Proposition Joe said:
I mean, one can assume people's side in things are going to skew towards the team they are or aren't a fan of.
That doesn't change basic logic fallacies though. And for the most part I think Houston fans would pretty much agree that if they are going to just assume every other team is doing it then it's fair to assume that Houston did it post-2017.
It would be like a Rangers fan saying "All other teams were doing steroids too... but the only Rangers that were doing it were the ones that got caught!"
As for Flexbone, defending something without any logic is kind of his shtick. I believe he's the guy that after TCU beat us 2-out-of-3 in the super regionals a while back was proclaiming we were actually the better team. If the final score doesn't support what he thinks it should, he'll jump through logic hoops to frame it in a way that makes him right. Which I guess is what works for him as a lawyer... You don't actually have to prove anything with facts, just repeat nonsense enough times that a few idiots on the jury will think it's logical.
Yes, that's what board certified lawyers do. We just make up fancy arguments with no basis to try and trick jurors. Strange strategy considering Tax Court trials are bench trials held by federally appointed judges. And most cases are docketed in Tax Court.
You don't understand what logic is and your ridiculous posts demonstrate that. Look at this post. NOBODY argued what you just said. You keep going back to "there's no proof Houston didn't do it in 2018/2019" while in the same breath pointing to the conclusions of the very same investigation that concluded they did it in 2017. That same investigation concluded they didn't do it then. Could that be wrong? Sure. But this whole thing started because of one player talking. Yet when other players from other teams have come out and said that Houston is just the tip of the iceberg, you dismiss it as irrelevant. That makes no sense. "There's more evidence against Houston!" No kidding, that's usually what happens in an investigation...they find evidence. Unless there's the same investigation undertaken against other teams, there's likely going to more evidence against the team they did investigate.
As for me claiming A&M to be better than a team it lost to, thank you for proving absolutely what I just said about your ability to reason. It would take 5 seconds to name 100 examples of games where the better team lost.