LOL at people watching this movie on a plane.
what about Bane dialogue?c-jags said:
i may be weird, but i just didn't have any problems hearing the audio in theater. complaints about the plot and explanation, i get, but not audio. i can't think of a single word that i couldn't make out.
didn't for interstellar either.
that i can grant was somewhat difficult.Mr. White said:what about Bane dialogue?c-jags said:
i may be weird, but i just didn't have any problems hearing the audio in theater. complaints about the plot and explanation, i get, but not audio. i can't think of a single word that i couldn't make out.
didn't for interstellar either.
Watching on an ipad while I rock my daughter to sleep. Sometimes we just can't be choosy.schmendeler said:
LOL at people watching this movie on a plane.
It keeps you from noticing all the snakes......schmendeler said:
LOL at people watching this movie on a plane.
Good point at the end. Although I pooped all over this movie, I still applaud the effort. At least they tried something and it wasn't another 80's sitcom movie, reboot, or even worse, another stupid comic book movie.oragator said:
Finally watched it.
Loved the effort and idea, not a a huge fan of the execution. Half the time they were in masks so you didn't know who you were seeing, and that also affected the sound. And it was like he wanted to see how much info he could squeeze into 2.5 hours, and many of the things that you needed to know for later happened in half seconds. One thing I had to slow mo on my dvr three times to make sure I got it. And a couple of things I had to Google afterwards which was frustrating. And there was a time plot hole at the end I think as well.
But I will take movies like this all day every day over most movies for sure. At least it tried to be new and different.
i like that. but is there any explanation for how he knows this?MW03 said:
I read an internet theory that the Protagonist stops the Time Bomb because he knows the team from Interstellar in the future will be able to leave the planet, therefore rendering the future-people-in-Tenet's need for a "planet do over" moot.
Fun theory for a "Nolanverse" even if pretty damned thin.
Dr. Not Yet Dr. Ag said:
Woof, JDW ruined this movie for me. He is an absolutely terrible actor. It was just so painful to see such a great actor in Pattinson be forced to share screen time with him. He has no range, no emotion, no charisma. His physicality is great for action scenes, but that's about it. It really feels like a football player trying really hard to act. I have no clue what Nolan was thinking making JDW his leading man.
TCTTS said:Dr. Not Yet Dr. Ag said:
Woof, JDW ruined this movie for me. He is an absolutely terrible actor. It was just so painful to see such a great actor in Pattinson be forced to share screen time with him. He has no range, no emotion, no charisma. His physicality is great for action scenes, but that's about it. It really feels like a football player trying really hard to act. I have no clue what Nolan was thinking making JDW his leading man.
I don't think JDW did amazing or anything, but "ruined the movie" seems a little extreme. I thought he was... fine. Personally, I loved the movie, and it just keeps getting better with time for me, but I do wonder how much better it could have been if the protagonist and Kat had any chemistry whatsoever. They just seemed so mismatched, from their personalities to him being so short, her being so tall, there being zero sparks between them, etc. If those two characters had more chemistry, and there was more of a romantic subplot there - the spy who falls for the villain's tortured wife and vice versa - the movie would have crackled so much more. Heck, JDW and Pattinson could have switched roles and that right there could have solved 75% of it. Ultimately, though, I would have completely recast the protagonist and Kat and made that relationship sizzle. Would have gone such a long way toward giving the movie the heart and emotion it desperately needs.
Milwaukees Best Light said:Good point at the end. Although I pooped all over this movie, I still applaud the effort. At least they tried something and it wasn't another 80's sitcom movie, reboot, or even worse, another stupid comic book movie.oragator said:
Finally watched it.
Loved the effort and idea, not a a huge fan of the execution. Half the time they were in masks so you didn't know who you were seeing, and that also affected the sound. And it was like he wanted to see how much info he could squeeze into 2.5 hours, and many of the things that you needed to know for later happened in half seconds. One thing I had to slow mo on my dvr three times to make sure I got it. And a couple of things I had to Google afterwards which was frustrating. And there was a time plot hole at the end I think as well.
But I will take movies like this all day every day over most movies for sure. At least it tried to be new and different.