duhFHKChE07 said:
And apparently he does it all the time. I can't figure out why though...
keep power to all four wheels to prevent getting stuck while stopped
duhFHKChE07 said:
And apparently he does it all the time. I can't figure out why though...
Ark03 said:I just assumed he was driving a standard transmission. In that case, leaving it in gear is better than leaving it in neutral (although if my ebrake wasn't working, I'd have something to chock the wheels on the seat next to me).AggieChemist said:
I'm trying to wrap my head around what kind of moron it takes to PURPOSELY leave a vehicle in gear, relying solely on the handbrake.
I have been driving for 37 years and have never done this, nor has it ever occurred to me to do this.
But yes, people who do this in an automatic are morons.
Edit: Yup, he's driving a 6-speed manual transmission. Leaving it in first was the right thing to do, but relying on that alone was stupid.
As fast as he claimed it rolled away, I think it must have slipped out of gear.
Also, he sure seems to freak out a lot about his jeep on its side. When you read the account of the couple that did a real overland trip, the number of times they rolled over on really rough roads is almost comical, and it barely phases them: https://www.expeditionportal.com/forum/threads/democratic-republic-of-congo-lubumbashi-to-kinshasa.50799/
Out of gear is neutral. Then you have no resistance if the vehicle wants to roll. Some resistance (ie 1st gear) means that it at least has to overcome the inertia of the gear that's hardest to turn before rolling.Naveronski said:Ark03 said:I just assumed he was driving a standard transmission. In that case, leaving it in gear is better than leaving it in neutral (although if my ebrake wasn't working, I'd have something to chock the wheels on the seat next to me).AggieChemist said:
I'm trying to wrap my head around what kind of moron it takes to PURPOSELY leave a vehicle in gear, relying solely on the handbrake.
I have been driving for 37 years and have never done this, nor has it ever occurred to me to do this.
But yes, people who do this in an automatic are morons.
Edit: Yup, he's driving a 6-speed manual transmission. Leaving it in first was the right thing to do, but relying on that alone was stupid.
As fast as he claimed it rolled away, I think it must have slipped out of gear.
Also, he sure seems to freak out a lot about his jeep on its side. When you read the account of the couple that did a real overland trip, the number of times they rolled over on really rough roads is almost comical, and it barely phases them: https://www.expeditionportal.com/forum/threads/democratic-republic-of-congo-lubumbashi-to-kinshasa.50799/
Why 1st instead of taking it out of gear?
That's fine if you're parked on an incline where the vehicle may roll backwards. You don't ever want the engine to turn backwards - if that happens your valves can hit the pistons if the timing is wrong, screwing up your engine.Texmid said:
When driving a standard I always parked mine in reverse.
Ark03 said:I just assumed he was driving a standard transmission. In that case, leaving it in gear is better than leaving it in neutral (although if my ebrake wasn't working, I'd have something to chock the wheels on the seat next to me).AggieChemist said:
I'm trying to wrap my head around what kind of moron it takes to PURPOSELY leave a vehicle in gear, relying solely on the handbrake.
I have been driving for 37 years and have never done this, nor has it ever occurred to me to do this.
But yes, people who do this in an automatic are morons.
Edit: Yup, he's driving a 6-speed manual transmission. Leaving it in first was the right thing to do, but relying on that alone was stupid.
As fast as he claimed it rolled away, I think it must have slipped out of gear.
Also, he sure seems to freak out a lot about his jeep on its side. When you read the account of the couple that did a real overland trip, the number of times they rolled over on really rough roads is almost comical, and it barely phases them: https://www.expeditionportal.com/forum/threads/democratic-republic-of-congo-lubumbashi-to-kinshasa.50799/
ellebee said:
Disagree. If they don't hit rolling forward, they won't hit in reverse.Quote:
You don't ever want the engine to turn backwards - if that happens your valves can hit the pistons if the timing is wrong, screwing up your engine.
I won't argue with you regarding the likelihood of screwing up the timing. I realize that you'd have to get it spinning pretty fast, which would be hard from a dead stop. That said, if the vehicle is in reverse and it is rolling forward down a hill, you might as well have a broken timing chain - it can't do its job if the car is in reverse but the car is pushed forward. Still unlikely to do damage coming from a dead stop. That's much more likely when you throw the timing chain at highway speeds.CanyonAg77 said:Disagree. If they don't hit rolling forward, they won't hit in reverse.Quote:
You don't ever want the engine to turn backwards - if that happens your valves can hit the pistons if the timing is wrong, screwing up your engine.
The only possible scenario I could see this happening was if you had extremely close clearances between the piston and valve train and you had a really worn timing chain.
Some engines are "interference" engines, some are not. On an interference engine, if you throw a timing chain or belt, and the valve train stops moving, the pistons and valves can hit. Honda and Acura V-6s for example. Some engines are not, the valve and the piston never occupy the same spot. A flathead engine would be the extreme example of this.
Mantis Toboggan MD said:ellebee said:
This picture actually confirms that this d**cher really doesn't know left from right. In order to see the rest of the photos on his Instagram, you start by swiping LEFT when on the first photo, and then continue swiping left to see the rest. If you want to go back towards the original photo, then you swipe RIGHT.
Quote:
A few days later I notice the front axle is now leaking a little bit of oil out the end of the axle tube on the drivers side so I wonder if hitting the bank so violently on that side has caused one of the axle seals to unseat a little. It's barely a weep at this point, though it's the first time this Jeep has ever leaked anything, so I'll keep a close eye on it.
I knew there was a reason he was sticking to the paved roads...TexasAggie_02 said:
http://theroadchoseme.com/disaster-aftermathQuote:
A few days later I notice the front axle is now leaking a little bit of oil out the end of the axle tube on the drivers side so I wonder if hitting the bank so violently on that side has caused one of the axle seals to unseat a little. It's barely a weep at this point, though it's the first time this Jeep has ever leaked anything, so I'll keep a close eye on it.
TresPuertas said:
I've got a bottle of 15 year old pappy that I'll send the guy if he pulls this off. No lie
I have a feeling I'll be drinking that bottle myself.
spud1910 said:
I'll buck the trend and say he completes the journey in 2-20-20. Stranger things have happened. It won't be the route he painted on the Jeep, but close enough we will give him credit.
wessimo said:
Update: he's made it to Egypt alive and apparently isn't going to try to drive into Libya; therefore, his Africa journey is over.
Whoever picked "not going to die" in the death pool looks like the winner.
wessimo said:
Update: he's made it to Egypt alive and apparently isn't going to try to drive into Libya; therefore, his Africa journey is over.
Whoever picked "not going to die" in the death pool looks like the winner.
AggieChemE09 said:wessimo said:
Update: he's made it to Egypt alive and apparently isn't going to try to drive into Libya; therefore, his Africa journey is over.
Whoever picked "not going to die" in the death pool looks like the winner.
He couldn't get a visa into Libya
http://reddit.com/r/Jeep/comments/bj4vac/the_hood_of_my_jk_after_999_days_53500_miles_and/em9bwso