Lindsay Clancy Trial

180,884 Views | 1801 Replies | Last: 18 hrs ago by BigRobSA
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The body was so heavily decomposed most of the case was based on circumstantial evidence and the prosecution couldnt really say how or what caused her death.

They went for murder 1 with not enough evidence to support that charge.

She definitely had something to do with it.
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggie93 said:

El Chupacabra said:

So what happens to the newest hero of democrats? Sit in prison? House arrest? Nothing?

Millionaire from GoFundMe and never convicted and treated as a hero by some deranged women is most likely.


She'll wait it out.

Prosecutor will half ass it. Cant prosecute a liberal hero. Make sure theres no sane male on the next jury. Given this is a blue state, not very hard.

Free. Magically gets better.
Has millions.

Runs for the Senate, because M*******s love their killer senators.
Psycho Bunny
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She aged nicely for a crazy person. For evidence, there was plenty of it, D.A. failed to link it to Casey or couldn't link it to her.
New slogan for Aggie football.

"abandon all hope, ye who enter here"
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
deddog said:

aggie93 said:

El Chupacabra said:

So what happens to the newest hero of democrats? Sit in prison? House arrest? Nothing?

Millionaire from GoFundMe and never convicted and treated as a hero by some deranged women is most likely.


She'll wait it out.

Prosecutor will half ass it. Cant prosecute a liberal hero. Make sure theres no sane male on the next jury. Given this is a blue state, not very hard.

Free. Magically gets better.
Has millions.

Runs for the Senate, because M love their killer senators.


The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Thunderstruck xx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Liberalism truly is a mental disease.



BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We have an epidemic of stupid, insane women. We are in serious trouble.
Infection_Ag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hardcore Greg said:

Psycho Bunny said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

That speaks more to his poor selection criteria than anything else. The type of woman capable of saying that showed signs long before that.

Another issue is that hardly anyone dates for marriage anymore. I never once got past the second date with a girl without the topic of kids/jobs/future coming up. I always knew early on whether this was gonna have a chance or not. My wife and I knew exactly how many kids each other wanted, what we wanted to do with our lives, what our values were, etc. within a few weeks of dating. Now people routinely get married before any of those talks come up in earnest.

Possibly. Or her views at the time of dating and proposal were not there yet and this one case struck a nerve with her and she went full ret*rd. Not saying the dude missed the signs, signs could have been there and they were not enough to break up over. Till this murder case came around and the dude just couldn't look pass the view point his soon to be wife was making.

I remember my ex wife getting bent out of shape because I called it that Casey Anthony was going to walk. She called me all kinds of names, it truly was kind of the end the marriage at that point. She just couldn't understand why I thought Casey should go free. Even spending hours talking to her about the charges and how the D.A. failed to prove their case. It all fell on deaf ears.

Not saying Casey is 100% innocent. Like I told my current wife when we were dating. It's not what you know, it's what you can prove. If a defense lawyer can get one member to have their mind changed, boom, hung jury. D.A. has the hard job, proving the case without reasonable doubt. Defense job, poke enough holes to make room for doubt.

I am curious how many fathers are installing nanny cams, hiring PI's, or getting a divorce lawyer to see what legal action they have.

Wait. Wasn't the evidence overwhelming that Casey Anthony did it? Didn't she lie her ass off about the abduction of her daughter?

I will say...she did not age poorly.



The circumstantial evidence, and just the general lack of evidence pointing toward anyone else, showed that with near certainty Anthony was involved in disposing of the body at the very least. The problem was that because of the state of the body they could never say for sure how or when she died, and it's pretty much impossible to convict someone of first degree murder if you can't even tell the jury with certainty that the victim was murdered.

But in practice it's nearly impossible to come up with a scenario where Anthony didn't either cover up an accidental death or commit the murder. And because it's hard to fathom a loving mother covering up an accident that killed their child, I've always considered her guilty in my mind. It just makes no sense to cover up your child drowning in a swimming pool.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1561373968250396


This kinda captures this in an interesting way...
You can turn off signatures, btw
Psycho Bunny
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why I thought negligent homicide would have been an easier charge. At least get her on something. Then if the DA finds evidence that comes back to murder, then charge her with murder.

Am I wrong for thinking this.
New slogan for Aggie football.

"abandon all hope, ye who enter here"
ShaggySLC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Psycho Bunny said:

Why I thought negligent homicide would have been an easier charge. At least get her on something. Then if the DA finds evidence that comes back to murder, then charge her with murder.

Am I wrong for thinking this.


The DA was elected by the women on that jury is the best explaintion I can think of.
TexasAggie_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Since there's three murders, can they charge her one at a time and make her sit through three trials?
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasAggie_02 said:

Since there's three murders, can they charge her one at a time and make her sit through three trials?

Whatever is the most painful thing possible for this child murderer.
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not even a week after the mistrial was declared these AWFL clowns are going on the CBS morning show to collect the attention that they seek.



And the big reveal: Holdout juror was a Based black man.
Thunderstruck xx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So now he is 100% doxxed. Here come the "uncle tom" accusations and harassment of this poor man.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TexasAggie_02 said:

Since there's three murders, can they charge her one at a time and make her sit through three trials?

Technically yes but that would be a waste of resources, i.e. taxpayer funds.
AgEngr12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BadMoonRisin said:

Not even a week after the mistrial was declared these AWFL clowns are going on the CBS morning show to collect the attention that they seek.



Holdout juror was a Based black man.

ETA: wrong emoji

Me moving forward, "THEY'RE ALL A BUNCH OF RACISTS!"
Just gotta execute
Tony Franklins Other Shoe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Two great clips. When the woman is talking about strangulation, 3 times, those idiots have to swallow their tongues. You know they hated that woman for voicing that.

Then the dumb woman is so surprised he is black. All of a sudden, skin color is important to her in the wrong way. Hypocrites. All of them.

Person Not Capable of Pregnancy
Hardcore Greg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BadMoonRisin said:

Not even a week after the mistrial was declared these AWFL clowns are going on the CBS morning show to collect the attention that they seek.



Holdout juror was a Based black man.

ETA: wrong emoji


Haha the black interviewers shock. "Whoa, I have to sit with that for a second".

These people are freakin clowns.
hunter2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TrumpsBarber said:




In light of today's revelations this is doubly funny…
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How many copycats now?



Execute them in public instead of making them famous victims and this will all stop.
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BadMoonRisin said:

How many copycats now?



Execute them in public and this will all stop.


Instead Democrats give them money on GoFundMe.
Vile.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BadMoonRisin said:

Not even a week after the mistrial was declared these AWFL clowns are going on the CBS morning show to collect the attention that they seek.



Holdout juror was a Based black man.

ETA: wrong emoji

The left will have a hard time deciding whether to go after him, or just limit it to trash talking him.

If it was a white dude, he would have already been doxxed, likely swatted multiple times, if not already murdered.
Tramp96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So a bunch of white women were harassing the only African-American in the room?

Where is Rev. Sharpton when you need him?

ETA:

The 11 whites on the jury trying to disparage the one black man should be sent some chocolate pie...

Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The fact that they are basically outing this guy is sick! There should be nothing said about the identity of any member of the jury! White liberal females are the scourge of the earth!
CampSkunk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yesterday Laura Hollis said everything that needs to be said about this - we have a country full of people who think having compassion is the most important factor in life.

Quote:

Watching the Lindsay Clancy trial, as well as its aftermath, play out has made me fear, seriously, for the future of this country. A functioning 21st-century society requires a sensible and reliable legal system, and ours seems to be going off the rails.

Clancy sent her husband, Patrick, on errands, and while he was gone, she strangled their three children, including an eight-month-old baby, and then tried to kill herself. Clancy claimed she was suffering from postpartum psychosis, but medical experts who testified admitted that there was no evidence of psychosis in Clancy's extensive medical records, which did show she was being treated for postpartum depression.

The jury in Clancy's case nine women and three men not only did not convict her, but 11 of the 12 jurors voted for acquittal on grounds of insanity. The 12th juror's refusal to acquit resulted in a mistrial.

Quote:

Governance by compassion, therefore, results not in a more benevolent society but rather in a chaotic, anarchic and disordered one. Policies promoted because they are said to be 'compassionate' to the unfortunate few end up creating a system of misery for the majority, institutionalizing unfairness, oppression, absurdity, violence and even societal collapse.
The Clancy trial bears that out in spades.

It's the Legal System That's Insane
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If I could put 1000 stars on this post I would but all I have is another after the fact single blue star.


No amount of logic is going to convince the illogical that orange man isn't so bad that we should all vote for socialists in 2026. He wants to vote for a socialist who wants to kill the O&G industry, dismantle capitalism, open the borders, ban guns, legalize abortion up to birth, allow men to play girls sports and hang out in women's locker rooms, and pay for trans surgeries for little kids. SIGNED txags92
Enrico Pallazzo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BadMoonRisin said:

How many copycats now?



Execute them in public instead of making them famous victims and this will all stop.


Custody battle. In reality, this is her killing the kids to punish the ex and she should get the death penalty for it. Like what we did to John Battaglia. He was crazy and we killed him anyway because he deserved it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Battaglia
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"After all you've heard today?" - Oprah

She admitted it you stupid c word!!!

And it's absolutely delicious that the lone, sane holdout juror is a black man. Look for this story to die rapidly.
rgag12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well said. Just google what restorative justice really is. Its not just a new nonsense word the left created. Its basically "well yeah the crime happened, but how can we get the best outcome for the victims and the offender."

It's complete nonsense. The only thing the offender deserves is punishment for what they did.
Tramp96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TrumpsBarber
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I wonder if Patrick Clancey was considering divorce prior to the mass murders. Demented people have been known to kill their own children after divorce or separation becomes a topic of discussion. Her entire defense revolved around her victimhood. Shedding light on a plausible motive would seem like a logical strategy for the prosecution. As for Patrick, he has an ongoing lawsuit against the pharmaceutical companies, doctors and hospitals and that would conflict with him admitting to marital problems. How could there not have been serious marital problems?
Tramp96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.