You and I know she wouldn't. Neither would mine, to be fair.Chipotlemonger said:BowSowy said:It has to be Connelly with a tall drink of water, or we riot.Chipotlemonger said:
I think I'm going to need a movie poster for this in my garage.
Unsure if the wife would appreciate a big old Jennifer poster in my garage
*** TOP GUN: MAVERICK *** (Spoiler Thread)
203,709 Views |
1717 Replies |
Last: 10 mo ago by Marauder Blue 6
TCTTS said:JB!98 said:Ok, first re-write. Can the kid. Tom and Penny show up to Viper's house and want to get closure as Maverick's career in the Navy is ending and he now has to go fly commercial or be a test pilot for Lockheed Martin. I am not tied to the kid for this to move forward. I am not sure I can handle the Hollywood critics.maroon barchetta said:schmendeler said:
I like this, but where in the world is this kid of Tom cruise and 50+ year old Jennifer Connelly coming from?
Yeah. Up until then it kinda worked
No present-day stuff. Entire movie takes place in the '60s. We see Mav as a baby/kid at the end and that's it.
Being dropped off by Obi-Wan.
JB!98 said:I am good with it, just thinking that having Cruise in it may give it and him a little incentive to cooperate. You could do the Magnum P.I. arc with his dad also. Lots of different angles. I think it centering on his dad and Viper is a winner though and lets you introduce new actors. Could also do something with Maverick's mom. It would have to roll into the 70's though because most of those top gun grads saw most of their combat during Linebacker II in '72.TCTTS said:JB!98 said:Ok, first re-write. Can the kid. Tom and Penny show up to Viper's house and want to get closure as Maverick's career in the Navy is ending and he now has to go fly commercial or be a test pilot for Lockheed Martin. I am not tied to the kid for this to move forward. I am not sure I can handle the Hollywood critics.maroon barchetta said:schmendeler said:
I like this, but where in the world is this kid of Tom cruise and 50+ year old Jennifer Connelly coming from?
Yeah. Up until then it kinda worked
No present-day stuff. Entire movie takes place in the '60s. We see Mav as a baby/kid at the end and that's it.
Got it, yeah, I just meant no present day stuff. And I think part of the attraction would be that Cruise doesn't have to star in it, he could only produce. I'm betting the main reason he nixed the Days of Thunder thing was because it would be a TV series going straight to Paramount+, when he seems borderline obsessed with the theatrical experience.
Chipotlemonger said:BowSowy said:It has to be Connelly with a tall drink of water, or we riot.Chipotlemonger said:
I think I'm going to need a movie poster for this in my garage.
Unsure if the wife would appreciate a big old Jennifer poster in my garage
If it is indeed your garage, she doesn't get a say.
Great point, that is part of the deal for all of us husbands isn't it. They get the house we get the garage.
Maybe just because I love Glen Powell in every role he's in, my only critique of this movie is I wanted more screen time for Hangman.bangobango said:There will almost surely be a sequel with the way Hollywood is today.GrayMatter said:
As a huge fan of Top Gun, TG: Maverick was everything that I thought it would be and more.
But...
I absolutely do not want a sequel and I hope Tom doesn't do one either. Maverick with Penny, her daughter and Rooster at the end in the hangar is how it should end.
I could see Top Gun: Rooster, Top Gun: Phoneix, Top Gun: Hangman, etc.
Not sure if Cruise has any say in it, but with the way this movie has performed I cannot imagine Paramount not demanding a sequel. Maybe if Cruise can veto it, then it doesn't get done (and I could see him doing that, to be honest), but otherwise I would be shocked if there weren't spin-offs from this and the attempt to start a franchise like Jurassic Park, Star Wars, Marvel, etc.
I could see them doing it with Cruise not in it at all, or as a very minor role, maybe.
That being said, I would totally be in on a sequel that revolved around Rooster and Hangman. Just have Maverick pop up in a cameo role to give them some advice or something. There's got to be a way we can get more of this Top Gun in our lives.
I don't think Cruise would sign on for a bunch of Jarrassic Park-like sequels that taint the originals.HerschelwoodHardhead said:Maybe just because I love Glen Powell in every role he's in, my only critique of this movie is I wanted more screen time for Hangman.bangobango said:There will almost surely be a sequel with the way Hollywood is today.GrayMatter said:
As a huge fan of Top Gun, TG: Maverick was everything that I thought it would be and more.
But...
I absolutely do not want a sequel and I hope Tom doesn't do one either. Maverick with Penny, her daughter and Rooster at the end in the hangar is how it should end.
I could see Top Gun: Rooster, Top Gun: Phoneix, Top Gun: Hangman, etc.
Not sure if Cruise has any say in it, but with the way this movie has performed I cannot imagine Paramount not demanding a sequel. Maybe if Cruise can veto it, then it doesn't get done (and I could see him doing that, to be honest), but otherwise I would be shocked if there weren't spin-offs from this and the attempt to start a franchise like Jurassic Park, Star Wars, Marvel, etc.
I could see them doing it with Cruise not in it at all, or as a very minor role, maybe.
That being said, I would totally be in on a sequel that revolved around Rooster and Hangman. Just have Maverick pop up in a cameo role to give them some advice or something. There's got to be a way we can get more of this Top Gun in our lives.
but it has to be a deep fake kid that looks just like Tom Cruise, and he's wearing ray bans, and he lives on a goose farm.TCTTS said:JB!98 said:Ok, first re-write. Can the kid. Tom and Penny show up to Viper's house and want to get closure as Maverick's career in the Navy is ending and he now has to go fly commercial or be a test pilot for Lockheed Martin. I am not tied to the kid for this to move forward. I am not sure I can handle the Hollywood critics.maroon barchetta said:schmendeler said:
I like this, but where in the world is this kid of Tom cruise and 50+ year old Jennifer Connelly coming from?
Yeah. Up until then it kinda worked
No present-day stuff. Entire movie takes place in the '60s. We see Mav as a baby/kid at the end and that's it.
I want a movie where Maverick discovers a wormhole and goes back in time to save Goose.
rynning said:
I want a movie where Maverick discovers a wormhole and goes back in time to save Goose.
And a white collared shirt, tighty whiteys, and socksTexasAggie_02 said:but it has to be a deep fake kid that looks just like Tom Cruise, and he's wearing ray bans, and he lives on a goose farm.TCTTS said:JB!98 said:Ok, first re-write. Can the kid. Tom and Penny show up to Viper's house and want to get closure as Maverick's career in the Navy is ending and he now has to go fly commercial or be a test pilot for Lockheed Martin. I am not tied to the kid for this to move forward. I am not sure I can handle the Hollywood critics.maroon barchetta said:schmendeler said:
I like this, but where in the world is this kid of Tom cruise and 50+ year old Jennifer Connelly coming from?
Yeah. Up until then it kinda worked
No present-day stuff. Entire movie takes place in the '60s. We see Mav as a baby/kid at the end and that's it.
The Collective said:rynning said:
I want a movie where Maverick discovers a wormhole and goes back in time to save Goose.
And also accidentally kills his own father before he's born, opening a paradox. Then the movie fades to black, without telling the audience how the paradox plays out.
Another reason I think they try and make more in this universe is because they created special cameras just for these planes so now that they have that technology I can't imagine they dont try to use it again.
Agreed, you don't want to turn it into a formula film. Remember Rocky won best picture when it was a stand alone.aTmAg said:I don't think Cruise would sign on for a bunch of Jarrassic Park-like sequels that taint the originals.HerschelwoodHardhead said:Maybe just because I love Glen Powell in every role he's in, my only critique of this movie is I wanted more screen time for Hangman.bangobango said:There will almost surely be a sequel with the way Hollywood is today.GrayMatter said:
As a huge fan of Top Gun, TG: Maverick was everything that I thought it would be and more.
But...
I absolutely do not want a sequel and I hope Tom doesn't do one either. Maverick with Penny, her daughter and Rooster at the end in the hangar is how it should end.
I could see Top Gun: Rooster, Top Gun: Phoneix, Top Gun: Hangman, etc.
Not sure if Cruise has any say in it, but with the way this movie has performed I cannot imagine Paramount not demanding a sequel. Maybe if Cruise can veto it, then it doesn't get done (and I could see him doing that, to be honest), but otherwise I would be shocked if there weren't spin-offs from this and the attempt to start a franchise like Jurassic Park, Star Wars, Marvel, etc.
I could see them doing it with Cruise not in it at all, or as a very minor role, maybe.
That being said, I would totally be in on a sequel that revolved around Rooster and Hangman. Just have Maverick pop up in a cameo role to give them some advice or something. There's got to be a way we can get more of this Top Gun in our lives.
Nothing about Hollywood should suggest that they will maintain the integrity of the franchise.Ferg said:Agreed, you don't want to turn it into a formula film. Remember Rocky won best picture when it was a stand alone.aTmAg said:I don't think Cruise would sign on for a bunch of Jarrassic Park-like sequels that taint the originals.HerschelwoodHardhead said:Maybe just because I love Glen Powell in every role he's in, my only critique of this movie is I wanted more screen time for Hangman.bangobango said:There will almost surely be a sequel with the way Hollywood is today.GrayMatter said:
As a huge fan of Top Gun, TG: Maverick was everything that I thought it would be and more.
But...
I absolutely do not want a sequel and I hope Tom doesn't do one either. Maverick with Penny, her daughter and Rooster at the end in the hangar is how it should end.
I could see Top Gun: Rooster, Top Gun: Phoneix, Top Gun: Hangman, etc.
Not sure if Cruise has any say in it, but with the way this movie has performed I cannot imagine Paramount not demanding a sequel. Maybe if Cruise can veto it, then it doesn't get done (and I could see him doing that, to be honest), but otherwise I would be shocked if there weren't spin-offs from this and the attempt to start a franchise like Jurassic Park, Star Wars, Marvel, etc.
I could see them doing it with Cruise not in it at all, or as a very minor role, maybe.
That being said, I would totally be in on a sequel that revolved around Rooster and Hangman. Just have Maverick pop up in a cameo role to give them some advice or something. There's got to be a way we can get more of this Top Gun in our lives.
If Cruise isn't able to veto it, then you'll have Hangman Free jumping from his shot and smoking jet into the cockpit of Rooster's jet w/in three sequels from now. It'll be called "Top Gun: Too Top, Too Gun."
When you and the crew read that your movie has grossed over $400 million at the box office, making it the highest-grossing movie of 2022 domestically. pic.twitter.com/1pePctTyo1
— The Playlist (@ThePlaylistNews) June 14, 2022
Quote:
It'll be called "Top Gun: Too Top, Too Gun.
Top Gun III: Hangman's Curse
Top Gun IV: Phoenix Rising
Top Gun V: Bobs Away!
Iron Eagle: ReduxSea Speed said:
Another reason I think they try and make more in this universe is because they created special cameras just for these planes so now that they have that technology I can't imagine they dont try to use it again.
Beating Dr. Strange to $400 million is a phenomenal achievement, like Hank Aaron roaring past Willie Mays to break Babe Ruth's record. Would never have thought it was going to happen until it happened.
Consider Dr. Strange was at $354 million on the day before Maverick came out.
Monday was Maverick's 18th day at the box, and it's at $401 million. Strange was at $346 million at the same date, albeit without a massive holiday opening weekend and the first couple of weeks with school still in session.
$600 million seems like a mortal lock for Maverick, thing will probably blow the balls off the top of theaters on 4th of July weekend. Domestically that gets you knocking on the door of top 10 all-time domestic (The Last Jedi sits 10th at $620 million).
What a triumph for Cruise.
Consider Dr. Strange was at $354 million on the day before Maverick came out.
Monday was Maverick's 18th day at the box, and it's at $401 million. Strange was at $346 million at the same date, albeit without a massive holiday opening weekend and the first couple of weeks with school still in session.
$600 million seems like a mortal lock for Maverick, thing will probably blow the balls off the top of theaters on 4th of July weekend. Domestically that gets you knocking on the door of top 10 all-time domestic (The Last Jedi sits 10th at $620 million).
What a triumph for Cruise.
TCTTS said:When you and the crew read that your movie has grossed over $400 million at the box office, making it the highest-grossing movie of 2022 domestically. pic.twitter.com/1pePctTyo1
— The Playlist (@ThePlaylistNews) June 14, 2022
Turn and Burn
TCTTS said:JB!98 said:Ok, first re-write. Can the kid. Tom and Penny show up to Viper's house and want to get closure as Maverick's career in the Navy is ending and he now has to go fly commercial or be a test pilot for Lockheed Martin. I am not tied to the kid for this to move forward. I am not sure I can handle the Hollywood critics.maroon barchetta said:schmendeler said:
I like this, but where in the world is this kid of Tom cruise and 50+ year old Jennifer Connelly coming from?
Yeah. Up until then it kinda worked
No present-day stuff. Entire movie takes place in the '60s. We see Mav as a baby/kid at the end and that's it.
This is Karma. I check into my hotel in Corpus today and here is my view. We can use the Lexington for the Vietnam carrier shots. This is all coming together!
Today, unfortunately, many Americans have good reason to fear that they will be victimized if they are unable to protect themselves. And today, no less than in 1791, the Second Amendment guarantees their right to do so. - Justice Samuel Alito 2022
I'm thinking a crossover
Top Gun: Fast & Furious
Top Gun: Fast & Furious
Nice!JB!98 said:TCTTS said:JB!98 said:Ok, first re-write. Can the kid. Tom and Penny show up to Viper's house and want to get closure as Maverick's career in the Navy is ending and he now has to go fly commercial or be a test pilot for Lockheed Martin. I am not tied to the kid for this to move forward. I am not sure I can handle the Hollywood critics.maroon barchetta said:schmendeler said:
I like this, but where in the world is this kid of Tom cruise and 50+ year old Jennifer Connelly coming from?
Yeah. Up until then it kinda worked
No present-day stuff. Entire movie takes place in the '60s. We see Mav as a baby/kid at the end and that's it.
This is Karma. I check into my hotel in Corpus today and here is my view. We can use the Lexington for the Vietnam carrier shots. This is all coming together!
Worked for Pearl HarborJB!98 said:TCTTS said:JB!98 said:Ok, first re-write. Can the kid. Tom and Penny show up to Viper's house and want to get closure as Maverick's career in the Navy is ending and he now has to go fly commercial or be a test pilot for Lockheed Martin. I am not tied to the kid for this to move forward. I am not sure I can handle the Hollywood critics.maroon barchetta said:schmendeler said:
I like this, but where in the world is this kid of Tom cruise and 50+ year old Jennifer Connelly coming from?
Yeah. Up until then it kinda worked
No present-day stuff. Entire movie takes place in the '60s. We see Mav as a baby/kid at the end and that's it.
This is Karma. I check into my hotel in Corpus today and here is my view. We can use the Lexington for the Vietnam carrier shots. This is all coming together!
_lefraud_ said:
I'm thinking a crossover
Top Gun: Fast & Furious
Top Gun: Battleships
It was disappointing that Rihanna was not a radar operator on the aircraft carrier. I guess she retired after that whole mess with the aliens
_lefraud_ said:
I'm thinking a crossover
Top Gun: Fast & Furious
C'mon Dom, do some of that Toretto *****
Talk to me, Brian.
Ask any pilot, any real pilot. It don't matter if you win Top Gun by an inch or a mile.
Just got back from seeing it a second time. We barely ever see movies twice in the theater, but this is one of the best movies we've seen in a long time. Just top notch from every aspect.
Squadron7 said:Quote:
It'll be called "Top Gun: Too Top, Too Gun.
Top Gun III: Hangman's Curse
Top Gun IV: Phoenix Rising
Top Gun V: Bobs Away!
Top Gun 2: Bogie Boogaloo
http://i.imgur.com/H6jmyPq.png
The Top and the Furious: San Diego Drift
Need a Top Gun / Pearl Harbor / Final Countdown / Valkyrie crossover. Maverick takes an experimental plane back in time, single-handedly defeats the Japanese fleet, then flies straight to Berlin and gives Adolf the finger while inverted, distracting the Fuhrer while Col. Klaus Stauffenberg (Tom Cruise) plants a bomb to kill him.
Top Gun: Bent Airframes. 30 min short on the military mechanics complaining about the airframes that Maverick has damaged thru his career
One of the Tomcats from Top Gun is on the carrier. Seems like fate to me.JB!98 said:TCTTS said:JB!98 said:Ok, first re-write. Can the kid. Tom and Penny show up to Viper's house and want to get closure as Maverick's career in the Navy is ending and he now has to go fly commercial or be a test pilot for Lockheed Martin. I am not tied to the kid for this to move forward. I am not sure I can handle the Hollywood critics.maroon barchetta said:schmendeler said:
I like this, but where in the world is this kid of Tom cruise and 50+ year old Jennifer Connelly coming from?
Yeah. Up until then it kinda worked
No present-day stuff. Entire movie takes place in the '60s. We see Mav as a baby/kid at the end and that's it.
This is Karma. I check into my hotel in Corpus today and here is my view. We can use the Lexington for the Vietnam carrier shots. This is all coming together!
how did we go 23 pages without an Archer Gif?
I thought it was funny how different cruise looked in his monologue and the movie. That's some crazy editing or whatever it is.
LB41Diamond said:
I thought it was funny how different cruise looked in his monologue and the movie. That's some crazy editing or whatever it is.
Well there was like a ten year delay between shooting and movie release.
Featured Stories
See All
41:06
3h ago
1.9k
Presenting Texas Aggies United's 'Florida Slam Dunk' Sweepstakes!
by Texas Aggies United
8:17
2h ago
1.4k
'I'm ready': Freshman Terrence Kiel II excited for the 2025 opener
by Ryan Brauninger
Efficiency, coaching experience trends point to A&M's true capabilities
by Luke Evangelist
14:13
1d ago
2.6k
El Mero Mero 14
Rich Get Richer - Dick Sports and Texas Athletics
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
57