It's a good sign that we somehow have 11 diametrically opposed opinions on this very specific question, right? We are definitely experts who know what they are talking about.
jackie childs said:i get that and actually don't disagree. Han, as we knew him before Solo, wouldn't have necessarily spoken or behaved like he did in Solo.Philip J Fry said:
Ditto. Felt like Glover was Lando and Ehrenreich was doing his best to impersonate Han. There were too many times in the movie where I just could not believe Han would speak or behave like I was seeing on screen.
Him shooting first though at the end made up for a lot of that bull**** though. I damn near wanted to stand and applause at that.
but that's actually why it worked for me. we actually get to see a little of how Han developed into the character we meet in ANH.
i liken it to Daniel Craig in Casino Royale.
Brian Earl Spilner said:
I was a little disappointed Alden didn't do the signature Harrison Ford point.
TCTTS said:
Honestly, I almost felt the opposite. I love Glover and he did a great job, but ultimately it was clearly Glover doing an impression... and there were a couple times where that was painfully obvious. Ehrenreich, on the other hand, felt more like Chris Pine as Kirk. The spirit of the original was there in his performance, but he wasn't trying to do an impression, and thus came across as more natural and something that felt more his own.
Why is that? The first MCU movie with a black lead did quite well. The first Star Wars movie with a black lead may surprise.AlphaCharlieUniformAggie said:
I think the best way to enjoy Ehrenreich's performance is by mentally blocking out Harrison Ford's portrayal.
Clearly that's not an easy thing to do, especially if you've see Empire Strikes Back a few times. It's maybe not a fair analogy, but if you make love to a beautiful woman and then you make love to your high school lunch lady, yes, there may be some disappointment.
But when you make sweet love to the lunch lady you must BE with the lunch lady. Forget the beautiful woman. She's gone. Light saber killed her. It is now lunch lady time. Enjoy the lunch lady. Let the lunch lady surprise you by opening up like a flower. She's so lonely, so eager. She wants your love, but also she needs it.
Glover was really good. Never liked Lando, but it might have been B.D. Williams I didn't like. Glover was cool. A Lando movie is financially a bad idea but I would watch it.
Saul Goodman said:
Kind of creeping me out, but you're keeping this thread entertaining.
Farmer1906 said:Why is that? The first MCU movie with a black lead did quite well. The first Star Wars movie with a black lead may surprise.AlphaCharlieUniformAggie said:
I think the best way to enjoy Ehrenreich's performance is by mentally blocking out Harrison Ford's portrayal.
Clearly that's not an easy thing to do, especially if you've see Empire Strikes Back a few times. It's maybe not a fair analogy, but if you make love to a beautiful woman and then you make love to your high school lunch lady, yes, there may be some disappointment.
But when you make sweet love to the lunch lady you must BE with the lunch lady. Forget the beautiful woman. She's gone. Light saber killed her. It is now lunch lady time. Enjoy the lunch lady. Let the lunch lady surprise you by opening up like a flower. She's so lonely, so eager. She wants your love, but also she needs it.
Glover was really good. Never liked Lando, but it might have been B.D. Williams I didn't like. Glover was cool. A Lando movie is financially a bad idea but I would watch it.
Bingo. I really enjoyed Rogue One because it was a new/fresh story, with new characters, in a familar setting.Quote:
It was fresh characters with the backdrop of Star Wars.
Quote:
Why is that? The first MCU movie with a black lead did quite well. The first Star Wars movie with a black lead may surprise.
I would say Han Solo is a much more beloved character than say Ant-Man, but they're not too far off from each other box office wise.AlphaCharlieUniformAggie said:Quote:
Why is that? The first MCU movie with a black lead did quite well. The first Star Wars movie with a black lead may surprise.
Ah, but I never said any of that.
I am as prone as making poor snap judgements based on stereo types as the next man. I am after all only a man. Mr. Glover is also a man.
The fact that Mr. Glover is also a black man, while not escaping my notice, did not capture my attention.
I reason that if a beloved character like Han Solo fell short at the box office, then how would a semi-beloved character do?
Quote:
What 10-year-old boy doesn't want to see a black space cowboy?
Wow, a Force 10 From Navarone clip. I'd forgotten that movie. I need to watch that one again.Flashdiaz said:
that's right... Han (Ford) points a lot.
This. It takes place in Wakanda. A 100% black nation, in Africa, fantastically wealthy, with the greatest technology on earth.Brick Tamland said:
I think it had more to do with Black Panther being an African king than just being black
I'm literally lol'ingAverageJones said:
Geez you are on fire today
It was weird because Glover kept going in and out of his "Billy Dee accent"Ag Since 83 said:
Agreed. Glover is great, and I would gladly watch him as Lando again, but he was definitely just doing an impression. The accent when they first get to the Falcon was so out of nowhere. It didn't ruin my enjoyment of the movie, but definitely had me going "hmm....that's....interesting..."
Ehrenreich was much better
Living Legend said:
It was weird because Glover kept going in and out of his "Billy Dee accent"
CJS4715 said:Living Legend said:
It was weird because Glover kept going in and out of his "Billy Dee accent"
I need to watch again. I wonder if it is something that was done different between normal shoot and reshoot.
i'm in agreement with you. they built up Glover/Lando so much prior and i thought it fell pretty flat.TCTTS said:
Honestly, I almost felt the opposite. I love Glover and he did a great job, but ultimately it was clearly Glover doing an impression... and there were a couple times where that was painfully obvious. Ehrenreich, on the other hand, felt more like Chris Pine as Kirk. The spirit of the original was there in his performance, but he wasn't trying to do an impression, and thus came across as more natural and something that felt more his own.
I noticed it as well, but I think it may have been determined by where he was/who was around. When playing cards, the Billy Dee was in full effect. When he was on the Falcon and having to work around "partners" then he slipped out of it. And when he was recording his memoirs.....oh yeah, Billy Dee time.AliasMan02 said:CJS4715 said:Living Legend said:
It was weird because Glover kept going in and out of his "Billy Dee accent"
I need to watch again. I wonder if it is something that was done different between normal shoot and reshoot.
That's my assumption
Finally saw the movie yesterday and I agree with this.TCTTS said:
Honestly, I almost felt the opposite. I love Glover and he did a great job, but ultimately it was clearly Glover doing an impression... and there were a couple times where that was painfully obvious. Ehrenreich, on the other hand, felt more like Chris Pine as Kirk. The spirit of the original was there in his performance, but he wasn't trying to do an impression, and thus came across as more natural and something that felt more his own.