I agree. I just find it so crazy how well he fit the profile. A Hollywood big budget casting call wouldn't have been able to do a better job. I just keep thinking about his mickey mouse haircut
quote:
I agree. I just find it so crazy how well he fit the profile. A Hollywood big budget casting call wouldn't have been able to do a better job. I just keep thinking about his mickey mouse haircut
quote:This happens every week on CSI!
The Brendan thing is absolutely scary. His first attorney should have been disbarred. He let his client speak to the authorities without him present? That is lawyer 101. Is his investigator an attorney? Also, he was completely inept as counsel.
quote:
he judge is rediculous too. How he didn't think the deleted voice mails were relevant is beyond me. And the ex printed her phone records?! Wtf?
quote:quote:
he judge is rediculous too. How he didn't think the deleted voice mails were relevant is beyond me. And the ex printed her phone records?! Wtf?
And the ex boyfriend somehow guessed her password. Wtf? And after guessing it he didn't remember what it was, said it was something to do with her sister's birthday. I don't know the birthday of my wife's siblings, definitely didn't know the birthdays of my girlfriends' siblings. Not to mention it probably wasn't just as simple as typing in her birthday.
quote:
Random thought but it is fascinating that the ex boyfriend just happened to guess her password to check the voicemails, and delete some, and no one else seemed to think that was strange.
quote:I might need to rewatch that part, but this is what I thought happened with Teresa's voice mails and call log. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Random thought but it is fascinating that the ex boyfriend just happened to guess her password to check the voicemails, and delete some, and no one else seemed to think that was strange.
quote:Right, it shows the car might have been towed. But seeing as how either the police OR avery had the key, towing would be pointless for either guilty party. However both had the means to do so if desired. It doesn't add anything to Avery's defense or to his conviction IMO. Adds nothing.
The front wheel well and light were ripped out of the front driver side of her car when it was discovered by the ladies on the Avery property for the first time. There is no history of Teresa having had car issues(they also ran a report on her car apparently) or major work done.
So the theory is that the car was towed on to the property by someone else. It was towed by someone most likely, and I'm not sure whey Avery would tow it on his own property. If he were smart enough to think "dont' get in the car and leave evidence, so tow it over to the corner of the property," then you'd think he'd be smart enough to wipe that swab of blood off the dash that was clearly visible.
quote:quote:Right, it shows the car might have been towed. But seeing as how either the police OR avery had the key, towing would be pointless for either guilty party. However both had the means to do so if desired. It doesn't add anything to Avery's defense or to his conviction IMO. Adds nothing.
The front wheel well and light were ripped out of the front driver side of her car when it was discovered by the ladies on the Avery property for the first time. There is no history of Teresa having had car issues(they also ran a report on her car apparently) or major work done.
So the theory is that the car was towed on to the property by someone else. It was towed by someone most likely, and I'm not sure whey Avery would tow it on his own property. If he were smart enough to think "dont' get in the car and leave evidence, so tow it over to the corner of the property," then you'd think he'd be smart enough to wipe that swab of blood off the dash that was clearly visible.
quote:
The documentary said that part of Avery's criminal past included animal cruelty. To my recollection, it didn't specify exactly what that animal cruelty was. I know that for some of our readers, knowing is enough to want to see Avery get the death sentence regardless of whether he murdered Halbach: He doused a cat in oil and threw it on a bonfire (this is not relevant to the murder trial, but it certainly diminishes the sympathy some of us felt for him).
Past criminal activity also included threatening a female relative at gunpoint.
In the months leading up to Halbach's disappearance, Avery had called Auto Trader several times and always specifically requested Halbach to come out and take the photos.
Halbach had complained to her boss that she didn't want to go out to Avery's trailer anymore, because once when she came out, Avery was waiting for her wearing only a towel (this was excluded for being too inflammatory). Avery clearly had an obsession with Halbach.
On the day that Halbach went missing, Avery had called her three times, twice from a *67 number to hide his identity.
The bullet with Halbach's DNA on it came from Avery's gun, which always hung above his bed.
Avery had purchased handcuffs and leg irons like the ones Dassey described holding Halbach only three weeks before (Avery said he's purchased them for use with his girlfriend, Jodi, with whom he'd had a tumultuous relationship at one point, he was ordered by police to stay away from her for three days).
Here's the piece of evidence that was presented at trial but not in the series that I find most convincing: In Dassey's illegally obtained statement, Dassey stated that he helped Avery moved the RAV4 into the junkyard and that Avery had lifted the hood and removed the battery cable. Even if you believe that the blood in Halbach's car was planted by the cops (as I do), there was also non-blood DNA evidence on the hood latch. I don't believe the police would plant or know to plant that evidence.
I certainly believe that there was a tremendous amount of police misconduct in this case. I believe the police helped the case against Avery along by planting evidence (and there's no doubt in my mind that they planted the RAV4 key in Avery's trailer). I also don't believe the prosecution's theory of events: There's no way Halbach was raped and had her throat slashed in the trailer without a speck of DNA evidence, and there's no way she was shot in the garage without any blood splatter evidence. After all, if Avery had somehow used bleach to erase all trace of Halbach's DNA, he would've also cleaned the garage of his own DNA (and the garage still contained lots of Avery's DNA).
I don't know how Avery murdered Halbach. I also don't believe anything that Dassey said in his coerced confession, but I also won't rule out Dassey's involvement because he would've done anything anyone asked of him. Still, the idea that the police killed Halbach is impossible to believe, not because they weren't capable of it, but because of the planning and foresight it would've required.
I also believe that Adnan Syed is guilty, but in both cases, I don't believe the jury should've convicted because there simply wasn't enough unimpeachable evidence to support a guilty verdict. I am even more convinced than after Serial that the jury system is ****ed, but ironically, in both cases, I also think the jury arrived at the correct conclusion.
quote:Still means nothing in terms of Avery's innocence. Just because you can think of a situation that fits your theory doesn't mean it's evidence.quote:quote:Right, it shows the car might have been towed. But seeing as how either the police OR avery had the key, towing would be pointless for either guilty party. However both had the means to do so if desired. It doesn't add anything to Avery's defense or to his conviction IMO. Adds nothing.
The front wheel well and light were ripped out of the front driver side of her car when it was discovered by the ladies on the Avery property for the first time. There is no history of Teresa having had car issues(they also ran a report on her car apparently) or major work done.
So the theory is that the car was towed on to the property by someone else. It was towed by someone most likely, and I'm not sure whey Avery would tow it on his own property. If he were smart enough to think "dont' get in the car and leave evidence, so tow it over to the corner of the property," then you'd think he'd be smart enough to wipe that swab of blood off the dash that was clearly visible.
It absolutely would not be pointless for either party. The police would know not to get in that car and drive it because they could leave DNA evidence everywhere in there, or something could go wrong and they'd be seen in the car. They would know to plant blood in a controlled environment, then tow it to the place you want to leave it.
quote:He took his glove off to start the car? He wiped the car clean and missed the blood? or maybe the conditions at the time weren't conducive to fingerprint marks? Circumstantial, but it's still another piece of the puzzle
If the blood was from his hand, why aren't there finger prints anywhere? Likely because he was wearing gloves.... So then how would blood from the cut on his hand get in the car?
Anyway, all of that "evidence" is much weaker than the evidence that points to him being set up.