Writers Guild strike 2023

145,591 Views | 1612 Replies | Last: 9 mo ago by uujm
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bluefire579
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Welp, there it is. Hopefully this speeds negotiations along
Claude!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:


Nah, it's why the world still needs editors.
TXAGBQ76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
sounds like a pride event
St Hedwig Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TXAGBQ76 said:

sounds like a pride event

Iew…that's terrifying!
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This woman is so stupid, having made gaffe after gaffe during these negotiations. This one takes the cake, though. Hopefully she's replaced in the next election...


double aught
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ted Cruz would be proud.
Sea Speed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So she isn't allowed to go anywhere? Do they not have zoom in Hollywood? And she made her money with a hit show years ago, is she not allowed to spend it? Shaming her for making residuals? Smacks of jealousy.
Sea Speed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Also never in a million years imagined her having a serious role in anything.
Counterpoint
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
She should just do that laugh during negotiations and the other side would instantly fold.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sea Speed said:

So she isn't allowed to go anywhere? Do they not have zoom in Hollywood? And she made her money with a hit show years ago, is she not allowed to spend it? Shaming her for making residuals? Smacks of jealousy.


Give me a break. As president of the guild, she peaced out and left the country during the final weekend of negotiations. On no planet is that a good look or good leadership.
Sea Speed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Did anyone anticipate a deal being done? If they were at an impasse, what does it matter? That is a legitimate question. The main point of that post is that whoever wrote that tweet sounds bitter and jealous that they don't get to live off of residuals.
TXAGBQ76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That could be a negotiating tactic.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
By the sound of it, things are going to get uglier before they get better (though this is probably more of negotiation tactic than anything)…

TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
These people are f/cking ghouls…

Quote:

"The endgame is to allow things to drag on until union members start losing their apartments and losing their houses," a studio executive told Deadline. Acknowledging the cold-as-ice approach, several other sources reiterated the statement. One insider called it "a cruel but necessary evil."
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's exactly what this article is, a warning…

TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The studios may have just screwed themselves. 70+ days into the WGA strike and I've never seen the writers more pissed and galvanized than they are right now, after reading that article. Just a ridiculously evil threat, in a desperate attempt to try and keep SAG from striking as well. Except now SAG is even more pissed too, and at this point they're also almost assuredly going to strike, tomorrow night, then all of Hollywood shuts down, which the studios are clearly scared to death of, and weren't actually anticipating. What an absolute cluster/ck.
TXAGBQ76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hello AI?
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I've always known this, having dealt with these studio assh*les for years and years, but it's still disheartening to realize once again they really are just the dumbest, most incompetent group of morons. That it's *these* people holding the purse strings almost makes it worse than if it were actually smart, capable assh*les.
Legal Custodian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm curious your thoughts how this strike is both similar and different than the one in 2006?

Both from what the writers and/or actors are wanting as well as the overall environment that either benefits or detracts from both sides.

One example is the fact that streaming old shows is prevalent now that wasn't around in the mid-2000s. I have to think that reduces the pressure of incoming revenue for the studios would need for new shows or movies. Thoughts?
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Legal Custodian said:

I'm curious your thoughts how this strike is both similar and different than the one in 2006?

Both from what the writers and/or actors are wanting as well as the overall environment that either benefits or detracts from both sides.

One example is the fact that streaming old shows is prevalent now that wasn't around in the mid-2000s. I have to think that reduces the pressure of incoming revenue for the studios would need for new shows or movies. Thoughts?

The biggest difference is the fact that Big Tech (Amazon, Apple, Netflix) is now part of the AMPTP, and their attitude is basically that they don't have to play by the same rules as the traditional studios. At the same time cord cutting is in full effect, Big Tech has forced so many new norms (shorter TV seasons, way smaller writer rooms, etc) that it's broken the industry to the point where the vast majority of writers can't earn a living writing any more. It's essentially become a gig economy, one that simply isn't sustainable, both for writers, but also eventually the studios themselves (which they stupidly either don't realize or refuse to care about, since it won't affect them for another few years).

The other big difference is of course the emergence of AI. Studios want to be able to be able to replace both writers and actors with computers (to a certain extent, not all the way), while writers and actors want at least *some* protections in that regard.

As for the streaming of old shows, that's not really a factor in any of this because what primarily feeds audience growth for streaming is new content, not so much old content. Sure, the streamers could last a couple months, but once the new content spigot is turned off, old libraries just won't be enough to retain all of its users, much less grow users. And there's nothing these streamers fear more than their quarterly user numbers dropping.
Capybara
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Right, I'm not sure how anyone buys the studios are operating from a place of strength when more people than ever (at least in the modern era) know the WBD CEO by name.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ha, exactly.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG



SlimM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I have a weird question for the experts on here: Can a SAG member appear on a show like Masked Singer (as a judge OR a singer) during a strike?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.