For anyone who is not on Tik Tok, I need to let you know — they now think Patrick Clancy is Elaine Rossi, the family nanny, in some Mrs. Doubtfire type situation.

I think we should all lose our internet privileges for a day. pic.twitter.com/HmONfsrlSL

— Emily See (@TheEmilySee) September 17, 2026

BadMoonRisin said:

---

new tiktok wine mom conspiracy theory just dropped:

they now think that patrick clancy was the nanny in drag, like mrs. doubtfire.

---

YokelRidesAgain said:

---

BadMoonRisin said:

---

new tiktok wine mom conspiracy theory just dropped:

they now think that patrick clancy was the nanny in drag, like mrs. doubtfire.

---

There's nothing wrong with drinking a box of wine between the time the school bus leaves and after school pickup. A lot of people do that.

---

Queso1 said:

---

Why? They'll never get a conviction.

---

CaptTex said:

---

I was reading somewhere that a group of the jurors planned to do a joint interview about the case after it was over, can anyone corroborate this? This supposedly came from one of the jurors in a NBC-10 interview. Isn't this right up there with obstruction of justice or some kind of manipulation if it's true?

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

CaptTex said:

---

I was reading somewhere that a group of the jurors planned to do a joint interview about the case after it was over, can anyone corroborate this? This supposedly came from one of the jurors in a NBC-10 interview. Isn't this right up there with obstruction of justice or some kind of manipulation if it's true?

---

No. Jurors are told by the judge they're free to talk about the case as much or as little as they want to after their service is complete.That's fairly standard.

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

CaptTex said:

---

I was reading somewhere that a group of the jurors planned to do a joint interview about the case after it was over, can anyone corroborate this? This supposedly came from one of the jurors in a NBC-10 interview. Isn't this right up there with obstruction of justice or some kind of manipulation if it's true?

---

No. Jurors are told by the judge they're free to talk about the case as much or as little as they want to after their service is complete.That's fairly standard.

---

Tony Franklins Other Shoe said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

CaptTex said:

---

I was reading somewhere that a group of the jurors planned to do a joint interview about the case after it was over, can anyone corroborate this? This supposedly came from one of the jurors in a NBC-10 interview. Isn't this right up there with obstruction of justice or some kind of manipulation if it's true?

---

No. Jurors are told by the judge they're free to talk about the case as much or as little as they want to after their service is complete.That's fairly standard.

---

We were told that on our federal jury trial. It garnered enough local attention that there were reporters out front, but they were waiting for the attorneys and we walked right past the mob. They never looked at us.

---

fc2112 said:

---

Lemme get this right.....

If we vote for a woman for President, it's possible she could start World War III but it wouldn't be her fault because it's the wrong time of the month?

---

Whoop2 said:

---

If you murder your kids when you could have told your husband to take them and help her to get help or ask your family to take them is responsible, whether or not she's on medication or hormonal crazy. She was clear headed enough to look up how long she needed to send her husband away and she did send him away so she could kill them. How could she live knowing she did that. If you harm a child the Bible has a big warning.

---

Backyard Gator said:

---

Tony Franklins Other Shoe said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

CaptTex said:

---

I was reading somewhere that a group of the jurors planned to do a joint interview about the case after it was over, can anyone corroborate this? This supposedly came from one of the jurors in a NBC-10 interview. Isn't this right up there with obstruction of justice or some kind of manipulation if it's true?

---

No. Jurors are told by the judge they're free to talk about the case as much or as little as they want to after their service is complete.That's fairly standard.

---

We were told that on our federal jury trial. It garnered enough local attention that there were reporters out front, but they were waiting for the attorneys and we walked right past the mob. They never looked at us.

---

You scared them away when you stopped to talk to that one reporter about rocks.

---

Backyard Gator said:

---

Tony Franklins Other Shoe said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

CaptTex said:

---

I was reading somewhere that a group of the jurors planned to do a joint interview about the case after it was over, can anyone corroborate this? This supposedly came from one of the jurors in a NBC-10 interview. Isn't this right up there with obstruction of justice or some kind of manipulation if it's true?

---

No. Jurors are told by the judge they're free to talk about the case as much or as little as they want to after their service is complete.That's fairly standard.

---

We were told that on our federal jury trial. It garnered enough local attention that there were reporters out front, but they were waiting for the attorneys and we walked right past the mob. They never looked at us.

---

You scared them away when you stopped to talk to that one reporter about rocks.

---

Fenrir said:

---

Backyard Gator said:

---

Tony Franklins Other Shoe said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

CaptTex said:

---

I was reading somewhere that a group of the jurors planned to do a joint interview about the case after it was over, can anyone corroborate this? This supposedly came from one of the jurors in a NBC-10 interview. Isn't this right up there with obstruction of justice or some kind of manipulation if it's true?

---

No. Jurors are told by the judge they're free to talk about the case as much or as little as they want to after their service is complete.That's fairly standard.

---

We were told that on our federal jury trial. It garnered enough local attention that there were reporters out front, but they were waiting for the attorneys and we walked right past the mob. They never looked at us.

---

You scared them away when you stopped to talk to that one reporter about rocks.

---

They're not rocks, they're minerals.

---

Mathguy64 said:

---

How the hell is that even possible? When I served on a jury they took the cell phones away while in the room.

---

Quote:

---

Why Sequestration Was Denied

Defense request: Defense attorney Kevin Reddington asked Judge Sullivan to sequester the jury due to heavy public attention.

Judge's decision: The judge denied the request. He noted that keeping a jury in a hotel away from home is rare and extreme in modern trials.

Alternative approach: The judge chose to trust the jurors to follow the rules while living at home during the trial.

---

Mathguy64 said:

---

How the hell is that even possible? When I served on a jury they took the cell phones away while in the room.

---

Mathguy64 said:

---

How the hell is that even possible? When I served on a jury they took the cell phones away while in the room.

---