*****Official Jan 6th Committee Hearing Thread*****

152,727 Views | 2038 Replies | Last: 8 mo ago by Funky Winkerbean
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OP has said throughout this thread that It's ALWAYS (D)ifferent when his party does it. It's the only thing he's been consistent about this entire propaganda pushing thread
Bill Clinternet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maroon Dawn said:

OP has said throughout this thread that It's ALWAYS (D)ifferent when his party does it. It's the only thing he's been consistent about this entire propaganda pushing thread
Secretary Bowers of Arizona Testimony

(D)efinitely telling the truth
"I am neither an Athenian nor a Greek, but a citizen of the world"-Plato, attributed to Socrates, Theaetetus-
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Neehau said:

Maroon Dawn said:

OP has said throughout this thread that It's ALWAYS (D)ifferent when his party does it. It's the only thing he's been consistent about this entire propaganda pushing thread
Secretary Bowers of Arizona Testimony

(D)efinitely telling the truth


Tell us how the Kavanaugh riot wasn't insurrection when Dem protestors cornered congressmen in elevators and bathrooms and threatened them if they didn't overturn the will of the peoples duly elected representatives in selecting a SCOTUS judge vital to the country's function

Can't wait to hear how that was (D)ifferent!

*gets popcorn*
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Have they indicted Trump yet or are they still soaking up the camera time? We're waiting.
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rockdoc said:

Have they indicted Trump yet or are they still soaking up the camera time? We're waiting.


already said there would be no charges. There was no point to this to begin with but now it's just pissing on us without the decency to say it's rain
Bill Clinternet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maroon Dawn said:

Neehau said:

Maroon Dawn said:

OP has said throughout this thread that It's ALWAYS (D)ifferent when his party does it. It's the only thing he's been consistent about this entire propaganda pushing thread
Secretary Bowers of Arizona Testimony

(D)efinitely telling the truth


Tell us how the Kavanaugh riot wasn't insurrection when Dem protestors cornered congressmen in elevators and bathrooms and threatened them if they didn't overturn the will of the peoples duly elected representatives in selecting a SCOTUS judge vital to the country's function

Can't wait to hear how that was (D)ifferent!

*gets popcorn*
Ya what they did was wrong. They should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Unfortunately, attempting to derail a thread to avoid the thread topic is against the forum rules so lets try and stay on topic please.
"I am neither an Athenian nor a Greek, but a citizen of the world"-Plato, attributed to Socrates, Theaetetus-
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Neehau said:

Maroon Dawn said:

Neehau said:

Maroon Dawn said:

OP has said throughout this thread that It's ALWAYS (D)ifferent when his party does it. It's the only thing he's been consistent about this entire propaganda pushing thread
Secretary Bowers of Arizona Testimony

(D)efinitely telling the truth


Tell us how the Kavanaugh riot wasn't insurrection when Dem protestors cornered congressmen in elevators and bathrooms and threatened them if they didn't overturn the will of the peoples duly elected representatives in selecting a SCOTUS judge vital to the country's function

Can't wait to hear how that was (D)ifferent!

*gets popcorn*
Ya what they did was wrong. They should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Unfortunately, attempting to derail a thread to avoid the thread topic is against the forum rules so lets try and stay on topic please.


I didn't ask you if it was "wrong"

I asked if it was insurrection

Answer the question as this entire hearing centers on this issue so it's entirely germane

Yes or No

And if no, tell us how it's (D)ifferent
Bill Clinternet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maroon Dawn said:

Neehau said:

Maroon Dawn said:

Neehau said:

Maroon Dawn said:

OP has said throughout this thread that It's ALWAYS (D)ifferent when his party does it. It's the only thing he's been consistent about this entire propaganda pushing thread
Secretary Bowers of Arizona Testimony

(D)efinitely telling the truth


Tell us how the Kavanaugh riot wasn't insurrection when Dem protestors cornered congressmen in elevators and bathrooms and threatened them if they didn't overturn the will of the peoples duly elected representatives in selecting a SCOTUS judge vital to the country's function

Can't wait to hear how that was (D)ifferent!

*gets popcorn*
Ya what they did was wrong. They should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Unfortunately, attempting to derail a thread to avoid the thread topic is against the forum rules so lets try and stay on topic please.


I didn't ask you if it was "wrong"

I asked if it was insurrection

Answer the question as this entire hearing centers on this issue so it's entirely germane

Yes or No

And if no, tell us how it's (D)ifferent
I don't think it is relevant if it was an insurrection or not. That has nothing to do with the thread topic. If you would like to discuss if it's an insurrection or not I am happy to discuss that with you in another thread addressing it.
"I am neither an Athenian nor a Greek, but a citizen of the world"-Plato, attributed to Socrates, Theaetetus-
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This entire thread is about hearing that alleges insurrection happened on Jan 6th

Yet there appears to be a huge double standard with this term that none of you leftists will admit to because you know the Kav riot destroys the entire basis of this dog and pony show hearing

Your refusal to answer the simple yes or no question like every other leftist in this thread proves your hypocrisy and commitment to "it's always (D)ifferent when Dems do it"
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Neehau said:

Rockdoc said:

Neehau said:

captkirk said:

If these corrupt morons succeed, they get to face DeSantis
They aren't corrupt. They are right.

DeSantis will be the next President of the United States.

Good to see you all in on the dem clown show production. Lol
They have provided overwhelming evidence of Trump's guilt.

I don't think they should indict Trump, and if they do, I think Biden should pardon him. Country needs to put this nightmare behind us.
Guilt of what?
Bill Clinternet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maroon Dawn said:

This entire thread is about hearing that alleges insurrection happened on Jan 6th

Yet there appears to be a huge double standard with this term that none of you leftists will admit to because you know the Kav riot destroys the entire basis of this dog and pony show hearing

Your refusal to answer the simple yes or no question like every other leftist in this thread proves your hypocrisy and commitment to "it's always (D)ifferent when Dems do it"
It wasn't an insurrection against Kavanaugh. It was a riot. Its completely different.

"I am neither an Athenian nor a Greek, but a citizen of the world"-Plato, attributed to Socrates, Theaetetus-
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Neehau said:

Maroon Dawn said:

This entire thread is about hearing that alleges insurrection happened on Jan 6th

Yet there appears to be a huge double standard with this term that none of you leftists will admit to because you know the Kav riot destroys the entire basis of this dog and pony show hearing

Your refusal to answer the simple yes or no question like every other leftist in this thread proves your hypocrisy and commitment to "it's always (D)ifferent when Dems do it"
It wasn't an insurrection against Kavanaugh. It was a riot. Its completely different.




And there it is folks!

Threatening congressmen to overthrow the will of the people isnt insurrection when Dems do it!

It's completely (D)ifferent!

I'd like to thank our first brave, honest leftist to finally say it out loud!

etxag02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A woman confronting flake in an elevator

equals

thousands rioting at the capitol and calling to hang the vp to stop the transfer of power
moroon dawn logic at its finest.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
etxag02 said:

A woman confronting flake in an elevator

equals

thousands rioting at the capitol and calling to hang the vp to stop the transfer of power
moroon dawn logic at its finest.

Where are the fires and destruction in that bottom pic? I see people waving flags.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

thousands rioting at the capitol and calling to hang the vp to stop the transfer of power

moroon dawn logic at its finest.
Whether Pence was there or not does not affect the transfer of power. Senate President Pro Tempore takes over and finishes it.
etxag02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

thousands rioting at the capitol and calling to hang the vp to stop the transfer of power

moroon dawn logic at its finest.
Whether Pence was there or not does not affect the transfer of power. Senate President Pro Tempore takes over and finishes it.
The House select committee investigating the 2021 US Capitol insurrection has obtained a December 2020 proposal from a lawyer to Rudy Giuliani and others that sketched out an early, rough plan to halt Joe Biden becoming president by throwing the certification of the election into the hands of the Senate pro tempore at the time, Republican Chuck Grassley of Iowa.

cevans_40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lol at these libs and CMs here getting aroused only to be let down again. It's like High School all over again.
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You see! Now that one of them finally admitted that it's (D)ifferent they're working up the courage to all come out and say it!

The Kav riot was about trying to overthrow the will of the people and prevent him from being installed

But according to leftist that's just angry people venting so it's cool and you can't take them too seriously

It's ALWAYS (D)ifferent when Dems do it
Carolin_Gallego
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Let's compare the differences between the events at the Kavanaugh hearings and the certification of the 2000 election.

The Kavanaugh hearings had:
  • Chanting
  • Banners & flags
  • Sit-ins
  • People pushing past a barricade to pound on Supreme Court doors
  • Standing and shouting to disrupt Senators' questioning of Kavanaugh
  • No reported extreme altercations with police
  • No reported damage to buildings



January 6th election certification had:
  • Chanting
  • Banners & flags
  • People pushing past barricades to enter Capitol (before police are seen standing by doors "letting them in")
  • People fighting with police at the barricades
  • Widespread assaults on police with metal pipes, flag poles, chemical irritants, etc.
  • Breaking and entering
  • Destruction of property
  • Theft of property
  • Calls to kill the Vice President
  • People involved said on the day of the event, and testified in court, that they believed Trump directed them to stop the certification



One event involved relatively civil protest while the other was a violent uprising to stop one of the most important and perilous processes in any government -- the transfer of power.

We believe progress is made through MORE discussion, not LESS, and we believe that to be true even if the topics are uncomfortable and we occasionally disagree with one another. - TexAgs
The name-calling technique making false associations is a child's game. The propagandist who uses this technique hopes that the audience will reject a person and their argument on this false basis.
Burdizzo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Carolin_Gallego said:

Let's compare the differences between the events at the Kavanaugh hearings and the certification of the 2000 election.

The Kavanaugh hearings had:
  • Chanting
  • Banners & flags
  • Sit-ins
  • People pushing past a barricade to pound on Supreme Court doors
  • Standing and shouting to disrupt Senators' questioning of Kavanaugh
  • No reported extreme altercations with police
  • No reported damage to buildings



January 6th election certification had:
  • Chanting
  • Banners & flags
  • People pushing past barricades to enter Capitol (before police are seen standing by doors "letting them in")
  • People fighting with police at the barricades
  • Widespread assaults on police with metal pipes, flag poles, chemical irritants, etc.
  • Breaking and entering
  • Destruction of property
  • Theft of property
  • Calls to kill the Vice President
  • People involved said on the day of the event, and testified in court, that they believed Trump directed them to stop the certification



One event involved relatively civil protest while the other was a violent uprising to stop one of the most important and perilous processes in any government -- the transfer of power.





The Kavanaugh hearings also had a


BIG LIE


And a smear on a man's reputation. You are familiar with big lies, no?
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's (D)ifferent.

Keef was all in on the Kavanaugh big lie. Heck, his current user name is based on another lie designed to take out Trump.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
tysker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

One event involved relatively civil protest while the other was a violent uprising to stop one of the most important and perilous processes in any government -- the transfer of power.
Is it really perilous? Was it even that perilous on Jan 6th?
They went back to work like 2 hours later and it was done by end of day.

Most of the violent activity you see in the video is occurring outside of the building and videos from inside the buildings look more like your kids open house at school. The people that actually entering the chambers had a prayer like one of those See You at the Pole meetups.
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Of course not, it's just being dramatized by extremely dishonest partisans who's hypocrisy is unmatched. The way they act about 1/6 after the summer of 2020 is one of the most hypocritical and disgusting displays our political system has ever seen. We're dealing with countrymen who have zero ethical or moral boundaries and almost complete control over the flow of information. Not good!
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Carolin_Gallego said:

Let's compare the differences between the events at the Kavanaugh hearings and the certification of the 2000 election.

The Kavanaugh hearings had:
  • Chanting
  • Banners & flags
  • Sit-ins
  • People pushing past a barricade to pound on Supreme Court doors
  • Standing and shouting to disrupt Senators' questioning of Kavanaugh
  • No reported extreme altercations with police
  • No reported damage to buildings



January 6th election certification had:
  • Chanting
  • Banners & flags
  • People pushing past barricades to enter Capitol (before police are seen standing by doors "letting them in")
  • People fighting with police at the barricades
  • Widespread assaults on police with metal pipes, flag poles, chemical irritants, etc.
  • Breaking and entering
  • Destruction of property
  • Theft of property
  • Calls to kill the Vice President
  • People involved said on the day of the event, and testified in court, that they believed Trump directed them to stop the certification



One event involved relatively civil protest while the other was a violent uprising to stop one of the most important and perilous processes in any government -- the transfer of power.




It's ALWAYS (D)ifferent

As long as you ignore Dems were cornering and threatening congressmen for the express purpose of overthrowing the peoples will because they disagreed with the outcome

No, when Dems do that, it's not "insurrection" it's just a "mostly peaceful protest"

It's ALWAYS (D)ifferent when they try to overthrow the will of the people
blacksox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Most folks are much more concerned about Comrade Trump's repeated efforts to overturn an election through fraud, lies and abuse of power than than a bunch of brain dead morons who stormed congress.
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
blacksox said:

Most folks are much more concerned about Comrade Trump's repeated efforts to overturn an election through fraud, lies and abuse of power than than a bunch of brain dead morons who stormed congress.


A survey of actual voters shows, no, they're not concerned at all

They're concerned about how you Dems have effed up the economy so badly they can't afford food fuel or rent

This dog and pony show is your desperate attempt to distract people from those REAL concerns

But judging by the ratings it's failed miserably at that too
tk111
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
blacksox said:

Most folks are much more concerned about Comrade Trump's repeated efforts to overturn an election through fraud, lies and abuse of power than than a bunch of brain dead morons who stormed congress.
Jean-Pierre, is that you?
tysker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
blacksox said:

Most folks are much more concerned about Comrade Trump's repeated efforts to overturn an election through fraud, lies and abuse of power than than a bunch of brain dead morons who stormed congress.
But none of that happened. There was still an orderly transfer of power. This should be indication of how robust the system is.
Line Ate Member
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wow a lot of posts went poof!
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
blacksox said:

Most folks are much more concerned about Comrade Trump's repeated efforts to overturn an election through fraud, lies and abuse of power than than a bunch of brain dead morons who stormed congress.

Facts are your friends. Try using them sometimes.
Get Off My Lawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Line Ate Member said:

Wow a lot of posts went poof!
We'll see if this is 'on topic' enough to stay!
Carolin_Gallego
How long do you want to ignore this user?
[This isn't the committee's Twitter feed. Folks that want to read that can sign up to follow them. You're about to get this thread locked -- Staff]
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

People tend to focus on the January 6th event
GEE WHIZ???? I wonder why that is?

Could it be, I don't know, maybe because the libs that control the news told us it was the worst event in America since the British burned the capitol in 1812?

Are you really that completely devoid of a sense of self-awareness about what your kind does?

I'm Gipper
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So then why has the committee already said there won't be any charges?

Get Off My Lawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Because Al Gore and Hillary Clinton accepted defeat gracefully and with no pushback?

Get off it. You're doing nothing but repost one sided propaganda at this point. You're blowing it so far out of proportion as to make me stop caring about ANY of it (even the vandalism).

Trump 2024!
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.