Vessel said:
This completely removes agency from women. Things have gotten so much easier for women over the past 100 years. Even the SAHMs have had their workload cut by like 90% due to modern household appliances. But still women are more unhappy than ever.
They want more and more "freedom," but freedom to them does not mean "little to no government intervention."
Ducks4brkfast said:
Good grief, they're women. Women wear pink. Some of yall are so easily gaslit by folks on X.
Ducks4brkfast said:
Good grief, they're women. Women wear pink. Some of yall are so easily gaslit by folks on X.
Vessel said:Ducks4brkfast said:
Good grief, they're women. Women wear pink. Some of yall are so easily gaslit by folks on X.
Two out of 9 grown adult women wearing pink is not impossible, but pretty improbable.
Given what we know about this case and the state of womandom, I'd say it's probably an L for sanity.
twelve12twelve said:Vessel said:Ducks4brkfast said:
Good grief, they're women. Women wear pink. Some of yall are so easily gaslit by folks on X.
Two out of 9 grown adult women wearing pink is not impossible, but pretty improbable.
Given what we know about this case and the state of womandom, I'd say it's probably an L for sanity.
That has to be it. Can't be your preconceived biases. Nope, not one bit.
Infection_Ag11 said:
Interestingly, the data actually suggests that female jurors are often LESS lenient/forgiving than males in cases involving crimes against children.
I'd be hesitant to assume the long deliberations are due to all the women wanting to acquit due to insanity. They could easily be subdivided into multiple factions or the split could simply be over which of the charges they will ultimately convict her of. I could certainly envision and understand a debate between first and decade degree murder for example, which carries significant sentencing ramifications.
twelve12twelve said:Vessel said:Ducks4brkfast said:
Good grief, they're women. Women wear pink. Some of yall are so easily gaslit by folks on X.
Two out of 9 grown adult women wearing pink is not impossible, but pretty improbable.
Given what we know about this case and the state of womandom, I'd say it's probably an L for sanity.
That has to be it. Can't be your preconceived biases. Nope, not one bit.
Spotted Ag said:Infection_Ag11 said:
Interestingly, the data actually suggests that female jurors are often LESS lenient/forgiving than males in cases involving crimes against children.
I'd be hesitant to assume the long deliberations are due to all the women wanting to acquit due to insanity. They could easily be subdivided into multiple factions or the split could simply be over which of the charges they will ultimately convict her of. I could certainly envision and understand a debate between first and decade degree murder for example, which carries significant sentencing ramifications.
Historically, liberal nutjob woman, and men for that matter, haven't been allowed to run amuck within society in the name of feelings. They've been laughed at and treated as outcasts and housed in insane asylums when necessary.
Infection_Ag11 said:
But women have always been treated more gently by our legal system going all the way back to OG English common law. That's nothing new.
ErnestEndeavor said:
What I've always heard from attorneys though is that if there are women on the jury and your client is a female, you better hope they feel some sort of connection to her because otherwise they won't go easy at all, sometimes worse. Women tend to be more judgmental one way or the other.
ErnestEndeavor said:
What I've always heard from attorneys though is that if there are women on the jury and your client is a female, you better hope they feel some sort of connection to her because otherwise they won't go easy at all, sometimes worse. Women tend to be more judgmental one way or the other.
Ducks4brkfast said:
Good grief, they're women. Women wear pink. Some of yall are so easily gaslit by folks on X.
Rapier108 said:ErnestEndeavor said:
What I've always heard from attorneys though is that if there are women on the jury and your client is a female, you better hope they feel some sort of connection to her because otherwise they won't go easy at all, sometimes worse. Women tend to be more judgmental one way or the other.
Very true, especially of other women.
Aggies1322 said:
Do we think that maybe it had less to do with whiteness and more to do with quality of defense? Are we comparing gang bangers killing people to a middle class white guy who killed his wife? Food for thought. I'd guess that socioeconomic class has more to do with sentencing.
Ducks4brkfast said:
It's 2026' It Color
https://www.vogue.com/article/blush-pink-trend
MsDoubleD81 said:
Jury gone home for the day.
Infection_Ag11 said:
But women have always been treated more gently by our legal system going all the way back to OG English common law. That's nothing new.
And with respect to white men being at the very bottom, I definitely disagree. The statistics are very clear that multiple ethnic/racial demographics of men receive longer/more severe sentences for the same crimes compared to white men. For example, in states where the death penalty is legal black men convicted of first degree/capital murder are over twice as likely to get the death penalty compared to white men, and that's just for the last 30 years. The difference only gets larger the further back in time you go.
