Needs to star David Tennant and Victoria Tennant.
Probably also a reference to a minority actor taking a lead as well. Not nearly as common.TCTTS said:
Tagline is:
"It's time for a new protagonist."
Kind of generic, as just about every new movie gives us a "new protagonist."
I wonder if that means that it's time to add a new hero to the lexicon - like the next "Bond" or whatever - or if the word "protagonist" is key; as in, the movie is literally *about* storytelling in some way?
If that's the case, then I am very disappointed.Saxsoon said:Probably also a reference to a minority actor taking a lead as well. Not nearly as common.TCTTS said:
Tagline is:
"It's time for a new protagonist."
Kind of generic, as just about every new movie gives us a "new protagonist."
I wonder if that means that it's time to add a new hero to the lexicon - like the next "Bond" or whatever - or if the word "protagonist" is key; as in, the movie is literally *about* storytelling in some way?
Exactly right. Time itself has come for a new protagonist.Quad Dog said:
The taglines could also work if you treat TIME as a tangible antagonist of the movie. For example if you replaced the word TIME with VADER.
TCTTS said:
I don't quite follow. Why would we shorten an already short word?
Btw, I love how, in the way it's presented, it's even more than just a palindrome. The way the letters are positioned, and the way the title rotates, it can not only be read the same backwards and forwards, but upside down as well. It's like it's Nolan's little way of signaling that this is going to be his most mind-bending movie yet.
Blatant Disregard said:
Some thoughts:
"Time has come for..." is very deliberate. Not THE time has come, but TIME ITSELF has come.
In the second clip with Washington, it almost looks like he's sliding to the right like he's on a conveyor belt instead of walking. Likely sliding through past events in time.
PatAg said:
I got a snarky vibe from the tweet, was that not their intent?
It was just the "another" part of it that made me think that.TCTTS said:
Didn't think of it is as snarky when I posted it, but I can see how it might be.