This is a very lengthy tweet that I saw, what do you think about this Hawg?
So the Fulton County Georgia prosecutor's office "accidentally" posted the charges against Trump even though the Grand Jury was still hearing testimony and hadn't voted on anything.
Nope, not rigged.
The charges are things like "racketeering," making false statements, conspiracy, and solicitation of oath violation. The local Democrat prosecutor bringing the charges, Fani Willis, also includes a charge of "forgery."
Was Donald Trump forging stuff?
I'd like to see the evidence on that.
Hard to see how anything Trump did involved "racketeering."
If you are conspiring with others to commit crimes, that can fall under the RICO ACT (Racketeering and Corrupt Organizations Act). This law was enacted to allow the government to more effectively go after organized crime -- like Al Capone, Lucky Luciano, drug cartels, etc.
RICO is a very broadly worded statute that can be used to put almost anyone away for life if the government really decides to put everything you've done under a microscope.
Check out the book THREE FELONIES A DAY by attorney Harvey Silvergate (a Harvard Law grad).
This book tells us that the typical professional today is committing several federal crimes per day without knowing it.
In this case, Trump was simply expressing his opinion to people about the 2020 Election. And a lot of people were basically nodding in agreement. So that's racketeering and conspiracy.
Trump's team was also challenging the election results in the courts -- perfectly legal.
The 98-page indictment by local Fulton County prosecutor Fani Willis also includes indictments against these co-defendants: state Sen. Shawn Still; attorneys John Eastman, Sidney Powell, Jenna Ellis, Bob Cheeley, Ray Smith III and Kenneth Chesebro; former assistant U.S. attorney general Jeffrey Clark; GOP strategist Michael Roman; former Coffee County elections supervisor Misty Hampton; former Coffee County GOP chairwoman Cathy Latham; Atlanta bail bondsman Scott Hall; publicist Trevian Kutti; Illinois pastor Stephen Cliffguard Lee; and Harrison Floyd, who briefly ran for a suburban Atlanta U.S. House seat before serving as director of Black Voices for Trump.
Really? Trump's lawyer Jenna Willis?
I've seen her on TV many times.
Looks like a perfectly respectable lawyer.
Certainly does not strike me as any kind of Al Capone?
Sidney Powell does strike me as crazy. But it's not illegal to be crazy.
The Director of Black Voices for Trump is also indicted.
Really? What did he do?
This indictment is just an effort to destroy the lives of any and all who have any connection to Trump. And it's extra bad if you happen to be a black Trump supporter.
Former Assistant U.S. Attorney General Jeffrey Clark indicted?
Really? What did he do?
Looks like Trump's entire legal team has been indicted?
Is it illegal now to launch legal challenges to elections?
Only if you're a Republican challenging an election result favorable to the Democrat, apparently.
The Fulton County grand jury met for just 10 hours on these 41 charges.
How was this grand jury able to go through 98 pages and 41 charges in just 10 hours?
I guess it really is true that any prosecutor can secure indictments against a ham sandwich.
The Democrat judge was cracking jokes and laughing the entire time he was reading off the charges.
The Democrat prosecutor, Fani Willis, wants all defendants tried together all at once in one trial.
Sounds like a trial in North Korea.
Trump did call the GA Sec State and ask him to find 12,000 votes. Trump did not say manufacture 12,000 bogus ballots. Trump obviously believed there were 12,000 votes for Trump out there somewhere, perhaps in a dumpster. Right or wrong, he's entitled to believe that.
And it's perfectly legal for Trump to scream and yell about it, just as Hillary Clinton went on ad nausea about how she believed the 2016 Election was stolen. Actually, she tried to steal the 2016 election by creating the "Russia Hoax" narrative, but failed.
That actually was a crime -- many crimes. This hoax triggered a two-year investigation by a Special Counsel even though the FBI knew the "Russia Hoax" was a hoax from the start. It was an attempt by the Hillary Campaign and the Obama FBI-CIA-NSA to frame Donald Trump. But no one prosecuted for this hoax.
It's interesting that none of these indictments accuse Trump of committing election fraud, vote fraud, or anything like that.
The prosecutor, Fani Willis, vaguely accuses Trump of "undermining" the election.
They are attacking Trump for his words and statements.
His words, statements, and legal challenges to the election all came after the election. So how does any of this undermine the election?
And why is it illegal to make legal challenges to the election?
Trump is not being prosecuted for things most people think of as crimes. He's not being prosecuted for stealing money, bribery while in office, or killing anyone. He's not being prosecuted for inciting a riot, insurrection, or sedition.
After 7 years of non-stop investigations, they haven't even been able to find any cheating on taxes.
Jack Smith's J6 case hinges entirely on Trump not really believing what he's been saying. Trump's been saying the election was stolen. Is there any doubt that Trump believes this?
Trump might be wrong. But there's no question he believes the 2020 Election was stolen.
It's not illegal to be wrong. It's not even illegal to lie, unless under oath. If it were illegal for politicians to lie, everyone in Congress would be in jail, as would every President except for George Washington . . . because he "never told a lie." Or at least that's what I was taught in first grade.
So they want to put Trump in prison for 9,000,000,000,000 years for making false statements (possibly false) that he believes were true statements.
Let's not forget that Jack Smith's prosecution and conviction of Governor Bob McDonnell was overturned 9-0 by the U.S. Supreme Court. The Fulton County prosecutor, Fani Willis, is an elected official. She's a Democrat politician and has been fundraising for her reelection on getting Trump.
In the Fulton County, Georgia indictments, why does a local Democrat prosecutor have any jurisdiction over federal election law?
If this were really a valid case here, why isn't this being handled at the federal level by a U.S. Attorney?
Apparently, because even the Biden Justice Department does not think there's a case in Fulton County.
Are we at a point now when any local Republican DA can bring criminal charges against any Democrat running for President?
And is it really possible to prove the 2020 Election wasn't stolen?
We're only talking about 44,000 votes or so across three states that made the difference.
It's true Trump never proved the Election was stolen. So then: Is it a crime now to make a statement that might or might not be true, but then fail to prove your statement true?
There were many violations of Election law in the key Democrat-run states, especially in Wisconsin, as ruled by the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
No one was held accountable for these election law violations that heavily favored Biden in Wisconsin. And the court did not order a do-over for the election.
Mark Zuckerberg contributed $450 million to set up ballot drop boxes in urban areas (where the Democrat votes are) in battleground states. This amounted to true election interference and was ruled illegal by the Wisconsin Supreme Court one year after the 2020 election.
Justice Rebecca Bradley wrote this in her opinion for the majority: "The illegality of these drop boxes weakens the people's faith that the election produced an outcome reflective of their will. The Wisconsin voters, and all lawful voters, are injured when the institution charged with administering Wisconsin elections does not follow the law, leaving the results in question."
She noted: "If the right to vote is to have any meaning at all, elections must be conducted according to law."
But no legal repercussions for Zuck.
Google search is heavily biased in favor of Democrats. This is a $1.5 TRILLION corporation. Google's rigged search results amount to election interference. We know from the work of Harvard Psychologist and the former editor of Psychology Today Robert Epstein that biased Google search results are having massive impact on elections in favor of Democrats at every level of government. So Google is deciding all close elections.
So now Democrats have indicted Donald Trump, the leading Republican candidate for President, on upwards of 100 crimes.
Almost all these indictments stem from Donald Trump having an opinion about the 2020 Election that differs from the official narrative. Why not 1,000 crimes? Why not a MILLION crimes? Why stop there?
@benhart_freedom