*****Official Jan 6th Committee Hearing Thread*****

153,248 Views | 2038 Replies | Last: 8 mo ago by Funky Winkerbean
Ag In Ok
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not sure we are communicating here - the guy hit the crash bar on the right door and it opened up. Code or not, the door wasn't locked when he tried. Not sure the point you are trying to make. The left door was locked, safe to assume as was the right. Then they unlock.
Carolin_Gallego
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It unlocked after the timed delay.
We believe progress is made through MORE discussion, not LESS, and we believe that to be true even if the topics are uncomfortable and we occasionally disagree with one another. - TexAgs
The name-calling technique making false associations is a child's game. The propagandist who uses this technique hopes that the audience will reject a person and their argument on this false basis.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
After this tv production is concluded is there gonna be a show kinda like Cops where they go and chase Trump down? I want to set my DVR. keep us posted Carolin.
Ag In Ok
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Carolin_Gallego said:

It unlocked after the timed delay.


That's not how it works, it requires constant pressure to release. Not push once and wait.
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Carolin_Gallego said:

aggieforester05 said:

So you're upset that people were floating alternate legal methods to keep a suspected illegitimate president elect from being confirmed before a proper investigation of a highly contentious and unusual election could be completed?
Three falsehoods in that statement. Trumps own team confirmed that Biden was legitimately elected. Trumps own team confirmed the alternate methods were not legal. Trump and others acted on those illegal alternate methods.


More lies and missing context, big surprise.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wisconsin statehouse: Is this an insurrection? Asking for a friend.



And is this incitement by the Governor?

Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Trying to overthrow the will of the people is always (D)ifferent when those people are evil Republicans
TxAgLaw03RW
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Carolin_Gallego said:

MouthBQ98 said:

Nobody cares. Seriously.
You cared enough to comment, multiple times.


That's about the extent, and I am a big follower of politics. Jane and Joe Sixpack DGAF.
tysker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rockdoc said:

After this tv production is concluded is there gonna be a show kinda like Cops where they go and chase Trump down? I want to set my DVR. keep us posted Carolin.

Maybe like Cheaters. Liz Cheney and a camera will confront him when hw least expects it and catches him in the act.
Marcus Brutus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
28 pages discussing a Soviet-style show trial.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Carolin_Gallego said:

aggieforester05 said:

So you're upset that people were floating alternate legal methods to keep a suspected illegitimate president elect from being confirmed before a proper investigation of a highly contentious and unusual election could be completed?
Three falsehoods in that statement. Trumps own team confirmed that Biden was legitimately elected. Trumps own team confirmed the alternate methods were not legal. Trump and others acted on those illegal alternate methods.
How could Trump's team possibly know something that wasn't even fully investigated? Will you ever get tired of lying?
Carolin_Gallego
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

Carolin_Gallego said:

aggieforester05 said:

So you're upset that people were floating alternate legal methods to keep a suspected illegitimate president elect from being confirmed before a proper investigation of a highly contentious and unusual election could be completed?
Three falsehoods in that statement. Trumps own team confirmed that Biden was legitimately elected. Trumps own team confirmed the alternate methods were not legal. Trump and others acted on those illegal alternate methods.
How could Trump's team possibly know something that wasn't even fully investigated? Will you ever get tired of lying?
Fraud claims where fully investigated.


Furthermore,
We believe progress is made through MORE discussion, not LESS, and we believe that to be true even if the topics are uncomfortable and we occasionally disagree with one another. - TexAgs
The name-calling technique making false associations is a child's game. The propagandist who uses this technique hopes that the audience will reject a person and their argument on this false basis.
Watermelon Man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

Carolin_Gallego said:

aggieforester05 said:

So you're upset that people were floating alternate legal methods to keep a suspected illegitimate president elect from being confirmed before a proper investigation of a highly contentious and unusual election could be completed?
Three falsehoods in that statement. Trumps own team confirmed that Biden was legitimately elected. Trumps own team confirmed the alternate methods were not legal. Trump and others acted on those illegal alternate methods.
How could Trump's team possibly know something that wasn't even fully investigated? Will you ever get tired of lying?
The election results were fully investigated to the point that eliminated possible fraud from affecting the results before the results were certified. All that really needed to be done to verify this is to make sure they followed their procedures and certified their results. That is what the election departments of the various states do. The idea that the election departments were crooked is so absurd as to be unbelievable.

A common tactic of authoritarian strongmen is to make a claim that is so absurd that only those truly loyal to the despot would believe it. Like Kim Jung Un learned to drive when he was 3 years old.

Under normal circumstances, nobody would believe that a candidate that lost a presidential election by over 74 electoral votes, over 7 million in the popular vote, had actually won. But, if you start making threats to elected officials, doxing the election workers, and insulting anyone who suggests that Loser Donny actually lost, well, you can be fairly sure those who agree with your lie are true believers and do a pretty good job of preventing those who have the integrity to tell the truth from being heard.

Trump lost. He knew he lost. He knew that the only way to stay in power was to subvert the US Constitution and really didn't care who he hurt to achieve that goal. He failed to uphold the oath he swore to when he assumed office. In effect, he lied to God.

But, keep repeating misleading headlines, manufactured evidence, and try to destroy anything that gets in your way. That's the American way (or, at least, what the American way is becoming).
It is much easier to fool someone than it is to convince someone that he has been fooled.
Carolin_Gallego
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hearing at 2:00pm central time.



Witnesses:
Jeffrey A. Rosen, Former Acting Attorney General
Richard Donoghue, Former Acting Deputy Attorney General
Steven Engel, Former Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel
We believe progress is made through MORE discussion, not LESS, and we believe that to be true even if the topics are uncomfortable and we occasionally disagree with one another. - TexAgs
The name-calling technique making false associations is a child's game. The propagandist who uses this technique hopes that the audience will reject a person and their argument on this false basis.
petroleo y agua
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nobody cares about the Kangaroo Court. Also, it wasnt an insurrection. Have a blessed day.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Your time must not be worth anything. Go out and get a good job. It'll make you feel better about yourself.
TxAgLaw03RW
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Correct. Looks like some of the Dems are coming around to the idea nobody cares, but people do care about the economic sh**storm Biden and the Democrats have ignited.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/politico-reporter-democratic-lawmakers-january-6
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So did we get him yet?

Any day now?
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gigem314 said:

So did we get him yet?

Any day now?

I keep asking carolin when they are gonna go arrest and shackle Trump but he won't answer.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
From Politico. Democrats braying their TDS on this thread should pay attention to reality as quoted here:

Quote:

"The reality is - obviously, it's a very important issue. Obviously - like I've been covering this nonstop for the last year. It's important, it's a key part of understanding American history and the democratic trajectory that this country is on. It is also true at the same time and not at all contradictory that it's not a top-tier voting issue for people who are figuring out who they're going to support during the midterms," Swan told Todd. "Top-tier issues are material concerns. How are people paying their mortgages? How much does it cost to get milk and bread? How much does it cost to get gas?"

Swan added, "Do these hearings result in different electoral outcomes for Democrats? I have yet to see any actual evidence that they do."

I do agree with her on concerns about our democratic trajectory in this country but those concerns 100% originate with the totalitarian efforts of Democrats. I'm assuming this Politico reporter hasn't thought to question the left side of the aisle on their trajectory though.
barbacoa taco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gigem314 said:

So did we get him yet?

Any day now?
The serious answer to your sarcastic question is yes, there's already more than enough to prosecute and indict Trump. The fact that "people dont care" doesn't change that.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
larry culpepper said:

Gigem314 said:

So did we get him yet?

Any day now?
The serious answer to your sarcastic question is yes, there's already more than enough to prosecute and indict Trump. The fact that "people dont care" doesn't change that.

Then get on with it. Let's see it.
Oh brother.
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
larry culpepper said:

Gigem314 said:

So did we get him yet?

Any day now?
The serious answer to your sarcastic question is yes, there's already more than enough to prosecute and indict Trump. The fact that "people dont care" doesn't change that.
Then why don't they do it? What are they waiting on?

Maybe a third impeachment will do the trick since the first two failed?
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Watermelon Man said:




Under normal circumstances, nobody would believe that a candidate that lost a presidential election by over 74 electoral votes, over 7 million in the popular vote, had actually won. But, if you start making threats to elected officials, doxing the election workers, and insulting anyone who suggests that Loser Donny actually lost, well, you can be fairly sure those who agree with your lie are true believers and do a pretty good job of preventing those who have the integrity to tell the truth from being heard.

Trump lost. He knew he lost. He knew that the only way to stay in power was to subvert the US Constitution and really didn't care who he hurt to achieve that goal. He failed to uphold the oath he swore to when he assumed office. In effect, he lied to God.

But, keep repeating misleading headlines, manufactured evidence, and try to destroy anything that gets in your way. That's the American way (or, at least, what the American way is becoming).




Hrmm...
Quote:

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 55% of Likely U.S. voters believe cheating likely affected the outcome of the 2020 presidential election

https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/may_2022/election_integrity_most_voters_still_suspect_cheating

Keep repeating to yourself that only fringe lunatics believe in election fraud. It's incorrect.
"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms … disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes… . Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.”

--Thomas Jefferson
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
larry culpepper said:

Gigem314 said:

So did we get him yet?

Any day now?
The serious answer to your sarcastic question is yes, there's already more than enough to prosecute and indict Trump. The fact that "people dont care" doesn't change that.


The discovery would be delicious.

There is a reason why this whole thing is going down in a kangaroo court instead of the legal system. Once you get constitutional protections involved, this whole sham would become unraveled.
"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms … disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes… . Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.”

--Thomas Jefferson
barbacoa taco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rockdoc said:

larry culpepper said:

Gigem314 said:

So did we get him yet?

Any day now?
The serious answer to your sarcastic question is yes, there's already more than enough to prosecute and indict Trump. The fact that "people dont care" doesn't change that.

Then get on with it. Let's see it.
Oh brother.
I couldn't agree more. **** or get off the pot. The evidence is there. Lock that criminal piece of **** up.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
larry culpepper said:

Rockdoc said:

larry culpepper said:

Gigem314 said:

So did we get him yet?

Any day now?
The serious answer to your sarcastic question is yes, there's already more than enough to prosecute and indict Trump. The fact that "people dont care" doesn't change that.

Then get on with it. Let's see it.
Oh brother.
I couldn't agree more. **** or get off the pot. The evidence is there. Lock that criminal piece of **** up.

Do it. I can't wait.
Your so misguided.
Trucker 96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
larry culpepper said:

Gigem314 said:

So did we get him yet?

Any day now?
The serious answer to your sarcastic question is yes, there's already more than enough to prosecute and indict Trump. The fact that "people dont care" doesn't change that.
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
larry culpepper said:

Rockdoc said:

larry culpepper said:

Gigem314 said:

So did we get him yet?

Any day now?
The serious answer to your sarcastic question is yes, there's already more than enough to prosecute and indict Trump. The fact that "people dont care" doesn't change that.

Then get on with it. Let's see it.
Oh brother.
I couldn't agree more. **** or get off the pot. The evidence is there. Lock that criminal piece of **** up.
Maybe after the next round of campaign donations...they'll finally do it. This time it will be for real! This time they'll really get him! #AnyDayNow
etxag02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MouthBQ98 said:

Nobody cares. Seriously.
Trump is hate-watching every Jan. 6 hearing and almost screams at the TV because he feels nobody is defending him. One guy cares. LOL
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
etxag02 said:

MouthBQ98 said:

Nobody cares. Seriously.
Trump is hate-watching every Jan. 6 hearing and almost screams at the TV because he feels nobody is defending him. One guy cares. LOL



Quote:

Trump is at "the point of about to scream at the TV" as he tunes in to each hearing, one unnamed close advisor told the paper.

Another in his circle, also unnamed, told the paper that Trump continually complains that "there's no one to defend me" at the hearings, which have attracted huge amounts of media coverage.

A person familiar with the situation denied this to Insider, saying: "This is not true. He has barely watched any of the hearings at all."
Sims
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

"There's already more than enough to prosecute and indict Trump."
- Adam Schiff, 2017
- Adam Schiff, 2018
- Adam Schiff, 2019
- Adam Schiff, 2020
- Adam Schiff, 2021
- Adam Schiff, 2022
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Talk about someone who could be in prison for lying under oath. Being in congress has saved his arse.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.