staticdoor said:
Excellent post by Brandon; not necessary or owed but genuinely appreciate the timeline
Well crafted by a damn fine lawyer.
staticdoor said:
Excellent post by Brandon; not necessary or owed but genuinely appreciate the timeline
Guitarsoup said:piag94 said:
2 and 3 are a joke. No the mods just want to hide behind their username and just want to be the internet tough guy...
Because there are definitely not any sociopaths on Texags to be wary of.
editedCDUB98 said:staticdoor said:
Excellent post by Brandon; not necessary or owed but genuinely appreciate the timeline
Well crafted by a damn fine lawyer.
CDUB98 said:staticdoor said:
Excellent post by Brandon; not necessary or owed but genuinely appreciate the timeline
Well crafted by a damn fine lawyer.
As it should beCDUB98 said:staticdoor said:
Excellent post by Brandon; not necessary or owed but genuinely appreciate the timeline
Well crafted by a damn fine lawyer.
This is a fair critique Jock. I went back this morning and read nearly every post of the 8 page thread on Varsity that occurred back in 2014. It felt different than it certainly does now and I think many believed he was working to make things right. I regret believing that and I regret not poking deeper in the months that followed. You were deeply skeptical in that thread, btw - I wish I was more so too.Ol Jock 99 said:
Brandon, I appreciate your explanation. I would suggest that someone being allowed to keep their moderator status after being shown defrauding other site members is a serious control issue. Separately, having someone as hotheaded as jorts (on his best day) could help explain the issue so many of us have with inconsistent and erratic moderation.
Quote:
Brandon - It appears from many posts here that poor moderation from volunteer, anonymous moderators is the biggest negative your customers have with your business, and has apparently already cost y'all a good deal of money.
actually it was necessary.staticdoor said:
Excellent post by Brandon; not necessary or owed but genuinely appreciate the timeline
Gotta consult with Zone before issuing a statement on Jorts.CDUB98 said:staticdoor said:
Excellent post by Brandon; not necessary or owed but genuinely appreciate the timeline
Well crafted by a damn fine lawyer.
Three main reasons:Hood said:
Brandon,
Since this has turned into a sort-of Q&A session (and apologies if you've answered this elsewhere) - what's the reasoning for anonymous moderating as SOP on Texags?
WatchOle said:Three main reasons:Hood said:
Brandon,
Since this has turned into a sort-of Q&A session (and apologies if you've answered this elsewhere) - what's the reasoning for anonymous moderating as SOP on Texags?
1. I want moderators to be able to participate on the forums as normal posters without the social burden of being a moderator.
2. I want moderators to moderate based on policy and not based community pressure.
3. I want moderators to be free on real world retribution by disgruntled community members.
However, as posted above, we are going to make some changes to this. Maybe not as far as going completely known, but transparency layers will be added.