Are you saying that made a difference in which down to challenge? Honest question, what is the point?
I wasn't expecting him to perform at this level this soon, which let's be honest would not be happening without that o-line, but I wanted Houston to draft him despite the Osweiler signing. I guess i watched him more in college than others, but he had great development with Mullen at State and showed there what he could do against top competition. They were pretty stacked in '14 with upperclassmen, but he was by far the main reason they were #1 in the first CFB playoff rankings.bilbobag said:
There were plenty of teams that passed on Dak.. no one and I mean no one thought he had this in him.. what he is doing now is Brady like.. it will be interesting to see how the rest of the year plays out and next year and if he can sustain it
nhayden said:Ag12thman said:Two way-wrong calls.nhayden said:
What an absolute joke on the 4th down review. I am sure we will hear about how they made a mistake on the Hopkins out of bounds and the 4th down review.
Can you tell me where I am wrong? I will hang up and listen.
bilbobag said:
I will get roasted for this but one thing worth mentioning and not defending OB or the Texans, but I wonder what replay technology was used at that stadium for reviews. Not as many cameras. That's an old stadium. Lastly, what feed were coaching staffs getting to see. Not same setup. Big elephant in the room for me.
BMX Bandit said:
The lack of replay cameras were not a problem with those spot calls in the fourth quarter. At a minimum, they have access to the TV feed.
I doubt they didn't have access to feeds, but if that's the case, then there should not be another game played in Mexico until they can get that corrected. They also shouldn't allow the game to be played if the teams aren't afforded the same technology/tools during their game as other teams had. In a league where 1 game can decide a playoff spot or not, handicapping a team could cost them millions.Ag_07 said:BMX Bandit said:
The lack of replay cameras were not a problem with those spot calls in the fourth quarter. At a minimum, they have access to the TV feed.
I wouldn't be so sure about that. I read that that 76k seat stadium doesn't have one elevator or escalator.
It wouldn't be hard to imagine a coach's box without tvs. Coaches may not have had anything to work to let Bill know to throw the flag.
The refs have no excuse but Bill may have an excuse of why he didn't throw the flags. I could certainly see that situation.
bilbobag said:
If you have the time, go read Watt's players tribune article. He talks about a little known Staph infection that we caught early that kept him from losing his leg. It was kept under wraps at his discretion.
It seemed fairly innocent at that time but within a couple hours had progressively worse. Stash infections aren't no joke
His jersey was green a few times in the 2nd half...but that should have been expected if you've ever watched the US Soccer team (or anyone else) at the Aztecabilbobag said:
https://www.facebook.com/KHOUDanielGotera/videos/1303920846295320/
Lasers you say
Doesn't show up like this on the cut tape
gougler08 said:His jersey was green a few times in the 2nd half...but that should have been expected if you've ever watched the US Soccer team (or anyone else) at the Aztecabilbobag said:
https://www.facebook.com/KHOUDanielGotera/videos/1303920846295320/
Lasers you say
Doesn't show up like this on the cut tape
Even the Nuk call... Listen for how late/delayed the whistle is. It's once he is breaking away again and going to score.oh no said:
the ball spot on consecutive downs, 3rd and 4th, late Q4 in the redzone in a tie game just felt crooked to me. didn't feel like a "just part of the game" normal officiating mistake or misjudgement. felt dirty. the 3rd down spot looked awful, but the 4th down spot was reviewed and every camera angle that ESPN had showed an obvious 1st down.. doesn't even make any sense.
oh no said:
the ball spot on consecutive downs, 3rd and 4th, late Q4 in the redzone in a tie game just felt crooked to me. didn't feel like a "just part of the game" normal officiating mistake or misjudgement. felt dirty. the 3rd down spot looked awful, but the 4th down spot was reviewed and every camera angle that ESPN had showed an obvious 1st down.. doesn't even make any sense.
Great article.bilbobag said:
If you have the time, go read Watt's players tribune article. He talks about a little known Staph infection that we caught early that kept him from losing his leg. It was kept under wraps at his discretion.
It seemed fairly innocent at that time but within a couple hours had progressively worse. Stash infections aren't no joke
nhayden said:oh no said:
the ball spot on consecutive downs, 3rd and 4th, late Q4 in the redzone in a tie game just felt crooked to me. didn't feel like a "just part of the game" normal officiating mistake or misjudgement. felt dirty. the 3rd down spot looked awful, but the 4th down spot was reviewed and every camera angle that ESPN had showed an obvious 1st down.. doesn't even make any sense.
I would get it if it was close and could go either way, by damn the 4th down play he had cleared the 1st down line by almost a yard. I am not into conspiracies, but I am not totally sure how they kissed that. The Nuk play they should have just swallowed their whistle and then had it reviewed.