Making a Murder - Netflix Original Series

214,207 Views | 1382 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Pluralizes Everythings
Bunk Moreland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I agree. I just find it so crazy how well he fit the profile. A Hollywood big budget casting call wouldn't have been able to do a better job. I just keep thinking about his mickey mouse haircut
Franklin Delano Bluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
I agree. I just find it so crazy how well he fit the profile. A Hollywood big budget casting call wouldn't have been able to do a better job. I just keep thinking about his mickey mouse haircut


Lol.... Personally my favorite public defender look is the bowl dome w scraggly long hair over the ears (like Danny Devito)....

Those mother****ers have spent a lifetime being the state's *****, but can't move forward bc they're incompetent
GinaLinetti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The judge is rediculous too. How he didn't think the deleted voice mails were relevant is beyond me. And the ex printed her phone records?! Wtf?
Big Al 1992
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
2 episodes to go - will go back and read this thread when I finish - which will be at 2:30 this morning.

5 Creepiest dbags so far

Lawyer Len - what a weasel - liked the attention, almost got a Fran vibe from him
The officer that framed his composite sketch and claimed he drew from description, not mugshot
Len's investigator O'Kelly - that sort of defense should be criminal
DA Kratz - whiny, high pitched, and smug
Sherrif Kennedy - easier to eliminate him than frame

This could have made a great True Detective storyline but would never have believed it.
Big Al 1992
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:


The Brendan thing is absolutely scary. His first attorney should have been disbarred. He let his client speak to the authorities without him present? That is lawyer 101. Is his investigator an attorney? Also, he was completely inept as counsel.


This happens every week on CSI!
Anagrammatic Nudist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The investigator crying on the stand in the final episode when talking about the ribbon on the tree just might have been the oddest thing of this whole story, and that speaks volumes. Seriously, WTF.

If this whole thing were a fictional movie, no one would pay to see it because of how absurd it would all sound.

Crazy, crazy story.
St Hedwig Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This series is SO good! Up to episode 6...I always get such good recommendations of shows I would not otherwise watch on my own from this forum!

mavsfan4ever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
he judge is rediculous too. How he didn't think the deleted voice mails were relevant is beyond me. And the ex printed her phone records?! Wtf?


And the ex boyfriend somehow guessed her password. Wtf? And after guessing it he didn't remember what it was, said it was something to do with her sister's birthday. I don't know the birthday of my wife's siblings, definitely didn't know the birthdays of my girlfriends' siblings. Not to mention it probably wasn't just as simple as typing in her birthday.
GinaLinetti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
quote:
he judge is rediculous too. How he didn't think the deleted voice mails were relevant is beyond me. And the ex printed her phone records?! Wtf?


And the ex boyfriend somehow guessed her password. Wtf? And after guessing it he didn't remember what it was, said it was something to do with her sister's birthday. I don't know the birthday of my wife's siblings, definitely didn't know the birthdays of my girlfriends' siblings. Not to mention it probably wasn't just as simple as typing in her birthday.


Who wants to bet it's the same as her vm password
2ndGen87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Evidence against Steve:

The Key. Does anyone seriously believe that the key WASN'T PLANTED? I mean, come on. 8 searches and no key. 9th search and voila! And by Lenk, which is just pure coincidence. Junkyards with 10,000 cars have zero keys other than the magic one.

The Bullet. Did you SEE the garage? How long would it take to search a pigsty like that? Months and months after the crime? No other evidence in the garage that any crime took place there. How do you get rid of all the blood evidence if you shot her in the head in the garage? If you didn't, why is a bullet there? This was a huge high profile case. I think that was PLANTED. Why did you think they killed her in the garage? The cops came up with the fact she was tied down and all.

The Car. The car bothers me. I can't say that it was planted. But seriously - Steve was operating the crusher the day after she disappeared. Why would you not crush the car? Why did the mom and daughter team find it in 10 minutes among literally 40 acres of cars? Why did the cop radio the license plate from another location AFTER she disappeared? Why are there damages to the Rav4 that match someone towing the vehicle? Why did the "cover up" job look fake - I mean tree branches a foot apart? Why was there a hole in the blood vial? Why was Steve's blood in very random places but no fingerprints?

The bone fragments. This is the only real evidence I see. The weird thing here is having the bone fragments in 3 places miles apart.

What i think happened:
Cops hated the Averys. Cops hated the lawsuit. Cops thought Steve did it. Cops planted bullet, car, keys.

Who killed her?
I have no idea. Might have been Steve. Might have been boyfriend. Might have been roommate. I really don't think the cops killed her at all. I think they helped the evidence - just like they did in his rape trial. Does anyone else think its weird that under oath they won't admit he was innocent of the rape?

I think the cops are terrible, terrible investigators. Barney Fife blows them away.
benMath08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I agree with pretty much everything you said, except the salvage yard wasn't 40 acres. The Avery's did own a 40 acre plot, but only a portion of that was used for the salvage yard.

There were definitely a lot of cars to search and they beelined right to it, after showing up late to the search party and asking specifically to search the Avery's, and being given a camera "randomly" by the ex-boyfriend. Super weird, just like every other piece of physical evidence.
Big Al 1992
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And that car was supposed to be found - the RAV4 logo staring out at everyone to see (especially volunteer searchers). I cover my plants before a freeze better than that.
PJD Ag 10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Random thought but it is fascinating that the ex boyfriend just happened to guess her password to check the voicemails, and delete some, and no one else seemed to think that was strange.
Big Al 1992
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And this series is about to blow up as more and more watch it...

https://www.yahoo.com/tv/39-making-a-murderer-39-celebrity-fans-1331245954973750.html

Amazing that I agree with some of the far left loons on this subject!
Bunk Moreland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Random thought but it is fascinating that the ex boyfriend just happened to guess her password to check the voicemails, and delete some, and no one else seemed to think that was strange.

It's fascinating the ex didn't even get investigated in her disappearance.
benMath08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
Random thought but it is fascinating that the ex boyfriend just happened to guess her password to check the voicemails, and delete some, and no one else seemed to think that was strange.
I might need to rewatch that part, but this is what I thought happened with Teresa's voice mails and call log. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

When she goes missing, her Mom and others try to call her but her voicemail box is full. However, the only voicemails left in the Cingular database(?) after she's found don't add up to what would cause a voicemail box to be full, therefore some have been deleted. I don't understand how Cingular doesn't know with more certainty what happened, but maybe it wasn't present in the documentary or they just keep really bad server logs.

Her brother thought he knew her voicemail pin, which it turned out he did. I don't find that incredibly far fetched, at least not by itself. He listened to all the voice mails at the time and presumably didn't hear anything noteworthy. He claimed to not have deleted any voicemails.

Her ex-boyfriend "guessed" her password to her online account in order to see who she called and when. His explanation of how he was able to do so and then not remembering the password later is questionable at best. To play devil's advocate, maybe he already knew her password and it was something super embarrassing and he just didn't want to repeat it in court since it wasn't relevant. Or hell, maybe she was already logged into her account and he just wanted to sound cool by "hacking" into it. I could be wrong but I don't think it was possible for him to listen to or delete voice mails from the online account but it wasn't really mentioned.

The ex-boyfriend and brother always seemed suspicious to me, but I'm willing to admit that maybe the documentary did that on purpose. However the police should have never let them onto the Avery residence once he was considered a suspect.
george07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Someone posted a link earlier on this thread with a photo of the ex boyfriend during the search and he had scratches on his hands. I mean seriously the ex boyfriend or spouse are the first people questioned normally! How could they completely ignore this guy? Not to mention the deleted voice messages.
Bunk Moreland
How long do you want to ignore this user?



GinaLinetti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The thing with the vm was that it was full on November 2nd or 3rd but later on (the 18th?) there were new vm left. That means someone deleted messages between the 2nd and the 18th.
Bunk Moreland
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Bunk Moreland
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Kate Beckett
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
About to start episode 7. This is all insane. Not going to Wisconsin any time soon.
LHIOB
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We need the Ticket to come off dry dock so Strum can comment on whether or not he knows the Sturms who found the SUV
M.C. Swag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't understand the purpose of what that photo is trying to prove?
Bunk Moreland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
which one?
M.C. Swag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Either
Bunk Moreland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The front wheel well and light were ripped out of the front driver side of her car when it was discovered by the ladies on the Avery property for the first time. There is no history of Teresa having had car issues(they also ran a report on her car apparently) or major work done.

So the theory is that the car was towed on to the property by someone else. It was towed by someone most likely, and I'm not sure whey Avery would tow it on his own property. If he were smart enough to think "dont' get in the car and leave evidence, so tow it over to the corner of the property," then you'd think he'd be smart enough to wipe that swab of blood off the dash that was clearly visible.
M.C. Swag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Keep in mind the documentary's bias and the power of editing, music, and other film techniques in shaping one's viewpoint and emotions.

Here's the evidence from off the top of my head. I find the DNA evidence to be the most important. I will give the benefit of the doubt to skeptics and leave out the evidence of the key and Brendan's confessions.

Circumstantial Evidence
  • Theresa visits Steven, who has specifically requested her. He is the last known person to see her alive. He calls her three times that daytwice with *67, but the last time without it.
  • Experts say Theresa was shot with a .22, just like the one in Steven Avery's room.
  • Steve has a bonfire the night of the murder. Theresa's burnt bones are found throughout his yard.
  • According to Brendan's mom, Brendan came home the night of the murder with bleach on his jeans and told her he was helping Steven clean the garage. His jeans with bleach on them are submitted as evidence.
  • Steve has no alibi.

  • DNA:

    • Steve's and Theresa's blood is found in Theresa's car, and Steve has a cut on his right index finger.
    • Steve's sweat is found on the hood latch of the car.
    • Theresa's DNA is found on a bullet in the garage.
    Character:

    • Characterized as manipulative by his family and prone to outbursts of anger. Almost no one in his family believes he's innocent.
    • Theresa supposedly finds him creepy and requests not to go over there anymore after he answers his door in only a towel.
    1985 and before:

    • Robbed a bar.
    • Doused a cat in gasoline and threw it in the fire, killing it.
    • Ran a female relative off the road and pointed a gun at her head. 6 of his 18 years in prison are spent for this crime.
    In prison:

    • Wrote disturbing letters to ex-wife and kids about killing his ex-wife.
    • Supposedly told inmates about plans for a torture chamber and how burning a body is best for getting rid of DNA.
    2003 and after:

    • In early 2006, Steven Avery's relative accuses him of sexually assaulting her in 2004 when she was 16 (it was investigated in 2004, but she did not admit to it then because he threatened to kill her family if she did). If Avery wasn't convicted of murder, he was going to be charged for this.
    Police tampering:

    • Manitowoc police are involved in some of the crime scene investigation, but there is no direct evidence of any tampering, only speculation.
    • The hole in the blood vial is perfectly normal (as shown here, but not in the documentary). While the ripped tape is weird, the FBI's EDTA test showed EDTA in the vial but not in the car stains, leading there to be no legitimate reason IN THE COURT OF LAW to believe blood was planted in the car.
    M.C. Swag
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    quote:
    The front wheel well and light were ripped out of the front driver side of her car when it was discovered by the ladies on the Avery property for the first time. There is no history of Teresa having had car issues(they also ran a report on her car apparently) or major work done.

    So the theory is that the car was towed on to the property by someone else. It was towed by someone most likely, and I'm not sure whey Avery would tow it on his own property. If he were smart enough to think "dont' get in the car and leave evidence, so tow it over to the corner of the property," then you'd think he'd be smart enough to wipe that swab of blood off the dash that was clearly visible.
    Right, it shows the car might have been towed. But seeing as how either the police OR avery had the key, towing would be pointless for either guilty party. However both had the means to do so if desired. It doesn't add anything to Avery's defense or to his conviction IMO. Adds nothing.
    Bunk Moreland
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    quote:
    quote:
    The front wheel well and light were ripped out of the front driver side of her car when it was discovered by the ladies on the Avery property for the first time. There is no history of Teresa having had car issues(they also ran a report on her car apparently) or major work done.

    So the theory is that the car was towed on to the property by someone else. It was towed by someone most likely, and I'm not sure whey Avery would tow it on his own property. If he were smart enough to think "dont' get in the car and leave evidence, so tow it over to the corner of the property," then you'd think he'd be smart enough to wipe that swab of blood off the dash that was clearly visible.
    Right, it shows the car might have been towed. But seeing as how either the police OR avery had the key, towing would be pointless for either guilty party. However both had the means to do so if desired. It doesn't add anything to Avery's defense or to his conviction IMO. Adds nothing.

    It absolutely would not be pointless for either party. The police would know not to get in that car and drive it because they could leave DNA evidence everywhere in there, or something could go wrong and they'd be seen in the car. They would know to plant blood in a controlled environment, then tow it to the place you want to leave it.
    Bunk Moreland
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Here's an article where a site put some of that same stuff you mentioned above down together.

    quote:
    The documentary said that part of Avery's criminal past included animal cruelty. To my recollection, it didn't specify exactly what that animal cruelty was. I know that for some of our readers, knowing is enough to want to see Avery get the death sentence regardless of whether he murdered Halbach: He doused a cat in oil and threw it on a bonfire (this is not relevant to the murder trial, but it certainly diminishes the sympathy some of us felt for him).

    Past criminal activity also included threatening a female relative at gunpoint.

    In the months leading up to Halbach's disappearance, Avery had called Auto Trader several times and always specifically requested Halbach to come out and take the photos.

    Halbach had complained to her boss that she didn't want to go out to Avery's trailer anymore, because once when she came out, Avery was waiting for her wearing only a towel (this was excluded for being too inflammatory). Avery clearly had an obsession with Halbach.

    On the day that Halbach went missing, Avery had called her three times, twice from a *67 number to hide his identity.

    The bullet with Halbach's DNA on it came from Avery's gun, which always hung above his bed.

    Avery had purchased handcuffs and leg irons like the ones Dassey described holding Halbach only three weeks before (Avery said he's purchased them for use with his girlfriend, Jodi, with whom he'd had a tumultuous relationship at one point, he was ordered by police to stay away from her for three days).

    Here's the piece of evidence that was presented at trial but not in the series that I find most convincing: In Dassey's illegally obtained statement, Dassey stated that he helped Avery moved the RAV4 into the junkyard and that Avery had lifted the hood and removed the battery cable. Even if you believe that the blood in Halbach's car was planted by the cops (as I do), there was also non-blood DNA evidence on the hood latch. I don't believe the police would plant or know to plant that evidence.

    I certainly believe that there was a tremendous amount of police misconduct in this case. I believe the police helped the case against Avery along by planting evidence (and there's no doubt in my mind that they planted the RAV4 key in Avery's trailer). I also don't believe the prosecution's theory of events: There's no way Halbach was raped and had her throat slashed in the trailer without a speck of DNA evidence, and there's no way she was shot in the garage without any blood splatter evidence. After all, if Avery had somehow used bleach to erase all trace of Halbach's DNA, he would've also cleaned the garage of his own DNA (and the garage still contained lots of Avery's DNA).

    I don't know how Avery murdered Halbach. I also don't believe anything that Dassey said in his coerced confession, but I also won't rule out Dassey's involvement because he would've done anything anyone asked of him. Still, the idea that the police killed Halbach is impossible to believe, not because they weren't capable of it, but because of the planning and foresight it would've required.

    I also believe that Adnan Syed is guilty, but in both cases, I don't believe the jury should've convicted because there simply wasn't enough unimpeachable evidence to support a guilty verdict. I am even more convinced than after Serial that the jury system is ****ed, but ironically, in both cases, I also think the jury arrived at the correct conclusion.



    http://www.pajiba.com/netflix_movies_and_tv/is-steven-avery-guilty-evidence-making-a-murderer-didnt-present.php

    I don't agree with all of it, but for the sake of context for the thread, figured I'd put it out there.
    PJD Ag 10
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    If the blood was from his hand, why aren't there finger prints anywhere? Likely because he was wearing gloves.... So then how would blood from the cut on his hand get in the car?

    Anyway, all of that "evidence" is much weaker than the evidence that points to him being set up.
    M.C. Swag
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    quote:
    quote:
    quote:
    The front wheel well and light were ripped out of the front driver side of her car when it was discovered by the ladies on the Avery property for the first time. There is no history of Teresa having had car issues(they also ran a report on her car apparently) or major work done.

    So the theory is that the car was towed on to the property by someone else. It was towed by someone most likely, and I'm not sure whey Avery would tow it on his own property. If he were smart enough to think "dont' get in the car and leave evidence, so tow it over to the corner of the property," then you'd think he'd be smart enough to wipe that swab of blood off the dash that was clearly visible.
    Right, it shows the car might have been towed. But seeing as how either the police OR avery had the key, towing would be pointless for either guilty party. However both had the means to do so if desired. It doesn't add anything to Avery's defense or to his conviction IMO. Adds nothing.

    It absolutely would not be pointless for either party. The police would know not to get in that car and drive it because they could leave DNA evidence everywhere in there, or something could go wrong and they'd be seen in the car. They would know to plant blood in a controlled environment, then tow it to the place you want to leave it.
    Still means nothing in terms of Avery's innocence. Just because you can think of a situation that fits your theory doesn't mean it's evidence.

    You could just as easily say Teresa's key went missing during a struggle in Steven's trailer, which is why Avery had to tow the car and why he didn't dispose of the key. Or she was run off the road after leaving and then killed? Avery had run a woman off a road before and then approached her with a gun. What if it was a repeat.

    Alot of hypotheticals and it doesn't prove it was planted by the cops or exonerate Avery.
    M.C. Swag
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    quote:
    If the blood was from his hand, why aren't there finger prints anywhere? Likely because he was wearing gloves.... So then how would blood from the cut on his hand get in the car?

    Anyway, all of that "evidence" is much weaker than the evidence that points to him being set up.
    He took his glove off to start the car? He wiped the car clean and missed the blood? or maybe the conditions at the time weren't conducive to fingerprint marks? Circumstantial, but it's still another piece of the puzzle
    Mostly Peaceful
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    So he bled in the car from the cut on his finger, but left no fingerprints?
     
    ×
    subscribe Verify your student status
    See Subscription Benefits
    Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.