I'm not arguing Trump was a failure overall (he definitely failed in many areas) but he could have been so much more effective if he didn't do stupid crap like this. I don't know how that is even an argument.fka ftc said:His words are never going to be heard in court, but that aside, him speaking up and speaking out is WHO HE IS.aggie93 said:
Of course he has a right to say what he wants. Everyone has a right to be a dumbass. This is just insane from a legal perspective to do this kind of lunacy. Everything he says like this can be used against him in Court. What sounds great sitting on the toilet typing away doesn't sound so great in front of a Judge that probably doesn't like you to begin with.
Look, I don't question that all of this stuff is crap against Trump but this illustrates one of his biggest flaws. Trump is an expert at taking a problem and making it a LOT worse. This is how he ended up not getting so many things done because he played stupid games like this over and over again and he hasn't learned a thing. It just amazes me how people continue to defend his stupidity.
Regarding what he got done, here you ago (again): https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/trump-administration-accomplishments/
BMX Bandit said:
your question makes no sense. try again.
LINKQuote:
Now, Elias is leading election challenge efforts. One of those cases concern Democratic candidate Anthony Brindisi efforts against former Republican representative Claudia Tenney. Tenney now holds a 125-vote lead after weeks of rechecking by the 22nd Congressional District's eight counties. Rowan Scarborough notes that Elias seems to be "taking a page out of the Donald Trump playbook" in arguing in court that "there is reason to believe that voting tabulation machines misread hundreds if not thousands of valid votes as undervotes, and that these tabulation machine errors disproportionately affected Brindisi."
The tabulation machines are reportedly Dominion Voting machines and a spokeswoman for the Oswego County Board of Election insisted the Elias' claims are meritless.
It's red meat for his base followers but a major turnoff to everyone else. It also may cause him additional legal problems.Hungry Ojos said:aggie93 said:Of course he has a right to say what he wants. Everyone has a right to be a dumbass. This is just insane from a legal perspective to do this kind of lunacy. Everything he says like this can be used against him in Court. What sounds great sitting on the toilet typing away doesn't sound so great in front of a Judge that probably doesn't like you to begin with.fka ftc said:Pretty sure Trump has a 1st amendment right to share his opinion.aggie93 said:
Totally agree this is a hitjob and a witch hunt but Trump definitely is a complete idiot when it comes to asking for more of this stuff. Either that or he just wants more charges. I can't imagine a day in the life of being Trump's attorney.Trump is now explicitly telling a witness slated to testify Tuesday that he shouldn't testify. pic.twitter.com/kz8rGe0dxp
— Aaron Blake (@AaronBlake) August 14, 2023
How is what he said intimidating? Trump, a private citizen, can give his opinion on this.
But I am sure Madame Gang-Banger Indicty Pants from Atlanta will claim otherwise.
Anything to silence political opposition.
Look, I don't question that all of this stuff is crap against Trump but this illustrates one of his biggest flaws. Trump is an expert at taking a problem and making it a LOT worse. This is how he ended up not getting so many things done because he played stupid games like this over and over again and he hasn't learned a thing. It just amazes me how people continue to defend his stupidity.
I don't agree with this. The left (which includes all branches of government, media, entertainment, academia, etc) has been on him NON-STOP for over six years now. He has had to face the most partisan, ridiculous, made up nonsense from EVERY front imaginable. I don't believe his "words" caused the attacks. They are just the response.
Trump has always had that problem.Quote:
As the Bible says, "there is a time to speak and a time to be silent."
Is this the same grand jury that already had the foreman go on TV to talk about the case and expose her biases before the indictments were ever voted on? If so, seems like Trump's attorneys would have a legit beef about anything done by that GJ after that point.TheTruthsLastHope said:Kvetch said:
Wow! A political prosecution that has no basis in fact! Who would've seen that coming?
Except there is seemingly evidence of fact that will be presented to a grand jury and again to a jury if indicted. Are you confused on what "fact" means?
This needs to be repeated over and over to the CMs and squishy Rs.Ellis Wyatt said:Trump has always had that problem.Quote:
As the Bible says, "there is a time to speak and a time to be silent."
But it is honestly irrelevant. There is nothing Trump could say or could not say to avoid all of this.
This is not a prosecution seeking justice. This is a prosecution seeking vengeance.
No. That was a special grand jury that did not have the power to indict, merely report their findings to Willis and then she could choose to present to another grand jury for indictment.txags92 said:Is this the same grand jury that already had the foreman go on TV to talk about the case and expose her biases before the indictments were ever voted on? If so, seems like Trump's attorneys would have a legit beef about anything done by that GJ after that point.TheTruthsLastHope said:Kvetch said:
Wow! A political prosecution that has no basis in fact! Who would've seen that coming?
Except there is seemingly evidence of fact that will be presented to a grand jury and again to a jury if indicted. Are you confused on what "fact" means?
Trump is not the target anymore. The target is any reasonable conservative candidate that might have a chance to defeat a democrat for president. They are making it clear that their henchmen in the DOJ, FBI, and elsewhere will hound any successful republican president, not just while they are in office, but for years afterwards. This is not about Trump anymore, it is about making the cost clear to anybody willing to run against them.Hungry Ojos said:aggie93 said:Of course he has a right to say what he wants. Everyone has a right to be a dumbass. This is just insane from a legal perspective to do this kind of lunacy. Everything he says like this can be used against him in Court. What sounds great sitting on the toilet typing away doesn't sound so great in front of a Judge that probably doesn't like you to begin with.fka ftc said:Pretty sure Trump has a 1st amendment right to share his opinion.aggie93 said:
Totally agree this is a hitjob and a witch hunt but Trump definitely is a complete idiot when it comes to asking for more of this stuff. Either that or he just wants more charges. I can't imagine a day in the life of being Trump's attorney.Trump is now explicitly telling a witness slated to testify Tuesday that he shouldn't testify. pic.twitter.com/kz8rGe0dxp
— Aaron Blake (@AaronBlake) August 14, 2023
How is what he said intimidating? Trump, a private citizen, can give his opinion on this.
But I am sure Madame Gang-Banger Indicty Pants from Atlanta will claim otherwise.
Anything to silence political opposition.
Look, I don't question that all of this stuff is crap against Trump but this illustrates one of his biggest flaws. Trump is an expert at taking a problem and making it a LOT worse. This is how he ended up not getting so many things done because he played stupid games like this over and over again and he hasn't learned a thing. It just amazes me how people continue to defend his stupidity.
I don't agree with this. The left (which includes all branches of government, media, entertainment, academia, etc) has been on him NON-STOP for over six years now. He has had to face the most partisan, ridiculous, made up nonsense from EVERY front imaginable. I don't believe his "words" caused the attacks. They are just the response.
The target has always been anyone who will stand in the way of the advance of marxism. That includes you and me.txags92 said:
Trump is not the target anymore. The target is any reasonable conservative candidate that might have a chance to defeat a democrat for president.
BMX Bandit said:
trump believes, correctly, that these types of statement will help him in his election bid. will he win? who knows.
sorry reading is hard. we all know truth is for you.
txags92 said:Is this the same grand jury that already had the foreman go on TV to talk about the case and expose her biases before the indictments were ever voted on? If so, seems like Trump's attorneys would have a legit beef about anything done by that GJ after that point.TheTruthsLastHope said:Kvetch said:
Wow! A political prosecution that has no basis in fact! Who would've seen that coming?
Except there is seemingly evidence of fact that will be presented to a grand jury and again to a jury if indicted. Are you confused on what "fact" means?
txags92 said:Trump is not the target anymore. The target is any reasonable conservative candidate that might have a chance to defeat a democrat for president. They are making it clear that their henchmen in the DOJ, FBI, and elsewhere will hound any successful republican president, not just while they are in office, but for years afterwards. This is not about Trump anymore, it is about making the cost clear to anybody willing to run against them.Hungry Ojos said:aggie93 said:Of course he has a right to say what he wants. Everyone has a right to be a dumbass. This is just insane from a legal perspective to do this kind of lunacy. Everything he says like this can be used against him in Court. What sounds great sitting on the toilet typing away doesn't sound so great in front of a Judge that probably doesn't like you to begin with.fka ftc said:Pretty sure Trump has a 1st amendment right to share his opinion.aggie93 said:
Totally agree this is a hitjob and a witch hunt but Trump definitely is a complete idiot when it comes to asking for more of this stuff. Either that or he just wants more charges. I can't imagine a day in the life of being Trump's attorney.Trump is now explicitly telling a witness slated to testify Tuesday that he shouldn't testify. pic.twitter.com/kz8rGe0dxp
— Aaron Blake (@AaronBlake) August 14, 2023
How is what he said intimidating? Trump, a private citizen, can give his opinion on this.
But I am sure Madame Gang-Banger Indicty Pants from Atlanta will claim otherwise.
Anything to silence political opposition.
Look, I don't question that all of this stuff is crap against Trump but this illustrates one of his biggest flaws. Trump is an expert at taking a problem and making it a LOT worse. This is how he ended up not getting so many things done because he played stupid games like this over and over again and he hasn't learned a thing. It just amazes me how people continue to defend his stupidity.
I don't agree with this. The left (which includes all branches of government, media, entertainment, academia, etc) has been on him NON-STOP for over six years now. He has had to face the most partisan, ridiculous, made up nonsense from EVERY front imaginable. I don't believe his "words" caused the attacks. They are just the response.
Maybe you missed the earlier TV interview with the GJ foreman that Aggiehawg pointed out was for an earlier version of the work by this prosecutor? I asked a simple question about whether it was the same GJ or not. There was no fantasy or fiction involved.TheTruthsLastHope said:txags92 said:Is this the same grand jury that already had the foreman go on TV to talk about the case and expose her biases before the indictments were ever voted on? If so, seems like Trump's attorneys would have a legit beef about anything done by that GJ after that point.TheTruthsLastHope said:Kvetch said:
Wow! A political prosecution that has no basis in fact! Who would've seen that coming?
Except there is seemingly evidence of fact that will be presented to a grand jury and again to a jury if indicted. Are you confused on what "fact" means?
Not sure if the grand jury members have been made public in regards to this reported upcoming indictment. I'm not familiar with any exposing of biases, and as far as I know acknowledging facts is far from exposing biases. Nevermind I see you ended with "if so", you just wanted to discuss fantasy or fiction for the sake of discussing.
