Rogue One: A Star Wars Story (spoilers and discussion)

245,663 Views | 1640 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by Fat Bib Fortuna
bangobango
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There is some bad acting in the OT, but there is also some really great acting to go along with it, especially by Harrison Ford.

I was 18 or 19 when episode one came out and I remember thinking the biggest problem with the show was they didn't have a Han Solo type character to lighten things up. Jedi, as portrayed in the prequel, are pretty freaking boring.

I've subsequently come to think there are a lot more wrong with episode one than just that, but I think Han Solo really is what gives the first three movies their heart and soul.

There were some great actors in the prequel, but none of them were written in a way that they could really steal the show or cover up for the weaker actor's flaws.
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
M.C. Swag said:

No one is going to defend the prequels in terms of quality. They are objectively bad films in almost every way; but I liked their intent. I know Lucas didn't intend to tell the Star Wars story with ANH as being Ep. 4 of a 6 part saga, but as a viewer, I really really enjoyed that idea. I was floored to find out how Vader became his evil self and what young Obi Wan in his prime could do. The idea of seeing MULTIPLE Jedi on screen, fighting together, should have been amazing.

Lucas completely failed to execute on those opportunities and I feel like it has biased alot of people against the IDEA of the prequels. Which is a shame. What Lucas tried to do, was appreciated by me.
Think those are excellent points, and I know some of us had that very same conversation on here (and with friends in RL). HOW Lucas chose to tell that story is what was awful. Anakin's fall from grace should have been heartbreaking and there should have definitely been way better action...maybe less Senate debates,. Oh well.


Pretty sure I will never get tired of watching the Vader rampage at the end of Rogue One.
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bangobango said:

There is some bad acting in the OT, but there is also some really great acting to go along with it, especially by Harrison Ford.

I was 18 or 19 when episode one came out and I remember thinking the biggest problem with the show was they didn't have a Han Solo type character to lighten things up. Jedi, as portrayed in the prequel, are pretty freaking boring.

I've subsequently come to think there are a lot more wrong with episode one than just that, but I think Han Solo really is what gives the first three movies their heart and soul.

There were some great actors in the prequel, but none of them were written in a way that they could really steal the show or cover up for the weaker actor's flaws.
I also feel like the poor writing/directing played a huge role, as even some of the talented actors seemed wooden.
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
M.C. Swag said:

Well lets be honest; ANH has not aged well. As someone who wasn't even alive when the original trilogy concluded, it was a little hard to get kids my age invested in the story. Alot of my friends found it too cheesy to take seriously. The graphics, the action, the acting....it's all VERY 80s.

I think starting off with something newer might get new viewers in the future to buy-in easier than ANH would.
Speaking as someone who also wasn't alive when the Original trilogy concluded, myself and everyone I know was super into star wars. Starting with anything other than 4-6 would be a mistake.
bangobango
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PatAg said:

M.C. Swag said:

No one is going to defend the prequels in terms of quality. They are objectively bad films in almost every way; but I liked their intent. I know Lucas didn't intend to tell the Star Wars story with ANH as being Ep. 4 of a 6 part saga, but as a viewer, I really really enjoyed that idea. I was floored to find out how Vader became his evil self and what young Obi Wan in his prime could do. The idea of seeing MULTIPLE Jedi on screen, fighting together, should have been amazing.

Lucas completely failed to execute on those opportunities and I feel like it has biased alot of people against the IDEA of the prequels. Which is a shame. What Lucas tried to do, was appreciated by me.
Think those are excellent points, and I know some of us had that very same conversation on here (and with friends in RL). HOW Lucas chose to tell that story is what was awful. Anakin's fall from grace should have been heartbreaking and there should have definitely been way better action...maybe less Senate debates,. Oh well.


Pretty sure I will never get tired of watching the Vader rampage at the end of Rogue One.
I never felt like Anakin reached grace to fall from.

That has always been one of my biggest gripes and why I was grinning ear to ear the last few minutes of Rogue one, it was never really established in the prequels that Anakin was a complete badass. In fact, if anything, the prequels make Obi Wan seem like the "chosen one."
bangobango
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'd like them to redo the prequels and scrap all the kid Anakin stuff. Start with him as a young pilot in the Clone Wars. And make the Clone Wars like a legit life or death struggle from an outside type threat that has nothing to do with the dark side or the light side of the force. Show Anakin rising up the ranks and becoming a legendary fight pilot like Obi Wan said. Think Maverick in Top Gun. Have him fall in with Obi Wan somehow who begins to train him in the use of the Force.

But show lots and lots of Anakin kicking ass and winning major battles. Maybe the other side retaliates in some way that forces him to turn to the dark side to survive and/or save those he loves. Work Palpatine in there somehow. Maybe Palpatine also turns to the dark side as a result of the Clone Wars. The formation of the Empire happens organically from the fallout of the Clone Wars, and not some ridiculous scheme with Palpatine pulling all the strings. The switch to the dark side comes from frustration and anger of losing those you love in a long and bloody war. You start thinking the ends justify the means and before you know it, the dark side has you.

Not real sure how that works with all the ridiculous Sith rules they came up with, but don't really care, either.
pagerman @ work
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Brian Earl Spilner said:

Man, this guy really hates Star Wars.
Not at all. I actually love Star Wars. I saw Rogue One twice this weekend.

I also realize that I saw Star Wars the first time in 1977 when I was 8, and as such I saw it with 8 year old eyes. I didn't notice the bad acting and worse writing. I did notice the blasters, light sabers, the force, the fighters, the Death Star, the droids and the creatures/worlds that were all amazing, and completely overwhelmed me. That was what Lucas wanted me to see. He was going for cheesy matinee style movie. The only movies that don't have a serious amount of that are the ones he didn't direct or wasn't directly involved in (Empire, The Force Awakens, Rogue One).

As an adult I can love the movies and characters and still realize that they are what they are, namely good fun entertaining movies that aren't (and were never intended to be) serious dramas like the Godfather.

Now that Lucas is out and Disney is hiring good young actors to fill the roles in the movies and getting much better writers I think you will see movies that get better both story and writing wise and acting wise also. That's all great. I just think that people for some reason want the original 6 movies to be something that they were never intended to be, and unfortunately it ruins the enjoyment of the movies for them.
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tex117 said:

I thought the movie was good but not "great."

It lacked the "adventure" feel of the other Episodes . . . so we were left with a war movie. Which is fine...but it wasn't all THAT great of a war movie because there was barely any character development.

War movies work on the fact that you care about the people in it. Rouge One did not do a good job with making you actually care about anyone onboard Rogue One.




That's like, your opinion man. I cared about them. And I thought they had made it pretty clear that these weren't going to be like the main series of movies, thats what I was personally really looking forward to.
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
pagerman @ work said:

Brian Earl Spilner said:

Man, this guy really hates Star Wars.
Not at all. I actually love Star Wars. I saw Rogue One twice this weekend.

I also realize that I saw Star Wars the first time in 1977 when I was 8, and as such I saw it with 8 year old eyes. I didn't notice the bad acting and worse writing. I did notice the blasters, light sabers, the force, the fighters, the Death Star, the droids and the creatures/worlds that were all amazing, and completely overwhelmed me. That was what Lucas wanted me to see. He was going for cheesy matinee style movie. The only movies that don't have a serious amount of that are the ones he didn't direct or wasn't directly involved in (Empire, The Force Awakens, Rogue One).

As an adult I can love the movies and characters and still realize that they are what they are, namely good fun entertaining movies that aren't (and were never intended to be) serious dramas like the Godfather.

Now that Lucas is out and Disney is hiring good young actors to fill the roles in the movies and getting much better writers I think you will see movies that get better both story and writing wise and acting wise also. That's all great. I just think that people for some reason want the original 6 movies to be something that they were never intended to be, and unfortunately it ruins the enjoyment of the movies for them.
There's an original 3 movies, not original 6. Hope this helps.
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bangobango said:

PatAg said:

M.C. Swag said:

No one is going to defend the prequels in terms of quality. They are objectively bad films in almost every way; but I liked their intent. I know Lucas didn't intend to tell the Star Wars story with ANH as being Ep. 4 of a 6 part saga, but as a viewer, I really really enjoyed that idea. I was floored to find out how Vader became his evil self and what young Obi Wan in his prime could do. The idea of seeing MULTIPLE Jedi on screen, fighting together, should have been amazing.

Lucas completely failed to execute on those opportunities and I feel like it has biased alot of people against the IDEA of the prequels. Which is a shame. What Lucas tried to do, was appreciated by me.
Think those are excellent points, and I know some of us had that very same conversation on here (and with friends in RL). HOW Lucas chose to tell that story is what was awful. Anakin's fall from grace should have been heartbreaking and there should have definitely been way better action...maybe less Senate debates,. Oh well.


Pretty sure I will never get tired of watching the Vader rampage at the end of Rogue One.
I never felt like Anakin reached grace to fall from.

That has always been one of my biggest gripes and why I was grinning ear to ear the last few minutes of Rogue one, it was never really established in the prequels that Anakin was a complete badass. In fact, if anything, the prequels make Obi Wan seem like the "chosen one."
As I've said before, by far the best thing to come out of the prequels was the original Clone Wars 2D animated series by Gendy Tartakovsky. It's amazing that a cel animated series can feel more cinematic than a major motion picture.

Here's one of my faves, Mace Windu doing everything you've ever really wanted to see a Jedi do, but the stories with Anakin really help develop his character as well and there's some great clone trooper stuff. They haven't been available digitally that I've been able to find (unless that's changed recently), but they're not tough to track down on YouTube.


Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The only issue i had with it the way over power the jedi.
wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agreed. The two Clone Wars series are great to watch for the most part and do a lot to flesh out a young Anakin
AGSPORTSFAN07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
M.C. Swag said:

CJS4715 said:

Are you saying that the OT was only enjoyed by kids in the 70s?
Don't think that's what he's meant. Nostalgia (member berries) bias is real. Kids of the late 90s/early 2000s liked the prequels for the same reasons kids of the 70s like the original. Older Star Wars fans like to bash Hayden Christensen's acting and whiny petulance but give Mark Hamil a pass when he basically did the same stuff. The bad CGI is a more modern version of the early costumes in ANH. (The cantina scenes with all the aliens in party city masks are pretty rough when you look at it today.)


What I meant is that if you weren't there for the first introduction where it was a new experience, you wouldn't understand that the nostalgia will cause biases against anything else that comes after. I didn't say you couldn't enjoy it. I'm just saying it's not the same and us older folks are more judgmental for it.

If they ever add a Jar Jar to a prequel of the Matrix and they half @$$ it. Then perhaps you'll understand.
M.C. Swag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why did you reply to me?
MelvinUdall
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I really enjoyed Rogue 1, I like how they took it up to the point of Leia being captured.
DTP02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Heading to see this tonight.

I'm not a huge fan of 3D unless there are is some really cool 3D stuff.

3D or not 3D, that is the question?

M.C. Swag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No 3D
pagerman @ work
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah, I'd go no 3D. There is no compelling reason to see it in 3D and my experience (after seeing both) was that the CGI looked better in 2D and the picture was lighter (meaning not as dark).
DTP02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ok, thanks guys!
Zombie Jon Snow
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
i hate 3D movies. so i'm biased.

but i'd go non 3D.....because it wasn't even filmed in 3D.

and i've heard the CGI of humans (spoiler) is worse in 3D whereas it did not bother me in 2D.
benMath08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
M.C. Swag said:

Quote:

And now we know why Jyn is seen on the beach running with the hard drive (data tape, whatever) - she lived originally. Holy crap - letting almost everyone live would have destroyed this story.

Not sure that's entirely the case. I think that was simply editing. Originally the place where the plans were stolen and subsequently uploaded, were two different locations. I believe they just edited out the sequence of her running to the upload site and combined the locations to be in the same place.
Right, the article actually says that the "happily ever after" ending was never filmed.
AgGrad99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
twilly said:

Another observation about Rogue One...

In the Darth Vader bad ass killing scene, at the beginning, the only illumination comes from his igniting his light saber. What about the lights on his chest plate and belt? Wouldn't those have been seen in complete darkness?

And just to be sure, I rewatched his entrance into the Tantive IV in ANH, and sure enough, those lights were on.
He's a Sith Lord and can control things with his mind....I'm willing to believe that includes dimming lights.
AliasMan02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The greatest feat of TCW was making me give a **** about Anakin. Even his relationship with Padme was believable.
Flashdiaz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
this was the best thing about the prequels.



which I still find it how jarring that we cut to this scene where they're in a darkened room with a fire going, padme is dressed like this (I'm sure I could hear Barry White playing)... and she's uncomfortable because Anakin likes her??? talk about mixed signals woman.

I'm actually impressed with Hayden's acting that he's actually looking at her face.
Malachi Constant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I prefer this look

Duncan Idaho
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AliasMan02 said:

The greatest feat of TCW was making me give a **** about Anakin. Even his relationship with Padme was believable.


Still thought he was a whiny *****
gravy97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgGrad99 said:

twilly said:

Another observation about Rogue One...

In the Darth Vader bad ass killing scene, at the beginning, the only illumination comes from his igniting his light saber. What about the lights on his chest plate and belt? Wouldn't those have been seen in complete darkness?

And just to be sure, I rewatched his entrance into the Tantive IV in ANH, and sure enough, those lights were on.
He's a Sith Lord and can control things with his mind....I'm willing to believe that includes dimming lights.
Do you even Sith bro? its not his mind... its the midi-chlorians in his blood that work together with the force or have the force or are the force... dangit...i need to rewatch TPM to understand all this... jk that would be ridiculous
cone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Duncan Idaho said:

The half in the bag guys did not care for it.
And they were correct in their opinions.
redbaron788
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AGSPORTSFAN07 said:

twilly said:

I'm curious, for those that had a problem with the CGI, what is an example of really good CGI use in depicting a real life person? Not a made up character that looks real, a simulation of an actual human being.
It's like they took Tron Legacy and made it better. But they should have used better camera angle creativity to hide the CGI as much as possible.
This reminded me of a moment in Tron: Legacy where I completely bought the young Bridges. His face was partially shadowed, mostly the mouth I believe. A moment later he was fully illuminated and the illusion was lost. They have definitely gotten better with the tech but I think they could have gotten away with it using shadows or reflections. Although, y'all were saying the 3D was more noticeable so I guess I'll just have to rewatch a normal screening to judge it better.

Anyway, good movie 7.5/10
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I just got back from seeing it. I put it well above TFA. TFA story was just a rehash of ANH with a worse villain and hero. R1 story is original and much better. What I liked about it is that, except for Vader, there were no Jedi in it at all. From the prequels on, Jedi have become far too powerful to the point that it makes it boring. Sorta like how Batman is an infinitely more entertaining superhero to watch than Superman.
JCRiley09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
After a second viewing...

The haters can suck a big one.

This was a great Star Wars movie.
AggieSouth06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I thought it was solid, but not quite great. Personally I rank it below TFA because I thought the characters were not as compelling or developed, but I won't argue with anyone that ranks them the other way around.

As long as we're all agreed that Star Wars is officially now five episodes AND ABSOLUTELY NO MORE.
jr15aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Post Rogue One order of favorites:

Jedi, Empire, Force Awakens, New Hope, Rogue One, Prequels.

Thought Rogue One was good, but I'm much more drawn to the numbered sequels. Will have to see again and maybe it will climb the list.
AliasMan02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just back from my second viewing, in a much better headspace this time.

The Tarkin CGI wasn't as bad as my first viewing (both in 2D), but at times was pretty damn bad. Other times was pretty flawless. Straight-on camera work and extended dialogue exposed it badly. Same with Leia. When she was half turned away, it looked great, but turning towards the camera in the light exposed it. Basically looked like CGI in a really high end video game.

I get why they did CGI. I do. But I think in retrospect, even the filmmakers would admit they should have instead recast the roles, even if that was just scouring the earth for convincing doubles. If they don't think that now, they will in 5 years.

Edwards, or someone on the team, is clearly a big Rebels fan. I caught the Ghost this time (several times). I heard the reference to General Syndulla the first time. I'm pretty sure one of the alien rebel soldiers swears "Karabast!" during the battle. Someone said they saw Chopper on Yavin, but I didn't.

It's really good. A worthy Star Wars film that ranks up with Jedi. I like TFA better due to the emotional notes and better overall performances.

Gun to my head, for me it's 5... 4, 7... RO, 6. 4 and 7, and RO and 6 are basically coin flips with each other.
oragator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AGSPORTSFAN07 said:

M.C. Swag said:

CJS4715 said:

Are you saying that the OT was only enjoyed by kids in the 70s?
Don't think that's what he's meant. Nostalgia (member berries) bias is real. Kids of the late 90s/early 2000s liked the prequels for the same reasons kids of the 70s like the original. Older Star Wars fans like to bash Hayden Christensen's acting and whiny petulance but give Mark Hamil a pass when he basically did the same stuff. The bad CGI is a more modern version of the early costumes in ANH. (The cantina scenes with all the aliens in party city masks are pretty rough when you look at it today.)


What I meant is that if you weren't there for the first introduction where it was a new experience, you wouldn't understand that the nostalgia will cause biases against anything else that comes after. I didn't say you couldn't enjoy it. I'm just saying it's not the same and us older folks are more judgmental for it.

If they ever add a Jar Jar to a prequel of the Matrix and they half @$$ it. Then perhaps you'll understand.
Us older folks may be judgmental but with good reason. Find a prequel on this list. Star wars was a revolutionary movie in score, sci fi, the action genre, and special effects even with its flaws. Anyone that wasn't around then can never fully appreciate it, and sees it through a modern lens, which is unfair. Its like arguing that Luxor in Vegas is a better pyramid than the great pyramid becaus its more modern with more things to do.

http://www.afi.com/100years/movies10.aspx
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.