Daily Charts

608,828 Views | 2786 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by AggieUSMC
BiochemAg97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Bruce Almighty • 7:30a, 6/16/20
AG
Bruce Almighty said:
So are cases going up, but deaths going down? In Springfield, where I live, we had 8 deaths during the shutdown with the last being on April 9th. Since we've reopened in early May, the number of cases have more than doubled, yet we are still sitting at 8 deaths. It just seems odd that we had 8 deaths in the first three weeks of our first case and zero in the last nine weeks.
I think that may be a result of the change in demographics of who is getting infected. The 20-30 yo crowd that seems to be the bulk of cases now has a very low risk of hospitalizations and death.

I think it hit a number of vulnerable high risk people early before they went into isolation which made it look really bad. Now it is the lower risk groups that are getting it.
Reply Quote
5
Keegan99
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BiochemAg97 • 7:34a, 6/16/20
AG
Exactly. Not all cases are created equal.

This, along with targeted testing and testing volume, is why case counts cannot be compared over time.

A positive test result today is a very different creature, statistically speaking, than one from two months ago.
Reply Quote
1
BiochemAg97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Fitch • 7:34a, 6/16/20
AG
Fitch said:
The way the article reads some ~60% of them were new in the last week, unless I misread.

The hospitalization metric they referenced is probably a refinement of the one determined by the UT model team, outlined in the below video at about 28:10.



The segment starting at 26:00 kind of has to make you go "huh".

**I don't think that will happen. Just providing a reference point from ~30 days ago.
I have no issue with the metric, more that they have a metric, they haven't cross the threshold, but are reacting as if they are. Yes, hospitalizations increased and it is something to keep an eye on and warn people about, but the constant changing of goal posts is annoying and destroys credibility.
Reply Quote
3
Dazed and Confused
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:12a, 6/16/20
AG
Demographic change in admits, improvements in treatments, haven't seen the data yet. But glad deaths are not currently following hospitalization trend.
Reply Quote
1
TexasAggie008
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:05a, 6/16/20
AG
any way to tell what % of state-wide hospitalizations are currently 20s &30s age ranges?
Reply Quote
1 edit
PJYoung
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PJYoung • 12:59p, 6/16/20
AG
PJYoung said:
DFWTLR said:
PJYoung said:
Hospitalizations in Hidalgo County:



44 people currently hospitalized in a county of 900,000 and it's a black eye? Seems like they have nothing to worry about to me.

The black eye was for the trend. 12 on May 24th, 44 yesterday.

69 yesterday
Reply Quote
AgsMyDude
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Dazed and Confused • 1:27p, 6/16/20
AG
deaths do tend to lag hospitalizations so it could follow that trend, but maybe not
Reply Quote
PJYoung
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:08p, 6/16/20
AG
Reply Quote
Duncan Idaho
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PJYoung • 2:42p, 6/16/20
Jesus..25% hit rate? I dont think it was that high when they were strictly limiting who could get tested.
Reply Quote
2
chimpanzee
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:48p, 6/16/20
Scary twitter graph notwithstanding. Here's Arizona's data website. Lots of info, nothing seems too stressed.

https://www.azdhs.gov/preparedness/epidemiology-disease-control/infectious-disease-epidemiology/covid-19/dashboards/index.php

Reply Quote
2
Big Al 1992
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BiochemAg97 • 5:48p, 6/16/20
AG
Have family and friends that work at Seton. They are getting slammed. Not sure what capacity they are at or have but sounds like they are close to full.
Reply Quote
Fitch
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:34p, 6/16/20
AG
Bit of an uptick.












Reply Quote
Sq 17
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Duncan Idaho • 7:21p, 6/16/20
Duncan Idaho said:
Jesus..25% hit rate? I dont think it was that high when they were strictly limiting who could get tested.


I am guessing There has to be a prison in that group of data. That being said Things are definitely going the wrong way in AZ
Reply Quote
wessimo
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:09a, 6/17/20
AG
4,098 new cases reported for Texas yesterday. The previous high (6/10) was 2,504.
Reply Quote
Keegan99
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to wessimo • 7:11a, 6/17/20
AG
Not entirely correct. There was a new high, but it wasn't 4098.

Texas: "The reported cases for June 16 include 2,622 new cases and 1,476 cases that were previously diagnosed among Texas Department of Criminal Justice inmates but that had not been reported by local health departments (887 from Anderson County and 589 from Brazoria County)."
Reply Quote
2
wessimo
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Keegan99 • 7:41a, 6/17/20
AG
Thanks for the insight. They should have backdated those cases.
Reply Quote
Keegan99
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to wessimo • 7:46a, 6/17/20
AG
States across the country have demonstrated their inability to transparently and effectively communicate data throughout the course of this pandemic.

In some cases it's political (eg New York grossly under-reporting deaths of nursing home residents) but in most instances it seems to be reflective of general bureaucratic incompetence.
Reply Quote
5
HotardAg07
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:19a, 6/17/20
AG




ICU capacity still low, but it's ~160 beds higher than 10 days ago. If the trend were to continue, we wouldn't be in a good position in a month or two at that pace.
Reply Quote
2
2 edits
Duncan Idaho
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Keegan99 • 11:53a, 6/17/20
Keegan99 said:
States across the country have demonstrated their inability to transparently and effectively communicate data throughout the course of this pandemic.

In some cases it's political (eg New York grossly under-reporting deaths of nursing home residents) but in most instances it seems to be reflective of general bureaucratic incompetence.


Florida is by far the biggest example of shady reporting to reflect local politics.
Reply Quote
2
Dazed and Confused
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Big Al 1992 • 11:56a, 6/17/20
AG
Big Al 1992 said:
Have family and friends that work at Seton. They are getting slammed. Not sure what capacity they are at or have but sounds like they are close to full.


Just saw that there are 12 nurses that are arriving from Michigan on Sunday to help out at Seton. It is not only hospital beds, but staff that gets impacted.
Reply Quote
HowdyTexasAggies
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Duncan Idaho • 11:58a, 6/17/20
AG
Which narrative? The one you don't like? Did you like the NY narrative so it was ok?
Reply Quote
3
Duncan Idaho
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to HowdyTexasAggies • 12:25p, 6/17/20
OlSarge92 said:
Which narrative? The one you don't like? Did you like the NY narrative so it was ok?

I dont like anyone ****ing with data.
Reply Quote
6
Beat40
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Duncan Idaho • 12:26p, 6/17/20
Duncan Idaho said:
Jesus..25% hit rate? I dont think it was that high when they were strictly limiting who could get tested.


I think some of the reason the hit rate is going up is because seasonal sickness like the flu and seasonal allergies trend down during this time. Probably a lot less people going in to get tested with other sickness than before.

Granted, it's not the full reason for a 25% hit rate, but it's a factor.
Reply Quote
HotardAg07
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:31p, 6/17/20
AG
This is a case where I wish the federal government had standardized reporting requirements across all states for not just cases, but tests, hospitalizations, confirmed deaths, probable deaths -- broken down by age, race, etc. There has been too much inconsistency in the reporting and too much room for gamesmanship of the data.
Reply Quote
4
czechy91
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:34p, 6/17/20
AG
Houston - looks like we have liftoff!
Reply Quote
Premium
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to czechy91 • 12:36p, 6/17/20
AG
czechy91 said:
Houston - looks like we have liftoff!


Checked oil prices before I realized it was a covid response...
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
Ozzy Osbourne
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:51p, 6/17/20
Reply Quote
5
Keegan99
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Duncan Idaho • 12:52p, 6/17/20
AG
Duncan Idaho said:
Keegan99 said:
States across the country have demonstrated their inability to transparently and effectively communicate data throughout the course of this pandemic.

In some cases it's political (eg New York grossly under-reporting deaths of nursing home residents) but in most instances it seems to be reflective of general bureaucratic incompetence.


Florida is by far the biggest example of shady reporting to reflect local politics.

Not even close.

NY takes the cake with their nursing home fatality totals. They've miscategorized upwards of ten thousand deaths to avoid Cuomo taking heat for the ridiculous order forcing facilities to accept COVID+ patients.
Reply Quote
4
MAROON
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to czechy91 • 12:56p, 6/17/20
AG
czechy91 said:
Houston - looks like we have liftoff!
yep - to be expected. We've opened up somewhat, and we had 80k-100k people marching shoulder to shoulder for hours just a few weeks ago. That will lead to an increase in positive tests.

Friend who is a doc at Methodist said the number of cases he is seeing have increased significantly and they are skewing younger. All very predictable given the past weeks.
What do you boys want for breakfast BBQ ?.....OK Chili.
Reply Quote
2 edits
TxAG#2011
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ozzy Osbourne • 1:01p, 6/17/20
"may be"

It doesn't make sense either. We have been open for a month now and employers are just now asking for people to get tested? Also, hospitlizations are certainly going up.
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
Pasquale Liucci
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TxAG#2011 • 1:24p, 6/17/20
AG
Lots of employers have been exclusively WFH and are just now bringing non essentials back to office. We are in our internal Stage 2 re opening with 2/3 allowed back on site. Based on the amount of stupid CYA we are required to do, I totally believe that some employers would require a negative test before returning.
Reply Quote
1
culdeus
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Pasquale Liucci • 1:28p, 6/17/20
AG
Lester Freamon said:
Lots of employers have been exclusively WFH and are just now bringing non essentials back to office. We are in our internal Stage 2 re opening with 2/3 allowed back on site. Based on the amount of stupid CYA we are required to do, I totally believe that some employers would require a negative test before returning.


Every day?
Reply Quote
plain_o_llama
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:31p, 6/17/20
Not all the state, but it doesn't support the idea that testing rates have greatly increased.
https://www.tmc.edu/coronavirus-updates/covid-19-testing-trends/
Reply Quote
CowtownAg06
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to plain_o_llama • 1:34p, 6/17/20
AG
Your chart does show the positivity rate going up. I was just coming to post this... I don't understand why we're only do 1/2 of the tests of a week ago.

Reply Quote
Duncan Idaho
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to CowtownAg06 • 2:09p, 6/17/20
Can't have any cases if to you dont test /djt
Reply Quote
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.