*****Official Jan 6th Committee Hearing Thread*****

150,428 Views | 2038 Replies | Last: 6 mo ago by Funky Winkerbean
Gabster43213
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:59p, 6/28/22
Has Mark Meadows commented yet?

After all, Hutchinson was one of his trusted employees.
Reply Quote
barbacoa taco
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:05p, 6/28/22
AG


Sounds like if the secret service disputes Hutchinson's testimony, they're going to testify.
Reply Quote
2
Gigem314
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:06p, 6/28/22
AG
Reply Quote
4
barbacoa taco
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 9:11p, 6/28/22
AG
will25u said:
24 hour rule blown to smithereens. Only a couple of hours and it is debunked.

But the libs here earlier were all giddy, and saying this was YUGE!

L.O.L.
y'all are already popping champagne bottles based on a tweet about an unnamed source from the secret service.

if someone has exculpating evidence, they're free to testify under oath. until then we're relying on secondhand information over actual testimony under oath.

and if they do, i'll accept it, and it will make the j6 committee look bad.
Reply Quote
4
1872walker
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to barbacoa taco • 9:18p, 6/28/22
larry culpepper said:
will25u said:
24 hour rule blown to smithereens. Only a couple of hours and it is debunked.

But the libs here earlier were all giddy, and saying this was YUGE!

L.O.L.
y'all are already popping champagne bottles based on a tweet about an unnamed source from the secret service.

if someone has exculpating evidence, they're free to testify under oath. until then we're relying on secondhand information over actual testimony under oath.

and if they do, i'll accept it, and it will make the j6 committee look bad.


No, they're not free to testify. They can't walk into the chamber and demand an audience.

It's up to the committee to call them to testify. Will they?
Reply Quote
11
1 edit
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to barbacoa taco • 9:18p, 6/28/22
larry culpepper said:
will25u said:
24 hour rule blown to smithereens. Only a couple of hours and it is debunked.

But the libs here earlier were all giddy, and saying this was YUGE!

L.O.L.
y'all are already popping champagne bottles based on a tweet about an unnamed source from the secret service.

if someone has exculpating evidence, they're free to testify under oath. until then we're relying on secondhand information over actual testimony under oath.

and if they do, i'll accept it, and it will make the j6 committee look bad.
.

If they don't call them, how can they testify under oath? The Democrats control this whole farce.

And we all know, the Democrats will not call them.
Reply Quote
11
Old Ag 74
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to barbacoa taco • 9:25p, 6/28/22
AG
larry culpepper said:
will25u said:
24 hour rule blown to smithereens. Only a couple of hours and it is debunked.

But the libs here earlier were all giddy, and saying this was YUGE!

L.O.L.
y'all are already popping champagne bottles based on a tweet about an unnamed source from the secret service.

if someone has exculpating evidence, they're free to testify under oath. until then we're relying on secondhand information over actual testimony under oath.

and if they do, i'll accept it, and it will make the j6 committee look bad.
LOL - are you really this dumb?
Reply Quote
15
1872walker
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Old Ag 74 • 9:29p, 6/28/22
I kind of feel like this tweet is aimed at our usual suspects

Reply Quote
10
HarryJ33tamu
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Old Ag 74 • 9:32p, 6/28/22
Yes, he most certainly is.
Reply Quote
8
barbacoa taco
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 1872walker • 9:35p, 6/28/22
AG
1872walker said:
larry culpepper said:
will25u said:
24 hour rule blown to smithereens. Only a couple of hours and it is debunked.

But the libs here earlier were all giddy, and saying this was YUGE!

L.O.L.
y'all are already popping champagne bottles based on a tweet about an unnamed source from the secret service.

if someone has exculpating evidence, they're free to testify under oath. until then we're relying on secondhand information over actual testimony under oath.

and if they do, i'll accept it, and it will make the j6 committee look bad.


No, they're not free to testify. They can't walk into the chamber and demand an audience.

It's up to the committee to call them to testify. Will they?
Yes.



Keep in mind, the only disputed part was the assaulting agents/grabbing the steering wheel part, according to Alexander. That was one small part of the testimony today.
Reply Quote
2
Old Ag 74
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to barbacoa taco • 9:43p, 6/28/22
AG
larry culpepper said:
1872walker said:
larry culpepper said:
will25u said:
24 hour rule blown to smithereens. Only a couple of hours and it is debunked.

But the libs here earlier were all giddy, and saying this was YUGE!

L.O.L.
y'all are already popping champagne bottles based on a tweet about an unnamed source from the secret service.

if someone has exculpating evidence, they're free to testify under oath. until then we're relying on secondhand information over actual testimony under oath.

and if they do, i'll accept it, and it will make the j6 committee look bad.


No, they're not free to testify. They can't walk into the chamber and demand an audience.

It's up to the committee to call them to testify. Will they?
Yes.



Keep in mind, the only disputed part was the assaulting agents/grabbing the steering wheel part, according to Alexander. That was one small part of the testimony today.
So an anonymous aide tells a DNBC "journalist" that anyone is welcome to testify that has contradictory testimony.....rrrrrright.
Reply Quote
6
MRB10
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:45p, 6/28/22
AG
Is anyone actually paying attention to this?
“There is no red.
There is no blue.
There is the state.
And there is you.”

“As government expands, Liberty contracts” - R. Reagan
Reply Quote
3
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to barbacoa taco • 9:45p, 6/28/22
Small part, but the part media chose to magnify. Why was that?

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
3
Rockdoc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:49p, 6/28/22
AG
They would have to be invited by the chairmen. We'll see. I hope they are.
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
Good Poster
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:21p, 6/28/22
AG
Reply Quote
7
Rockdoc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:27p, 6/28/22
AG
Oh crap!
Reply Quote
5
YouBet
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to barbacoa taco • 10:46p, 6/28/22
AG
larry culpepper said:
1872walker said:
larry culpepper said:
will25u said:
24 hour rule blown to smithereens. Only a couple of hours and it is debunked.

But the libs here earlier were all giddy, and saying this was YUGE!

L.O.L.
y'all are already popping champagne bottles based on a tweet about an unnamed source from the secret service.

if someone has exculpating evidence, they're free to testify under oath. until then we're relying on secondhand information over actual testimony under oath.

and if they do, i'll accept it, and it will make the j6 committee look bad.


No, they're not free to testify. They can't walk into the chamber and demand an audience.

It's up to the committee to call them to testify. Will they?
Yes.



Keep in mind, the only disputed part was the assaulting agents/grabbing the steering wheel part, according to Alexander. That was one small part of the testimony today.
Of f'ing course they found it credible. It's all Democrats running yet another TDS kangaroo court!

Lol. You really think they wouldn't? They are going to find everything credible because they have shifted their legal mindset to guilty until proven innocent - a paradigm shift that was actually proclaimed should happen during Kanvanaugh.
Reply Quote
7
1 edit
GMaster0
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 1872walker • 10:47p, 6/28/22
1872walker said:


I am truly, genuinely shocked by this news.

Trump is fit enough to lunge? That can't be true, he's so fat.

Reply Quote
5
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:48a, 6/29/22
Reply Quote
6
Austin Ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:50a, 6/29/22
AG
What Would An Indictment of Trump Look Like? Libertarian
Reply Quote
5 edits
aggiedata
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:00a, 6/29/22
AG
Reply Quote
5
aggiedata
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:02a, 6/29/22
AG
Reply Quote
18
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiedata • 8:04a, 6/29/22
AG
aggiedata said:


Journalists *and* texags CMs. Weird how that's so intertwined...
Reply Quote
7
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiedata • 8:05a, 6/29/22
AG
aggiedata said:
Wonder if Cassidy has "beach friends" that are Dem activist lawyers, too?
Reply Quote
5
1872walker
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:53a, 6/29/22
Reply Quote
9
Whirligigs
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:55a, 6/29/22
What a banana republic we have become - and everybody seems to hope for the next election cycle to fix the banana republic. Go figure.
Reply Quote
2
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:00a, 6/29/22
Reply Quote
11
Prosperdick
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BenFiasco14 • 9:02a, 6/29/22
AG
BenFiasco14 said:
It's amazing the crap libs will believe

Russian blackmail and golden showers

Blasey Ford

Trump insulting Japanese by dumping koi food

Russia collusion

Trump dramatically grasping for steering wheel vin diesel style
Don't forget the calendar watching with Melania missing openly speculating that Trump beat her and she couldn't be seen in public with all those bruises.

Libs are little children and Trump is their boogeyman.
Reply Quote
5
YouBet
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:02a, 6/29/22
AG
Are we at a point that we can officially write this committee off as fake news? Now that the American media apparatus has even clowned this entire day of events...the first actual thing from this trial that made it above the fold by the way....then what's the point of it now?

Rhetorical, obviously.

But, seriously, it officially has no legitimacy at this point.
Reply Quote
3
FriscoKid
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to YouBet • 9:08a, 6/29/22
AG
YouBet said:
Are we at a point that we can officially write this committee off as fake news? Now that the American media apparatus has even clowned this entire day of events...the first actual thing from this trial that made it above the fold by the way....then what's the point of it now?

Rhetorical, obviously.

But, seriously, it officially has no legitimacy at this point.

It was dumb from the beginning. Even with a one sided "trial" they still can't win the case. Imagine how bad it would be if the defense got to ask questions. This is a clown show and some people here got egg on their face once again.
Reply Quote
3
tysker
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 9:08a, 6/29/22
AG
grab them by the pus s y steering wheel


Reply Quote
5
1 edit
Gigem314
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Some Junkie Cosmonaut • 9:11a, 6/29/22
AG
Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:
aggiedata said:


Journalists *and* texags CMs. Weird how that's so intertwined...
I was about to say. Funny how their demeanor changed throughout the day from "We got him!!" to "It wasn't an important part of the testimonial...the big one is coming! Just you wait!!"
Reply Quote
5
Aggie95
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:13a, 6/29/22
AG
Is there ANY chance someone like Trump had a hand in this debacle yesterday? This lady was supposedly going to work at Mar-a Lago and was in Trump's larger circle....so Trump says hey..."go to tell them you overheard a bunch of stuff (2nd hand info, so she can't be perjury, etc)" and make the dems look like fools for believing any of it.
Reply Quote
1 edit
BuddysBud
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gigem314 • 9:13a, 6/29/22
AG
Gigem314 said:
Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:
aggiedata said:


Journalists *and* texags CMs. Weird how that's so intertwined...
I was about to say. Funny how their demeanor changed throughout the day from "We got him!!" to "It wasn't an important part of the testimonial...the big one is coming! Just you wait!!"


It sums up the entire committee, the Mueller investigation, and the impeachments.

Off course if you tell a lie often enough, people begin to believe it.
Reply Quote
2
Gigem314
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aggie95 • 9:14a, 6/29/22
AG
Aggie95 said:
Is there ANY chance someone like Trump had a hand in this debacle yesterday? This lady was supposedly going to work at Mara Lago and was in Trump's larger circle....so Trump says hey..."go to tell them you overheard a bunch of stuff (2nd hand info, so she can't be perjury, etc)" and make the dems look like fools for believing any of it.
While not likely, I would honestly find that 100x more believable than anything this "committee" has brought up about Trump or Jan 6th.
Reply Quote
7
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.