riverrataggie said:
bangobango said:
agcrock2005 said:
Proposition Joe said:
So unless hundreds of people were dying a day in NYC due a "strange flu" back in January and we just didn't notice it, then the data simply doesn't support it.
I'm not downplaying the situation at all. I know this is serious but I don't think we have all of the data either. Do we know "patient zero" is "patient zero"? Thousands (if not hundreds of thousands) of people came in from China AFTER they were having their issues and all the way up UNTIL Trump cut off travel from there. Daily direct flights from one of China's largest cities. They were flying to NYC, LA, Seattle, Chicago, and many others (possibly DFW?) every day. Did we all just get lucky over the last couple months?
I guess we will see in a few weeks, as they're saying it will hit its peak in Texas three weeks from now.
I think it will be pretty obvious that it was not going around during the time you are suggesting. The simple fact that we are likely to have a huge uptick in people getting sick and dying will bear that out.
Think about this, a week ago there were 352 positive cases and eight deaths. Today we have 2,877 positive cases and 38 deaths. That's pretty rapid growth, and we are way under-testing.
Can someone explain the hit the peak in three weeks? We've been on lockdown for two weeks now. If you are going to have symptoms max is this weekend. We should see peaks this weekend if not starting to go down with a 14 day max/ 5 day average incubation and symptoms in 5 days.
Not trying to stir. Really want to understand. Bc they said peak in 3 weeks a couple weeks ago.
Because "lockdown" doesn't stop the virus from spreading, it simply slows it. So we may have slowed the exponential growth, but people are still infecting other people (especially with so many people who assume because they feel fine, they must be fine).
I think "when things get bad" is basing much of it on how the charts look once a state hits 100 cases, and we're roughly 10 days behind New York on that.
So don't look it as when we'll hit our peak (because we're still a long ways off from that), glance at what New York was 10-12 days ago and assume that is roughly where we are at. 12 days ago they hit 2480 confirmed cases. Right now we stand at 3195... It's not an exact science so don't take that as we're worse off than NY, but if you look at where they are now you start to see that it's in 3-4 days when #'s start getting really concerning in Texas and by the next week it potentially looks really, really bad.
I think too many people view this from the lens of everyone in America starting at the same time so since we're so far behind WA/NY/LA that means we're not in bad shape. But we didn't start at the same time, and exponential growth can make things get real big, real fast.
What we don't know is how much social distancing (and general distance between living that Texans enjoy over New York) is going to impact that growth. If we'r sitting at 5000-6000 cases by the end of the week, I'd say social distancing has helped us quite a bit.