All this drama in Fulton County with harassment towards Fanni .......seems unlikely, like MAGA in Chicago
no sig
Pending indictment against Trump in Georgia
220,039 Views |
2442 Replies |
Last: 8 days ago by Stat Monitor Repairman
Can someone post a new link? The previous one stopped working for me.
AggieAces06 said:
Can someone post a new link? The previous one stopped working for me.
Dad watched Fanny's testimony yesterday. Tainted witness.
This is a disgrace, our country is becoming a ****hole.
I thought a witness can watch other witness testimonies? Or am I confusing expert witnesses at criminal/civil trials?
He's a lawyer. He knows better.Ellis Wyatt said:
Dad watched Fanny's testimony yesterday. Tainted witness.
The hearing on Monday on the motions to quash Fani's lawyers told the judge they were going to call him and asked permission for him to testiy via zoom since he was ill and in California.
Today, he testified that he flew in late Tuesday night, met with lawyers for prep on Wednesday. He knew he was going to be a witness. He knew he shouldn't be watching the hearing but the rules don't apply to him, I guess.
Fanny was advised not to discuss her testimony with anyone. I am assuming he was not supposed to have seen or heard it.SwigAg11 said:
I thought a witness can watch other witness testimonies? Or am I confusing expert witnesses at criminal/civil trials?
No way this judge removes these scum bags from the case
Experts can be present in the courtroom, yes. Fact witnesses are instructed to avoid watching or otherwise follow what other fact witnesses say. Cannot be in the courtroom nor otherwise watch or read before they are called. Further, if they are subject to recall (as stated at the time they finish testifying, they may be called back) that prohibition remains in place.SwigAg11 said:
I thought a witness can watch other witness testimonies? Or am I confusing expert witnesses at criminal/civil trials?
Judge risks being drawn and quartered, his career, if he rules against Fani and the Dems.
You're acting like this board not viewing her testimony as credible is some biased take when it's the other way around.TXAggie2011 said:Im Gipper said:I bet they did!1872walker said:
State passes on questioning Willis
Judge: Would the State like to get behind the wheel of this garbage barge trainwreck?
Lawyer: Nah, we good.
Folks were throwing this around yesterday evening.
And I get it. I'm not sure what they could add in cross. Fani answered when the relationship started, Fani answered about the trips and how they were paid, Fani explained the origin of having cash (which referenced her father who is testifying today so they may seek to corroborate that then.)
They didn't hit her with anything new evidence or any "gotchas" that need further explanation.
You either view her testimony as credible or you don't. This board won't. The Berkeley board will.
Pissing match.
DA Willis ran on NOT having sex with her employees. What a joke! Georgia needs to do better. pic.twitter.com/wVYqZC1XoB
— Maggie Speaks (@MaggiesMusings) February 16, 2024
She contradicts herself so much, why should ANYONE view her as credible unless you're biased because she's out to "get Trump" (her words, not mine) and some DEI posterchild?
Hawg, if the judge rules in favor of Willis, can that ruling be appealed?aggiehawg said:If they cross, then Merchant et. al. get a redirect. Understandable from a strategic standpoint.Im Gipper said:I bet they did!1872walker said:
State passes on questioning Willis
Judge: Would the State like to get behind the wheel of this garbage barge trainwreck?
Lawyer: Nah, we good.
Also a sign they know they have pretty much lost.
This has always been my take on this.bobbranco said:
Judge risks being drawn and quartered, his career, if he rules against Fani and the Dems.
People like Peter Strzok should be in jail but it's always (D)ifferent when they do this kind of ***** It's plain as day what happened here and that this should have been thrown out already. But it never will and these people are never actually held accountable.
He's a crafty lawyer, knows how to tell sweet lies and spin tall tales, who happens to be be black and probably more than capable of laying down the race angle for his benefit. His daughter is a product of him. Not surprising at all.Ellis Wyatt said:
Dad watched Fanny's testimony yesterday. Tainted witness.
Not sure, TBH. In a gray area with how this hearing came about to begin with. It is a combination of a motion to dismiss plus disqualification. So might be yes on one and no on the other. This record is a mess however and the judge is trier of fact and assesses the credibility of these witnesses. Not sure if an appeal would be worthwhile.100% Pure Aggie said:Hawg, if the judge rules in favor of Willis, can that ruling be appealed?aggiehawg said:If they cross, then Merchant et. al. get a redirect. Understandable from a strategic standpoint.Im Gipper said:I bet they did!1872walker said:
State passes on questioning Willis
Judge: Would the State like to get behind the wheel of this garbage barge trainwreck?
Lawyer: Nah, we good.
Also a sign they know they have pretty much lost.
gotcha, thx.aggiehawg said:Not sure, TBH. In a gray area with how this hearing came about to begin with. It is a combination of a motion to dismiss plus disqualification. So might be yes on one and no on the other. This record is a mess however and the judge is trier of fact and assesses the credibility of these witnesses. Not sure if an appeal would be worthwhile.100% Pure Aggie said:Hawg, if the judge rules in favor of Willis, can that ruling be appealed?aggiehawg said:If they cross, then Merchant et. al. get a redirect. Understandable from a strategic standpoint.Im Gipper said:I bet they did!1872walker said:
State passes on questioning Willis
Judge: Would the State like to get behind the wheel of this garbage barge trainwreck?
Lawyer: Nah, we good.
Also a sign they know they have pretty much lost.
LOL.
CNN chyron: "SOURCES: FULTON PROSECUTORS THINK WILLIS' TESTIMONY WAS ENOUGH TO BEAT DISQUALIFICATION BID, DON'T NEED MORE"
— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) February 16, 2024
Was the source the prosecution? pic.twitter.com/MhY3IWC2gj
I mean, we have it on good authority that she is credible, right? That she's totally telling the truth this time (all the other lies and contradictions be damned).aggiehawg said:
LOL.CNN chyron: "SOURCES: FULTON PROSECUTORS THINK WILLIS' TESTIMONY WAS ENOUGH TO BEAT DISQUALIFICATION BID, DON'T NEED MORE"
— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) February 16, 2024
Was the source the prosecution? pic.twitter.com/MhY3IWC2gj
...The state told the court that it had no further questions for Willis, which is why she will not testify today. It is a smart move to minimize any damage. There remains Wade's former lawyer who was cited in the original motion as having knowledge of a pre-2022 relationship.
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) February 16, 2024
The judge has a tough call to make on the cash issue as both Wade and Willis are in lockstep and there isn't much to rebut that.
Court is back. Bradley is back on the stand.
Court is back. Bradley is back on the stand.
I'm no lawyer, but it appears the state knows that keeping these texts out are critical to any hope of salvaging this case.
I'm lost. I understand that Merchant is getting close to being a witness while counsel of record since those are communications between her and Bradley.
Merchant gave Fani's lawyers a list of her questions for Bradley before hand but the state refused to put their objections on the record until now.
Merchant gave Fani's lawyers a list of her questions for Bradley before hand but the state refused to put their objections on the record until now.
Now Merchant handed her phone to state's counsels to see the text exchanges and when she gets her phone back, they have scrambled her screen shots?
I believe they just started scrolling in the long text chain and lost her place.
Crime fraud exception to attorney client privilege. This is getting too far into the weeds.
bobbranco said:His daughter is a product of him. Not surprising at all.Ellis Wyatt said:
Dad watched Fanny's testimony yesterday. Tainted witness.
From what I've seen his daughter is a product of spite, hate, and low IQ.
But I'm not a lawyer, so I might be wrong.
If Bradley was Wade's divorce lawyer when the false answers were provided to the interrogatories, then Bradley knew it was false back then and thus a fraud was committed upon the court hearing the divorce case.
But I'm not sure of the timing of when Bradley was or was not acting as Wade's divorce counsel. So I'm not sure why this issue is getting the judge so tied up in knots?
But I'm not sure of the timing of when Bradley was or was not acting as Wade's divorce counsel. So I'm not sure why this issue is getting the judge so tied up in knots?
My take is the witness is being protected from providing the truth and that is why the judge is in knots.aggiehawg said:
If Bradley was Wade's divorce lawyer when the false answers were provided to the interrogatories, then Bradley knew it was false back then and thus a fraud was committed upon the court hearing the divorce case.
But I'm not sure of the timing of when Bradley was or was not acting as Wade's divorce counsel. So I'm not sure why this issue is getting the judge so tied up in knots?
As someone not totally in tune with these proceedings, what is the estimate of completion? And what are the possible outcomes? Judge either rules in favor of fani and she remains on the case, or she's out? Is it that simple?
I think the judge made the wrong ruling there but at least it will be in evidence, albeit sealed.
Apologize as I got behind here.
But Wade getting his business associates those contracts with Fulton County? And given their revenue sharing arrangement, Wade would get a third of both of those contracts?
ETA: Wade was on Willis' transition team before she took office.
But Wade getting his business associates those contracts with Fulton County? And given their revenue sharing arrangement, Wade would get a third of both of those contracts?
ETA: Wade was on Willis' transition team before she took office.
And then you add that he's a White male and she's a Black female, they'll crucify him. Corruption again. The little I've seen the judge isn't doing well letting her get away with a lot, but ya'll have been watching more closely. I could be wrong.Aggies2009 said:This has always been my take on this.bobbranco said:
Judge risks being drawn and quartered, his career, if he rules against Fani and the Dems.
People like Peter Strzok should be in jail but it's always (D)ifferent when they do this kind of ***** It's plain as day what happened here and that this should have been thrown out already. But it never will and these people are never actually held accountable.
Currently a happy listless vessel and deplorable. #FDEMS TRUMP 2024.
Fight Fight Fight.
Fight Fight Fight.
Judge has to rule in her favor or else another Wendy's gets burned.... hell, they might even burn two
Featured Stories
See All
Post Game Review: Southern California 35, Texas A&M 31
by Kay Naegeli
Presenting Texas Aggies United's 'Battle At Reed' Sweepstakes!
by Texas Aggies United
Scouting Report: No. 13 Texas A&M vs. Abilene Christian
by Tom Schuberth
35:16
14h ago
3.6k