Yep that's where I get the info fromOCEN99 said:
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
.......and now Beijing is working overtime to blame the US for creating the virus. No ShameStupe said:
All of this happening because China didn't want to admit that they had an issue.
I don't understand the relevance of the "media mentions" data?NASAg03 said:
https://informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/covid-19-coronavirus-infographic-datapack/
I'm guessing this is because they were late to quarantine/shutdown and are catching up on testing?Exsurge Domine said:
Italy 3500 cases today. That's ridiculous
ETFan said:I'm guessing this is because they were late to quarantine/shutdown and are catching up on testing?Exsurge Domine said:
Italy 3500 cases today. That's ridiculous
ETFan said:I'm guessing this is because they were late to quarantine/shutdown and are catching up on testing?Exsurge Domine said:
Italy 3500 cases today. That's ridiculous
Big Al 1992 said:
Remember when Diamond Princess was in 3rd place like 2 weeks ago? And man if that's accurate, Singapore really nipped this in the bud- they were thought to have spectacular Heath care system and we should look to them.
NASAg03 said:
This is my current go-to:
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/peteraldhous/coronavirus-updating-charts-us-world-compare
Interractive with updates for total case and recorded deaths.
My concern:
"Deaths are likely to be counted more accurately than cases, which rely on how many people have been tested. "
After extensive testing and letting the dust settle, the mortality ratio in China stands at 0.4%. In S Korea, it's 0.9%.
PJYoung said:NASAg03 said:
This is my current go-to:
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/peteraldhous/coronavirus-updating-charts-us-world-compare
Interractive with updates for total case and recorded deaths.
My concern:
"Deaths are likely to be counted more accurately than cases, which rely on how many people have been tested. "
After extensive testing and letting the dust settle, the mortality ratio in China stands at 0.4%. In S Korea, it's 0.9%.
Of SK's 8,320 cases, 6,838 are still active.
How many of those will die? Waaaaaaay too soon to peg it at .9% in South Korea.
Moxley said:Big Al 1992 said:
Remember when Diamond Princess was in 3rd place like 2 weeks ago? And man if that's accurate, Singapore really nipped this in the bud- they were thought to have spectacular Heath care system and we should look to them.
Someone mentioned that's on another thread but I think it's worth pointing out again. East Asia has had several outbreaks of random viruses (SARS-1, Bird Flu, etc.) over the last 15 to 20 years. They've had plans in place for this eventuality and have experience dealing with this stuff. The public generally knows the risks and what needs to be done.
I think a lot of the problems in the US and in Europe are a symptom of "can't happen here" attitude. These situations are always a learning experience. East Asia has more experience dealing with this stuff and they are simply better with practice.
Beat the Hell said:PJYoung said:NASAg03 said:
This is my current go-to:
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/peteraldhous/coronavirus-updating-charts-us-world-compare
Interractive with updates for total case and recorded deaths.
My concern:
"Deaths are likely to be counted more accurately than cases, which rely on how many people have been tested. "
After extensive testing and letting the dust settle, the mortality ratio in China stands at 0.4%. In S Korea, it's 0.9%.
Of SK's 8,320 cases, 6,838 are still active.
How many of those will die? Waaaaaaay too soon to peg it at .9% in South Korea.
And how many have it that didn't get tested? Waaaaay too soon to peg any number anywhere.
Beat the Hell said:PJYoung said:NASAg03 said:
This is my current go-to:
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/peteraldhous/coronavirus-updating-charts-us-world-compare
Interractive with updates for total case and recorded deaths.
My concern:
"Deaths are likely to be counted more accurately than cases, which rely on how many people have been tested. "
After extensive testing and letting the dust settle, the mortality ratio in China stands at 0.4%. In S Korea, it's 0.9%.
Of SK's 8,320 cases, 6,838 are still active.
How many of those will die? Waaaaaaay too soon to peg it at .9% in South Korea.
And how many have it that didn't get tested? Waaaaay too soon to peg any number anywhere.
Quote:
China and S. Korea are the only two that have exited exponential growth so should be settling in on their final numbers. looks like 4% for china and 1%-1.5% for S. Korea (who still has 76% of its cases as active)
BlackGoldAg2011 said:
Here is a graph i have been keeping, to track the changing CFR for each country above 5k cases. i'll update this post as i update my graphs. Data from https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
Data updated 0 GMT 3/19/2020
my interesting observations:
3/19/2020:
- China and S. Korea are the only two that have exited exponential growth so should be settling in on their final numbers. looks like 4% for china and 1%-1.5% for S. Korea (who still has 76% of its cases as active)
- The US is the only country in exponential growth with a declining CFR. This could possibly be in part due to the fact that our early data skewed high due to the first tracked outbreak being in a nursing home. It looks like our final number and S. Korea's might meet.
- Germany's number is a confusing anomaly. They are about 1 day ahead of us on the daily total case curve. Have almost no deaths. On possible explanation is that maybe their outbreak started in younger communities. I'm very interested to watch their number as they only really started having deaths a few days ago (3/15/2020)