OP has said throughout this thread that It's ALWAYS (D)ifferent when his party does it. It's the only thing he's been consistent about this entire propaganda pushing thread
Secretary Bowers of Arizona TestimonyMaroon Dawn said:
OP has said throughout this thread that It's ALWAYS (D)ifferent when his party does it. It's the only thing he's been consistent about this entire propaganda pushing thread
Rockdoc said:
Have they indicted Trump yet or are they still soaking up the camera time? We're waiting.
Ya what they did was wrong. They should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Unfortunately, attempting to derail a thread to avoid the thread topic is against the forum rules so lets try and stay on topic please.Maroon Dawn said:Neehau said:Secretary Bowers of Arizona TestimonyMaroon Dawn said:
OP has said throughout this thread that It's ALWAYS (D)ifferent when his party does it. It's the only thing he's been consistent about this entire propaganda pushing thread
(D)efinitely telling the truth
Tell us how the Kavanaugh riot wasn't insurrection when Dem protestors cornered congressmen in elevators and bathrooms and threatened them if they didn't overturn the will of the peoples duly elected representatives in selecting a SCOTUS judge vital to the country's function
Can't wait to hear how that was (D)ifferent!
*gets popcorn*
I don't think it is relevant if it was an insurrection or not. That has nothing to do with the thread topic. If you would like to discuss if it's an insurrection or not I am happy to discuss that with you in another thread addressing it.Maroon Dawn said:Neehau said:Ya what they did was wrong. They should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Unfortunately, attempting to derail a thread to avoid the thread topic is against the forum rules so lets try and stay on topic please.Maroon Dawn said:Neehau said:Secretary Bowers of Arizona TestimonyMaroon Dawn said:
OP has said throughout this thread that It's ALWAYS (D)ifferent when his party does it. It's the only thing he's been consistent about this entire propaganda pushing thread
(D)efinitely telling the truth
Tell us how the Kavanaugh riot wasn't insurrection when Dem protestors cornered congressmen in elevators and bathrooms and threatened them if they didn't overturn the will of the peoples duly elected representatives in selecting a SCOTUS judge vital to the country's function
Can't wait to hear how that was (D)ifferent!
*gets popcorn*
I didn't ask you if it was "wrong"
I asked if it was insurrection
Answer the question as this entire hearing centers on this issue so it's entirely germane
Yes or No
And if no, tell us how it's (D)ifferent
Guilt of what?Neehau said:They have provided overwhelming evidence of Trump's guilt.Rockdoc said:Neehau said:They aren't corrupt. They are right.captkirk said:
If these corrupt morons succeed, they get to face DeSantis
DeSantis will be the next President of the United States.
Good to see you all in on the dem clown show production. Lol
I don't think they should indict Trump, and if they do, I think Biden should pardon him. Country needs to put this nightmare behind us.
It wasn't an insurrection against Kavanaugh. It was a riot. Its completely different.Maroon Dawn said:
This entire thread is about hearing that alleges insurrection happened on Jan 6th
Yet there appears to be a huge double standard with this term that none of you leftists will admit to because you know the Kav riot destroys the entire basis of this dog and pony show hearing
Your refusal to answer the simple yes or no question like every other leftist in this thread proves your hypocrisy and commitment to "it's always (D)ifferent when Dems do it"
Neehau said:It wasn't an insurrection against Kavanaugh. It was a riot. Its completely different.Maroon Dawn said:
This entire thread is about hearing that alleges insurrection happened on Jan 6th
Yet there appears to be a huge double standard with this term that none of you leftists will admit to because you know the Kav riot destroys the entire basis of this dog and pony show hearing
Your refusal to answer the simple yes or no question like every other leftist in this thread proves your hypocrisy and commitment to "it's always (D)ifferent when Dems do it"
etxag02 said:
A woman confronting flake in an elevator
equals
thousands rioting at the capitol and calling to hang the vp to stop the transfer of power
moroon dawn logic at its finest.
Whether Pence was there or not does not affect the transfer of power. Senate President Pro Tempore takes over and finishes it.Quote:
thousands rioting at the capitol and calling to hang the vp to stop the transfer of power
moroon dawn logic at its finest.
The House select committee investigating the 2021 US Capitol insurrection has obtained a December 2020 proposal from a lawyer to Rudy Giuliani and others that sketched out an early, rough plan to halt Joe Biden becoming president by throwing the certification of the election into the hands of the Senate pro tempore at the time, Republican Chuck Grassley of Iowa.aggiehawg said:Whether Pence was there or not does not affect the transfer of power. Senate President Pro Tempore takes over and finishes it.Quote:
thousands rioting at the capitol and calling to hang the vp to stop the transfer of power
moroon dawn logic at its finest.
This was January 6th.
— Rep. Liz Cheney (@RepLizCheney) February 4, 2022
This is not “legitimate political discourse.” pic.twitter.com/lKgbVyVcJr
Carolin_Gallego said:
Let's compare the differences between the events at the Kavanaugh hearings and the certification of the 2000 election.
The Kavanaugh hearings had:
- Chanting
- Banners & flags
- Sit-ins
- People pushing past a barricade to pound on Supreme Court doors
- Standing and shouting to disrupt Senators' questioning of Kavanaugh
- No reported extreme altercations with police
- No reported damage to buildings
January 6th election certification had:
- Chanting
- Banners & flags
- People pushing past barricades to enter Capitol (before police are seen standing by doors "letting them in")
- People fighting with police at the barricades
- Widespread assaults on police with metal pipes, flag poles, chemical irritants, etc.
- Breaking and entering
- Destruction of property
- Theft of property
- Calls to kill the Vice President
- People involved said on the day of the event, and testified in court, that they believed Trump directed them to stop the certification
This was January 6th.
— Rep. Liz Cheney (@RepLizCheney) February 4, 2022
This is not “legitimate political discourse.” pic.twitter.com/lKgbVyVcJr
One event involved relatively civil protest while the other was a violent uprising to stop one of the most important and perilous processes in any government -- the transfer of power.
Is it really perilous? Was it even that perilous on Jan 6th?Quote:
One event involved relatively civil protest while the other was a violent uprising to stop one of the most important and perilous processes in any government -- the transfer of power.
Carolin_Gallego said:
Let's compare the differences between the events at the Kavanaugh hearings and the certification of the 2000 election.
The Kavanaugh hearings had:
- Chanting
- Banners & flags
- Sit-ins
- People pushing past a barricade to pound on Supreme Court doors
- Standing and shouting to disrupt Senators' questioning of Kavanaugh
- No reported extreme altercations with police
- No reported damage to buildings
January 6th election certification had:
- Chanting
- Banners & flags
- People pushing past barricades to enter Capitol (before police are seen standing by doors "letting them in")
- People fighting with police at the barricades
- Widespread assaults on police with metal pipes, flag poles, chemical irritants, etc.
- Breaking and entering
- Destruction of property
- Theft of property
- Calls to kill the Vice President
- People involved said on the day of the event, and testified in court, that they believed Trump directed them to stop the certification
This was January 6th.
— Rep. Liz Cheney (@RepLizCheney) February 4, 2022
This is not “legitimate political discourse.” pic.twitter.com/lKgbVyVcJr
One event involved relatively civil protest while the other was a violent uprising to stop one of the most important and perilous processes in any government -- the transfer of power.
blacksox said:
Most folks are much more concerned about Comrade Trump's repeated efforts to overturn an election through fraud, lies and abuse of power than than a bunch of brain dead morons who stormed congress.
Jean-Pierre, is that you?blacksox said:
Most folks are much more concerned about Comrade Trump's repeated efforts to overturn an election through fraud, lies and abuse of power than than a bunch of brain dead morons who stormed congress.
But none of that happened. There was still an orderly transfer of power. This should be indication of how robust the system is.blacksox said:
Most folks are much more concerned about Comrade Trump's repeated efforts to overturn an election through fraud, lies and abuse of power than than a bunch of brain dead morons who stormed congress.
blacksox said:
Most folks are much more concerned about Comrade Trump's repeated efforts to overturn an election through fraud, lies and abuse of power than than a bunch of brain dead morons who stormed congress.
We'll see if this is 'on topic' enough to stay!Line Ate Member said:
Wow a lot of posts went poof!
GEE WHIZ???? I wonder why that is?Quote:
People tend to focus on the January 6th event