DDub74 said:
My speculation is this was a professional hit for several reasons.
Had to know ahead of time how to access roof, know they had a sight line to stage, etc. Most roof access ladders have locks, so either had bolt cutters or key.
From all accounts, one shot was fired. Not several like Trumps attempt. One shot means they had confidence in their shot.
The shooter obviously escaped quickly probably meaning he had an escape plan and/or had help.
Who?
My guess is possibly Utah/Idaho fringe white supremists or similar. Why? To start or continue to flame a civil war.
Or radical anti Christian religious group. Or even a foreign group.
If they don't have anyone in 24-48 hours, then you have to think it was professional.
rab79 said:
They have been working the more outrageous lib posts over there pretty hard though, so thanks for that. Maybe why they are trying to invest this one now.
HoustonAg2106 said:
Can we have a thread dedicated to updates on the man hunt for this monster?
I really want to keep track of the search and then execution of this *******.
New footage shows the shooter on the roof of Utah Valley University’s Losee Center moments before Charlie Kirk was shot. The gunman remains at large as the investigation continues. pic.twitter.com/R4jCtyQxQf
— Geopoliti𝕏 Monitor (@GeopolitixM) September 10, 2025
maybe they don't. Maybe they just spy and surveil a lot in our country and shared something they knewBTKAG97 said:
Why would a foreign entity/country want to kill Kirk?
Charlie Kirk was murdered for speaking truth and defending freedom. A lion-hearted friend of Israel, he fought the lies and stood tall for Judeo-Christian civilization. I spoke to him only two weeks ago and invited him to Israel. Sadly, that visit will not take place.
— Benjamin Netanyahu - בנימין נתניהו (@netanyahu) September 10, 2025
We lost an…
Bibi tweeted t&p! That definitively rules him out!sanangelo said:
Posted to possibly rule out one foreign actor.Charlie Kirk was murdered for speaking truth and defending freedom. A lion-hearted friend of Israel, he fought the lies and stood tall for Judeo-Christian civilization. I spoke to him only two weeks ago and invited him to Israel. Sadly, that visit will not take place.
— Benjamin Netanyahu - בנימין נתניהו (@netanyahu) September 10, 2025
We lost an…
brazagg said:
Jeez Louise. Foreign assets kill Charlie? What the f
Ranger26 said:
When you say a professional hit, do you mean a professional hitman, or a someone that has trained to shoot? I could think of a lot more places a professional could kill Kirk a lot easier than a roof of a public venue.
BTKAG97 said:
Why would a foreign entity/country want to kill Kirk?
usmcbrooks said:DDub74 said:
My speculation is this was a professional hit for several reasons.
Had to know ahead of time how to access roof, know they had a sight line to stage, etc. Most roof access ladders have locks, so either had bolt cutters or key.
From all accounts, one shot was fired. Not several like Trumps attempt. One shot means they had confidence in their shot.
The shooter obviously escaped quickly probably meaning he had an escape plan and/or had help.
Who?
My guess is possibly Utah/Idaho fringe white supremists or similar. Why? To start or continue to flame a civil war.
Or radical anti Christian religious group. Or even a foreign group.
If they don't have anyone in 24-48 hours, then you have to think it was professional.
Do you Moonlight as a writer for Babylon Bee? A White Supremacist killed the checks notes, the voice for white supremacy? I would openly call you the hard R word however, you're not worth the ban.
TAMUallen said:
Oh god, more professional hit talk.
It was jfk with a 22 from the blimp
Ranger26 said:
So a professional runs across a roof in the public's view to shoot? When you say professional, that to me is a whole different level. There was a video on this forum awhile back where a government agency went to another country and set up at a hotel and did surveillance and got the victims key card and assassinated him in his hotel room and flew out of the country. That to me is professional, going into an unsecured building onto the roof in public view doesn't seem professional.
Keyno said:Ranger26 said:
So a professional runs across a roof in the public's view to shoot? When you say professional, that to me is a whole different level. There was a video on this forum awhile back where a government agency went to another country and set up at a hotel and did surveillance and got the victims key card and assassinated him in his hotel room and flew out of the country. That to me is professional, going into an unsecured building onto the roof in public view doesn't seem professional.
What if the intended goal was a very public and filmed hit for millions to see?
hph6203 said:
What if the earth is really flat? Most probable scenario is some random, generally untrained lunatic that took an opportunity and was successful despite lack of preparation. That is the norm scenario in these kinds of situations, and their success is a consequence of probabilities rather than planning.
Madagascar said:
Anyone know where Hillary was this afternoon?
Keyno said:Ranger26 said:
So a professional runs across a roof in the public's view to shoot? When you say professional, that to me is a whole different level. There was a video on this forum awhile back where a government agency went to another country and set up at a hotel and did surveillance and got the victims key card and assassinated him in his hotel room and flew out of the country. That to me is professional, going into an unsecured building onto the roof in public view doesn't seem professional.
What if the intended goal was a very public and filmed hit for millions to see?
TAMUallen said:Keyno said:Ranger26 said:
So a professional runs across a roof in the public's view to shoot? When you say professional, that to me is a whole different level. There was a video on this forum awhile back where a government agency went to another country and set up at a hotel and did surveillance and got the victims key card and assassinated him in his hotel room and flew out of the country. That to me is professional, going into an unsecured building onto the roof in public view doesn't seem professional.
What if the intended goal was a very public and filmed hit for millions to see?
You'd live stream it.
Not that hard.
Other shooters have
To be seen if they do. My bet is they don't. Tamerlan Tsaernev was dead 4 days after he killed people in Boston, his brother captured not long after. Would not be surprised if ultimately you're revering the skill of a dick tucking ****** that bought a gun within the last month.Keyno said:hph6203 said:
What if the earth is really flat? Most probable scenario is some random, generally untrained lunatic that took an opportunity and was successful despite lack of preparation. That is the norm scenario in these kinds of situations, and their success is a consequence of probabilities rather than planning.
Yeah? And how often do these random untrained, comically lucky killers get away with it? The norm scenario for these situations?
Keyno said:TAMUallen said:Keyno said:Ranger26 said:
So a professional runs across a roof in the public's view to shoot? When you say professional, that to me is a whole different level. There was a video on this forum awhile back where a government agency went to another country and set up at a hotel and did surveillance and got the victims key card and assassinated him in his hotel room and flew out of the country. That to me is professional, going into an unsecured building onto the roof in public view doesn't seem professional.
What if the intended goal was a very public and filmed hit for millions to see?
You'd live stream it.
Not that hard.
Other shooters have
You'd live stream it when you wanted everyone to know you were the killer/expected to be killed yourself. This professional obviously intended to get away with this.
TAMUallen said:Keyno said:TAMUallen said:Keyno said:Ranger26 said:
So a professional runs across a roof in the public's view to shoot? When you say professional, that to me is a whole different level. There was a video on this forum awhile back where a government agency went to another country and set up at a hotel and did surveillance and got the victims key card and assassinated him in his hotel room and flew out of the country. That to me is professional, going into an unsecured building onto the roof in public view doesn't seem professional.
What if the intended goal was a very public and filmed hit for millions to see?
You'd live stream it.
Not that hard.
Other shooters have
You'd live stream it when you wanted everyone to know you were the killer/expected to be killed yourself. This professional obviously intended to get away with this.
Youre delusional
Keyno said:TAMUallen said:Keyno said:TAMUallen said:Keyno said:Ranger26 said:
So a professional runs across a roof in the public's view to shoot? When you say professional, that to me is a whole different level. There was a video on this forum awhile back where a government agency went to another country and set up at a hotel and did surveillance and got the victims key card and assassinated him in his hotel room and flew out of the country. That to me is professional, going into an unsecured building onto the roof in public view doesn't seem professional.
What if the intended goal was a very public and filmed hit for millions to see?
You'd live stream it.
Not that hard.
Other shooters have
You'd live stream it when you wanted everyone to know you were the killer/expected to be killed yourself. This professional obviously intended to get away with this.
Youre delusional
Not an argument.
hph6203 said:
When you presume a high level of skill rather than unfortunate luck it's a form of reverence. In the vast majority of incidences, regardless of the circumstances for which it occurred, the perpetrator of this kind of thing is an individualistic, ideological ****bag with very little skill that happened to be successful in their goal. I would prefer not laying competence at their feet.