Ranger #007 said:
So essentially: we cheated, we won, we don't care. Remind me how the Rangers are the sips of baseball again?
The Red Sox have 3 other recent WS championships besides 2018. They have proven their ability to win without cheating, so they will get a pass by the media, opposing players, etc. Right or wrong, Boston will be held to a different standard by the people that matter. And that will go for the rest of their careers, Hall of Fame voting, etc.Ranger #007 said:
On a thread about the Astros? On a board dominated by Astros and Rangers fans? Yeah, the Astros are front and center. Like I posted on this thread, if the Red Sox don't get at least what the Astros did it's absurd. I can't control what they do about the Yankees (who didn't wins WS).
Ranger #007 said:
I don't think anyone has insinuated the Astros were a bad team absent the sign stealing. Quite the opposite actually. The Astros were a great team that cheated when they didn't have to in all likelihood. Which makes the whole thing even dumber.
Probably one of the most intelligent posts on this thread.Proposition Joe said:
I'd assume it was looked at from an "advanced analytic" standpoint... They didn't feel like they were necessarily "cheating", just getting the edge that came from having advanced data that is happening in all sports.
Now, they were wrong and it definitely crossed the line, but I think the above is a good explanation of how it initially started.
South Platte said:
the narrative will be that they only won the title because they cheated.
PLEASE tell me this is satire. WOW.03_Aggie said:
I don't blame you. I was disappointed at first. The more I thought about it, the more I figured this is much ado about nothing.
Distinguishing between a fast ball and a breaking ball isn't that beneficial.
03_Aggie said:
I think the "Dark Arts" scheme may fall into that category. But technically that wasn't illegal and didn't directly involve the players.
I don't think the trash can/monitor deal was some elaborate scheme by the club. I think it was as simple as two guys, that were respected by the players, saying you guys are way behind in this stuff and here's how we'll change that. Players probably didn't give it much thought from a risk perspective. Most of them had only played for the Astros.
We know some players didn't like it because they found the noise distracting. That would lend credence that this wasn't a batter by batter request but most likely someone that wasn't playing implementing the process.
But people love a good conspiracy theory.
Proposition Joe said:03_Aggie said:
I think the "Dark Arts" scheme may fall into that category. But technically that wasn't illegal and didn't directly involve the players.
I don't think the trash can/monitor deal was some elaborate scheme by the club. I think it was as simple as two guys, that were respected by the players, saying you guys are way behind in this stuff and here's how we'll change that. Players probably didn't give it much thought from a risk perspective. Most of them had only played for the Astros.
We know some players didn't like it because they found the noise distracting. That would lend credence that this wasn't a batter by batter request but most likely someone that wasn't playing implementing the process.
But people love a good conspiracy theory.
I think it's less that people love a good conspiracy theory, and more posts like these from Astros fans that try and skew everything in the softest possible light...
Trying to make a case that aspects "technically weren't illegal" and that this was somehow just 2 rogue players that forced the rest of the team to bend to their will and the innocent little players didn't know any better is going overdrive in trying to downplay things.
Your own coach reportedly took a bat to the monitors on two different occasions. There was absolutely no doubt that once this thing was in full swing that the players knew what they were doing wasn't kosher.
Oh no, I think he's actually serious. Or a great troll.Ervin Burrell said:PLEASE tell me this is satire. WOW.03_Aggie said:
I don't blame you. I was disappointed at first. The more I thought about it, the more I figured this is much ado about nothing.
Distinguishing between a fast ball and a breaking ball isn't that beneficial.
The fact that you fail to realize you're doing the very same thing by defending the Astros via post after post after post after post is pretty delicious. Cue the laugh/cry response to this.Flexbone said:Proposition Joe said:03_Aggie said:
I think the "Dark Arts" scheme may fall into that category. But technically that wasn't illegal and didn't directly involve the players.
I don't think the trash can/monitor deal was some elaborate scheme by the club. I think it was as simple as two guys, that were respected by the players, saying you guys are way behind in this stuff and here's how we'll change that. Players probably didn't give it much thought from a risk perspective. Most of them had only played for the Astros.
We know some players didn't like it because they found the noise distracting. That would lend credence that this wasn't a batter by batter request but most likely someone that wasn't playing implementing the process.
But people love a good conspiracy theory.
I think it's less that people love a good conspiracy theory, and more posts like these from Astros fans that try and skew everything in the softest possible light...
Trying to make a case that aspects "technically weren't illegal" and that this was somehow just 2 rogue players that forced the rest of the team to bend to their will and the innocent little players didn't know any better is going overdrive in trying to downplay things.
Your own coach reportedly took a bat to the monitors on two different occasions. There was absolutely no doubt that once this thing was in full swing that the players knew what they were doing wasn't kosher.
Whatever you guys need to tell yourselves so you can feel better about your pathetic need to attach yourself to a pro sports team because you're a mediocre individual.
Proposition Joe said:
Just remind you guys, you are pathetic. You should care less about sports teams. Be like Flexbone. He obviously doesn't care. Nope, not at all.
Ervin Burrell said:The fact that you fail to realize you're doing the very same thing by defending the Astros via post after post after post after post is pretty delicious. Cue the laugh/cry response to this.Flexbone said:Proposition Joe said:03_Aggie said:
I think the "Dark Arts" scheme may fall into that category. But technically that wasn't illegal and didn't directly involve the players.
I don't think the trash can/monitor deal was some elaborate scheme by the club. I think it was as simple as two guys, that were respected by the players, saying you guys are way behind in this stuff and here's how we'll change that. Players probably didn't give it much thought from a risk perspective. Most of them had only played for the Astros.
We know some players didn't like it because they found the noise distracting. That would lend credence that this wasn't a batter by batter request but most likely someone that wasn't playing implementing the process.
But people love a good conspiracy theory.
I think it's less that people love a good conspiracy theory, and more posts like these from Astros fans that try and skew everything in the softest possible light...
Trying to make a case that aspects "technically weren't illegal" and that this was somehow just 2 rogue players that forced the rest of the team to bend to their will and the innocent little players didn't know any better is going overdrive in trying to downplay things.
Your own coach reportedly took a bat to the monitors on two different occasions. There was absolutely no doubt that once this thing was in full swing that the players knew what they were doing wasn't kosher.
Whatever you guys need to tell yourselves so you can feel better about your pathetic need to attach yourself to a pro sports team because you're a mediocre individual.
Bruh....Proposition Joe said:
Just remind you guys, you are pathetic. You should care less about sports teams. Be like Flexbone. He obviously doesn't care. Nope, not at all.
investorAg83 said:Oh no, I think he's actually serious. Or a great troll.Ervin Burrell said:PLEASE tell me this is satire. WOW.03_Aggie said:
I don't blame you. I was disappointed at first. The more I thought about it, the more I figured this is much ado about nothing.
Distinguishing between a fast ball and a breaking ball isn't that beneficial.
And the winner is whoever had the AngelsDannyDuberstein said:
Any guesses as to which mlb team has a player that takes a **** on the astros tomorrow? Today's winner was whoever had the Reds thanks to Trevor Bauer
Proposition Joe said:03_Aggie said:
I think the "Dark Arts" scheme may fall into that category. But technically that wasn't illegal and didn't directly involve the players.
I don't think the trash can/monitor deal was some elaborate scheme by the club. I think it was as simple as two guys, that were respected by the players, saying you guys are way behind in this stuff and here's how we'll change that. Players probably didn't give it much thought from a risk perspective. Most of them had only played for the Astros.
We know some players didn't like it because they found the noise distracting. That would lend credence that this wasn't a batter by batter request but most likely someone that wasn't playing implementing the process.
But people love a good conspiracy theory.
I think it's less that people love a good conspiracy theory, and more posts like these from Astros fans that try and skew everything in the softest possible light...
Trying to make a case that aspects "technically weren't illegal" and that this was somehow just 2 rogue players that forced the rest of the team to bend to their will and the innocent little players didn't know any better is going overdrive in trying to downplay things.
Your own coach reportedly took a bat to the monitors on two different occasions. There was absolutely no doubt that once this thing was in full swing that the players knew what they were doing wasn't kosher.
Gleybar Torres and Justin Turner as well. Weird, I thought the only ones talking about it were Rangers fans?McDadeTXAggie said:
More players weighing in on this... its Trout now. It's not going away anytime soon
Ervin Burrell said:Gleybar Torres and Justin Turner as well. Weird, I thought the only ones talking about it were Rangers fans?McDadeTXAggie said:
More players weighing in on this... its Trout now. It's not going away anytime soon
And half of the posts are from a Cards fan and "I don't care about pro sports or this issue at all" Flexbone.03_Aggie said:Ervin Burrell said:Gleybar Torres and Justin Turner as well. Weird, I thought the only ones talking about it were Rangers fans?McDadeTXAggie said:
More players weighing in on this... its Trout now. It's not going away anytime soon
This thread is close to surpassing the actual Rangers dedicated thread. But please continue to tell us how much they don't care about the Astros.
03_Aggie said:Proposition Joe said:03_Aggie said:
I think the "Dark Arts" scheme may fall into that category. But technically that wasn't illegal and didn't directly involve the players.
I don't think the trash can/monitor deal was some elaborate scheme by the club. I think it was as simple as two guys, that were respected by the players, saying you guys are way behind in this stuff and here's how we'll change that. Players probably didn't give it much thought from a risk perspective. Most of them had only played for the Astros.
We know some players didn't like it because they found the noise distracting. That would lend credence that this wasn't a batter by batter request but most likely someone that wasn't playing implementing the process.
But people love a good conspiracy theory.
I think it's less that people love a good conspiracy theory, and more posts like these from Astros fans that try and skew everything in the softest possible light...
Trying to make a case that aspects "technically weren't illegal" and that this was somehow just 2 rogue players that forced the rest of the team to bend to their will and the innocent little players didn't know any better is going overdrive in trying to downplay things.
Your own coach reportedly took a bat to the monitors on two different occasions. There was absolutely no doubt that once this thing was in full swing that the players knew what they were doing wasn't kosher.
They were two completely different things. But people, apparently like yourself, have trouble understanding that.
I also never said it was rogue people either. But it wasn't Bregman in there signaling for Correa.
So just like Hinch broke the monitors, yet it continued on, some players didn't care to participate but that doesn't mean someone didn't bang the trashcan during their at bats.
Quote:
"It was a player-driven thing. It sucks, too, because guys' careers have been affected, a lot of people lost jobs. It was tough. Me going up to the plate knowing what was coming -- it would be pretty fun up there."